Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
You fucked up, you trusted us.
Comments
-
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels. -
I'm at the point is that if you can't care for yourself, then I get to determine your care and it doesn't include alcohol or drugs. Get Sheriff Joe out of retirement from Arizona and start building enforced tent camping in the middle of phucking nowhere. Just passed a 30ish man with a "need money, I'm homeless" sign at the off ramp and he had a puppy. Can't take care of himself, but he needs a dog to also not care for.MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why should you buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels. -
Same with fat people. If you can’t put down the feed bag, I get to decide what you eat. Obesity is the 3rd leading cause of death and costs us billions.WestlinnDuck said:
I'm at the point is that if you can't care for yourself, then I get to determine your care and it doesn't include alcohol or drugs. Get Sheriff Joe out of retirement from Arizona and start building enforced tent camping in the middle of phucking nowhere. Just passed a 30ish man with a "need money, I'm homeless" sign at the off ramp and he had a puppy. Can't take care of himself, but he needs a dog to also not care for.MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why should you buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels. -
My point is that we in the US, especially on the West Coast, are too fucking lazy to follow up on any such treatment or diversion programs, so "harm reduction" is a complete and total myth. IDGAF what Portugal does. IT WILL NOT WORK IN THE U.S., ESPECIALLY THE WEST COAST.MikeDamone said:
Whats your point? I said Portugal decriminalized drugs successful. Oregon half assed it and fucked it up. It can be done,but like everything the left touches here, it turns to shit.TurdBomber said:
I'm aware of how Portugal does it, yes. But they have a comprehensive system that includes law enforcement keeping that shit out of public display and having addicts ruling it's downtowns. Seattle, Portland and Van BC want the easy parts of do-nothing "harm reduction" but they ignore and avoid the hard parts that instead land upon citizens and tourists who can't walk safely and unmolested through their downtowns.MikeDamone said:
So you didn’t look into how Portugal does it.TurdBomber said:
If you're dumb enough to get addicted to drugs, I shouldn't have to pay to get you sober. That's on you, druggie.MikeDamone said:
People will never stop getting messed up on drugs. They damage can only be contained. Not only did the war on drugs failed, it made things worse. See Portugal for a model of successful controlling the damage. Is the Portugal model scalable to the USA? Oregon tried it, but only did half of it.TurdBomber said:
Harm Reduction doesn't work either.MikeDamone said:
Disagree. Oregon did it but fucked it up. Portugal is actually the correct case study here.Kaepsknee said:
You already have case studies in Oregon and Washington.MikeDamone said:
I’m very much into decriminalizing drugs. But as usual, the left figures out how to fuck it up.WestlinnDuck said:Another shocking stat. Who could have seen this coming? This is the sh*t the dazzler votes for because he "cares".
https://instapundit.com/
MYSTIFIED: Overdoses Up 700% After Oregon Decriminalizes Hard Street Drugs. Officials Mystified.
There’s a case to be made for decriminalization, but it involves getting serious about mandator rehab and treatment for mental illness — not just leaving sick people out on the street to “self-medicate” themselves to death.
But that’s what passes for progressive compassion.
But because you’re afraid Of getting busted with mushrooms, you stay on this stale, misinformed tact.
Sad.
I have never taken an illegal drug in my life.
But I know what the black market is.
I remember the country's prohibition on alcohol phase.
The "war on drugs" has been a costly and catastrophic failure.
We need to acknowledge the obvious: Some people can take drugs without fucking up their lives and burdening society. But too many can't, and they are, and will continue to be, drags on society who consume far too many resources because of their inabilities to handle or manage their addictions. You can appropriately call the war on drugs a failure. But you cannot point to any successes, either.
Read San Fransicko or shit, take a day trip to Vancouver BC to see the proof, first-hand.
Some can afford it, some can't. Some steal to afford it. If you can't handle the heat, GTFO of the kitchen. Pretty basic.
PS: Harm reduction policies don't control the damage. They merely hide it, while the damage explodes.
Want proof? Look at the City and County budge requests for "low barrier housing and treatment."
So it's an idea that's DOA, but you can dream on about it as you like. -
MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels.
Sorry, but history has shown that argument is bankrupt.
The less Seattle pursues illegal drug activity, the more of it we see, and the more junkies come to Seattle, busting the bank of social services, which increase dramatically every year. Legalization is a nice theory. In practice, it's worse than the War on Drugs, given it's cost, failure rates, and lazy pro-drug assholes who inhabit all the rehab programs that don't work. At least the War on Drugs provides SOME LEVEL of deterrence. Harm Reduction provides absolutely none. Hence, its abject failure up and down the West Coast. -
I agree. Pretending we can put some meth and fentanyl addict into an involuntary 30 day in patient care program for $10,000 to $20,000 then turn him loose is an idiot's fantasy, let alone 10,000 homeless in Oregon alone.TurdBomber said:
My point is that we in the US, especially on the West Coast, are too fucking lazy to follow up on any such treatment or diversion programs, so "harm reduction" is a complete and total myth. IDGAF what Portugal does. IT WILL NOT WORK IN THE U.S., ESPECIALLY THE WEST COAST.MikeDamone said:
Whats your point? I said Portugal decriminalized drugs successful. Oregon half assed it and fucked it up. It can be done,but like everything the left touches here, it turns to shit.TurdBomber said:
I'm aware of how Portugal does it, yes. But they have a comprehensive system that includes law enforcement keeping that shit out of public display and having addicts ruling it's downtowns. Seattle, Portland and Van BC want the easy parts of do-nothing "harm reduction" but they ignore and avoid the hard parts that instead land upon citizens and tourists who can't walk safely and unmolested through their downtowns.MikeDamone said:
So you didn’t look into how Portugal does it.TurdBomber said:
If you're dumb enough to get addicted to drugs, I shouldn't have to pay to get you sober. That's on you, druggie.MikeDamone said:
People will never stop getting messed up on drugs. They damage can only be contained. Not only did the war on drugs failed, it made things worse. See Portugal for a model of successful controlling the damage. Is the Portugal model scalable to the USA? Oregon tried it, but only did half of it.TurdBomber said:
Harm Reduction doesn't work either.MikeDamone said:
Disagree. Oregon did it but fucked it up. Portugal is actually the correct case study here.Kaepsknee said:
You already have case studies in Oregon and Washington.MikeDamone said:
I’m very much into decriminalizing drugs. But as usual, the left figures out how to fuck it up.WestlinnDuck said:Another shocking stat. Who could have seen this coming? This is the sh*t the dazzler votes for because he "cares".
