I have more faith in our DOJ/FBI/Congress etc (the investigative branches) to come up with a special prosecutor that will find results after both Hunter and his Big Guy dad are dead. One from a drug overdose. Probably dad with all the pep me ups he takes.
Nothing will happen except the GOP will find out once and for all it is powerless when in power.
Every relation Joe has is turning a buck off his position in government but unless you can show Joe personally profited Dazzler has no problem with it.
Btw how much of Joe's property has been audited in order to determine how he paid for it? Private schools for all his kids and grandkids, sports cars, houses. Where did all the money come from to pay for it?
Like all swamp dwelling Pols, Joey lived beyond the means of a max $169K US Senator salary and a VP Salary that topped out at $238K. I hear he made quite a bit off speaking engagements and a book deal after 2016. Sure he did.
Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?
Yes or No answer only.
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?
Shrewd!
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.
You're making my point, ma'am.
So where's this evidence?
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.
White flag
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.
That theory is untested.
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
Other than the last year and a half
But still
Joe has lied a dozen times about it and you cheered
He's refused to cooperate with the law enforcement? Link?
Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?
Yes or No answer only.
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?
Shrewd!
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.
You're making my point, ma'am.
So where's this evidence?
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.
White flag
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.
That theory is untested.
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
Other than the last year and a half
But still
Joe has lied a dozen times about it and you cheered
He's refused to cooperate with the law enforcement? Link?
Not a deep thinker are you hh. I would say that threatening to withhold aid to a foreign country unless they stop investigating your crooked son who is working for a very corrupt company, is a tad uncooperative.
As for Trump not wanting to assist an investigation into an impeachment for a fake dossier if you don't understand why he did what he did then i must assume you are the dumbest fucking lawyer on the planet.
Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?
Yes or No answer only.
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?
Shrewd!
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.
You're making my point, ma'am.
So where's this evidence?
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.
White flag
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.
That theory is untested.
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
Other than the last year and a half
But still
Joe has lied a dozen times about it and you cheered
He's refused to cooperate with the law enforcement? Link?
Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?
Yes or No answer only.
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?
Shrewd!
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.
You're making my point, ma'am.
So where's this evidence?
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.
White flag
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.
That theory is untested.
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
Other than the last year and a half
But still
Joe has lied a dozen times about it and you cheered
He's refused to cooperate with the law enforcement? Link?
Not a deep thinker are you hh. I would say that threatening to withhold aid to a foreign country unless they stop investigating your crooked son who is working for a very corrupt company, is a tad uncooperative.
As for Trump not wanting to assist an investigation into an impeachment for a fake dossier if you don't understand why he did what he did then i must assume you are the dumbest fucking lawyer on the planet.
Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
Hunter has already stated publically that the "Russians" stole and earlier version of his laptop. The one he left in the repair shop was the second laptop he lost. You know Joe is compromised by Russia or Ukraine or both.
Once again everything they accused Trump of, they were actually guilty of.
Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever
Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.
Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?
Yes or No answer only.
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?
Shrewd!
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.
You're making my point, ma'am.
So where's this evidence?
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.
White flag
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.
That theory is untested.
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?
This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?
Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?
Yes or No answer only.
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?
Shrewd!
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.
You're making my point, ma'am.
So where's this evidence?
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.
White flag
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.
That theory is untested.
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?
This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?
If you see something that went to Joe, that should definitely be investigated.
Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?
Yes or No answer only.
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?
Shrewd!
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.
You're making my point, ma'am.
So where's this evidence?
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.
White flag
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.
That theory is untested.
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?
This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?
If you see something that went to Joe, that should definitely be investigated.
still waiting . . .
So if I can clarify your position, "There's no investigation so therefore there's no evidence so therefore there's no need for an investigation."
Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?
Yes or No answer only.
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?
Shrewd!
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.
You're making my point, ma'am.
So where's this evidence?
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.
White flag
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.
That theory is untested.
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?
This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?
If you see something that went to Joe, that should definitely be investigated.
still waiting . . .
So if I can clarify your position, "There's no investigation so therefore there's no evidence so therefore there's no need for an investigation."
Do I have that right "counselor"?
Hunter Biden is being investigated for a host of things. You keep saying that this will produce evidence, or already has produced evidence tending to show personal benefit to Joe.
Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?
Yes or No answer only.
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?
Shrewd!
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.
You're making my point, ma'am.
So where's this evidence?
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.
White flag
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.
That theory is untested.
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?
This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?
If you see something that went to Joe, that should definitely be investigated.
still waiting . . .
So if I can clarify your position, "There's no investigation so therefore there's no evidence so therefore there's no need for an investigation."
Do I have that right "counselor"?
Hunter Biden is being investigated for a host of things. You keep saying that this will produce evidence, or already has produced evidence tending to show personal benefit to Joe.
If so, investigate where that evidence leads.
still waiting . . .
"Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunter Biden, said Wednesday night that he can confirm details regarding his overseas business dealings, including that a reference to a “Big Guy” in a May 13, 2017 email did, in fact, refer to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden."
"In an article discussing Hunter Biden’s tax liability and potential criminal charges, The New York Times reporters noted that they and prosecutors gathered evidence from “a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop.” It is the only mention of Biden’s laptop in the article, but the piece goes on to describe how emails pertaining to the tax liability case, “were authenticated by people familiar with them and the investigation.”
So we just need Joe to show his financial records and that should clear this right up and exonerate him. Easy peasy.
Hunter Biden's laptop revealed evidence of an international criminal money laundering operation that directly implicates his father in his criminal activity.
okay
where is this evidence?
