Dazzler is this another issue you don't support but vote for anyway?

SFGbob

http://twitter.com/JesseKellyDC/status/1524502605048815617?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1524502605048815617%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fdougp-3137%2F2022%2F05%2F11%2Fjesse-kelly-adds-perspective-to-what-49-of-50-democrat-us-senators-voted-to-legalize-in-all-states%2F

MikeDamone

Pawz is onboard

HHusky

"49 Democrat senators just voted that it should be lawful to kill it the moment before this while it was still inside its mother."

No they didn't. But I can understand why a liar would quote a liar.

MikeDamone

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

HHusky

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

MikeDamone

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.

Bob_C

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

So now we should trust doctors instead of bureaucrats and pharmacists for personnel health decisions?

HHusky

MikeDamone said:

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.

That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.

46XiJCAB

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

Gosnell says hold my beer.

Fuck off

MikeDamone

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

So now we should trust doctors instead of bureaucrats and pharmacists for personnel health decisions?

Muh horse paste!

46XiJCAB

Inslee says hold my beer.

Dazzler, fuck off.

HHusky

46XiJCAB said:

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

Gosnell says hold my beer.

Fuck off

He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.

MikeDamone

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.

That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.

Tell us how it's inaccurate, lady

46XiJCAB

HHusky said:

46XiJCAB said:

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

Gosnell says hold my beer.

Fuck off

He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.

Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.

Dazzler, fuck off.

46XiJCAB

HHusky said:

46XiJCAB said:

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

Gosnell says hold my beer.

Fuck off

He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.

His victims are still dead.

Dazzler, fuck off.

HHusky

46XiJCAB said:

HHusky said:

46XiJCAB said:

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

Gosnell says hold my beer.

Fuck off

He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.

Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.

Dazzler, fuck off.

PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.

That's TugCon logic.

HHusky

MikeDamone said:

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.

That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.

Tell us how it's inaccurate, lady

It's your most frequent technique for lying. Lying by omission.

MikeDamone

At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.

46XiJCAB

HHusky said:

46XiJCAB said:

HHusky said:

46XiJCAB said:

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

Gosnell says hold my beer.

Fuck off

He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.

Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.

Dazzler, fuck off.

PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.

That's TugCon logic.

Quote where I've ever called for a ban, Liar. Gosnell's taint will always be on you and I'm here to remind you of that each and every single time you open your sewer hole regarding abortion.

MikeDamone

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.

That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.

Tell us how it's inaccurate, lady

It's your most frequent technique for lying. Lying by omission.

What did I omit? I posted the exact language of the bill, sally.

Sledog

HHusky said:

46XiJCAB said:

HHusky said:

46XiJCAB said:

HHusky said:

MikeDamone said:

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.



Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

Gosnell says hold my beer.

Fuck off

He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.

Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.

Dazzler, fuck off.

PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.

That's TugCon logic.

No we wnat them to stop murdering children you feckless cunt!