https://instapundit.com/
MYSTIFIED: Overdoses Up 700% After Oregon Decriminalizes Hard Street Drugs. Officials Mystified.
There’s a case to be made for decriminalization, but it involves getting serious about mandator rehab and treatment for mental illness — not just leaving sick people out on the street to “self-medicate” themselves to death.
But that’s what passes for progressive compassion.
But because you’re afraid Of getting busted with mushrooms, you stay on this stale, misinformed tact.
Sad.
I have never taken an illegal drug in my life.
But I know what the black market is.
I remember the country's prohibition on alcohol phase.
The "war on drugs" has been a costly and catastrophic failure.
We need to acknowledge the obvious: Some people can take drugs without fucking up their lives and burdening society. But too many can't, and they are, and will continue to be, drags on society who consume far too many resources because of their inabilities to handle or manage their addictions. You can appropriately call the war on drugs a failure. But you cannot point to any successes, either.
Read San Fransicko or shit, take a day trip to Vancouver BC to see the proof, first-hand.
Some can afford it, some can't. Some steal to afford it. If you can't handle the heat, GTFO of the kitchen. Pretty basic.
PS: Harm reduction policies don't control the damage. They merely hide it, while the damage explodes.
Want proof? Look at the City and County budge requests for "low barrier housing and treatment."
So it's an idea that's DOA, but you can dream on about it as you like. -
The social cost are enormous. The main reason that kids end up in the foster care system is because of their parents drug usage.TurdBomber said:MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels.
Sorry, but history has shown that argument is bankrupt.
The less Seattle pursues illegal drug activity, the more of it we see, and the more junkies come to Seattle, busting the bank of social services, which increase dramatically every year. Legalization is a nice theory. In practice, it's worse than the War on Drugs, given it's cost, failure rates, and lazy pro-drug assholes who inhabit all the rehab programs that don't work. At least the War on Drugs provides SOME LEVEL of deterrence. Harm Reduction provides absolutely none. Hence, its abject failure up and down the West Coast. -
You’re not listening. It’s not just decriminalizing drugs or making drugs legal. Like I said, Oregon fucked up. And you’re on,by seeing the tip of the iceberg. Strung out people of the streets. That number is dwarfed by people who are using and are not wandering around yelling. Again, Portugal, Not the half way stupid approach done in Oregon.TurdBomber said:MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels.
Sorry, but history has shown that argument is bankrupt.
The less Seattle pursues illegal drug activity, the more of it we see, and the more junkies come to Seattle, busting the bank of social services, which increase dramatically every year. Legalization is a nice theory. In practice, it's worse than the War on Drugs, given it's cost, failure rates, and lazy pro-drug assholes who inhabit all the rehab programs that don't work. At least the War on Drugs provides SOME LEVEL of deterrence. Harm Reduction provides absolutely none. Hence, its abject failure up and down the West Coast.
And yes, when all else fails the threat of incarceration is in play. -
Well, keep acting like the war on drugs is ever going to work. Best to get some better ideas on the table.TurdBomber said:
My point is that we in the US, especially on the West Coast, are too fucking lazy to follow up on any such treatment or diversion programs, so "harm reduction" is a complete and total myth. IDGAF what Portugal does. IT WILL NOT WORK IN THE U.S., ESPECIALLY THE WEST COAST.MikeDamone said:
Whats your point? I said Portugal decriminalized drugs successful. Oregon half assed it and fucked it up. It can be done,but like everything the left touches here, it turns to shit.TurdBomber said:
I'm aware of how Portugal does it, yes. But they have a comprehensive system that includes law enforcement keeping that shit out of public display and having addicts ruling it's downtowns. Seattle, Portland and Van BC want the easy parts of do-nothing "harm reduction" but they ignore and avoid the hard parts that instead land upon citizens and tourists who can't walk safely and unmolested through their downtowns.MikeDamone said:
So you didn’t look into how Portugal does it.TurdBomber said:
If you're dumb enough to get addicted to drugs, I shouldn't have to pay to get you sober. That's on you, druggie.MikeDamone said:
People will never stop getting messed up on drugs. They damage can only be contained. Not only did the war on drugs failed, it made things worse. See Portugal for a model of successful controlling the damage. Is the Portugal model scalable to the USA? Oregon tried it, but only did half of it.TurdBomber said:
Harm Reduction doesn't work either.MikeDamone said:
Disagree. Oregon did it but fucked it up. Portugal is actually the correct case study here.Kaepsknee said:
You already have case studies in Oregon and Washington.MikeDamone said:
I’m very much into decriminalizing drugs. But as usual, the left figures out how to fuck it up.WestlinnDuck said:Another shocking stat. Who could have seen this coming? This is the sh*t the dazzler votes for because he "cares".
https://instapundit.com/
MYSTIFIED: Overdoses Up 700% After Oregon Decriminalizes Hard Street Drugs. Officials Mystified.
