Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Half-truths

2»

Comments

  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    This is the greatest paragraph in political history-

    While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

    Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.

    And Biden said he would use the filibuster to keep the first potential black women off the court…you know, that relic of Jim Crow. Biden confirmed Janice Brown to a lower court..but said the the SOCTUS was different. Sums up the Dem party.
    Whataboutism.
    Or you’re just a hypocrite. Dim bulb.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    SFGbob said:
    "help me understand this."

    What can I say I got a soft spot for Pedos. Seems like the most logical answer.
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,217 Swaye's Wigwam
    Is anyone surprised that the dazzler is for reduced sentencing for pedophiles?
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,088

    Is anyone surprised that the dazzler is for reduced sentencing for pedophiles?

    He's pretty gay so no
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,548 Founders Club

    Is anyone surprised that the dazzler is for reduced sentencing for pedophiles?

    He's pretty gay so no

  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,995
    edited March 2022


    SFGbob said:

    This is the greatest paragraph in political history-

    While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

    Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.

    Were any of those other Federal Judges up for a Supreme Court seat trannie fucker?
    Just to be clear, you are arguing that being soft of pedophilia is fine for federal judges, just not the SC?
    So Kobe now admits he’s defending somebody soft on Pedos…I guess you could call him a Pedo sympathizer now…he’s just rationalizing it by saying it’s ok because Hawley apparently voted for some mythical other judge not identified who has the “same” record…wink…wink…nudge…nudge.

    And no, if any judge is downplaying/writing off an 18 year old abusing an 8 year old it is not ok, whether its a "conservative" judge or a "liberal" one...and if Hawley endorsed/voted for that judge knowing that judge holds those views it is not good. But it doesn't change the fact we should not be endorsing/validating that behavior now by putting this lady on the SC knowing she holds these views.

    Not that it will stop this crazy country from doing it...




  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113


    SFGbob said:

    This is the greatest paragraph in political history-

    While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

    Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.

    Were any of those other Federal Judges up for a Supreme Court seat trannie fucker?
    Just to be clear, you are arguing that being soft of pedophilia is fine for federal judges, just not the SC?
    So Kobe now admits he’s defending somebody soft on Pedos…I guess you could call him a Pedo sympathizer now…he’s just rationalizing it by saying it’s ok because Hawley apparently voted for some mythical other judge not identified who has the “same” record…wink…wink…nudge…nudge.

    And no, if any judge is downplaying/writing off an 18 year old abusing an 8 year old it is not ok, whether its a "conservative" judge or a "liberal" one...and if Hawley endorsed/voted for that judge knowing that judge holds those views it is not good. But it doesn't change the fact we should not be endorsing/validating that behavior now by putting this lady on the SC knowing she holds these views.

    Not that it will stop this crazy country from doing it...




    Throw in the fact that she is an obvious leftwing radical who is unwilling to be honest about her views on CRT, Trannies and crime and punishment issues. It's bad enough that she has the views she has but instead of lying about it be upfront. Admit that you believe this country is racist shit-hole. You know she thinks that, why not just come out and say it?
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,932 Founders Club
    edited March 2022
    SFGbob said:


    SFGbob said:

    This is the greatest paragraph in political history-

    While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

    Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.

    Were any of those other Federal Judges up for a Supreme Court seat trannie fucker?
    Just to be clear, you are arguing that being soft of pedophilia is fine for federal judges, just not the SC?
    So Kobe now admits he’s defending somebody soft on Pedos…I guess you could call him a Pedo sympathizer now…he’s just rationalizing it by saying it’s ok because Hawley apparently voted for some mythical other judge not identified who has the “same” record…wink…wink…nudge…nudge.

    And no, if any judge is downplaying/writing off an 18 year old abusing an 8 year old it is not ok, whether its a "conservative" judge or a "liberal" one...and if Hawley endorsed/voted for that judge knowing that judge holds those views it is not good. But it doesn't change the fact we should not be endorsing/validating that behavior now by putting this lady on the SC knowing she holds these views.

    Not that it will stop this crazy country from doing it...




    Throw in the fact that she is an obvious leftwing radical who is unwilling to be honest about her views on CRT, Trannies and crime and punishment issues. It's bad enough that she has the views she has but instead of lying about it be upfront. Admit that you believe this country is racist shit-hole. You know she thinks that, why not just come out and say it?
    Because liberals don't live in truth and their ideas do not survive in its light.
Sign In or Register to comment.