You don't think that crackhold won't squeal like a pig?
Yes or No answer only.
Disparaging the witness you plan to rely on?
Shrewd!
Pretty easy to look at the bank accounts and figure out where the money was going. Surprised that someone with a hypothetical MBA couldn't figure that out.
You're making my point, ma'am.
So where's this evidence?
Who are you kidding Dazzler? If don't give a fuck if Biden is guilty or not. If letting Joe shit in your mouth meant that it would keep Trump out of the White House you'd have done it.
The Captain Parmenter of the TugCon gals says it doesn't matter that you don't have the evidence because I wouldn't care anyway.
White flag
It doesn't matter what evidence you're presented.
That theory is untested.
Please define your standard of evidence for us. It seems somewhat contextual.
Gasbag says we need to see financial records. He's right . . . for once.
So we need Biden to be investigated. I'm glad we agree.
If the law enforcement investigation of Hunter actually implicates Joe, then yes.
Unlike you gals, I don't cheer when people on "my team" stonewall law enforcement.
Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
If Biden has nothing to hide then he shouldn't mind being investigated. It should clear his name of any wrong doing correct?
This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?
If you see something that went to Joe, that should definitely be investigated.
still waiting . . .
So if I can clarify your position, "There's no investigation so therefore there's no evidence so therefore there's no need for an investigation."
Do I have that right "counselor"?
Hunter Biden is being investigated for a host of things. You keep saying that this will produce evidence, or already has produced evidence tending to show personal benefit to Joe.
If so, investigate where that evidence leads.
still waiting . . .
"Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunter Biden, said Wednesday night that he can confirm details regarding his overseas business dealings, including that a reference to a “Big Guy” in a May 13, 2017 email did, in fact, refer to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden."
"In an article discussing Hunter Biden’s tax liability and potential criminal charges, The New York Times reporters noted that they and prosecutors gathered evidence from “a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop.” It is the only mention of Biden’s laptop in the article, but the piece goes on to describe how emails pertaining to the tax liability case, “were authenticated by people familiar with them and the investigation.”
So we just need Joe to show his financial records and that should clear this right up and exonerate him. Easy peasy.
So far you haven't even identified any flows in his direction. Where are those records?
Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
I'm sure he was just lying about never meeting Hunter's business partners and the laptop being "Russian disinformation" because he is completely innocent. All of Joe's relations are cashing in but not Joe, that's why he lied.
Like I said, cocksucking is too tame to describe what you're doing to old Joe Dazzler. Joe's been in Washington for nearly 50 years. The way you get rich and shield yourself from scutiny is to enrich your family members, set up a charity or a foundation. Old honest Joe did all of these things. How many crackheads have you heard of who were such great businessmen they were able pull in millions dollars a year?
Dazzler's position is that everyone in Biden's family was cashing in on access to Joe but Joe was too stupid to realize it. His meetings with Hunter's business partners was totally innocent and had nothing to do with Hunter's business. The fact that people were willing to toss millions of dollars at someone he knew to be a crack head who was fucking his dead son's widow raised no red flags with Joe. Hunter was just traveling the world, often with Joe, and cutting all these deals because he was such a savvy businessman.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
So "Joe must have cashed in" is still all you've got.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
You keep moving the goalposts and then pretending your latest line in the sand has been your position all along. But keep shouting "Ivan" "Comrade" "Boris" all you want. I'm sure you at least think it's clever
Did you know financial benefits should leave some sort of trace? An inflow and an outflow--like your checking account, for example.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
I sure he was just lying about never meeting Hunter's business partners and the laptop being "Russian disinformation" because he is completely innocent. All of Joe's relations are cashing in but not Joe, that's why he lied.
Like I said, cocksucking is too tame to describe what you're doing to old Joe Dazzler.
So, no records. Just lots of hearsay regarding what a crackhead said.
Gasbag and I want to see financial records before we hunt snipe.
Comments
Nothing will happen except the GOP will find out once and for all it is powerless when in power.
Btw how much of Joe's property has been audited in order to determine how he paid for it? Private schools for all his kids and grandkids, sports cars, houses. Where did all the money come from to pay for it?
Dazzler dumb.
As for Trump not wanting to assist an investigation into an impeachment for a fake dossier if you don't understand why he did what he did then i must assume you are the dumbest fucking lawyer on the planet.
No one should cooperate with rats, ever.
And then imagine you actually voted for that person to be President. Cock sucking is far too tame to describe what Dazzler is engaging in.
Once again everything they accused Trump of, they were actually guilty of.
I'm glad to see the admission that this is your "evidence" so far.
waiting for that dam to burst. . .
This was the standard you argued for with Trump after all. Is there any difference?
still waiting . . .
Do I have that right "counselor"?
If so, investigate where that evidence leads.
still waiting . . .
"In an article discussing Hunter Biden’s tax liability and potential criminal charges, The New York Times reporters noted that they and prosecutors gathered evidence from “a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop.” It is the only mention of Biden’s laptop in the article, but the piece goes on to describe how emails pertaining to the tax liability case, “were authenticated by people familiar with them and the investigation.”
So we just need Joe to show his financial records and that should clear this right up and exonerate him. Easy peasy.
Like I said, cocksucking is too tame to describe what you're doing to old Joe Dazzler. Joe's been in Washington for nearly 50 years. The way you get rich and shield yourself from scutiny is to enrich your family members, set up a charity or a foundation. Old honest Joe did all of these things. How many crackheads have you heard of who were such great businessmen they were able pull in millions dollars a year?
Gasbag and I want to see financial records before we hunt snipe.