There’s a case to be made for decriminalization, but it involves getting serious about mandator rehab and treatment for mental illness — not just leaving sick people out on the street to “self-medicate” themselves to death.
But that’s what passes for progressive compassion.
But because you’re afraid Of getting busted with mushrooms, you stay on this stale, misinformed tact.
Sad.
I have never taken an illegal drug in my life.
But I know what the black market is.
I remember the country's prohibition on alcohol phase.
The "war on drugs" has been a costly and catastrophic failure.
We need to acknowledge the obvious: Some people can take drugs without fucking up their lives and burdening society. But too many can't, and they are, and will continue to be, drags on society who consume far too many resources because of their inabilities to handle or manage their addictions. You can appropriately call the war on drugs a failure. But you cannot point to any successes, either.
Read San Fransicko or shit, take a day trip to Vancouver BC to see the proof, first-hand.
Some can afford it, some can't. Some steal to afford it. If you can't handle the heat, GTFO of the kitchen. Pretty basic.
PS: Harm reduction policies don't control the damage. They merely hide it, while the damage explodes.
Want proof? Look at the City and County budge requests for "low barrier housing and treatment."
So it's an idea that's DOA, but you can dream on about it as you like. -
Shoot the addictsMikeDamone said:
Well, keep acting like the war on drugs is ever going to work. Best to get some better ideas on the table.TurdBomber said:
My point is that we in the US, especially on the West Coast, are too fucking lazy to follow up on any such treatment or diversion programs, so "harm reduction" is a complete and total myth. IDGAF what Portugal does. IT WILL NOT WORK IN THE U.S., ESPECIALLY THE WEST COAST.MikeDamone said:
Whats your point? I said Portugal decriminalized drugs successful. Oregon half assed it and fucked it up. It can be done,but like everything the left touches here, it turns to shit.TurdBomber said:
I'm aware of how Portugal does it, yes. But they have a comprehensive system that includes law enforcement keeping that shit out of public display and having addicts ruling it's downtowns. Seattle, Portland and Van BC want the easy parts of do-nothing "harm reduction" but they ignore and avoid the hard parts that instead land upon citizens and tourists who can't walk safely and unmolested through their downtowns.MikeDamone said:
So you didn’t look into how Portugal does it.TurdBomber said:
If you're dumb enough to get addicted to drugs, I shouldn't have to pay to get you sober. That's on you, druggie.MikeDamone said:
People will never stop getting messed up on drugs. They damage can only be contained. Not only did the war on drugs failed, it made things worse. See Portugal for a model of successful controlling the damage. Is the Portugal model scalable to the USA? Oregon tried it, but only did half of it.TurdBomber said:
Harm Reduction doesn't work either.MikeDamone said:
Disagree. Oregon did it but fucked it up. Portugal is actually the correct case study here.Kaepsknee said:
You already have case studies in Oregon and Washington.MikeDamone said:
I’m very much into decriminalizing drugs. But as usual, the left figures out how to fuck it up.WestlinnDuck said:Another shocking stat. Who could have seen this coming? This is the sh*t the dazzler votes for because he "cares".
https://instapundit.com/
MYSTIFIED: Overdoses Up 700% After Oregon Decriminalizes Hard Street Drugs. Officials Mystified.
There’s a case to be made for decriminalization, but it involves getting serious about mandator rehab and treatment for mental illness — not just leaving sick people out on the street to “self-medicate” themselves to death.
But that’s what passes for progressive compassion.
But because you’re afraid Of getting busted with mushrooms, you stay on this stale, misinformed tact.
Sad.
I have never taken an illegal drug in my life.
But I know what the black market is.
I remember the country's prohibition on alcohol phase.
The "war on drugs" has been a costly and catastrophic failure.
We need to acknowledge the obvious: Some people can take drugs without fucking up their lives and burdening society. But too many can't, and they are, and will continue to be, drags on society who consume far too many resources because of their inabilities to handle or manage their addictions. You can appropriately call the war on drugs a failure. But you cannot point to any successes, either.
Read San Fransicko or shit, take a day trip to Vancouver BC to see the proof, first-hand.
Some can afford it, some can't. Some steal to afford it. If you can't handle the heat, GTFO of the kitchen. Pretty basic.
PS: Harm reduction policies don't control the damage. They merely hide it, while the damage explodes.
Want proof? Look at the City and County budge requests for "low barrier housing and treatment."
So it's an idea that's DOA, but you can dream on about it as you like. -
If I were king I'd bomb the cartels flat. No coca fields, no labs, no drug lords would survive. They are waging war on the U.S. and I'd treat it as such. China does everything through Mexico as well. We need strict border security and searches of anything coming through.MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels. -
Watch Sicario, toot-sweet. What is needed is order. Of any type.MikeDamone said:
You’re not listening. It’s not just decriminalizing drugs or making drugs legal. Like I said, Oregon fucked up. And you’re on,by seeing the tip of the iceberg. Strung out people of the streets. That number is dwarfed by people who are using and are not wandering around yelling. Again, Portugal, Not the half way stupid approach done in Oregon.TurdBomber said:MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels.
