Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Mario to Miami confirmed
Comments
-
-
Mike and the guy who made his handle while having a seizure told me that this is the best news they've heard all year! 16-4 or some random shit too!dnc said: -
Will they still mention how Thibodeaux is going to be the first player taken in the draft though? Or will they not because he will have already gone ninth at that point?46XiJCAB said:
I’m looking forward to the opener v UGA next year and not hearing.WoolleyDoog said:When Crisco goes to Miami will they automatically be labeled a big physical, tough team or does that kind of bullshit stay in Eugene with the hardestworkin comms team in the biz? I hope Hurricanes fans like watching the nation's best blocking schemes and quarterbacks who struggle to make passes over the line of scrimmage.
“Mario is building an SEC type squad out West”. -
This Oregon coaching position has really brought out the best in this board. Such vitriol. Such doggedness. Pretty fascinating stuff when you think about it.chuck said:
If you say so you simpleton cunt. There's something you're missing, and it pisses you off. I'm at peace with that.MikeDamone said:
Christ. The point still escapes you. Dumbfuck.chuck said:
The rankings don't really matter when you only give them a cursory glance. They were rated slightly higher. The ranking difference is insignificant.MikeDamone said:
No. He developed them better. Simple fact. Unless you’re going the RANKINGS DON’T MATTER! route. Which is FS.chuck said:
His point isn't about the NFL. The best players go play there. Petersen sent more players to the NFL than Helf because he had better players...because he recruited better players.MikeDamone said:
NOGAF about the NFL.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Wanna pull up the NFL draft charts for those years?MikeDamone said:
My point is Oregon’s floor with a dope like Helfrich is higher that UW’s ceiling as demonstrated by PetersenBeno4Life said:
It’s been pretty well documented by recruits, recruits’ parents (ie Hugh Breed Love Millen), and former staffers (ie Cooper Petagna) that Cristo cares more about recruiting than anything else and implores his staff to recruit like it’s the SEC.MikeDamone said:
Nike and PK recruits for Oregon. Who ever they get will recruit fine. The notion that MC is such an outstanding recruiter is a myth. I could recruit to Oregon just as well. Money talks.46XiJCAB said:
He’s Mario 2.0 w/o the recruiting. Absolute wrong choice which is why Mullins will hire him.Swaye said:
He actually could be. I don't think it's a high probability, but I see your main point. I mean there are mega resources there, and if he could luck into or find a really quality innovative offensive mind he could maybe do some damage there. I'd have hated him at UW, but there is a different dynamic there.CallMeBigErn said:
Bro, did you read the context? I'm saying there's a part of me that thinks that he could be the type to do so. Not saying he will ffs. I don't consider my opinion to be fact unlike some here. I'm raising the point that he could be good for Oregon as devil's advocate. Chill.Ice_Holmvik said:
You were just stating that hiring Wilcox would bring 20 years of stability to Oregon.CallMeBigErn said:
I prefer revolving door Oregon coaching. In fact, I love it. You don't see it that way and that's cool, Chuck. That's cool.chuck said:
Glad to see that my dog isn't the only one dumb enough to try fighting high volume sprinklers. There's also the one pictured, and @CallMeBigErnGladstone said:
Yes, as a Junction City kid and UO alum, he probably seems appealing from a "we're a stepping stone school" perspectiveCallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
My fear is that Wilcox, as an alum, could end up the type who's there for 20 years.
This is a bunch of platitude nonsense that doesn't mean anything. Bringing "stability" means nothing unless you're a good coach. This is one of those buzzwords on Twitter people throw out to try and sound smart. What does 'might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine' mean? How do you qualify this? Gibberish.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
It might not be lightning in a bottle right away but he's going to bring stability and might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
Oregon has a culture problem imo and Wilcox could very well be the type to fix it, or at least add a little substance to their charade.
