Snippet from today's article in The Athletic

MikeDamone

haie said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

HairyBallsDawg said:

Tequilla said:

In the end DeBoer until proven otherwise is a discounted knock off version of Petersen

I'm okay with this as long as he doesn't walk away after 2 Pac12 championships but failing to win any NY6 games.

In terms of development and focus on team chemistry and all that, sure.

But Petersen rolled out a stale shit offense for 6 years, so the comparison ends there and "Teq" conveniently leaves that PowerPoint slide out.

Cohen deserving to be fired while also getting the right coach can both be true.

I don’t care what you roll out if you have the “success” that Petersen had … DeBoer will do well to sniff that success

Petersen had 3 good seasons in 6 years and one of those (2017) he underachieved.

And he was burned out before even taking the job. Wouldn't read the room and change his offense.

I'll take a humble coach who lost 3 games in a stint over some coach that was stressing balls because he couldn't live up to his fluff fucking mountain west record.

Fuck off doog.

Well, that’s one way to look at I suppose.

YellowSnow

MikeDamone said:

YellowSnow said:

Tequilla said:

DerekJohnson said:

Cohen replied, in part: “There’s two issues at Washington that are concerning. One is that people are so breaking the rules with inducement. They’re taking kids away from schools. Until the NCAA starts to enforce it — and I think they will make an example of a couple schools. I think they have to. There’s a lot of pressure to do that. But we’re not going to be in that lane. You don’t want us to be in that lane. But we are in the lane of trying to find every student-athlete at Washington who wants an NIL deal, an NIL deal.”

This made my blood boil

You have to care first for your blood to boil.

This.

The program is over.

I wonder if a non revenue sport or two will get cut or will enough TV revenue trickle in to keep us in the black?

RoadDawg55

JoeEDangerously said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

HairyBallsDawg said:

Tequilla said:

In the end DeBoer until proven otherwise is a discounted knock off version of Petersen

I'm okay with this as long as he doesn't walk away after 2 Pac12 championships but failing to win any NY6 games.

In terms of development and focus on team chemistry and all that, sure.

But Petersen rolled out a stale shit offense for 6 years, so the comparison ends there and "Teq" conveniently leaves that PowerPoint slide out.

Cohen deserving to be fired while also getting the right coach can both be true.

I don’t care what you roll out if you have the “success” that Petersen had … DeBoer will do well to sniff that success

Petersen had 3 good seasons in 6 years and one of those (2017) he underachieved.

And he was burned out before even taking the job. Wouldn't read the room and change his offense.

I'll take a humble coach who lost 3 games in a stint over some coach that was stressing balls because he couldn't live up to his fluff fucking mountain west record.

Fuck off doog.

Hogan’s heel turn > Haie’s heel turn

You’re the man for the wrestling references. They are all from the real glory day is 1996 to about 2000.

Wrestling before that was boring. Wrestling after that is Mickey Mouse bullshit.

HFNY

How I see it:

1. Cohen will probably retire if Hopkins needs to be fired and may retire anyway if he stays. She probably doesn't have the energy to lobby Olympia either.

2. The program still has talent. The WRs get the most attention but the OL and DL could surprise to the upside (the LBs too if you include Dom Hampton).

3. The staff seems to be finding their legs in recruiting and has a pretty good OV list coming up. Deboer and Co. haven't substantially complained about anything and appear to have confidence that they can find the guys they need while receiving a helping hand from the portal for the next class or two.

4. There is a chance Montlake Futures gives in and buys a recruit or two...or finds a loophole to somehow sweeten the pot.

5. There is likely so much we don't know and how this continues to evolve. Who knows what will happen.

6. No matter what happens with Cohen and NIL, the bottom line is that DeBoer was a good hire and winning more games will create its own momentum. I am Doogin' hard on the Michigan State game. It's at Husky Stadium and in two games against them Penix went 58 for 80 (72.5%) for 606 yards (7.57 yards per attempt) with 5 TDs to 2 INTs (and he had 1 rushing TD).

