Joe Biden Will Be Impeached in November, Steve Bannon Says

DerekJohnson

https://newsweek.com/joe-biden-impeached-november-2022-midterms-trump-ally-steve-bannon-1672043

PurpleThrobber

Much as the Throbber would like to see Biden impeached AND convicted of those impeachment charges, never underestimate the GOP's ability to fuck up elections.

RaceBannon

If they don't have 60 senate votes then don't be retards like the democrats

DerekJohnson

PurpleThrobber said:

Much as the Throbber would like to see Biden impeached AND convicted of those impeachment charges, never underestimate the GOP's ability to fuck up elections.

Things are changing dramatically at the grassroots level

Bob_C

RaceBannon said:

If they don't have 60 senate votes then don't be retards like the democrats

It’s 67. 5 years ago I was in the just let Obama, Hilary fade off camp. I no longer am because of Russia, Ukraine, Jan 6 and Covid.

Republicans should go hard after anyone and everything next year. Specifically Covid.

Force democrat senators to vote against impeachment for Hunters China and Ukraine stuff. Force them to vote against impeachment for willful law breaking at the border and Afghanistan.

MikeDamone

I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

WestlinnDuck

MikeDamone said:

I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

He'd be gone today if he hadn't "selected" Kameltoe as VP.

Bob_C

MikeDamone said:

I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

Lol I remember that talking point. Harris was going to be so popular that she’d only be limited in years as president by term limits and not by votes.

He’s gonna be gone near the start of next year more to avoid the endless investigations.

greenblood

Why impeach him? The longer this incompetent Alzheimer’s patient is president the more damage it causes Democrats.

WestlinnDuck

greenblood said:

Why impeach him? The longer this incompetent Alzheimer’s patient is president the more damage it causes Democrats.

Get his and Hunter's banking records and find if he has any offshore accounts and where his 10% of the top went. The problem is that he is bought and paid for by the chicoms and most likely they and the Russians have some real leverage over Cho Bai Den unlike Trump. We need to stand up to the chicoms like yesterday and not in 2025 maybe. How many billions of dollars have we paid the chicoms for PPE for a virus they created and let loose. Plus scare the sh*t out of the dems on the border for failure to enforce the laws that he swore to protect.

Goduckies

WestlinnDuck said:

MikeDamone said:

I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

He'd be gone today if he hadn't "selected" Kameltoe as VP.

I'm convinced he did that as an insurance policy for him to not get Das boot

MikeDamone

WestlinnDuck said:

MikeDamone said:

I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

He'd be gone today if he hadn't "selected" Kameltoe as VP.

Imagine this scenario: Harris resigns this year under pressure from the DNC because of reasons. Hilary is named VP. Biden gets removed on January 1/21/23. 💥 Hillary is president for up to 10 years.

RoadTrip

MikeDamone said:

I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

Wouldn't his replacement have to be Harris? Is there a legitimate scenario whereby she is not the next in line? To me, this was the most confounding choice for his VP if the plan was always what you just laid out. She doesn't make sense and never has.

MikeDamone

RoadTrip said:

MikeDamone said:

I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

Wouldn't his replacement have to be Harris? Is there a legitimate scenario whereby she is not the next in line? To me, this was the most confounding choice for his VP if the plan was always what you just laid out. She doesn't make sense and never has.

Not if they have her "resign" first.

RaceBannon

Bob_C said:

RaceBannon said:

If they don't have 60 senate votes then don't be retards like the democrats

It’s 67. 5 years ago I was in the just let Obama, Hilary fade off camp. I no longer am because of Russia, Ukraine, Jan 6 and Covid.

Republicans should go hard after anyone and everything next year. Specifically Covid.

Force democrat senators to vote against impeachment for Hunters China and Ukraine stuff. Force them to vote against impeachment for willful law breaking at the border and Afghanistan.

I'm all in favor of getting even but Bitch McConnel is more scared of Trump than Biden. Nothing is stopping the GOP now other than a lack of guts. These issues could be front and center even as a minority party

The ones that try like Boebert and Greene are marginalized and ignored and their own "leadership" abandons them

Put Biden up for impeachment and the entire media complex goes into full attack on the right. A loss makes him stronger like it did Clinton, The squish middle did pay attention to the failed effort against Trump

All I'm saying is that if you're gonna do it then fucking win

In the meantime stop sitting around scratching your balls and make noise NOW

Swaye

MikeDamone said:

WestlinnDuck said:

MikeDamone said:

I've said from day one that if Biden is removed it will be as soon as possible into the third year of his term. This allows his replacement to serve out the last two years of Biden's term and then run twice more. 10 years if they win.

If Biden goes out before that his replacement can only run once after serving out Biden's term. 6 ish years if they win.

I'm not saying he WILL be removed. So don't twist.

He'd be gone today if he hadn't "selected" Kameltoe as VP.

Imagine this scenario: Harris resigns this year under pressure from the DNC because of reasons. Hilary is named VP. Biden gets removed on January 1/21/23. 💥 Hillary is president for up to 10 years.

Sledog

I don't think you get to just name someone VP?

MikeDamone

Sledog said:

I don't think you get to just name someone VP?

Yes, the president can and has done that. Like any appointee, it has to be approved by the Congress . See Nixion naming Ford VP when Agnew resigned. Ford was never elected president or Vice President.

Bob_C

MikeDamone said:

Sledog said:

I don't think you get to just name someone VP?

Yes, the president can and has done that. Like any appointee, it has to be approved by the Congress . See Nixion naming Ford VP when Agnew resigned. Ford was never elected president or Vice President.

So isn’t that a strong reason why this scenario would never happen in a 50/50 senate? You’d need the VP to break the tie on a nomination for a VP.

WestlinnDuck

Bob_C said:

MikeDamone said:

Sledog said:

I don't think you get to just name someone VP?

Yes, the president can and has done that. Like any appointee, it has to be approved by the Congress . See Nixion naming Ford VP when Agnew resigned. Ford was never elected president or Vice President.

So isn’t that a strong reason why this scenario would never happen in a 50/50 senate? You’d need the VP to break the tie on a nomination for a VP.

Yeah, she is VP until she resigns, dies, impeached or becomes President due to a presidential vacancy. So, if Harris becomes president because the dementia patient resigns or replaced under the 25th amendment the VP spot is vacant and there is no VP to break a Senate tie breaker on any 50-50 split. Same thing if Kameltoe resigns. No VP to exercise the VP tie breaker vote as set out in the Constitution.

MikeDamone

WestlinnDuck said:

Bob_C said:

MikeDamone said:

Sledog said:

I don't think you get to just name someone VP?

Yes, the president can and has done that. Like any appointee, it has to be approved by the Congress . See Nixion naming Ford VP when Agnew resigned. Ford was never elected president or Vice President.

So isn’t that a strong reason why this scenario would never happen in a 50/50 senate? You’d need the VP to break the tie on a nomination for a VP.

Yeah, she is VP until she resigns, dies, impeached or becomes President due to a presidential vacancy. So, if Harris becomes president because the dementia patient resigns or replaced under the 25th amendment the VP spot is vacant and there is no VP to break a Senate tie breaker on any 50-50 split. Same thing if Kameltoe resigns. No VP to exercise the VP tie breaker vote as set out in the Constitution.

If Harris is president and can’t get her own VP in there, then the position remains. A vacant until the election. (See LBJ). If Harris is then removed from office, the speaker of the house is then president.