Shocking, Biden's SC nominee is soft on pedophiles.
Comments
-
So she didn't hand down lighter sentences for pedophiles Dazzler? Btw, what do you call it when you lie about what Tulsi Gabbert actually said in order to claim she was repeating Russian propaganda? demagoguery?HHusky said:
"Meritless to the point of demagoguery." - Andrew McCarthySFGbob said:Now try to imagine that this was Kavanaugh's record.
Did Judge Jackson ever give a pedophile less time than what the sentencing guidelines called for Dazzler? Yes or No. Now go run and hide Kunt.
-
DIMS are groomers and when their Pedos are caught their judges give them light sentences. Sounds about par for the Pedo Party.
-
https://ace.mu.nu/
Josh Hawley @HawleyMO
Mar 16
I've been researching the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, reading her opinions, articles, interviews & speeches. I've noticed an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson's treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children
Judge Jackson has a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker. She's been advocating for it since law school. This goes beyond "soft on crime." I'm concerned that this a record that endangers our children
As far back as her time in law school, Judge Jackson has questioned making convicts register as sex offenders - saying it leads to "stigmatization and ostracism." She's suggested public policy is driven by a "climate of fear, hatred & revenge" against sex offenders
Judge Jackson has also questioned sending dangerous sex offenders to civil commitment. We have a civil commitment law in Missouri, and it protects children
Josh Hawley
It gets worse. As a member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson advocated for drastic change in how the law treats sex offenders by eliminating the existing mandatory minimum sentences for child porn
Judge Jackson has said that some people who possess child porn "are in this for either the collection, or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community." What community would that be? The community of child exploiters?
Judge Jackson has opined there may be a type of "less-serious child pornography offender" whose motivation is not sexual but "is the challenge, or to use the technology." A "less-serious" child porn offender?
In her time on the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson said she "mistakingly assumed that child pornography offenders are pedophiles" and she wanted "to understand this category of nonpedophiles who obtain child pornography."
On the federal bench, Judge Jackson put her troubling views into action. In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders
In the case of United States v. Hawkins, the sex offender had multiple images of child porn. He was over 18. The Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of up to 10 years. Judge Jackson sentenced the perpetrator to only 3 months in prison. Three months.
In United States v. Stewart, the criminal possessed thousands of images of child porn and also hoped to travel across state lines to abuse a 9-year-old girl. The Guidelines called for a sentence of 97-121 months. Judge Jackson sentenced the criminal to just 57 months.
In United States v. Cooper, in which the criminal had more than 600 images and videos and posted many on a public blog, the Guidelines called for a sentence of 151-188 months. Judge Jackson settled on 60 months, the lowest possible sentence allowed by law.
In United States v. Chazin, the offender had 48 files of child porn, which he had accessed over a period of years. The Guidelines recommended 78-97 months. Judge Jackson gave him 28.
In United States v. Downs, the perp posted multiple images to an anonymous instant messaging app, including an image of a child under the age of 5. The Guidelines recommended 70-87 months. Judge Jackson gave him the lowest sentence allowed by law, 60 months
In United States v. Sears, the sex offender distributed more than 102 child porn videos. He also sent lewd pictures of his own 10-year-old daughter. The Guidelines recommended 97-121 months in prison. Judge Jackson gave him 71 months.
In United States v. Savage, the sex offender was convicted of travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, and also admitted to transporting child porn. The Guidelines recommended 46-57 months. Judge Jackson gave him 37.
This is a disturbing record for any judge, but especially one nominated to the highest court in the land. Protecting the most vulnerable shouldn't be up for debate. Sending child predators to jail shouldn't be controversial.
