Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Are we Recruiting again? Fischer of Men Recruiting Thread - (Thread links)
Comments
-
deleteinsinceredawg said:Look who's back tweeting nonsensical rambles on Twitter
-
Great let’s creep out more recruitsinsinceredawg said:Look who's back tweeting nonsensical rambles on Twitter
-
@creepycougJoeEDangerously said:
Great let’s creep out more recruitsinsinceredawg said:Look who's back tweeting nonsensical rambles on Twitter
-
Truly gutted and sick to my stomach reading thisinsinceredawg said:Look who's back tweeting nonsensical rambles on Twitter
-
David Peevey and his family are wondering what the fuck this loser is talking about. Hopefully they don't see that tweet.insinceredawg said:Look who's back tweeting nonsensical rambles on Twitter
-
CAREFUL whose DM's you reply to young man.RoadDawg55 said:
David Peevey and his family are wondering what the fuck this loser is talking about. Hopefully they don't see that tweet.insinceredawg said:Look who's back tweeting nonsensical rambles on Twitter
-
Loved it until it was cool to love to hatednc said:
I think we've been tainted against recruiting rankings. UW finally started getting highly rated right before he coaching staff quit and then downgraded coordinators significantly. I think the UW experience with mostly highly rated guys failing is a bit of an anomaly.CuntWaffle said:Im done with rankings. Unless you are recruiting at Bama, Georgia, or OSUs level they don’t fucking matter. Most of the guys we were excited most about haven’t sniffed the field except for the WR duo of McMillan and Odunze.
I know people hate the TSIO crew here but the one principle they left us with that I think was really important, at least for evaluating Pete/Lake's recruiting was that it's less about getting highly recruited guys and more about getting your top targets. With that previous regime that mattered a lot because when they whiffed on their top targets they pretty consistently settled for the lowest hanging available fruit. I don't think this regime is as likely to do that, as evidenced by the much larger number of offers given out for one thing.
The corollary that I’d add to the principal of landing your top targets was how important it was to stack talent in the rooms
It’s never about Player A or Player B making it or not … it’s about making sure that through competition that the cream rises to the top (as the Macho Man so eloquently taught us all) -
insinceredawg said:
Look who's back tweeting nonsensical rambles on Twitter
ForemanJTTBanks
Peavy?
Live look at this man recruiting
-
Tequilla said:
Loved it until it was cool to love to hatednc said:
I think we've been tainted against recruiting rankings. UW finally started getting highly rated right before he coaching staff quit and then downgraded coordinators significantly. I think the UW experience with mostly highly rated guys failing is a bit of an anomaly.CuntWaffle said:Im done with rankings. Unless you are recruiting at Bama, Georgia, or OSUs level they don’t fucking matter. Most of the guys we were excited most about haven’t sniffed the field except for the WR duo of McMillan and Odunze.
I know people hate the TSIO crew here but the one principle they left us with that I think was really important, at least for evaluating Pete/Lake's recruiting was that it's less about getting highly recruited guys and more about getting your top targets. With that previous regime that mattered a lot because when they whiffed on their top targets they pretty consistently settled for the lowest hanging available fruit. I don't think this regime is as likely to do that, as evidenced by the much larger number of offers given out for one thing.
The corollary that I’d add to the principal of landing your top targets was how important it was to stack talent in the rooms
It’s never about Player A or Player B making it or not … it’s about making sure that through competition that the cream rises to the top (as the Macho Man so eloquently taught us all)
-
CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Tequilla said:
Loved it until it was cool to love to hatednc said:
I think we've been tainted against recruiting rankings. UW finally started getting highly rated right before he coaching staff quit and then downgraded coordinators significantly. I think the UW experience with mostly highly rated guys failing is a bit of an anomaly.CuntWaffle said:Im done with rankings. Unless you are recruiting at Bama, Georgia, or OSUs level they don’t fucking matter. Most of the guys we were excited most about haven’t sniffed the field except for the WR duo of McMillan and Odunze.
I know people hate the TSIO crew here but the one principle they left us with that I think was really important, at least for evaluating Pete/Lake's recruiting was that it's less about getting highly recruited guys and more about getting your top targets. With that previous regime that mattered a lot because when they whiffed on their top targets they pretty consistently settled for the lowest hanging available fruit. I don't think this regime is as likely to do that, as evidenced by the much larger number of offers given out for one thing.
The corollary that I’d add to the principal of landing your top targets was how important it was to stack talent in the rooms
It’s never about Player A or Player B making it or not … it’s about making sure that through competition that the cream rises to the top (as the Macho Man so eloquently taught us all)
