A must read
Comments
-
Of course not. But Atl's article says every district is becoming Seattle. So is that good news for Oakland and DC or nah?SFGbob said:
Would they "kill" for Washington DC or Oakland's black proficiency scores?HHusky said:
She got ousted. I follow this more closely than you do.RaceBannon said:
Keep voting for lunaticsHHusky said:Castro-Gill is a lunatic.
The "achievement gap" argument is drivel though. Seems the "achievement gap" shrinks a lot when whites don't perform well. Congratulations to Detroit, where math proficiency is abysmal for all. Truly Dr. King's vision.
That'll show them
Meanwhile, most of those conservative cities cited in the "Secret Shame" report mentioned would kill for Seattle's black proficiency scores.
Anyway, the point remains, those "conservative" districts have shitty white proficiency numbers. Sure cuts down on that "achievement gap" though. -
Like I said; semantics. The major award article must have been a real high point in your career.HHusky said:semantics?
I have never worked for nor represented a public school district.
semantics, apparently -
Charades are fun AureliusHHusky said: -
I'll bet the shitty "conservative" districts don't have white proficency numbers anywhere near as bad as the black proficiency numbers in San Francisco, Oakland, or Chicago. In fact, I'll bet the numbers for white students for any state in the country aren't as bad as they are for blacks in California.HHusky said:
Of course not. But Atl's article says every district is becoming Seattle. So is that good news for Oakland and DC or nah?SFGbob said:
Would they "kill" for Washington DC or Oakland's black proficiency scores?HHusky said:
She got ousted. I follow this more closely than you do.RaceBannon said:
Keep voting for lunaticsHHusky said:Castro-Gill is a lunatic.
The "achievement gap" argument is drivel though. Seems the "achievement gap" shrinks a lot when whites don't perform well. Congratulations to Detroit, where math proficiency is abysmal for all. Truly Dr. King's vision.
That'll show them
Meanwhile, most of those conservative cities cited in the "Secret Shame" report mentioned would kill for Seattle's black proficiency scores.
Anyway, the point remains, those "conservative" districts have shitty white proficiency numbers. Sure cuts down on that "achievement gap" though.
What are these great black proficiency numbers in Seattle that you're bragging about? -
I found the report. You can too.SFGbob said:
I'll bet the shitty "conservative" districts don't have white proficency numbers anywhere near as bad as the black proficiency numbers in San Francisco, Oakland, or Chicago. In fact, I'll bet the numbers for white students for any state in the country aren't as bad as they are for blacks in California.HHusky said:
Of course not. But Atl's article says every district is becoming Seattle. So is that good news for Oakland and DC or nah?SFGbob said:
Would they "kill" for Washington DC or Oakland's black proficiency scores?HHusky said:
She got ousted. I follow this more closely than you do.RaceBannon said:
Keep voting for lunaticsHHusky said:Castro-Gill is a lunatic.
The "achievement gap" argument is drivel though. Seems the "achievement gap" shrinks a lot when whites don't perform well. Congratulations to Detroit, where math proficiency is abysmal for all. Truly Dr. King's vision.
That'll show them
Meanwhile, most of those conservative cities cited in the "Secret Shame" report mentioned would kill for Seattle's black proficiency scores.
Anyway, the point remains, those "conservative" districts have shitty white proficiency numbers. Sure cuts down on that "achievement gap" though.
What are these great black proficiency numbers in Seattle that you're bragging about?
And Seattle's numbers aren't great at all. They're just better, and in some cases WAY better, than the black proficiency scores in most of those "conservative" districts. But Seattle's white proficiency scores are higher than in those "conservative" districts too. Achievement Gap!!! -
LiarHHusky said:
I found the report. You can too.SFGbob said:
I'll bet the shitty "conservative" districts don't have white proficency numbers anywhere near as bad as the black proficiency numbers in San Francisco, Oakland, or Chicago. In fact, I'll bet the numbers for white students for any state in the country aren't as bad as they are for blacks in California.HHusky said:
Of course not. But Atl's article says every district is becoming Seattle. So is that good news for Oakland and DC or nah?SFGbob said:
Would they "kill" for Washington DC or Oakland's black proficiency scores?HHusky said:
She got ousted. I follow this more closely than you do.RaceBannon said:
Keep voting for lunaticsHHusky said:Castro-Gill is a lunatic.
The "achievement gap" argument is drivel though. Seems the "achievement gap" shrinks a lot when whites don't perform well. Congratulations to Detroit, where math proficiency is abysmal for all. Truly Dr. King's vision.
That'll show them
Meanwhile, most of those conservative cities cited in the "Secret Shame" report mentioned would kill for Seattle's black proficiency scores.
Anyway, the point remains, those "conservative" districts have shitty white proficiency numbers. Sure cuts down on that "achievement gap" though.
What are these great black proficiency numbers in Seattle that you're bragging about?
And Seattle's numbers aren't great at all. They're just better, and in some cases WAY better, than the black proficiency scores in most of those "conservative" districts. But Seattle's white proficiency scores are higher than in those "conservative" districts too. Achievement Gap!!! -
Of course Herr Dazzler is ok with keeping black kids on the bottom rung.