So far, the Sentencing Commission has refused to turn over all Judge Jackson's records from her time there. In light of what we have learned, this stonewalling must end. We must get access to all relevant records -
only the people with the highest of character get the Dazzler and Yellow's vote.WestlinnDuck said: -
Sex offenders generally keep right on offending. Only exceptions are guys that had to register because their girlfriend was a little under 18 and a case was made. Those guys got screwed.WestlinnDuck said:https://ace.mu.nu/
Josh Hawley @HawleyMO
Mar 16
I've been researching the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, reading her opinions, articles, interviews & speeches. I've noticed an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson's treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children
Judge Jackson has a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker. She's been advocating for it since law school. This goes beyond "soft on crime." I'm concerned that this a record that endangers our children
As far back as her time in law school, Judge Jackson has questioned making convicts register as sex offenders - saying it leads to "stigmatization and ostracism." She's suggested public policy is driven by a "climate of fear, hatred & revenge" against sex offenders
Judge Jackson has also questioned sending dangerous sex offenders to civil commitment. We have a civil commitment law in Missouri, and it protects children
Josh Hawley
It gets worse. As a member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson advocated for drastic change in how the law treats sex offenders by eliminating the existing mandatory minimum sentences for child porn
Judge Jackson has said that some people who possess child porn "are in this for either the collection, or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community." What community would that be? The community of child exploiters?
Judge Jackson has opined there may be a type of "less-serious child pornography offender" whose motivation is not sexual but "is the challenge, or to use the technology." A "less-serious" child porn offender?
In her time on the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson said she "mistakingly assumed that child pornography offenders are pedophiles" and she wanted "to understand this category of nonpedophiles who obtain child pornography."
On the federal bench, Judge Jackson put her troubling views into action. In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders
In the case of United States v. Hawkins, the sex offender had multiple images of child porn. He was over 18. The Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of up to 10 years. Judge Jackson sentenced the perpetrator to only 3 months in prison. Three months.
In United States v. Stewart, the criminal possessed thousands of images of child porn and also hoped to travel across state lines to abuse a 9-year-old girl. The Guidelines called for a sentence of 97-121 months. Judge Jackson sentenced the criminal to just 57 months.
In United States v. Cooper, in which the criminal had more than 600 images and videos and posted many on a public blog, the Guidelines called for a sentence of 151-188 months. Judge Jackson settled on 60 months, the lowest possible sentence allowed by law.
In United States v. Chazin, the offender had 48 files of child porn, which he had accessed over a period of years. The Guidelines recommended 78-97 months. Judge Jackson gave him 28.
In United States v. Downs, the perp posted multiple images to an anonymous instant messaging app, including an image of a child under the age of 5. The Guidelines recommended 70-87 months. Judge Jackson gave him the lowest sentence allowed by law, 60 months
In United States v. Sears, the sex offender distributed more than 102 child porn videos. He also sent lewd pictures of his own 10-year-old daughter. The Guidelines recommended 97-121 months in prison. Judge Jackson gave him 71 months.
In United States v. Savage, the sex offender was convicted of travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, and also admitted to transporting child porn. The Guidelines recommended 46-57 months. Judge Jackson gave him 37.
This is a disturbing record for any judge, but especially one nominated to the highest court in the land. Protecting the most vulnerable shouldn't be up for debate. Sending child predators to jail shouldn't be controversial.
So far, the Sentencing Commission has refused to turn over all Judge Jackson's records from her time there. In light of what we have learned, this stonewalling must end. We must get access to all relevant records -
So she differentiates between possessing sick images and engaging in the behaviors depicted.
It's almost as if she draws distinctions or something. You know, like a judge does.
Sounds terrifying, ladies. -
The dazzler just votes for the pedophile grooming party. Circulating naked pictures of little boys and girls, often in sexual poses, doesn't hurt anyone, allegedly. It's no different than dressing your little girl up as a princess for Halloween and then taking some pictures for the scrapbook.HHusky said:
So she differentiates between possessing sick images and engaging in the behaviors depicted.
It's almost as if she draws distinctions or something. You know, like a judge does.
Sounds terrifying, ladies. -
The WH is stalling on the release of thousands of pages requested by Sen. Grassley regarding Pedo-Lite Jackson’s time as Vice-Chair of the US Sentencing Commission. A requirement under law.
