Half-truths
What are the odds that each and every time she was confronted with a child pornography case before her as a Judge she'd give greater leninency to the pedophile? And the Dazzler runs interference for her.
If someone had a record like this and the issue was anti-black hate crimes being committed by whites, anyone think the Rats would be as equally blase about it?
Comments
-
Probably all members of her local dims for communism group.
-
More than the defense argued for.
#HangingJudge -
-
There would be protests inside the hearing.SFGbob said:In every case of child pornography where Judge Jackson had some discretion on how much time the pedo offender was sentence to, she gave them less than what the prosecution was calling for, which runs directly counter to the lie the Dazzler told yesterday.
What are the odds that each and every time she was confronted with a child pornography case before her as a Judge she'd give greater leninency to the pedophile? And the Dazzler runs interference for her.
If someone had a record like this and the issue was anti-black hate crimes being committed by whites, anyone think the Rats would be as equally blase about it? -
Defending Pedos getting less than the max allowed. Dazzler charging up San Juan Hill. Only he's already lost.
-
Yeah, the defense was arguing for them to get off completely. She's real tough on Pedos. So why did you lie about her siding with the prosecution? With the Dazzler it's never "half-truths" it just flat-out lies.HHusky said:More than the defense argued for.
#HangingJudge -
I said what, lady?SFGbob said:
Yeah, the defense was arguing for them to get off completely. She's real tough on Pedos. So why did you lie about her siding with the prosecution? With the Dazzler it's never "half-truths" it just flat-out lies.HHusky said:More than the defense argued for.
#HangingJudge -
Look at the bitch trying to walk it back.HHusky said:
I said what, lady?SFGbob said:
Yeah, the defense was arguing for them to get off completely. She's real tough on Pedos. So why did you lie about her siding with the prosecution? With the Dazzler it's never "half-truths" it just flat-out lies.HHusky said:More than the defense argued for.
#HangingJudge -
Is there any line the Dazzler won't cross in defending his team? Fucker is now running interference for someone who went easy on and made excuses for pedophiles.
-
I think we need to know if the defendant in this case was black, because that might explain a lot of this.
-
Question stands.SFGbob said:
Look at the bitch trying to walk it back.HHusky said:
I said what, lady?SFGbob said:
Yeah, the defense was arguing for them to get off completely. She's real tough on Pedos. So why did you lie about her siding with the prosecution? With the Dazzler it's never "half-truths" it just flat-out lies.HHusky said:More than the defense argued for.
#HangingJudge -
You tell me, the Pedo's name in the case where she gave him 3 months in jail is Delonta K. Hawkins. That's why she gave him a reduced sentence. Racial Justice!!!!
Oh yeah, he was a repeat offender.
Mr. Hawkins pled guilty in 2018 to one count of misdemeanor sexual abuse of a child. Because he had already been convicted of misdemeanor sexual abuse of another child two years prior, the government argued that the court should certify him as a sex offender subject to lifetime registration. -
This is the greatest paragraph in political history-
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up. -
And Biden said he would use the filibuster to keep the first potential black women off the court…you know, that relic of Jim Crow. Biden confirmed Janice Brown to a lower court..but said the the SOCTUS was different. Sums up the Dem party.TheKobeStopper said:This is the greatest paragraph in political history-
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up. -
Were any of those other Federal Judges up for a Supreme Court seat trannie fucker?TheKobeStopper said:This is the greatest paragraph in political history-
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up. -
Just to be clear, you are arguing that being soft of pedophilia is fine for federal judges, just not the SC?SFGbob said:
Were any of those other Federal Judges up for a Supreme Court seat trannie fucker?TheKobeStopper said:This is the greatest paragraph in political history-
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up. -
Whataboutism.MikeDamone said:
And Biden said he would use the filibuster to keep the first potential black women off the court…you know, that relic of Jim Crow. Biden confirmed Janice Brown to a lower court..but said the the SOCTUS was different. Sums up the Dem party.TheKobeStopper said:This is the greatest paragraph in political history-
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up. -
If you can show me where a Federal Judge who was nominated by a Republican consistently gave a lighter sentence to every pedophile case that came before them I'll condemn them as well. Until then you're comparing pussy to a trannie's asshole, which come to think of it, is the same thing to you.TheKobeStopper said:MikeDamone said:
And Biden said he would use the filibuster to keep the first potential black women off the court…you know, that relic of Jim Crow. Biden confirmed Janice Brown to a lower court..but said the the SOCTUS was different. Sums up the Dem party.TheKobeStopper said:This is the greatest paragraph in political history-
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.
Just to be clear, you are arguing that being soft of pedophilia is fine for federal judges, just not the SC?SFGbob said:
Were any of those other Federal Judges up for a Supreme Court seat trannie fucker?TheKobeStopper said:This is the greatest paragraph in political history-
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.