What does this mean? Culture problem of good recruiting? Hiring good coaches? What substance to what charade? This entire post feels like it was written by a ML algorithm that doesn't quite understand the training data yet
Can you name literally any metric outside of "has ties to the physical area" that says Wilcox could be their Whittingham? Literally every sentence you typed is brutal wharrgarble nonsense.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
He will have the tools to do it. I could see him becoming Oregon's Whittingham. Not saying this will for sure happen by any means but I think it's a decent possibility that he's exactly what Oregon needs.
The one thing that would worry me as a Duck fan (and you alluded to this arguing the other way though) is his "stable" (read that as boring) type mentality. Oregon has always been loud, garish and new money rich. It's a huge part of their persona. That is not Wilcox. So I appreciate you thinking he might "fix" that in a sense, but I think fixing it would break them. It's a 2nd tier school in a shithole town. What makes them get top 10 recruiting classes is the new money swagger.
Just my thoughts. On balance, I hope like fuck UO hires Wilcocks because I think there is a 10% chance or less he kills it. But there is a chance.
So yeah, combined that effort and acumen with PK money and you have top-10 classes.
Simple fact.
I sure as hell don't value rankings over actual performance. You're just reaching into the bag of doogish excuses to try supporting your point. Petersen's players were better, therefore he recruited better. When you're not a top 5 recruiting program, eval matters way more than rankings do. Petersen evaluated better and recruited better. Simple. You can argue otherwise but you can't support it with anything other than your customary cuntiness. -
Maybe Thibbadough meant end of the Cristobal era in his post?
-
LMFAO, Cristobal to Miami. Sense a pattern here.dnc said:
https://youtu.be/zIh5AHxh-Ok
-
No, you're just a fucking idiot that creates world salads of buzzwords and bullshit corny cliches.CallMeBigErn said:
This Oregon coaching position has really brought out the best in this board. Such vitriol. Such doggedness. Pretty fascinating stuff when you think about it.chuck said:
If you say so you simpleton cunt. There's something you're missing, and it pisses you off. I'm at peace with that.MikeDamone said:
Christ. The point still escapes you. Dumbfuck.chuck said:
The rankings don't really matter when you only give them a cursory glance. They were rated slightly higher. The ranking difference is insignificant.MikeDamone said:
No. He developed them better. Simple fact. Unless you’re going the RANKINGS DON’T MATTER! route. Which is FS.chuck said:
His point isn't about the NFL. The best players go play there. Petersen sent more players to the NFL than Helf because he had better players...because he recruited better players.MikeDamone said:
NOGAF about the NFL.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Wanna pull up the NFL draft charts for those years?MikeDamone said:
My point is Oregon’s floor with a dope like Helfrich is higher that UW’s ceiling as demonstrated by PetersenBeno4Life said:
It’s been pretty well documented by recruits, recruits’ parents (ie Hugh Breed Love Millen), and former staffers (ie Cooper Petagna) that Cristo cares more about recruiting than anything else and implores his staff to recruit like it’s the SEC.MikeDamone said:
Nike and PK recruits for Oregon. Who ever they get will recruit fine. The notion that MC is such an outstanding recruiter is a myth. I could recruit to Oregon just as well. Money talks.46XiJCAB said:
He’s Mario 2.0 w/o the recruiting. Absolute wrong choice which is why Mullins will hire him.Swaye said:
He actually could be. I don't think it's a high probability, but I see your main point. I mean there are mega resources there, and if he could luck into or find a really quality innovative offensive mind he could maybe do some damage there. I'd have hated him at UW, but there is a different dynamic there.CallMeBigErn said:
Bro, did you read the context? I'm saying there's a part of me that thinks that he could be the type to do so. Not saying he will ffs. I don't consider my opinion to be fact unlike some here. I'm raising the point that he could be good for Oregon as devil's advocate. Chill.Ice_Holmvik said:
You were just stating that hiring Wilcox would bring 20 years of stability to Oregon.CallMeBigErn said:
I prefer revolving door Oregon coaching. In fact, I love it. You don't see it that way and that's cool, Chuck. That's cool.chuck said:
Glad to see that my dog isn't the only one dumb enough to try fighting high volume sprinklers. There's also the one pictured, and @CallMeBigErnGladstone said:
Yes, as a Junction City kid and UO alum, he probably seems appealing from a "we're a stepping stone school" perspectiveCallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
My fear is that Wilcox, as an alum, could end up the type who's there for 20 years.