Joey

RoadDawg55 said:

JoeEDangerously said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

HairyBallsDawg said:

Tequilla said:

In the end DeBoer until proven otherwise is a discounted knock off version of Petersen

I'm okay with this as long as he doesn't walk away after 2 Pac12 championships but failing to win any NY6 games.

In terms of development and focus on team chemistry and all that, sure.

But Petersen rolled out a stale shit offense for 6 years, so the comparison ends there and "Teq" conveniently leaves that PowerPoint slide out.

Cohen deserving to be fired while also getting the right coach can both be true.

I don’t care what you roll out if you have the “success” that Petersen had … DeBoer will do well to sniff that success

Petersen had 3 good seasons in 6 years and one of those (2017) he underachieved.

And he was burned out before even taking the job. Wouldn't read the room and change his offense.

I'll take a humble coach who lost 3 games in a stint over some coach that was stressing balls because he couldn't live up to his fluff fucking mountain west record.

Fuck off doog.

Hogan’s heel turn > Haie’s heel turn

You’re the man for the wrestling references. They are all from the real glory day is 1996 to about 2000.

Wrestling before that was boring. Wrestling after that is Mickey Mouse bullshit.

Greatest swerve in history. Haie’s swerve seems forced and unnecessary

MikeDamone

HFNY said:

How I see it:

1. Cohen will probably retire if Hopkins needs to be fired and may retire anyway if he stays. She probably doesn't have the energy to lobby Olympia either.

2. The program still has talent. The WRs get the most attention but the OL and DL could surprise to the upside (the LBs too if you include Dom Hampton).

3. The staff seems to be finding their legs in recruiting and has a pretty good OV list coming up. Deboer and Co. haven't substantially complained about anything and appear to have confidence that they can find the guys they need while receiving a helping hand from the portal for the next class or two.

4. There is a chance Montlake Futures gives in and buys a recruit or two...or finds a loophole to somehow sweeten the pot.

5. There is likely so much we don't know and how this continues to evolve. Who knows what will happen.

6. No matter what happens with Cohen and NIL, the bottom line is that DeBoer was a good hire and winning more games will create its own momentum. I am Doogin' hard on the Michigan State game. It's at Husky Stadium and in two games against them Penix went 58 for 80 (72.5%) for 606 yards (7.57 yards per attempt) with 5 TDs to 2 INTs (and he had 1 rushing TD).

MikeDamone

RoadDawg55 said:

JoeEDangerously said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

HairyBallsDawg said:

Tequilla said:

In the end DeBoer until proven otherwise is a discounted knock off version of Petersen

I'm okay with this as long as he doesn't walk away after 2 Pac12 championships but failing to win any NY6 games.

In terms of development and focus on team chemistry and all that, sure.

But Petersen rolled out a stale shit offense for 6 years, so the comparison ends there and "Teq" conveniently leaves that PowerPoint slide out.

Cohen deserving to be fired while also getting the right coach can both be true.

I don’t care what you roll out if you have the “success” that Petersen had … DeBoer will do well to sniff that success

Petersen had 3 good seasons in 6 years and one of those (2017) he underachieved.

And he was burned out before even taking the job. Wouldn't read the room and change his offense.

I'll take a humble coach who lost 3 games in a stint over some coach that was stressing balls because he couldn't live up to his fluff fucking mountain west record.

Fuck off doog.

Hogan’s heel turn > Haie’s heel turn

You’re the man for the wrestling references. They are all from the real glory day is 1996 to about 2000.

Wrestling before that was boring. Wrestling after that is Mickey Mouse bullshit.

RoadDawg55 said:

JoeEDangerously said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

HairyBallsDawg said:

Tequilla said:

In the end DeBoer until proven otherwise is a discounted knock off version of Petersen

I'm okay with this as long as he doesn't walk away after 2 Pac12 championships but failing to win any NY6 games.

