So she differentiates between possessing sick images and engaging in the behaviors depicted.
It's almost as if she draws distinctions or something. You know, like a judge does.
Sounds terrifying, ladies.
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question. She gave a lighter sentence, numerous times to pedophiles. If it was conservative nominee and they'd consistently done this with people who engaged in anti-black hate crimes you and every other leftists would be in fully OUTRAGE right now. She has a soft-spot for pedophiles. Shocking that you approve.
Yes it is. You even called it "sick" images. Now who equates a Halloween picture with a "sick" image of a naked little girl. They deserve at least the sentencing guidelines. Grooming and child porn is quite the hill to die on.
==============
In the case of United States v. Hawkins, the sex offender had multiple images of child porn. He was over 18. The Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of up to 10 years. Judge Jackson sentenced the perpetrator to only 3 months in prison. Three months.
Judge Jackson has said that some people who possess child porn "are in this for either the collection, or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community." What community would that be? The community of child exploiters?
So the maximum, was ten years. No additional details provided. I wonder why--nah, I don't really wonder why.
Plant the flag deep on Pedo Hill Dazzler. Honest to goodness you’re one sick puppy.
The dazzler just votes for the pedophile grooming party. Circulating naked pictures of little boys and girls, often in sexual poses, doesn't hurt anyone, allegedly. It's no different than dressing your little girl up as a princess for Halloween and then taking some pictures for the scrapbook.
So she differentiates between possessing sick images and engaging in the behaviors depicted.
It's almost as if she draws distinctions or something. You know, like a judge does.
Sounds terrifying, ladies.
You don't read the stuff you poast, Gasbag.
So she sentenced some sicko to 5 years instead of 8. That's called "letting him off the hook" in your world. I guess five years is what you get for "dressing your little girl up as a princess for Halloween and then taking some pictures for the scrapbook."
No, it's called giving pedos a lighter sentence then was available, something you claimed was a lie.
Guys why should a Pedo be denied 3 additional years to prey on children. Dazzler logic and empathy.
You're not bright, PDX. Not even one of those examples your demagogic pal wrote about involved any sexual contact with a child.
Hawley knows you girls are fucking stupid. You're his market.
Dazzler thinks preying on children is just the physical act. What a disgusting take. But quite on par for the Groomer party.
Looking at sick pictures is "preying" and "grooming" says Mr. Salads. We need a metaphysics bored.
Consuming the act of abuse is it what you're trying to minimize. Someone was horribly and maybe irreparably harmed making the images you consume. You're a sick fuck.
Guys why should a Pedo be denied 3 additional years to prey on children. Dazzler logic and empathy.
You're not bright, PDX. Not even one of those examples your demagogic pal wrote about involved any sexual contact with a child.
Hawley knows you girls are fucking stupid. You're his market.
Dazzler thinks preying on children is just the physical act. What a disgusting take. But quite on par for the Groomer party.
Looking at sick pictures is "preying" and "grooming" says Mr. Salads. We need a metaphysics bored.
Consuming the act of abuse is it what you're trying to minimize. Someone was horribly and maybe irreparably harmed making the images you consume. You're a sick fuck.
Imagine defending this.
Can you imagine making excuses for pedophiles just because your team nominated someone who as a judge went easy on pedophiles? Dazzler, isn't there a black female judge Biden could have nominated that wasn't an apologist for pedophiles?
Yes it is. You even called it "sick" images. Now who equates a Halloween picture with a "sick" image of a naked little girl. They deserve at least the sentencing guidelines. Grooming and child porn is quite the hill to die on.
==============
In the case of United States v. Hawkins, the sex offender had multiple images of child porn. He was over 18. The Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of up to 10 years. Judge Jackson sentenced the perpetrator to only 3 months in prison. Three months.
Judge Jackson has said that some people who possess child porn "are in this for either the collection, or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community." What community would that be? The community of child exploiters?
So the maximum, was ten years. No additional details provided. I wonder why--nah, I don't really wonder why.
Plant the flag deep on Pedo Hill Dazzler. Honest to goodness you’re one sick puppy.
Paid by the poast, Boris?
Pedo Defense? Just looking at Pics? Call 1-555-DAZ-ZLER
Guys why should a Pedo be denied 3 additional years to prey on children. Dazzler logic and empathy.
You're not bright, PDX. Not even one of those examples your demagogic pal wrote about involved any sexual contact with a child.
Hawley knows you girls are fucking stupid. You're his market.
Dazzler thinks preying on children is just the physical act. What a disgusting take. But quite on par for the Groomer party.
Looking at sick pictures is "preying" and "grooming" says Mr. Salads. We need a metaphysics bored.
Someone was horribly and maybe irreparably harmed making the images
No one is saying otherwise, lady.
Except you.
Even running with a dumb crowd, you stand out, Boris.
And this is where the Dazzler goes solely with the name calling while continuing to dodge every single question that's put to him like the lying fucking Kunt he is.
Guys why should a Pedo be denied 3 additional years to prey on children. Dazzler logic and empathy.
You're not bright, PDX. Not even one of those examples your demagogic pal wrote about involved any sexual contact with a child.
Hawley knows you girls are fucking stupid. You're his market.
Dazzler thinks preying on children is just the physical act. What a disgusting take. But quite on par for the Groomer party.
Looking at sick pictures is "preying" and "grooming" says Mr. Salads. We need a metaphysics bored.
Someone was horribly and maybe irreparably harmed making the images
No one is saying otherwise, lady.
Except you.
Even running with a dumb crowd, you stand out, Boris.
This is easier than clubbing baby harp seals.
Yeah, everyone is soooo stupid and Hawley is playing all of us, and that's why the Dazzler is dodging like a Kunt every question that's put to him about this.
Simple question, did she give lighter sentences to pedos than the law allowed for? Yes or no? Did she often give lighter sentences than what the prosecution was calling for Dazzler? We're all being "played" but the Dazzler is too big a Kunt to honestly answer either of those questions.
Comments
Imagine defending this.
Dazzler ran out of ammo an hour ago.