Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Half-truths

SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113
In every case of child pornography where Judge Jackson had some discretion on how much time the pedo offender was sentence to, she gave them less than what the prosecution was calling for, which runs directly counter to the lie the Dazzler told yesterday.

What are the odds that each and every time she was confronted with a child pornography case before her as a Judge she'd give greater leninency to the pedophile? And the Dazzler runs interference for her.

If someone had a record like this and the issue was anti-black hate crimes being committed by whites, anyone think the Rats would be as equally blase about it?


«1

Comments

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,491 Standard Supporter
    Probably all members of her local dims for communism group.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,637
    More than the defense argued for.

    #HangingJudge
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    HHusky said:

    More than the defense argued for.

    #HangingJudge

    LINK?

    FTFO
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,932 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    In every case of child pornography where Judge Jackson had some discretion on how much time the pedo offender was sentence to, she gave them less than what the prosecution was calling for, which runs directly counter to the lie the Dazzler told yesterday.

    What are the odds that each and every time she was confronted with a child pornography case before her as a Judge she'd give greater leninency to the pedophile? And the Dazzler runs interference for her.

    If someone had a record like this and the issue was anti-black hate crimes being committed by whites, anyone think the Rats would be as equally blase about it?


    There would be protests inside the hearing.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Defending Pedos getting less than the max allowed. Dazzler charging up San Juan Hill. Only he's already lost.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113
    HHusky said:

    More than the defense argued for.

    #HangingJudge

    Yeah, the defense was arguing for them to get off completely. She's real tough on Pedos. So why did you lie about her siding with the prosecution? With the Dazzler it's never "half-truths" it just flat-out lies.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,637
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    More than the defense argued for.

    #HangingJudge

    Yeah, the defense was arguing for them to get off completely. She's real tough on Pedos. So why did you lie about her siding with the prosecution? With the Dazzler it's never "half-truths" it just flat-out lies.
    I said what, lady?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    More than the defense argued for.

    #HangingJudge

    Yeah, the defense was arguing for them to get off completely. She's real tough on Pedos. So why did you lie about her siding with the prosecution? With the Dazzler it's never "half-truths" it just flat-out lies.
    I said what, lady?
    Look at the bitch trying to walk it back.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113
    I think we need to know if the defendant in this case was black, because that might explain a lot of this.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,637
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    More than the defense argued for.

    #HangingJudge

    Yeah, the defense was arguing for them to get off completely. She's real tough on Pedos. So why did you lie about her siding with the prosecution? With the Dazzler it's never "half-truths" it just flat-out lies.
    I said what, lady?
    Look at the bitch trying to walk it back.
    Question stands.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113
    edited March 2022
    You tell me, the Pedo's name in the case where she gave him 3 months in jail is Delonta K. Hawkins. That's why she gave him a reduced sentence. Racial Justice!!!!

    Oh yeah, he was a repeat offender.

    Mr. Hawkins pled guilty in 2018 to one count of misdemeanor sexual abuse of a child. Because he had already been convicted of misdemeanor sexual abuse of another child two years prior, the government argued that the court should certify him as a sex offender subject to lifetime registration.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    This is the greatest paragraph in political history-

    While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

    Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113

    This is the greatest paragraph in political history-

    While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

    Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.

    Were any of those other Federal Judges up for a Supreme Court seat trannie fucker?
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    edited March 2022
    SFGbob said:

    This is the greatest paragraph in political history-

    While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

    Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.

    Were any of those other Federal Judges up for a Supreme Court seat trannie fucker?
    Just to be clear, you are arguing that being soft of pedophilia is fine for federal judges, just not the SC?
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    This is the greatest paragraph in political history-

    While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

    Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.

    And Biden said he would use the filibuster to keep the first potential black women off the court…you know, that relic of Jim Crow. Biden confirmed Janice Brown to a lower court..but said the the SOCTUS was different. Sums up the Dem party.
    Whataboutism.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,113
    edited March 2022

    This is the greatest paragraph in political history-

    While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

    Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.

    And Biden said he would use the filibuster to keep the first potential black women off the court…you know, that relic of Jim Crow. Biden confirmed Janice Brown to a lower court..but said the the SOCTUS was different. Sums up the Dem party.
    SFGbob said:

    This is the greatest paragraph in political history-

    While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

    Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.

    Were any of those other Federal Judges up for a Supreme Court seat trannie fucker?
    Just to be clear, you are arguing that being soft of pedophilia is fine for federal judges, just not the SC?
    If you can show me where a Federal Judge who was nominated by a Republican consistently gave a lighter sentence to every pedophile case that came before them I'll condemn them as well. Until then you're comparing pussy to a trannie's asshole, which come to think of it, is the same thing to you.


    If she had done this in one or two cases you might have a point trannie fucker, but she has done this in every single case involving child porn that has come before her as a judge and the one case where she gave the greatest reduction in jail time, seems pretty obvious to me, also had something to do with the defendant's skin color.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,737 Standard Supporter

    This is the greatest paragraph in political history-

    While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

    Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.

    And Biden said he would use the filibuster to keep the first potential black women off the court…you know, that relic of Jim Crow. Biden confirmed Janice Brown to a lower court..but said the the SOCTUS was different. Sums up the Dem party.
    Biden filibustered Brown on her nomination to a Circuit Court of Appeals because that was her resume builder for the Supreme Court.
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,876

    This is the greatest paragraph in political history-

    While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.

    Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.

    Did they so that with pedophiles?
Sign In or Register to comment.