Sorry, but history has shown that argument is bankrupt.
The less Seattle pursues illegal drug activity, the more of it we see, and the more junkies come to Seattle, busting the bank of social services, which increase dramatically every year. Legalization is a nice theory. In practice, it's worse than the War on Drugs, given it's cost, failure rates, and lazy pro-drug assholes who inhabit all the rehab programs that don't work. At least the War on Drugs provides SOME LEVEL of deterrence. Harm Reduction provides absolutely none. Hence, its abject failure up and down the West Coast.
And yes, when all else fails the threat of incarceration is in play.
Medellin. -
That's the "rich white kids never go to jail" argument.MikeDamone said:
You’re not listening. It’s not just decriminalizing drugs or making drugs legal. Like I said, Oregon fucked up. And you’re on,by seeing the tip of the iceberg. Strung out people of the streets. That number is dwarfed by people who are using and are not wandering around yelling. Again, Portugal, Not the half way stupid approach done in Oregon.TurdBomber said:MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels.
Sorry, but history has shown that argument is bankrupt.
The less Seattle pursues illegal drug activity, the more of it we see, and the more junkies come to Seattle, busting the bank of social services, which increase dramatically every year. Legalization is a nice theory. In practice, it's worse than the War on Drugs, given it's cost, failure rates, and lazy pro-drug assholes who inhabit all the rehab programs that don't work. At least the War on Drugs provides SOME LEVEL of deterrence. Harm Reduction provides absolutely none. Hence, its abject failure up and down the West Coast.
And yes, when all else fails the threat of incarceration is in play.
And it's true. And it does work.
Private $$ >>> Public $$.
If you can pay the freight, you can get as high as you want. And your family can handle rehab on their own. -
And hundreds of Bradley Fighting Vehicles with M240 machine guns and A10 air support blowing everyone to pieces who crosses the boarder illegally!Sledog said:
If I were king I'd bomb the cartels flat. No coca fields, no labs, no drug lords would survive. They are waging war on the U.S. and I'd treat it as such. China does everything through Mexico as well. We need strict border security and searches of anything coming through.MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels. -
Tactical Nuke. Nobody likes Tijuana or Cuidad de Juarez anyway.MikeDamone said:
And hundreds of Bradley Fighting Vehicles with M240 machine guns and A10 air support blowing everyone to pieces who crosses the boarder illegally!Sledog said:
If I were king I'd bomb the cartels flat. No coca fields, no labs, no drug lords would survive. They are waging war on the U.S. and I'd treat it as such. China does everything through Mexico as well. We need strict border security and searches of anything coming through.MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels. -
I don't know that the WOD is ever a war that can be won but incarceration does deter some drug use and it does act a pretty good stick to get people into rehab. And yes I know that rehab is mostly a joke but finding yourself in jail is sometimes a great motivator for some to finally quit. You're never going to stop drug smuggling as long as there is a demand for the drugs, but you only need to look around to see what allowing open air drug use and handing out "free" needles does for us.MikeDamone said:
Well, keep acting like the war on drugs is ever going to work. Best to get some better ideas on the table.TurdBomber said:
My point is that we in the US, especially on the West Coast, are too fucking lazy to follow up on any such treatment or diversion programs, so "harm reduction" is a complete and total myth. IDGAF what Portugal does. IT WILL NOT WORK IN THE U.S., ESPECIALLY THE WEST COAST.MikeDamone said:
Whats your point? I said Portugal decriminalized drugs successful. Oregon half assed it and fucked it up. It can be done,but like everything the left touches here, it turns to shit.TurdBomber said:
I'm aware of how Portugal does it, yes. But they have a comprehensive system that includes law enforcement keeping that shit out of public display and having addicts ruling it's downtowns. Seattle, Portland and Van BC want the easy parts of do-nothing "harm reduction" but they ignore and avoid the hard parts that instead land upon citizens and tourists who can't walk safely and unmolested through their downtowns.MikeDamone said:
So you didn’t look into how Portugal does it.TurdBomber said:
If you're dumb enough to get addicted to drugs, I shouldn't have to pay to get you sober. That's on you, druggie.MikeDamone said:
People will never stop getting messed up on drugs. They damage can only be contained. Not only did the war on drugs failed, it made things worse. See Portugal for a model of successful controlling the damage. Is the Portugal model scalable to the USA? Oregon tried it, but only did half of it.TurdBomber said:
Harm Reduction doesn't work either.MikeDamone said:
Disagree. Oregon did it but fucked it up. Portugal is actually the correct case study here.Kaepsknee said:
You already have case studies in Oregon and Washington.MikeDamone said:
I’m very much into decriminalizing drugs. But as usual, the left figures out how to fuck it up.WestlinnDuck said:Another shocking stat. Who could have seen this coming? This is the sh*t the dazzler votes for because he "cares".
https://instapundit.com/
MYSTIFIED: Overdoses Up 700% After Oregon Decriminalizes Hard Street Drugs. Officials Mystified.
There’s a case to be made for decriminalization, but it involves getting serious about mandator rehab and treatment for mental illness — not just leaving sick people out on the street to “self-medicate” themselves to death.
But that’s what passes for progressive compassion.
