Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Unqualified

135678

Comments

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    You guys are dumb. You took Herr Dazzlers Ad Hominem bait. Look at the case. She made the right call based on the facts presented to her.

    Herr Dazzler and his merry band of dancing girls only attack the person when then have nothing of substance to use as a counter argument.
  • Sources
    Sources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,420 Founders Club

    You guys are dumb. You took Herr Dazzlers Ad Hominem bait. Look at the case. She made the right call based on the facts presented to her.

    Herr Dazzler and his merry band of dancing girls only attack the person when then have nothing of substance to use as a counter argument.

    Fair point. I should have stayed on topic.

    He has yet to even comment on whether the ruling is correct. I've no doubt he's ignored all facts, read "Trump appointee" and assumed the worst.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,764 Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:

    Sources said:

    HHusky said:

    Next HH will tell us she’s too pretty to be smart


    Gorgeous! And smart enough.

    Every smart baby lawyer should become a federal trial judge before having any practice experience. Don't you think?
    Agree that her lack of experience should have precluded her, but it's still less egregious than a rocket ship to the SCOTUS bench when you have less than one year of experience on the Court of Appeals
    So Clarence Thomas was qualified because he had a few months more than one year on the COA?
    What does Thomas have to do with the CDC over stepping their authority?
    I'm sure Thomas is part of the Russian state narrative, too.

    Chop chop, Dazzler. Present your treatise stat.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,498
    edited April 2022
    Sources said:

    You guys are dumb. You took Herr Dazzlers Ad Hominem bait. Look at the case. She made the right call based on the facts presented to her.

    Herr Dazzler and his merry band of dancing girls only attack the person when then have nothing of substance to use as a counter argument.

    Fair point. I should have stayed on topic.

    He has yet to even comment on whether the ruling is correct. I've no doubt he's ignored all facts, read "Trump appointee" and assumed the worst.
    "Assumed the worst" implies that I feel strongly about the outcome. I don't.

    She wrote a solid opinion, sitting as an appellate court due to the procedural posture of the case. I think she's probably right just as a matter of construing the language at issue.

    Still, there's no way a lawyer who never tried a case should be able to become a trial judge.

    But she is gorgeous.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,764 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sources said:

    You guys are dumb. You took Herr Dazzlers Ad Hominem bait. Look at the case. She made the right call based on the facts presented to her.

    Herr Dazzler and his merry band of dancing girls only attack the person when then have nothing of substance to use as a counter argument.

    Fair point. I should have stayed on topic.

    He has yet to even comment on whether the ruling is correct. I've no doubt he's ignored all facts, read "Trump appointee" and assumed the worst.
    "Assumed the worst" implies that I feel strongly about the outcome. I don't.

    She wrote a solid opinion, sitting as an appellate court due to the procedural posture of the case. I think she's probably right.

    Still, there's no way a lawyer who never tried a case should be able to become a trial judge.

    But she is gorgeous.
    Chop chop, Dazzler.

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,740 Standard Supporter
    HH is good with putting an actual communist on the supremes though. That's OK.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,498
    Sledog said:

    HH is good with putting an actual communist on the supremes though. That's OK.

    Jack Handy? That you?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,498
    edited April 2022

    Masks are for pussies. 95+% anything Covid related was overblown. Two years of lockdowns and hampered lives. The vaccine ain’t that great. That’s not controversial, it’s truth. It should have been over a long time ago. Move on.

    A little harsh about Daddy's vaccine.

    And in fact, the Covid vaccine has turned out to be one of the most effective vaccines ever.