Martin Luther King Jr ‘watched and laughed’ as woman was raped, secret FBI recordings allege Publisher claims tapes expose activist as the ‘Harvey Weinstein of civil rights movement’ who had ‘40 affairs’
Sounds like if I asked you to back that claim up and defend it you’d run and hide like a Kunt.
Today doesn’t bother me, we just have double standards on how we teach about historical figures, focusing solely on the warts of some while ignoring them in others.
Martin Luther King Jr ‘watched and laughed’ as woman was raped, secret FBI recordings allege Publisher claims tapes expose activist as the ‘Harvey Weinstein of civil rights movement’ who had ‘40 affairs’
This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.
My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.
My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
You’re disgusting
You want REAL socialism and we just need the right guys in there. It’s really never been tried…..Meanwhile we have 100 million + dead and lives destroyed. North Korea just has the wrong leader. Go to any former eastern block country and chat with people in the 40s and up who lived through that shit and report back. I’ve been there and know many people who live there and are from there. They would all call you a moron at best, dangerous at worst.
This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.
My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
You’re disgusting
You want REAL socialism and we just need the right guys in there. It’s really never been tried…..Meanwhile we have 100 million + dead and lives destroyed. North Korea just has the wrong leader. Go to any former eastern block country and chat with people in the 40s and up who lived through that shit and report back. I’ve been there and know many people who live there and are from there. They would all call you a moron at best, dangerous at worst.
This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.
My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
You’re disgusting
You want REAL socialism and we just need the right guys in there. It’s really never been tried…..Meanwhile we have 100 million + dead and lives destroyed. North Korea just has the wrong leader. Go to any former eastern block country and chat with people in the 40s and up who lived through that shit and report back. I’ve been there and know many people who live there and are from there. They would all call you a moron at best, dangerous at worst.
This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.
My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
You’re disgusting
You want REAL socialism and we just need the right guys in there. It’s really never been tried…..Meanwhile we have 100 million + dead and lives destroyed. North Korea just has the wrong leader. Go to any former eastern block country and chat with people in the 40s and up who lived through that shit and report back. I’ve been there and know many people who live there and are from there. They would all call you a moron at best, dangerous at worst.
200+ million dead from evils of communism and socialism in just the 20th century
This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.
My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
I'll give MLK pass since he was a relatively young man who said that in the 60s when the abject failure of Socialism wasn't readily apparent like it became later. You have no excuse Kobe, the failure of Socialism is all very apparent and you just ignore it, hell you're so fucking deluded you're still promoting the wonders of Communism.
This is a complex issue and the problem for any right winger is while, yes, he denounced communism, he also called himself a socialist and called for the redistribution of wealth and nationalizing industry. Things that he would get called a communist for today.
My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
So you're too big a lightweight Kunt to tell us in your own words.
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.
100 million is also bullshit
Agree.
Moreover, three of the book's main contributors (Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, and Nicolas Werth)[6] publicly disassociated themselves from Courtois' statements in the introduction and criticized his editorial conduct.[35] Margolin and Werth felt that Courtois was "obsessed" with arriving at a total of 100 million killed which resulted in "sloppy and biased scholarship",[38] faulted him for exaggerating death tolls in specific countries,[6][39]: 194 [40]: 123 and rejected the comparison between Communism and Nazism.[3][note 2] Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro called the book "a 1997 propaganda volume", whereas he described the total of 100 million killed as a "simultaneously fictitious and slanderous claim"
The overwhelming majority of these people who were "killed" died from their lack of immunity to viruses that Europeans carried. They weren't intentionally murdered. Btw, if anyone claims China is now responsible for the "murder" of a million Americans I'll guarantee you that Kobe will call that person a racist.
100 million is also bullshit
Agree.
Moreover, three of the book's main contributors (Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, and Nicolas Werth)[6] publicly disassociated themselves from Courtois' statements in the introduction and criticized his editorial conduct.[35] Margolin and Werth felt that Courtois was "obsessed" with arriving at a total of 100 million killed which resulted in "sloppy and biased scholarship",[38] faulted him for exaggerating death tolls in specific countries,[6][39]: 194 [40]: 123 and rejected the comparison between Communism and Nazism.[3][note 2] Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro called the book "a 1997 propaganda volume", whereas he described the total of 100 million killed as a "simultaneously fictitious and slanderous claim"
Comments
Today doesn’t bother me, we just have double standards on how we teach about historical figures, focusing solely on the warts of some while ignoring them in others.
Now go run and hide bitch.
In your own words tell us what “necessities” are being taken from the masses and given to the “classes” Kobe?
And so are you
What is good is st George Floyd
Using your own words:
Please define “the masses”.
Please define “the classes”.
Americans who lived through the Great Depression would laugh hysterically at what you consider “necessities”.
Unfortunately, most of them have passed and goofballs like you have been spoon fed American history as interpreted by leftists.
Unfortunately, the TKBS is incapable of critical thinking.
My take is at the time (and still so for many today) you could not differentiate between communism and Soviet. That they meant the same thing. King draws a distinction between communism and socialism, that isn’t there, in order to say “not like that”.
You want REAL socialism and we just need the right guys in there. It’s really never been tried…..Meanwhile we have 100 million + dead and lives destroyed. North Korea just has the wrong leader. Go to any former eastern block country and chat with people in the 40s and up who lived through that shit and report back. I’ve been there and know many people who live there and are from there. They would all call you a moron at best, dangerous at worst.
Is killing 100 million people bad, bros?
Who became today's socialists
Moreover, three of the book's main contributors (Karel Bartosek, Jean-Louis Margolin, and Nicolas Werth)[6] publicly disassociated themselves from Courtois' statements in the introduction and criticized his editorial conduct.[35] Margolin and Werth felt that Courtois was "obsessed" with arriving at a total of 100 million killed which resulted in "sloppy and biased scholarship",[38] faulted him for exaggerating death tolls in specific countries,[6][39]: 194 [40]: 123 and rejected the comparison between Communism and Nazism.[3][note 2] Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro called the book "a 1997 propaganda volume", whereas he described the total of 100 million killed as a "simultaneously fictitious and slanderous claim"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism
59% of DIMS want the unvaxxed detained in their homes. These lunatics would be Kobe’s socialist homies.