This is a bunch of platitude nonsense that doesn't mean anything. Bringing "stability" means nothing unless you're a good coach. This is one of those buzzwords on Twitter people throw out to try and sound smart. What does 'might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine' mean? How do you qualify this? Gibberish.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
It might not be lightning in a bottle right away but he's going to bring stability and might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
Oregon has a culture problem imo and Wilcox could very well be the type to fix it, or at least add a little substance to their charade.
What does this mean? Culture problem of good recruiting? Hiring good coaches? What substance to what charade? This entire post feels like it was written by a ML algorithm that doesn't quite understand the training data yet
Can you name literally any metric outside of "has ties to the physical area" that says Wilcox could be their Whittingham? Literally every sentence you typed is brutal wharrgarble nonsense.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
He will have the tools to do it. I could see him becoming Oregon's Whittingham. Not saying this will for sure happen by any means but I think it's a decent possibility that he's exactly what Oregon needs.
The one thing that would worry me as a Duck fan (and you alluded to this arguing the other way though) is his "stable" (read that as boring) type mentality. Oregon has always been loud, garish and new money rich. It's a huge part of their persona. That is not Wilcox. So I appreciate you thinking he might "fix" that in a sense, but I think fixing it would break them. It's a 2nd tier school in a shithole town. What makes them get top 10 recruiting classes is the new money swagger.
Just my thoughts. On balance, I hope like fuck UO hires Wilcocks because I think there is a 10% chance or less he kills it. But there is a chance.
So yeah, combined that effort and acumen with PK money and you have top-10 classes.
Simple fact.
I sure as hell don't value rankings over actual performance. You're just reaching into the bag of doogish excuses to try supporting your point. Petersen's players were better, therefore he recruited better. When you're not a top 5 recruiting program, eval matters way more than rankings do. Petersen evaluated better and recruited better. Simple. You can argue otherwise but you can't support it with anything other than your customary cuntiness. -
@MikeSeaver is clearly not able to handle the ups and downs of sleazy coaches. May need to take a time out for perspective.
-
Exhibit Abackthepack said:
No, you're just a fucking idiot that creates world salads of buzzwords and bullshit corny cliches.CallMeBigErn said:
This Oregon coaching position has really brought out the best in this board. Such vitriol. Such doggedness. Pretty fascinating stuff when you think about it.chuck said:
If you say so you simpleton cunt. There's something you're missing, and it pisses you off. I'm at peace with that.MikeDamone said:
Christ. The point still escapes you. Dumbfuck.chuck said:
The rankings don't really matter when you only give them a cursory glance. They were rated slightly higher. The ranking difference is insignificant.MikeDamone said:
No. He developed them better. Simple fact. Unless you’re going the RANKINGS DON’T MATTER! route. Which is FS.chuck said:
His point isn't about the NFL. The best players go play there. Petersen sent more players to the NFL than Helf because he had better players...because he recruited better players.MikeDamone said:
NOGAF about the NFL.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Wanna pull up the NFL draft charts for those years?MikeDamone said:
My point is Oregon’s floor with a dope like Helfrich is higher that UW’s ceiling as demonstrated by PetersenBeno4Life said:
It’s been pretty well documented by recruits, recruits’ parents (ie Hugh Breed Love Millen), and former staffers (ie Cooper Petagna) that Cristo cares more about recruiting than anything else and implores his staff to recruit like it’s the SEC.MikeDamone said:
Nike and PK recruits for Oregon. Who ever they get will recruit fine. The notion that MC is such an outstanding recruiter is a myth. I could recruit to Oregon just as well. Money talks.46XiJCAB said:
He’s Mario 2.0 w/o the recruiting. Absolute wrong choice which is why Mullins will hire him.Swaye said:
