Shocking, Biden's SC nominee is soft on pedophiles.
Comments
-
You're really sick in the head Fatso. Now do Ashley Babbitt.HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock? -
At least she stayed away from Corn Pop while a child.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/03/why-are-liberals-so-psychologically-needy-and-inauthentic.php
The latest such example is President Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. Turns out she’s a fan of Critical Race Theory and the 1619 Project, and I certainly hope she is asked in detail about these views in her confirmation hearings.
Never mind the issues of her views on CRT for the moment. Two years ago she gave a lecture embracing CRT at the University of Michigan Law School, which includes a curious detail in this passage:
Dr. Janet Bell’s late husband, Professor Derrick Bell, who was a civil rights lawyer and the first tenured African-American professor at Harvard Law School, wrote a book in the early 1990s about the persistence of racism in American life that he entitled “Faces At the Bottom of the Well.” My parents had this book on their coffee table for many years, and I remember staring at the image on the cover when I was growing up; I found it difficult to reconcile the image of the person, who seemed to be smiling, with the depressing message that the title and subtitle conveyed. I thought about this book cover again for the first time in forty years when I started preparing for this speech, because, before the civil rights gains of the 1960s, black women were the quintessential faces at the bottom of the well of American society, given their existence at the intersection of race and gender — both of which were highly disfavored characteristics.
The boldfaced passages are the odd part. Bell’s Faces at the Bottom of the Well was published in 1992, when Judge Jackson was 22, when she was working at Time magazine. It is impossible that her parents had the book on their coffee table “when I was growing up,” unless she was still “growing up” at age 22. It is also impossible that she “thought about this book cover again for the first time in forty years” when the book is only 30 years old today. Judge Jackson is 51 years old; the math doesn’t add up here. Judge Jackson even notes the book was written “in the early 1990s,” yet somehow this basic chronology doesn’t interfere with her subsequent claims in the same paragraph.
Perhaps she simply mis-remembers, in the same way that Joe Biden mis-remembered that he was not, in fact, descended from coal miners, or mis-remembered that Robert Kennedy had said the same things Biden did 20 years later. Funny how these kind of “mis-rememberings” among liberals all skew the same direction—toward aggrandizing their personal “narratives.”
Or maybe people who embrace the creed that truth is relative, and that the world can be bent endlessly to our own good will and idealism, who think the most important thing is “the narrative,” don’t think it’s a big deal to make stuff up in service of their cause. The point is, Judge Jackson appears to be another phony. -
I'm not out attacking police officers and trying to kill them. Makes life longer and more enjoyable. We know you support those very activities and probably donate to them. You are just an asshole in every facet of your miserable existence. My life's good! Cry yourself to nappy time now you'll feel better.HHusky said:
So do you, but I don't think the state should do the deed.Sledog said:
He deserved to get dead. Simple fact.HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock? -
Another lying liberal. Shocking development.WestlinnDuck said:At least she stayed away from Corn Pop while a child.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/03/why-are-liberals-so-psychologically-needy-and-inauthentic.php
The latest such example is President Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. Turns out she’s a fan of Critical Race Theory and the 1619 Project, and I certainly hope she is asked in detail about these views in her confirmation hearings.
Never mind the issues of her views on CRT for the moment. Two years ago she gave a lecture embracing CRT at the University of Michigan Law School, which includes a curious detail in this passage:
Dr. Janet Bell’s late husband, Professor Derrick Bell, who was a civil rights lawyer and the first tenured African-American professor at Harvard Law School, wrote a book in the early 1990s about the persistence of racism in American life that he entitled “Faces At the Bottom of the Well.” My parents had this book on their coffee table for many years, and I remember staring at the image on the cover when I was growing up; I found it difficult to reconcile the image of the person, who seemed to be smiling, with the depressing message that the title and subtitle conveyed. I thought about this book cover again for the first time in forty years when I started preparing for this speech, because, before the civil rights gains of the 1960s, black women were the quintessential faces at the bottom of the well of American society, given their existence at the intersection of race and gender — both of which were highly disfavored characteristics.
The boldfaced passages are the odd part. Bell’s Faces at the Bottom of the Well was published in 1992, when Judge Jackson was 22, when she was working at Time magazine. It is impossible that her parents had the book on their coffee table “when I was growing up,” unless she was still “growing up” at age 22. It is also impossible that she “thought about this book cover again for the first time in forty years” when the book is only 30 years old today. Judge Jackson is 51 years old; the math doesn’t add up here. Judge Jackson even notes the book was written “in the early 1990s,” yet somehow this basic chronology doesn’t interfere with her subsequent claims in the same paragraph.
Perhaps she simply mis-remembers, in the same way that Joe Biden mis-remembered that he was not, in fact, descended from coal miners, or mis-remembered that Robert Kennedy had said the same things Biden did 20 years later. Funny how these kind of “mis-rememberings” among liberals all skew the same direction—toward aggrandizing their personal “narratives.”
