Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Dazzler is this another issue you don't support but vote for anyway?

2456

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626

    At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.

    In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.

    Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.



  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.

    In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.

    Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.



    Gosnell says hold my beer. I'm sure he was/is the lone wolf.

    Dazzler, fuck off.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Yes, they did…

    a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
    under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
    services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
    receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
    requirements:

    9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
    in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
    provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
    the pregnant patient's life or health.



    Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

    Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

    “If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

    Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.
    What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.
    That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.
    Tell us how it's inaccurate, lady
    It's your most frequent technique for lying. Lying by omission.
    What did I omit? I posted the exact language of the bill, sally.
    You said the tweet wasn't inaccurate. It was grossly inaccurate, by omission, the technique of all studied liars.

  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.

    In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.

    Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.



    What are the penalties for a doctor not acting in good faith and who decides if the doctor acted in good faith?

    This bill allows for abortion up to birth for any reason and you trying to suggest it doesn't by hiding behind non specific and flimsy language is embarrassing, even for you, lady.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Yes, they did…

    a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
    under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
    services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
    receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
    requirements:

    9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
    in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
    provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
    the pregnant patient's life or health.



    Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

    Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

    “If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

    Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.
    What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.
    That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.
    Tell us how it's inaccurate, lady
    It's your most frequent technique for lying. Lying by omission.
    What did I omit? I posted the exact language of the bill, sally.
    You said the tweet wasn't inaccurate. It was grossly inaccurate, by omission, the technique of all studied liars.

    It's very accurate. Your typical mental convulsions don't change that, Mary.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    Yes, they did…

    a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
    under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
    services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
    receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
    requirements:

    9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
    in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
    provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
    the pregnant patient's life or health.



    Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

    Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

    “If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

    Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.
    Gosnell says hold my beer.

    Fuck off
    He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.
    Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.

    Dazzler, fuck off.
    PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.

    That's TugCon logic.
    No we wnat them to stop murdering children you feckless cunt!
    You don't give a shit about children.

    It's fetuses you fetishize.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,471 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    Yes, they did…

    a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
    under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
    services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
    receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
    requirements:

    9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
    in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
    provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
    the pregnant patient's life or health.



    Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

    Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

    “If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

    Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.
    Gosnell says hold my beer.

    Fuck off
    He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.
    Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.

    Dazzler, fuck off.
    PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.

    That's TugCon logic.
    No we wnat them to stop murdering children you feckless cunt!
    You don't give a shit about children.

    It's fetuses you fetishize.
    My children would say otherwise.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,710 Founders Club
    Now that we've clarified that the democrats want to kill viable babies up to birth time to make the commercials
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,710 Founders Club
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,075
    HHusky said:

    "49 Democrat senators just voted that it should be lawful to kill it the moment before this while it was still inside its mother."

    No they didn't. But I can understand why a liar would quote a liar.

    Shocking, Dazzler goes with the lie. Nothing in that bill prevents a woman from aborting her kid in the 9th month for any reason she likes.

    All she needs to find is a doctor who will say that for “mental” health reasons it’s okay.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,075
    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    Yes, they did…

    a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
    under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
    services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
    receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
    requirements:

    9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
    in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
    provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
    the pregnant patient's life or health.



    Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

    Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

    “If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

    Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.
    Gosnell says hold my beer.

    Fuck off
    He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.
    He is in prison in part because he violated Pennsylvania state abortion laws. This bill would eliminate all of this laws. Do you enjoy being a lying piece of shit Dazzler?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,075
    HHusky said:

    At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.

    In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.

    Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.



    Remember when you stated this lie years ago and I posted the information that showed you were a fucking liar Dazzler? They aren’t common but they do happen liar and the only “tragic” thing is that you and your party support it.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    "49 Democrat senators just voted that it should be lawful to kill it the moment before this while it was still inside its mother."

    No they didn't. But I can understand why a liar would quote a liar.

    Shocking, Dazzler goes with the lie. Nothing in that bill prevents a woman from aborting her kid in the 9th month for any reason she likes.

    All she needs to find is a doctor who will say that for “mental” health reasons it’s okay.
    Can't trust pregnant persons or doctors of course. Those 9th month abortions for no reason at all are a real big worry for a bunch of sad old fuckers like yourselves. Happens all the time!

  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    "49 Democrat senators just voted that it should be lawful to kill it the moment before this while it was still inside its mother."

    No they didn't. But I can understand why a liar would quote a liar.

    Shocking, Dazzler goes with the lie. Nothing in that bill prevents a woman from aborting her kid in the 9th month for any reason she likes.

    All she needs to find is a doctor who will say that for “mental” health reasons it’s okay.
    Can't trust pregnant persons or doctors of course. Those 9th month abortions for no reason at all are a real big worry for a bunch of sad old fuckers like yourselves. Happens all the time!

    Gosnell had no problem finding those poor minority women to abuse for cash. Late term.

    Dazzler, fuck off.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.

    In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.

    Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.



    Remember when you stated this lie years ago and I posted the information that showed you were a fucking liar Dazzler? They aren’t common but they do happen liar and the only “tragic” thing is that you and your party support it.
    It's unrealistic to expect me to "remember" everything you imagine.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,075
    edited May 2022
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Yes, they did…

    a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
    under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
    services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
    receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
    requirements:

    9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
    in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
    provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
    the pregnant patient's life or health.



    Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

    Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

    “If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

    Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.
    What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.
    That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.
    Tell us how it's inaccurate, lady
    It's your most frequent technique for lying. Lying by omission.
    They only liar is the person claiming this bill wouldn't have allowed for late term abortions for any reason the mother came up with. If she wanted to abort her kid in the 8th month because the pain of having a toxic male was too much for her mental health and she found a doctor who agreed with her, nothing in this bill would have stopped her from doing so.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited May 2022
    I remember when you lost your mind in the Woodshed 2.0 on this very topic. You were defending your GF Margaret, I was dragging your ass and you just cracked.

    Good times.

    For me.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,075
    HHusky said:

    At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.

    In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.

    Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.



    Yes, but abortions for reason of rape and incest are common and happen all the time. It's not only in "tragic" cases you lying sack of shit. Why not just ban it if it's never really happening Dazzler?
Sign In or Register to comment.