He actually could be. I don't think it's a high probability, but I see your main point. I mean there are mega resources there, and if he could luck into or find a really quality innovative offensive mind he could maybe do some damage there. I'd have hated him at UW, but there is a different dynamic there.CallMeBigErn said:
Bro, did you read the context? I'm saying there's a part of me that thinks that he could be the type to do so. Not saying he will ffs. I don't consider my opinion to be fact unlike some here. I'm raising the point that he could be good for Oregon as devil's advocate. Chill.Ice_Holmvik said:
You were just stating that hiring Wilcox would bring 20 years of stability to Oregon.CallMeBigErn said:
I prefer revolving door Oregon coaching. In fact, I love it. You don't see it that way and that's cool, Chuck. That's cool.chuck said:
Glad to see that my dog isn't the only one dumb enough to try fighting high volume sprinklers. There's also the one pictured, and @CallMeBigErnGladstone said:
Yes, as a Junction City kid and UO alum, he probably seems appealing from a "we're a stepping stone school" perspectiveCallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
My fear is that Wilcox, as an alum, could end up the type who's there for 20 years.
This is a bunch of platitude nonsense that doesn't mean anything. Bringing "stability" means nothing unless you're a good coach. This is one of those buzzwords on Twitter people throw out to try and sound smart. What does 'might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine' mean? How do you qualify this? Gibberish.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
It might not be lightning in a bottle right away but he's going to bring stability and might be less about the glitzy glamorous Oregon hype machine.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
Oregon has a culture problem imo and Wilcox could very well be the type to fix it, or at least add a little substance to their charade.
What does this mean? Culture problem of good recruiting? Hiring good coaches? What substance to what charade? This entire post feels like it was written by a ML algorithm that doesn't quite understand the training data yet
Can you name literally any metric outside of "has ties to the physical area" that says Wilcox could be their Whittingham? Literally every sentence you typed is brutal wharrgarble nonsense.CallMeBigErn said:theknowledge said:
The defense at Oregon under Wilcox will be improved but until proven otherwise I think Wiclox has offense AIDS. He just spreads it to whomever coaches offense under him. Baldwin was on an upward arc until he met Wilcox. Musgrave was an uninspired choice but even he is under what he produced at Virginia. This was the main reason I was wary of the Wilcox superior culture coming to UW. I just can’t handle any more bad offense.CallMeBigErn said:
Recruiting will take a step back to Chris Petersen at UW range but this is ultimately an upgrade imo.OreDawg said:Justin Wilcox might be their best realistic option at this point.
He will have the tools to do it. I could see him becoming Oregon's Whittingham. Not saying this will for sure happen by any means but I think it's a decent possibility that he's exactly what Oregon needs.
The one thing that would worry me as a Duck fan (and you alluded to this arguing the other way though) is his "stable" (read that as boring) type mentality. Oregon has always been loud, garish and new money rich. It's a huge part of their persona. That is not Wilcox. So I appreciate you thinking he might "fix" that in a sense, but I think fixing it would break them. It's a 2nd tier school in a shithole town. What makes them get top 10 recruiting classes is the new money swagger.
Just my thoughts. On balance, I hope like fuck UO hires Wilcocks because I think there is a 10% chance or less he kills it. But there is a chance.
So yeah, combined that effort and acumen with PK money and you have top-10 classes.
Simple fact.
I sure as hell don't value rankings over actual performance. You're just reaching into the bag of doogish excuses to try supporting your point. Petersen's players were better, therefore he recruited better. When you're not a top 5 recruiting program, eval matters way more than rankings do. Petersen evaluated better and recruited better. Simple. You can argue otherwise but you can't support it with anything other than your customary cuntiness.
I suggested that Wilcox might be better at O than you think. Call the police!
