Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
In every case of child pornography where Judge Jackson had some discretion on how much time the pedo offender was sentence to, she gave them less than what the prosecution was calling for, which runs directly counter to the lie the Dazzler told yesterday.
What are the odds that each and every time she was confronted with a child pornography case before her as a Judge she'd give greater leninency to the pedophile? And the Dazzler runs interference for her.
If someone had a record like this and the issue was anti-black hate crimes being committed by whites, anyone think the Rats would be as equally blase about it?
-1 ·
Comments
#HangingJudge
FTFO
Oh yeah, he was a repeat offender.
Mr. Hawkins pled guilty in 2018 to one count of misdemeanor sexual abuse of a child. Because he had already been convicted of misdemeanor sexual abuse of another child two years prior, the government argued that the court should certify him as a sex offender subject to lifetime registration.
While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley’s insinuation neglects critics context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice.
Pretty much sums the Republican Party up.
If she had done this in one or two cases you might have a point trannie fucker, but she has done this in every single case involving child porn that has come before her as a judge and the one case where she gave the greatest reduction in jail time, seems pretty obvious to me, also had something to do with the defendant's skin color.