But because you’re afraid Of getting busted with mushrooms, you stay on this stale, misinformed tact.
Sad.
I have never taken an illegal drug in my life.
But I know what the black market is.
I remember the country's prohibition on alcohol phase.
The "war on drugs" has been a costly and catastrophic failure.
We need to acknowledge the obvious: Some people can take drugs without fucking up their lives and burdening society. But too many can't, and they are, and will continue to be, drags on society who consume far too many resources because of their inabilities to handle or manage their addictions. You can appropriately call the war on drugs a failure. But you cannot point to any successes, either.
Read San Fransicko or shit, take a day trip to Vancouver BC to see the proof, first-hand.
Some can afford it, some can't. Some steal to afford it. If you can't handle the heat, GTFO of the kitchen. Pretty basic.
PS: Harm reduction policies don't control the damage. They merely hide it, while the damage explodes.
Want proof? Look at the City and County budge requests for "low barrier housing and treatment."
So it's an idea that's DOA, but you can dream on about it as you like. -
Do you have any proof of this? Anecdotal evidence in my life says it’s a revolving door. Unless they find Jesus somewhere along they way they go back to prison over and over. I have a couple cousins who have been frequent guests at the Coyote Ridge Corrections Center.SFGbob said:
I don't know that the WOD is ever a war that can be won but incarceration does deter some drug use and it does act a pretty good stick to get people into rehab. And yes I know that rehab is mostly a joke but finding yourself in jail is sometimes a great motivator for some to finally quit. You're never going to stop drug smuggling as long as there is a demand for the drugs, but you only need to look around to see what allowing open air drug use and handing out "free" needles does for us.MikeDamone said:
Well, keep acting like the war on drugs is ever going to work. Best to get some better ideas on the table.TurdBomber said:
My point is that we in the US, especially on the West Coast, are too fucking lazy to follow up on any such treatment or diversion programs, so "harm reduction" is a complete and total myth. IDGAF what Portugal does. IT WILL NOT WORK IN THE U.S., ESPECIALLY THE WEST COAST.MikeDamone said:
Whats your point? I said Portugal decriminalized drugs successful. Oregon half assed it and fucked it up. It can be done,but like everything the left touches here, it turns to shit.TurdBomber said:
I'm aware of how Portugal does it, yes. But they have a comprehensive system that includes law enforcement keeping that shit out of public display and having addicts ruling it's downtowns. Seattle, Portland and Van BC want the easy parts of do-nothing "harm reduction" but they ignore and avoid the hard parts that instead land upon citizens and tourists who can't walk safely and unmolested through their downtowns.MikeDamone said:
So you didn’t look into how Portugal does it.TurdBomber said:
If you're dumb enough to get addicted to drugs, I shouldn't have to pay to get you sober. That's on you, druggie.MikeDamone said:
People will never stop getting messed up on drugs. They damage can only be contained. Not only did the war on drugs failed, it made things worse. See Portugal for a model of successful controlling the damage. Is the Portugal model scalable to the USA? Oregon tried it, but only did half of it.TurdBomber said:
Harm Reduction doesn't work either.MikeDamone said:
Disagree. Oregon did it but fucked it up. Portugal is actually the correct case study here.Kaepsknee said:
You already have case studies in Oregon and Washington.MikeDamone said:
I’m very much into decriminalizing drugs. But as usual, the left figures out how to fuck it up.WestlinnDuck said:Another shocking stat. Who could have seen this coming? This is the sh*t the dazzler votes for because he "cares".
https://instapundit.com/
MYSTIFIED: Overdoses Up 700% After Oregon Decriminalizes Hard Street Drugs. Officials Mystified.
There’s a case to be made for decriminalization, but it involves getting serious about mandator rehab and treatment for mental illness — not just leaving sick people out on the street to “self-medicate” themselves to death.
But that’s what passes for progressive compassion.
But because you’re afraid Of getting busted with mushrooms, you stay on this stale, misinformed tact.
Sad.
I have never taken an illegal drug in my life.
But I know what the black market is.
I remember the country's prohibition on alcohol phase.
The "war on drugs" has been a costly and catastrophic failure.
We need to acknowledge the obvious: Some people can take drugs without fucking up their lives and burdening society. But too many can't, and they are, and will continue to be, drags on society who consume far too many resources because of their inabilities to handle or manage their addictions. You can appropriately call the war on drugs a failure. But you cannot point to any successes, either.
Read San Fransicko or shit, take a day trip to Vancouver BC to see the proof, first-hand.
Some can afford it, some can't. Some steal to afford it. If you can't handle the heat, GTFO of the kitchen. Pretty basic.
PS: Harm reduction policies don't control the damage. They merely hide it, while the damage explodes.
Want proof? Look at the City and County budge requests for "low barrier housing and treatment."
So it's an idea that's DOA, but you can dream on about it as you like.
