Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Conservatives hate the constitution part 1
TheKobeStopper
Member Posts: 5,959
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
Lefties can't meme, exhibit 1,000,000
-
Sorry, I don’t pay attention to old POS Commies.
I.
Just.
Don’t.
Kobe -
Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right
-
-
A progressive tax is uniform.greenblood said:Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right
-
.TheKobeStopper said:
How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc. -
I support a tax on progressives
-
Sledog said:
.TheKobeStopper said:
How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.
Answered!TheKobeStopper said:
A progressive tax is uniform.greenblood said:Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right
-
You’re a fucktard. It doesn’t say seize and redistribute wealth. Idiot. The “uniform” part is what makes your favorite wack jobs proposal to tax wealth unconstitutional.TheKobeStopper said: -
MikeDamone said:
You’re a fucktard. It doesn’t say seize and redistribute wealth. Idiot. The “uniform” part is what makes your favorite wack jobs proposal to tax wealth unconstitutional.TheKobeStopper said:
Answered!TheKobeStopper said:
A progressive tax is uniform.greenblood said:Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right
-
Thanks for proving me right, dumbshit.TheKobeStopper said:MikeDamone said:
You’re a fucktard. It doesn’t say seize and redistribute wealth. Idiot. The “uniform” part is what makes your favorite wack jobs proposal to tax wealth unconstitutional.TheKobeStopper said:
Answered!TheKobeStopper said:
A progressive tax is uniform.greenblood said:Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right
-
The term general welfare in 1789 didn't mean providing free sh*t to state residents. That was the state's choice. General welfare related to welfare of the US as a country, like roads, mail etc. The Constitution provides explicit examples of what the limited powers of the federal government consist of. But leftards have no interest in a written document limiting the power of the state.Sledog said:
.TheKobeStopper said:
How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; -
Well armed militia, anyone?WestlinnDuck said:
The term general welfare in 1789 didn't mean providing free sh*t to state residents. That was the state's choice. General welfare related to welfare of the US as a country, like roads, mail etc. The Constitution provides explicit examples of what the limited powers of the federal government consist of. But leftards have no interest in a written document limiting the power of the state.Sledog said:
.TheKobeStopper said:
How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; -
Agree to disagree.MikeDamone said:
Thanks for proving me right, dumbshit.TheKobeStopper said:MikeDamone said:
You’re a fucktard. It doesn’t say seize and redistribute wealth. Idiot. The “uniform” part is what makes your favorite wack jobs proposal to tax wealth unconstitutional.TheKobeStopper said:
Answered!TheKobeStopper said:
A progressive tax is uniform.greenblood said:Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right
-
Kobe fighting it out with the Dazzler for ignorant motherfucker of the day honors.TheKobeStopper said:
Well armed militia, anyone?WestlinnDuck said:
The term general welfare in 1789 didn't mean providing free sh*t to state residents. That was the state's choice. General welfare related to welfare of the US as a country, like roads, mail etc. The Constitution provides explicit examples of what the limited powers of the federal government consist of. But leftards have no interest in a written document limiting the power of the state.Sledog said:
.TheKobeStopper said:
How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; -
No it's not. Uniform is far from progressive. And that's state to state. Show me where the constitution says higher percentage for higher income. I'll wait.TheKobeStopper said:Sledog said:
.TheKobeStopper said:
How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.
Answered!TheKobeStopper said:
A progressive tax is uniform.greenblood said:Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right
-
Clash of the titans.PurpleThrobber said:
Kobe fighting it out with the Dazzler for ignorant motherfucker of the day honors.TheKobeStopper said:
Well armed militia, anyone?WestlinnDuck said:
The term general welfare in 1789 didn't mean providing free sh*t to state residents. That was the state's choice. General welfare related to welfare of the US as a country, like roads, mail etc. The Constitution provides explicit examples of what the limited powers of the federal government consist of. But leftards have no interest in a written document limiting the power of the state.Sledog said:
.TheKobeStopper said:
How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; -
With a progressive tax everyone is subject to the exact same tax rates. I would pay the same percentage for income over a million that Elon Musk would pay. And he would pay the same percentage on the first $50,000 that I would pay. It is the same, in all cases, the definition of uniform.Sledog said:
No it's not. Uniform is far from progressive. And that's state to state. Show me where the constitution says higher percentage for higher income. I'll wait.TheKobeStopper said:Sledog said:
.TheKobeStopper said:
How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.
Answered!TheKobeStopper said:
A progressive tax is uniform.greenblood said:Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right
The real problem with your argument is the logic of it suggests that a flat tax would also be unconstitutional. Because if the tax rate is 10% and I make $10 and you make $100 then you’re paying more. You’d make more and you’d pay more which you are currently defining as not uniform.
So if a flat tax is unconstitutional and a progressive tax in unconstitutional, kinda makes you wonder why they bothered to make taxes constitutional. If I didn’t know any better, I’d say you’re just wrong. -
Sounds like you have everything you need to pass further taxation. Go for it.