In terms of development and focus on team chemistry and all that, sure.

But Petersen rolled out a stale shit offense for 6 years, so the comparison ends there and "Teq" conveniently leaves that PowerPoint slide out.

Cohen deserving to be fired while also getting the right coach can both be true.

I don’t care what you roll out if you have the “success” that Petersen had … DeBoer will do well to sniff that success

Petersen had 3 good seasons in 6 years and one of those (2017) he underachieved.

And he was burned out before even taking the job. Wouldn't read the room and change his offense.

I'll take a humble coach who lost 3 games in a stint over some coach that was stressing balls because he couldn't live up to his fluff fucking mountain west record.

Fuck off doog.

Hogan’s heel turn > Haie’s heel turn

You’re the man for the wrestling references. They are all from the real glory day is 1996 to about 2000.

Wrestling before that was boring. Wrestling after that is Mickey Mouse bullshit.

Are you high? Wrestling in the 70s and 80s was unsurpassed. When was Wrestlmania 3? That’s what I thought.

How old are you?

HFNY

MikeDamone said:

HFNY said:

How I see it:

1. Cohen will probably retire if Hopkins needs to be fired and may retire anyway if he stays. She probably doesn't have the energy to lobby Olympia either.

2. The program still has talent. The WRs get the most attention but the OL and DL could surprise to the upside (the LBs too if you include Dom Hampton).

3. The staff seems to be finding their legs in recruiting and has a pretty good OV list coming up. Deboer and Co. haven't substantially complained about anything and appear to have confidence that they can find the guys they need while receiving a helping hand from the portal for the next class or two.

4. There is a chance Montlake Futures gives in and buys a recruit or two...or finds a loophole to somehow sweeten the pot.

5. There is likely so much we don't know and how this continues to evolve. Who knows what will happen.

6. No matter what happens with Cohen and NIL, the bottom line is that DeBoer was a good hire and winning more games will create its own momentum. I am Doogin' hard on the Michigan State game. It's at Husky Stadium and in two games against them Penix went 58 for 80 (72.5%) for 606 yards (7.57 yards per attempt) with 5 TDs to 2 INTs (and he had 1 rushing TD).

I like how the official visits are looking, it's ok to Doog a little after Jimmy Lake: https://247sports.com/college/washington/Season/2023-Football/Visits/

RoadDawg55

MikeDamone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

JoeEDangerously said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

HairyBallsDawg said:

Tequilla said:

In the end DeBoer until proven otherwise is a discounted knock off version of Petersen

I'm okay with this as long as he doesn't walk away after 2 Pac12 championships but failing to win any NY6 games.

In terms of development and focus on team chemistry and all that, sure.

But Petersen rolled out a stale shit offense for 6 years, so the comparison ends there and "Teq" conveniently leaves that PowerPoint slide out.

Cohen deserving to be fired while also getting the right coach can both be true.

I don’t care what you roll out if you have the “success” that Petersen had … DeBoer will do well to sniff that success

Petersen had 3 good seasons in 6 years and one of those (2017) he underachieved.

And he was burned out before even taking the job. Wouldn't read the room and change his offense.

I'll take a humble coach who lost 3 games in a stint over some coach that was stressing balls because he couldn't live up to his fluff fucking mountain west record.

Fuck off doog.

Hogan’s heel turn > Haie’s heel turn

You’re the man for the wrestling references. They are all from the real glory day is 1996 to about 2000.

Wrestling before that was boring. Wrestling after that is Mickey Mouse bullshit.

RoadDawg55 said:

JoeEDangerously said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

HairyBallsDawg said:

Tequilla said:

In the end DeBoer until proven otherwise is a discounted knock off version of Petersen

I'm okay with this as long as he doesn't walk away after 2 Pac12 championships but failing to win any NY6 games.

