Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The whitewashing of Martin Luther King

245

Comments

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    Agreed, who King really was has been whitewashed.

    Martin Luther King Jr ‘watched and laughed’ as woman was raped, secret FBI recordings allege
    Publisher claims tapes expose activist as the ‘Harvey Weinstein of civil rights movement’ who had ‘40 affairs’


    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/martin-luther-king-rape-fbi-tapes-video-mlk-laugh-files-a8932206.html

    Sounds like today bothers you. Weird.
    Sounds like if I asked you to back that claim up and defend it you’d run and hide like a Kunt.

    Today doesn’t bother me, we just have double standards on how we teach about historical figures, focusing solely on the warts of some while ignoring them in others.

    Now go run and hide bitch.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,658
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    Agreed, who King really was has been whitewashed.

    Martin Luther King Jr ‘watched and laughed’ as woman was raped, secret FBI recordings allege
    Publisher claims tapes expose activist as the ‘Harvey Weinstein of civil rights movement’ who had ‘40 affairs’


    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/martin-luther-king-rape-fbi-tapes-video-mlk-laugh-files-a8932206.html

    Sounds like today bothers you. Weird.
    Sounds like life bothers you. Not surprised.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    Mlk was overrated and would be hated by the left as an uncle Tom

    So today capitalism has outlived its usefulness. It has brought about a system that takes necessities from the masses to give luxuries to the classes

    I think he’d do alright.
    Want to see a Kunt dance?

    In your own words tell us what “necessities” are being taken from the masses and given to the “classes” Kobe?
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,538
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker

    Mlk was overrated and would be hated by the left as an uncle Tom

    So today capitalism has outlived its usefulness. It has brought about a system that takes necessities from the masses to give luxuries to the classes

    I think he’d do alright.
    Hes a faggot and all his ideals failed

    And so are you


    What is good is st George Floyd
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    edited January 2022

    Mlk was overrated and would be hated by the left as an uncle Tom

    So today capitalism has outlived its usefulness. It has brought about a system that takes necessities from the masses to give luxuries to the classes

    I think he’d do alright.
    Please list the “necessities” being taken from the masses. Be specific.

    Using your own words:

    Please define “the masses”.

    Please define “the classes”.

    Americans who lived through the Great Depression would laugh hysterically at what you consider “necessities”.

    Unfortunately, most of them have passed and goofballs like you have been spoon fed American history as interpreted by leftists.

    Unfortunately, the TKBS is incapable of critical thinking.

  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment First Anniversary
    This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.

    My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited January 2022

    This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.

    My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
    You’re disgusting


    You want REAL socialism and we just need the right guys in there. It’s really never been tried…..Meanwhile we have 100 million + dead and lives destroyed. North Korea just has the wrong leader. Go to any former eastern block country and chat with people in the 40s and up who lived through that shit and report back. I’ve been there and know many people who live there and are from there. They would all call you a moron at best, dangerous at worst.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment First Anniversary


    Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,658
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    When all else fails, run to the googles

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 100,717
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam



    Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?

    Ask the Royalist scum that did it

    Who became today's socialists
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,162
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club

    This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.

    My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
    You’re disgusting


    You want REAL socialism and we just need the right guys in there. It’s really never been tried…..Meanwhile we have 100 million + dead and lives destroyed. North Korea just has the wrong leader. Go to any former eastern block country and chat with people in the 40s and up who lived through that shit and report back. I’ve been there and know many people who live there and are from there. They would all call you a moron at best, dangerous at worst.

    This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.

    My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
    You’re disgusting


    You want REAL socialism and we just need the right guys in there. It’s really never been tried…..Meanwhile we have 100 million + dead and lives destroyed. North Korea just has the wrong leader. Go to any former eastern block country and chat with people in the 40s and up who lived through that shit and report back. I’ve been there and know many people who live there and are from there. They would all call you a moron at best, dangerous at worst.

    This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.

    My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
    You’re disgusting


    You want REAL socialism and we just need the right guys in there. It’s really never been tried…..Meanwhile we have 100 million + dead and lives destroyed. North Korea just has the wrong leader. Go to any former eastern block country and chat with people in the 40s and up who lived through that shit and report back. I’ve been there and know many people who live there and are from there. They would all call you a moron at best, dangerous at worst.
    200+ million dead from evils of communism and socialism in just the 20th century
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,162
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club



    Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?

    Oh you wanted me to add to the 200+ million by including the 18th and 19th centuries? You’re terrible at this.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    edited January 2022

    This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.

    My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
    I'll give MLK pass since he was a relatively young man who said that in the 60s when the abject failure of Socialism wasn't readily apparent like it became later. You have no excuse Kobe, the failure of Socialism is all very apparent and you just ignore it, hell you're so fucking deluded you're still promoting the wonders of Communism.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.

    My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
    So you're too big a lightweight Kunt to tell us in your own words.

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter



    Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?

    Ask the Royalist scum that did it

    Who became today's socialists
    The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 100,717
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    SFGbob said:



    Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?

    Ask the Royalist scum that did it

    Who became today's socialists
    The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.
    100 million is also bullshit


  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment First Anniversary

    SFGbob said:



    Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?

    Ask the Royalist scum that did it

    Who became today's socialists
    The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.
    100 million is also bullshit
    Agree.

    Moreover, three of the book's main contributors (Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, and Nicolas Werth)[6] publicly disassociated themselves from Courtois' statements in the introduction and criticized his editorial conduct.[35] Margolin and Werth felt that Courtois was "obsessed" with arriving at a total of 100 million killed which resulted in "sloppy and biased scholarship",[38] faulted him for exaggerating death tolls in specific countries,[6][39]: 194 [40]: 123  and rejected the comparison between Communism and Nazism.[3][note 2] Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro called the book "a 1997 propaganda volume", whereas he described the total of 100 million killed as a "simultaneously fictitious and slanderous claim"

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited January 2022
    Pol Pot had roughly 2M fellow Cambodians murdered in an attempt to achieve his socialist Xanadu. But Kobe’s socialism will do it right.

    59% of DIMS want the unvaxxed detained in their homes. These lunatics would be Kobe’s socialist homies.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:



    Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?

    Ask the Royalist scum that did it

    Who became today's socialists
    The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.
    100 million is also bullshit
    Agree.

    Moreover, three of the book's main contributors (Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, and Nicolas Werth)[6] publicly disassociated themselves from Courtois' statements in the introduction and criticized his editorial conduct.[35] Margolin and Werth felt that Courtois was "obsessed" with arriving at a total of 100 million killed which resulted in "sloppy and biased scholarship",[38] faulted him for exaggerating death tolls in specific countries,[6][39]: 194 [40]: 123  and rejected the comparison between Communism and Nazism.[3][note 2] Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro called the book "a 1997 propaganda volume", whereas he described the total of 100 million killed as a "simultaneously fictitious and slanderous claim"

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism
    The cut and paste Kunt strikes again!!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.