Also, I’m not a free needle is or safe injection site guy. You TugCons think I’m arguing the position and direction the leftists have taken. I’m not. -
I agree, that's why I said that rehab is a joke. But there are some people who do find themselves at rock bottom, and it's usually when they find themselves in jail and have lost everything who do eventually quit.MikeDamone said:
Do you have any proof of this? Anecdotal evidence in my life says it’s a revolving door. Unless they find Jesus somewhere along they way they go back to prison over and over. I have a couple cousins who have been frequent guests at the Coyote Ridge Corrections Center.SFGbob said:
I don't know that the WOD is ever a war that can be won but incarceration does deter some drug use and it does act a pretty good stick to get people into rehab. And yes I know that rehab is mostly a joke but finding yourself in jail is sometimes a great motivator for some to finally quit. You're never going to stop drug smuggling as long as there is a demand for the drugs, but you only need to look around to see what allowing open air drug use and handing out "free" needles does for us.MikeDamone said:
Well, keep acting like the war on drugs is ever going to work. Best to get some better ideas on the table.TurdBomber said:
My point is that we in the US, especially on the West Coast, are too fucking lazy to follow up on any such treatment or diversion programs, so "harm reduction" is a complete and total myth. IDGAF what Portugal does. IT WILL NOT WORK IN THE U.S., ESPECIALLY THE WEST COAST.MikeDamone said:
Whats your point? I said Portugal decriminalized drugs successful. Oregon half assed it and fucked it up. It can be done,but like everything the left touches here, it turns to shit.TurdBomber said:
I'm aware of how Portugal does it, yes. But they have a comprehensive system that includes law enforcement keeping that shit out of public display and having addicts ruling it's downtowns. Seattle, Portland and Van BC want the easy parts of do-nothing "harm reduction" but they ignore and avoid the hard parts that instead land upon citizens and tourists who can't walk safely and unmolested through their downtowns.MikeDamone said:
So you didn’t look into how Portugal does it.TurdBomber said:
If you're dumb enough to get addicted to drugs, I shouldn't have to pay to get you sober. That's on you, druggie.MikeDamone said:
People will never stop getting messed up on drugs. They damage can only be contained. Not only did the war on drugs failed, it made things worse. See Portugal for a model of successful controlling the damage. Is the Portugal model scalable to the USA? Oregon tried it, but only did half of it.TurdBomber said:
Harm Reduction doesn't work either.MikeDamone said:
Disagree. Oregon did it but fucked it up. Portugal is actually the correct case study here.Kaepsknee said:
You already have case studies in Oregon and Washington.MikeDamone said:
I’m very much into decriminalizing drugs. But as usual, the left figures out how to fuck it up.WestlinnDuck said:Another shocking stat. Who could have seen this coming? This is the sh*t the dazzler votes for because he "cares".
https://instapundit.com/
MYSTIFIED: Overdoses Up 700% After Oregon Decriminalizes Hard Street Drugs. Officials Mystified.
There’s a case to be made for decriminalization, but it involves getting serious about mandator rehab and treatment for mental illness — not just leaving sick people out on the street to “self-medicate” themselves to death.
But that’s what passes for progressive compassion.
But because you’re afraid Of getting busted with mushrooms, you stay on this stale, misinformed tact.
Sad.
I have never taken an illegal drug in my life.
But I know what the black market is.
I remember the country's prohibition on alcohol phase.
The "war on drugs" has been a costly and catastrophic failure.
We need to acknowledge the obvious: Some people can take drugs without fucking up their lives and burdening society. But too many can't, and they are, and will continue to be, drags on society who consume far too many resources because of their inabilities to handle or manage their addictions. You can appropriately call the war on drugs a failure. But you cannot point to any successes, either.
Read San Fransicko or shit, take a day trip to Vancouver BC to see the proof, first-hand.
Some can afford it, some can't. Some steal to afford it. If you can't handle the heat, GTFO of the kitchen. Pretty basic.
PS: Harm reduction policies don't control the damage. They merely hide it, while the damage explodes.
Want proof? Look at the City and County budge requests for "low barrier housing and treatment."
So it's an idea that's DOA, but you can dream on about it as you like.
Also, I’m not a free needle is or safe injection site guy. You TugCons think I’m arguing the position and direction the leftists have taken. I’m not.
I'd rather we get these people off the streets and at least make it more difficult for them to kill themselves. -
The percentages are slightly lower than rehab. It's the person. Its the situation they're going back to. And it's a lack of follow-up services.MikeDamone said:
Do you have any proof of this? Anecdotal evidence in my life says it’s a revolving door. Unless they find Jesus somewhere along they way they go back to prison over and over. I have a couple cousins who have been frequent guests at the Coyote Ridge Corrections Center.SFGbob said:
I don't know that the WOD is ever a war that can be won but incarceration does deter some drug use and it does act a pretty good stick to get people into rehab. And yes I know that rehab is mostly a joke but finding yourself in jail is sometimes a great motivator for some to finally quit. You're never going to stop drug smuggling as long as there is a demand for the drugs, but you only need to look around to see what allowing open air drug use and handing out "free" needles does for us.MikeDamone said:
Well, keep acting like the war on drugs is ever going to work. Best to get some better ideas on the table.TurdBomber said:
My point is that we in the US, especially on the West Coast, are too fucking lazy to follow up on any such treatment or diversion programs, so "harm reduction" is a complete and total myth. IDGAF what Portugal does. IT WILL NOT WORK IN THE U.S., ESPECIALLY THE WEST COAST.MikeDamone said:
Whats your point? I said Portugal decriminalized drugs successful. Oregon half assed it and fucked it up. It can be done,but like everything the left touches here, it turns to shit.TurdBomber said:
I'm aware of how Portugal does it, yes. But they have a comprehensive system that includes law enforcement keeping that shit out of public display and having addicts ruling it's downtowns. Seattle, Portland and Van BC want the easy parts of do-nothing "harm reduction" but they ignore and avoid the hard parts that instead land upon citizens and tourists who can't walk safely and unmolested through their downtowns.MikeDamone said:
So you didn’t look into how Portugal does it.TurdBomber said:
If you're dumb enough to get addicted to drugs, I shouldn't have to pay to get you sober. That's on you, druggie.MikeDamone said:
People will never stop getting messed up on drugs. They damage can only be contained. Not only did the war on drugs failed, it made things worse. See Portugal for a model of successful controlling the damage. Is the Portugal model scalable to the USA? Oregon tried it, but only did half of it.TurdBomber said:
Harm Reduction doesn't work either.MikeDamone said:
Disagree. Oregon did it but fucked it up. Portugal is actually the correct case study here.Kaepsknee said:
You already have case studies in Oregon and Washington.MikeDamone said:
I’m very much into decriminalizing drugs. But as usual, the left figures out how to fuck it up.WestlinnDuck said:Another shocking stat. Who could have seen this coming? This is the sh*t the dazzler votes for because he "cares".