In terms of development and focus on team chemistry and all that, sure.

But Petersen rolled out a stale shit offense for 6 years, so the comparison ends there and "Teq" conveniently leaves that PowerPoint slide out.

Cohen deserving to be fired while also getting the right coach can both be true.

I don’t care what you roll out if you have the “success” that Petersen had … DeBoer will do well to sniff that success

Petersen had 3 good seasons in 6 years and one of those (2017) he underachieved.

And he was burned out before even taking the job. Wouldn't read the room and change his offense.

I'll take a humble coach who lost 3 games in a stint over some coach that was stressing balls because he couldn't live up to his fluff fucking mountain west record.

Fuck off doog.

Hogan’s heel turn > Haie’s heel turn

You’re the man for the wrestling references. They are all from the real glory day is 1996 to about 2000.

Wrestling before that was boring. Wrestling after that is Mickey Mouse bullshit.

Are you high? Wrestling in the 70s and 80s was unsurpassed. When was Wrestlmania 3? That’s what I thought.

How old are you?

I am not high. I’m in my mid 30’s. I think it all has to do with being a kid and being into it. Wrestlemania 3 had to be in 86 or 87. I used to own a History of Wrestleman DVD.

Anyone in their 30’s that watched wrestling loved the Attitude Era and the Monday Night Wars.

BleachedAnusDawg

MikeDamone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

JoeEDangerously said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

HairyBallsDawg said:

Tequilla said:

In the end DeBoer until proven otherwise is a discounted knock off version of Petersen

I'm okay with this as long as he doesn't walk away after 2 Pac12 championships but failing to win any NY6 games.

In terms of development and focus on team chemistry and all that, sure.

But Petersen rolled out a stale shit offense for 6 years, so the comparison ends there and "Teq" conveniently leaves that PowerPoint slide out.

Cohen deserving to be fired while also getting the right coach can both be true.

I don’t care what you roll out if you have the “success” that Petersen had … DeBoer will do well to sniff that success

Petersen had 3 good seasons in 6 years and one of those (2017) he underachieved.

And he was burned out before even taking the job. Wouldn't read the room and change his offense.

I'll take a humble coach who lost 3 games in a stint over some coach that was stressing balls because he couldn't live up to his fluff fucking mountain west record.

Fuck off doog.

Hogan’s heel turn > Haie’s heel turn

You’re the man for the wrestling references. They are all from the real glory day is 1996 to about 2000.

Wrestling before that was boring. Wrestling after that is Mickey Mouse bullshit.

RoadDawg55 said:

JoeEDangerously said:

haie said:

Tequilla said:

haie said:

HairyBallsDawg said:

Tequilla said:

In the end DeBoer until proven otherwise is a discounted knock off version of Petersen

I'm okay with this as long as he doesn't walk away after 2 Pac12 championships but failing to win any NY6 games.

In terms of development and focus on team chemistry and all that, sure.

But Petersen rolled out a stale shit offense for 6 years, so the comparison ends there and "Teq" conveniently leaves that PowerPoint slide out.

Cohen deserving to be fired while also getting the right coach can both be true.

I don’t care what you roll out if you have the “success” that Petersen had … DeBoer will do well to sniff that success

Petersen had 3 good seasons in 6 years and one of those (2017) he underachieved.

And he was burned out before even taking the job. Wouldn't read the room and change his offense.

I'll take a humble coach who lost 3 games in a stint over some coach that was stressing balls because he couldn't live up to his fluff fucking mountain west record.

Fuck off doog.

Hogan’s heel turn > Haie’s heel turn

You’re the man for the wrestling references. They are all from the real glory day is 1996 to about 2000.

Wrestling before that was boring. Wrestling after that is Mickey Mouse bullshit.

Are you high? Wrestling in the 70s and 80s was unsurpassed. When was Wrestlmania 3? That’s what I thought.

How old are you?

Attitude era was best era, rather easily.