If she had done this in one or two cases you might have a point trannie fucker, but she has done this in every single case involving child porn that has come before her as a judge and the one case where she gave the greatest reduction in jail time, seems pretty obvious to me, also had something to do with the defendant's skin color. -
Biden filibustered Brown on her nomination to a Circuit Court of Appeals because that was her resume builder for the Supreme Court.MikeDamone said:
And Biden said he would use the filibuster to keep the first potential black women off the court…you know, that relic of Jim Crow. Biden confirmed Janice Brown to a lower court..but said the the SOCTUS was different. Sums up the Dem party.TheKobeStopper said:This is the greatest paragraph in political history-
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up. -
Did they so that with pedophiles?TheKobeStopper said:This is the greatest paragraph in political history-
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up. -
Or you’re just a hypocrite. Dim bulb.TheKobeStopper said:
Whataboutism.MikeDamone said:
And Biden said he would use the filibuster to keep the first potential black women off the court…you know, that relic of Jim Crow. Biden confirmed Janice Brown to a lower court..but said the the SOCTUS was different. Sums up the Dem party.TheKobeStopper said:This is the greatest paragraph in political history-
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up. -
"help me understand this."SFGbob said:Is there any line the Dazzler won't cross in defending his team? Fucker is now running interference for someone who went easy on and made excuses for pedophiles.
What can I say I got a soft spot for Pedos. Seems like the most logical answer. -
Is anyone surprised that the dazzler is for reduced sentencing for pedophiles?
-
He's pretty gay so noUW_Doog_Bot said:Is anyone surprised that the dazzler is for reduced sentencing for pedophiles?
-
Pitchfork51 said:
He's pretty gay so noUW_Doog_Bot said:Is anyone surprised that the dazzler is for reduced sentencing for pedophiles?
-
So Kobe now admits he’s defending somebody soft on Pedos…I guess you could call him a Pedo sympathizer now…he’s just rationalizing it by saying it’s ok because Hawley apparently voted for some mythical other judge not identified who has the “same” record…wink…wink…nudge…nudge.TheKobeStopper said:
Just to be clear, you are arguing that being soft of pedophilia is fine for federal judges, just not the SC?SFGbob said:
Were any of those other Federal Judges up for a Supreme Court seat trannie fucker?TheKobeStopper said:This is the greatest paragraph in political history-
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.
And no, if any judge is downplaying/writing off an 18 year old abusing an 8 year old it is not ok, whether its a "conservative" judge or a "liberal" one...and if Hawley endorsed/voted for that judge knowing that judge holds those views it is not good. But it doesn't change the fact we should not be endorsing/validating that behavior now by putting this lady on the SC knowing she holds these views.
Not that it will stop this crazy country from doing it...
-
Throw in the fact that she is an obvious leftwing radical who is unwilling to be honest about her views on CRT, Trannies and crime and punishment issues. It's bad enough that she has the views she has but instead of lying about it be upfront. Admit that you believe this country is racist shit-hole. You know she thinks that, why not just come out and say it?HoustonHusky said:
So Kobe now admits he’s defending somebody soft on Pedos…I guess you could call him a Pedo sympathizer now…he’s just rationalizing it by saying it’s ok because Hawley apparently voted for some mythical other judge not identified who has the “same” record…wink…wink…nudge…nudge.TheKobeStopper said:
Just to be clear, you are arguing that being soft of pedophilia is fine for federal judges, just not the SC?SFGbob said:
Were any of those other Federal Judges up for a Supreme Court seat trannie fucker?TheKobeStopper said:This is the greatest paragraph in political history-
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.
And no, if any judge is downplaying/writing off an 18 year old abusing an 8 year old it is not ok, whether its a "conservative" judge or a "liberal" one...and if Hawley endorsed/voted for that judge knowing that judge holds those views it is not good. But it doesn't change the fact we should not be endorsing/validating that behavior now by putting this lady on the SC knowing she holds these views.
Not that it will stop this crazy country from doing it... -
Because liberals don't live in truth and their ideas do not survive in its light.SFGbob said:
Throw in the fact that she is an obvious leftwing radical who is unwilling to be honest about her views on CRT, Trannies and crime and punishment issues. It's bad enough that she has the views she has but instead of lying about it be upfront. Admit that you believe this country is racist shit-hole. You know she thinks that, why not just come out and say it?HoustonHusky said:
So Kobe now admits he’s defending somebody soft on Pedos…I guess you could call him a Pedo sympathizer now…he’s just rationalizing it by saying it’s ok because Hawley apparently voted for some mythical other judge not identified who has the “same” record…wink…wink…nudge…nudge.TheKobeStopper said:
Just to be clear, you are arguing that being soft of pedophilia is fine for federal judges, just not the SC?SFGbob said:
Were any of those other Federal Judges up for a Supreme Court seat trannie fucker?TheKobeStopper said:This is the greatest paragraph in political history-
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.
And no, if any judge is downplaying/writing off an 18 year old abusing an 8 year old it is not ok, whether its a "conservative" judge or a "liberal" one...and if Hawley endorsed/voted for that judge knowing that judge holds those views it is not good. But it doesn't change the fact we should not be endorsing/validating that behavior now by putting this lady on the SC knowing she holds these views.
Not that it will stop this crazy country from doing it...