https://instapundit.com/
MYSTIFIED: Overdoses Up 700% After Oregon Decriminalizes Hard Street Drugs. Officials Mystified.
There’s a case to be made for decriminalization, but it involves getting serious about mandator rehab and treatment for mental illness — not just leaving sick people out on the street to “self-medicate” themselves to death.
But that’s what passes for progressive compassion.
But because you’re afraid Of getting busted with mushrooms, you stay on this stale, misinformed tact.
Sad.
I have never taken an illegal drug in my life.
But I know what the black market is.
I remember the country's prohibition on alcohol phase.
The "war on drugs" has been a costly and catastrophic failure.
We need to acknowledge the obvious: Some people can take drugs without fucking up their lives and burdening society. But too many can't, and they are, and will continue to be, drags on society who consume far too many resources because of their inabilities to handle or manage their addictions. You can appropriately call the war on drugs a failure. But you cannot point to any successes, either.
Read San Fransicko or shit, take a day trip to Vancouver BC to see the proof, first-hand.
Some can afford it, some can't. Some steal to afford it. If you can't handle the heat, GTFO of the kitchen. Pretty basic.
PS: Harm reduction policies don't control the damage. They merely hide it, while the damage explodes.
Want proof? Look at the City and County budge requests for "low barrier housing and treatment."
So it's an idea that's DOA, but you can dream on about it as you like.
Also, I’m not a free needle is or safe injection site guy. You TugCons think I’m arguing the position and direction the leftists have taken. I’m not.
Without a 12 step program, and a close community of support for sobriety, their closest friends will probably be fellow addicts. -
So you agree with me.TurdBomber said:
The percentages are slightly lower than rehab. It's the person. Its the situation they're going back to. And it's a lack of follow-up services.MikeDamone said:
Do you have any proof of this? Anecdotal evidence in my life says it’s a revolving door. Unless they find Jesus somewhere along they way they go back to prison over and over. I have a couple cousins who have been frequent guests at the Coyote Ridge Corrections Center.SFGbob said:
I don't know that the WOD is ever a war that can be won but incarceration does deter some drug use and it does act a pretty good stick to get people into rehab. And yes I know that rehab is mostly a joke but finding yourself in jail is sometimes a great motivator for some to finally quit. You're never going to stop drug smuggling as long as there is a demand for the drugs, but you only need to look around to see what allowing open air drug use and handing out "free" needles does for us.MikeDamone said:
Well, keep acting like the war on drugs is ever going to work. Best to get some better ideas on the table.TurdBomber said:
My point is that we in the US, especially on the West Coast, are too fucking lazy to follow up on any such treatment or diversion programs, so "harm reduction" is a complete and total myth. IDGAF what Portugal does. IT WILL NOT WORK IN THE U.S., ESPECIALLY THE WEST COAST.MikeDamone said:
Whats your point? I said Portugal decriminalized drugs successful. Oregon half assed it and fucked it up. It can be done,but like everything the left touches here, it turns to shit.TurdBomber said:
I'm aware of how Portugal does it, yes. But they have a comprehensive system that includes law enforcement keeping that shit out of public display and having addicts ruling it's downtowns. Seattle, Portland and Van BC want the easy parts of do-nothing "harm reduction" but they ignore and avoid the hard parts that instead land upon citizens and tourists who can't walk safely and unmolested through their downtowns.MikeDamone said:
So you didn’t look into how Portugal does it.TurdBomber said:
If you're dumb enough to get addicted to drugs, I shouldn't have to pay to get you sober. That's on you, druggie.MikeDamone said:
People will never stop getting messed up on drugs. They damage can only be contained. Not only did the war on drugs failed, it made things worse. See Portugal for a model of successful controlling the damage. Is the Portugal model scalable to the USA? Oregon tried it, but only did half of it.TurdBomber said:
Harm Reduction doesn't work either.MikeDamone said:
Disagree. Oregon did it but fucked it up. Portugal is actually the correct case study here.Kaepsknee said:
You already have case studies in Oregon and Washington.MikeDamone said:
I’m very much into decriminalizing drugs. But as usual, the left figures out how to fuck it up.WestlinnDuck said:Another shocking stat. Who could have seen this coming? This is the sh*t the dazzler votes for because he "cares".
https://instapundit.com/
MYSTIFIED: Overdoses Up 700% After Oregon Decriminalizes Hard Street Drugs. Officials Mystified.
There’s a case to be made for decriminalization, but it involves getting serious about mandator rehab and treatment for mental illness — not just leaving sick people out on the street to “self-medicate” themselves to death.