-
If we've moved on to taxes and economis prowess
-
NoTheKobeStopper said:
With a progressive tax everyone is subject to the exact same tax rates. I would pay the same percentage for income over a million that Elon Musk would pay. And he would pay the same percentage on the first $50,000 that I would pay. It is the same, in all cases, the definition of uniform.Sledog said:
No it's not. Uniform is far from progressive. And that's state to state. Show me where the constitution says higher percentage for higher income. I'll wait.TheKobeStopper said:Sledog said:
.TheKobeStopper said:
How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.
Answered!TheKobeStopper said:
A progressive tax is uniform.greenblood said:Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right
The real problem with your argument is the logic of it suggests that a flat tax would also be unconstitutional. Because if the tax rate is 10% and I make $10 and you make $100 then you’re paying more. You’d make more and you’d pay more which you are currently defining as not uniform.
So if a flat tax is unconstitutional and a progressive tax in unconstitutional, kinda makes you wonder why they bothered to make taxes constitutional. If I didn’t know any better, I’d say you’re just wrong. -
So it means it’s working when prices go down. And also means it’s working when they go up.hardhat said:If we've moved on to taxes and economis prowess
-
Progressive tax is unequal treatment under the law just like what you claim is happening to minorities. You are dumb.TheKobeStopper said:
With a progressive tax everyone is subject to the exact same tax rates. I would pay the same percentage for income over a million that Elon Musk would pay. And he would pay the same percentage on the first $50,000 that I would pay. It is the same, in all cases, the definition of uniform.Sledog said:
No it's not. Uniform is far from progressive. And that's state to state. Show me where the constitution says higher percentage for higher income. I'll wait.TheKobeStopper said:Sledog said:
.TheKobeStopper said:
How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.
Answered!TheKobeStopper said:
A progressive tax is uniform.greenblood said:Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right
The real problem with your argument is the logic of it suggests that a flat tax would also be unconstitutional. Because if the tax rate is 10% and I make $10 and you make $100 then you’re paying more. You’d make more and you’d pay more which you are currently defining as not uniform.
So if a flat tax is unconstitutional and a progressive tax in unconstitutional, kinda makes you wonder why they bothered to make taxes constitutional. If I didn’t know any better, I’d say you’re just wrong. -
Right. The unvaccinated are like Jews during the Holocaust and rich people paying taxes make them just like black people.Sledog said:
Progressive tax is unequal treatment under the law just like what you claim is happening to minorities. You are dumb.TheKobeStopper said:
With a progressive tax everyone is subject to the exact same tax rates. I would pay the same percentage for income over a million that Elon Musk would pay. And he would pay the same percentage on the first $50,000 that I would pay. It is the same, in all cases, the definition of uniform.Sledog said:
No it's not. Uniform is far from progressive. And that's state to state. Show me where the constitution says higher percentage for higher income. I'll wait.TheKobeStopper said:Sledog said:
.TheKobeStopper said:
How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.
Answered!TheKobeStopper said:
A progressive tax is uniform.greenblood said:Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right
The real problem with your argument is the logic of it suggests that a flat tax would also be unconstitutional. Because if the tax rate is 10% and I make $10 and you make $100 then you’re paying more. You’d make more and you’d pay more which you are currently defining as not uniform.
So if a flat tax is unconstitutional and a progressive tax in unconstitutional, kinda makes you wonder why they bothered to make taxes constitutional. If I didn’t know any better, I’d say you’re just wrong. -
NoTheKobeStopper said:
Right. The unvaccinated are like Jews during the Holocaust and rich people paying taxes make them just like black people.Sledog said:
Progressive tax is unequal treatment under the law just like what you claim is happening to minorities. You are dumb.TheKobeStopper said:
With a progressive tax everyone is subject to the exact same tax rates. I would pay the same percentage for income over a million that Elon Musk would pay. And he would pay the same percentage on the first $50,000 that I would pay. It is the same, in all cases, the definition of uniform.Sledog said:
No it's not. Uniform is far from progressive. And that's state to state. Show me where the constitution says higher percentage for higher income. I'll wait.TheKobeStopper said:Sledog said:
.TheKobeStopper said:
How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.
Answered!TheKobeStopper said:
A progressive tax is uniform.greenblood said:Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right
The real problem with your argument is the logic of it suggests that a flat tax would also be unconstitutional. Because if the tax rate is 10% and I make $10 and you make $100 then you’re paying more. You’d make more and you’d pay more which you are currently defining as not uniform.
So if a flat tax is unconstitutional and a progressive tax in unconstitutional, kinda makes you wonder why they bothered to make taxes constitutional. If I didn’t know any better, I’d say you’re just wrong. -
No,,you’re wrong. And ignorant.TheKobeStopper said:
Agree to disagree.MikeDamone said:
Thanks for proving me right, dumbshit.TheKobeStopper said:MikeDamone said:
You’re a fucktard. It doesn’t say seize and redistribute wealth. Idiot. The “uniform” part is what makes your favorite wack jobs proposal to tax wealth unconstitutional.TheKobeStopper said:
Answered!TheKobeStopper said:
A progressive tax is uniform.greenblood said:Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right
-
Death taxhardhat said:I support a tax on progressives
-
TKS doesn't know the constitution. Who'd have thought.................
-
He hasn't read it - it's too long for a tweet, especially after you finish typing RACIST a few times to get attentionSledog said:TKS doesn't know the constitution. Who'd have thought.................