Or maybe people who embrace the creed that truth is relative, and that the world can be bent endlessly to our own good will and idealism, who think the most important thing is “the narrative,” don’t think it’s a big deal to make stuff up in service of their cause. The point is, Judge Jackson appears to be another phony. -
HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock?
He didn’t “execute” Michael Brown.
He stopped the threat against his life.
Yes, I did follow the story.
You? -
Well we know what he did. He swallowed like a bitch every false narrative that came out at the time. From the original "hands up don't shoot" lie, to the lie about Brown being shot in the back, to the lie about Brown being on his knees with his arms in the air and being shot point blank in the head, to the lie that Brown never even touched the officer, the Dazzler bought them all, and when he was shown to be a gullible fool on each and everyone of these claims, he doubled and quadrupled down to the point that he now creates his own lies and bullshit like Obama helped cover up Brown's murder.trublue said:HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock?
He didn’t “execute” Michael Brown.
He stopped the threat against his life.
Yes, I did follow the story.
You? -
That turd says we're conspiracy theorists!SFGbob said:
Well we know what he did. He swallowed like a bitch every false narrative that came out at the time. From the original "hands up don't shoot" lie, to the lie about Brown being shot in the back, to the lie about Brown being on his knees with his arms in the air and being shot point blank in the head, to the lie that Brown never even touched the officer, the Dazzler bought them all, and when he was shown to be a gullible fool on each and everyone of these claims, he doubled and quadrupled down to the point that he now creates his own lies and bullshit like Obama helped cover up Brown's murder.trublue said:HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock?
He didn’t “execute” Michael Brown.
He stopped the threat against his life.
Yes, I did follow the story.
You?
Hows Hunter's laptop taste now BidenBros? -
He was also all in the Dossier and the Russian collusion fraud. Still claims they're true.Sledog said:
That turd says we're conspiracy theorists!SFGbob said:
Well we know what he did. He swallowed like a bitch every false narrative that came out at the time. From the original "hands up don't shoot" lie, to the lie about Brown being shot in the back, to the lie about Brown being on his knees with his arms in the air and being shot point blank in the head, to the lie that Brown never even touched the officer, the Dazzler bought them all, and when he was shown to be a gullible fool on each and everyone of these claims, he doubled and quadrupled down to the point that he now creates his own lies and bullshit like Obama helped cover up Brown's murder.trublue said:HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock?
He didn’t “execute” Michael Brown.
He stopped the threat against his life.
Yes, I did follow the story.
You?
Hows Hunter's laptop taste now BidenBros? -
You didn't follow the story did you? Wilson executed the future astronaut as he had his hands in the air, while on his knees, begging for his life. Not only did Wilson shoot him, but he finished him off with a shot to the top of the head. Then the Ferguson DA got the result he wanted out of the grand jury. And Obama and Holder were in on it too because they wanted Wilson to walk. The City of Ferguson paid bigly because they knew Wilson was guilty. I can't believe you don't know all of these undisputed facts of the case.SFGbob said:
Well we know what he did. He swallowed like a bitch every false narrative that came out at the time. From the original "hands up don't shoot" lie, to the lie about Brown being shot in the back, to the lie about Brown being on his knees with his arms in the air and being shot point blank in the head, to the lie that Brown never even touched the officer, the Dazzler bought them all, and when he was shown to be a gullible fool on each and everyone of these claims, he doubled and quadrupled down to the point that he now creates his own lies and bullshit like Obama helped cover up Brown's murder.trublue said:HHusky said:
But that isn't when he executed Michael Brown.trublue said:
Darrin Wilson was justified in using deadly physical force when Michael Brown came through the officer’s window and tried to disarm him.HHusky said:
What the fuck are you talking about, Detective? The DA didn't want an indictment and there was no indictment. It was handled splendidly!trublue said:
Don’t forget the Grand Jury investigation was mishandled according to the Dazzler, the “attorney” who know nothing about criminal law.SFGbob said:
Dazzler doesn't give a fuck about any of that. How many times has he been exposed as stone cold lying piece of crap. Have you ever seen him once admit that he was wrong? Dazzler revealed who he really when instead of just admitting he was wrong about the Mike Brown shooting, he went with claiming that Obama and Holder were in on the cover up. You can't shame or embarrass a pathological liar.46XiJCAB said:This is a classic Dazzler meltdown thread. Imagine being Fatso and knowing how much death, destruction and pain around the World your Joey vote is causing and not really giving a shit because you're a pussy and Trump was your Daddy. He does project a lot, doesn't he?
Dazzler, you're a shit human. You and I both know it.
Follow the story much, Sherlock?
He didn’t “execute” Michael Brown.
He stopped the threat against his life.
Yes, I did follow the story.
You?
If you slip on a grape at the local supermarket or fake that you did, my number is 555-555-5555 or #Imashittyattorney -
"Meritless to the point of demagoguery." - Andrew McCarthySFGbob said:Now try to imagine that this was Kavanaugh's record.