But that’s what passes for progressive compassion.
But because you’re afraid Of getting busted with mushrooms, you stay on this stale, misinformed tact.
Sad.
I have never taken an illegal drug in my life.
But I know what the black market is.
I remember the country's prohibition on alcohol phase.
The "war on drugs" has been a costly and catastrophic failure.
We need to acknowledge the obvious: Some people can take drugs without fucking up their lives and burdening society. But too many can't, and they are, and will continue to be, drags on society who consume far too many resources because of their inabilities to handle or manage their addictions. You can appropriately call the war on drugs a failure. But you cannot point to any successes, either.
Read San Fransicko or shit, take a day trip to Vancouver BC to see the proof, first-hand.
Some can afford it, some can't. Some steal to afford it. If you can't handle the heat, GTFO of the kitchen. Pretty basic.
PS: Harm reduction policies don't control the damage. They merely hide it, while the damage explodes.
Want proof? Look at the City and County budge requests for "low barrier housing and treatment."
So it's an idea that's DOA, but you can dream on about it as you like.
Also, I’m not a free needle is or safe injection site guy. You TugCons think I’m arguing the position and direction the leftists have taken. I’m not.
Without a 12 step program, and a close community of support for sobriety, their closest friends will probably be fellow addicts. -
Nah we can put cheap drones up with machine guns with control available to the public pay to play. Might pay for everything.MikeDamone said:
And hundreds of Bradley Fighting Vehicles with M240 machine guns and A10 air support blowing everyone to pieces who crosses the boarder illegally!Sledog said:
If I were king I'd bomb the cartels flat. No coca fields, no labs, no drug lords would survive. They are waging war on the U.S. and I'd treat it as such. China does everything through Mexico as well. We need strict border security and searches of anything coming through.MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels. -
Wtf you got a problem with TJ for?TurdBomber said:
Tactical Nuke. Nobody likes Tijuana or Cuidad de Juarez anyway.MikeDamone said:
And hundreds of Bradley Fighting Vehicles with M240 machine guns and A10 air support blowing everyone to pieces who crosses the boarder illegally!Sledog said:
If I were king I'd bomb the cartels flat. No coca fields, no labs, no drug lords would survive. They are waging war on the U.S. and I'd treat it as such. China does everything through Mexico as well. We need strict border security and searches of anything coming through.MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels. -
Twas but a joke, AmigoUW_Doog_Bot said:
Wtf you got a problem with TJ for?TurdBomber said:
Tactical Nuke. Nobody likes Tijuana or Cuidad de Juarez anyway.MikeDamone said:
And hundreds of Bradley Fighting Vehicles with M240 machine guns and A10 air support blowing everyone to pieces who crosses the boarder illegally!Sledog said:
If I were king I'd bomb the cartels flat. No coca fields, no labs, no drug lords would survive. They are waging war on the U.S. and I'd treat it as such. China does everything through Mexico as well. We need strict border security and searches of anything coming through.MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels. -
Might I recommend….MikeDamone said:
And hundreds of Bradley Fighting Vehicles with M240 machine guns and A10 air support blowing everyone to pieces who crosses the boarder illegally!Sledog said:
If I were king I'd bomb the cartels flat. No coca fields, no labs, no drug lords would survive. They are waging war on the U.S. and I'd treat it as such. China does everything through Mexico as well. We need strict border security and searches of anything coming through.MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels.
-
Look, if we are going to bash 2am runs to the border that end with crying at a donkey show then I AM OUT OF HERE.TurdBomber said:
Twas but a joke, AmigoUW_Doog_Bot said:
Wtf you got a problem with TJ for?TurdBomber said:
Tactical Nuke. Nobody likes Tijuana or Cuidad de Juarez anyway.MikeDamone said:
And hundreds of Bradley Fighting Vehicles with M240 machine guns and A10 air support blowing everyone to pieces who crosses the boarder illegally!Sledog said:
If I were king I'd bomb the cartels flat. No coca fields, no labs, no drug lords would survive. They are waging war on the U.S. and I'd treat it as such. China does everything through Mexico as well. We need strict border security and searches of anything coming through.MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels. -
UW_Doog_Bot said:
Look, if we are going to bash 2am runs to the border that end with crying at a donkey show then I AM OUT OF HERE.TurdBomber said:
Twas but a joke, AmigoUW_Doog_Bot said:
Wtf you got a problem with TJ for?TurdBomber said:
Tactical Nuke. Nobody likes Tijuana or Cuidad de Juarez anyway.MikeDamone said:
And hundreds of Bradley Fighting Vehicles with M240 machine guns and A10 air support blowing everyone to pieces who crosses the boarder illegally!Sledog said:
If I were king I'd bomb the cartels flat. No coca fields, no labs, no drug lords would survive. They are waging war on the U.S. and I'd treat it as such. China does everything through Mexico as well. We need strict border security and searches of anything coming through.MikeDamone said:
You don’t buy alcohol for addicts, why would you think you’d buy drugs?Sledog said:
You can buy them for the addicts then. I don't want to.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’re ready to go back to prohibition.Sledog said:Decriminalizing drugs isn't a good play. Making them easier to get just makes more addicts. Some drugs are so highly addictive one use makes addicts. Addicts are not something we need more of. Almost everything you see when looking at the homeless is caused by three things: mental problems, drugs or alcohol.
Where do these free drugs come from?
But you seem to enjoy spending billions on enforcement, incarceration, and waring with cartels.
