Conservatives hate the constitution part 1

TheKobeStopper

https://twitter.com/cons_owned/status/1463216624509636618

hardhat

Lefties can't meme, exhibit 1,000,000

46XiJCAB

Sorry, I don’t pay attention to old POS Commies.

I.

Just.

Don’t.

Kobe

greenblood

Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right

RaceBannon

TheKobeStopper

greenblood said:

Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right

A progressive tax is uniform.

Sledog

TheKobeStopper said:

https://twitter.com/cons_owned/status/1463216624509636618

.

How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.

hardhat

I support a tax on progressives

TheKobeStopper

Sledog said:

TheKobeStopper said:

https://twitter.com/cons_owned/status/1463216624509636618

.

How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.

TheKobeStopper said:

greenblood said:

Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right

A progressive tax is uniform.

Answered!

MikeDamone

TheKobeStopper said:

https://twitter.com/cons_owned/status/1463216624509636618

You’re a fucktard. It doesn’t say seize and redistribute wealth. Idiot. The “uniform” part is what makes your favorite wack jobs proposal to tax wealth unconstitutional.

TheKobeStopper

MikeDamone said:

TheKobeStopper said:

https://twitter.com/cons_owned/status/1463216624509636618

You’re a fucktard. It doesn’t say seize and redistribute wealth. Idiot. The “uniform” part is what makes your favorite wack jobs proposal to tax wealth unconstitutional.

TheKobeStopper said:

greenblood said:

Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right

A progressive tax is uniform.

Answered!

MikeDamone

TheKobeStopper said:

MikeDamone said:

TheKobeStopper said:

https://twitter.com/cons_owned/status/1463216624509636618

You’re a fucktard. It doesn’t say seize and redistribute wealth. Idiot. The “uniform” part is what makes your favorite wack jobs proposal to tax wealth unconstitutional.

TheKobeStopper said:

greenblood said:

Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right

A progressive tax is uniform.

Answered!

Thanks for proving me right, dumbshit.

WestlinnDuck

Sledog said:

TheKobeStopper said:

https://twitter.com/cons_owned/status/1463216624509636618

.

How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.

The term general welfare in 1789 didn't mean providing free sh*t to state residents. That was the state's choice. General welfare related to welfare of the US as a country, like roads, mail etc. The Constitution provides explicit examples of what the limited powers of the federal government consist of. But leftards have no interest in a written document limiting the power of the state.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

TheKobeStopper

WestlinnDuck said:

Sledog said:

TheKobeStopper said:

https://twitter.com/cons_owned/status/1463216624509636618

.

How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.

The term general welfare in 1789 didn't mean providing free sh*t to state residents. That was the state's choice. General welfare related to welfare of the US as a country, like roads, mail etc. The Constitution provides explicit examples of what the limited powers of the federal government consist of. But leftards have no interest in a written document limiting the power of the state.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

Well armed militia, anyone?

TheKobeStopper

MikeDamone said:

TheKobeStopper said:

MikeDamone said:

TheKobeStopper said:

https://twitter.com/cons_owned/status/1463216624509636618

You’re a fucktard. It doesn’t say seize and redistribute wealth. Idiot. The “uniform” part is what makes your favorite wack jobs proposal to tax wealth unconstitutional.

TheKobeStopper said:

greenblood said:

Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right

A progressive tax is uniform.

Answered!

Thanks for proving me right, dumbshit.

Agree to disagree.

PurpleThrobber

TheKobeStopper said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Sledog said:

TheKobeStopper said:

https://twitter.com/cons_owned/status/1463216624509636618

.

How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.

The term general welfare in 1789 didn't mean providing free sh*t to state residents. That was the state's choice. General welfare related to welfare of the US as a country, like roads, mail etc. The Constitution provides explicit examples of what the limited powers of the federal government consist of. But leftards have no interest in a written document limiting the power of the state.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

Well armed militia, anyone?

Kobe fighting it out with the Dazzler for ignorant motherfucker of the day honors.

Sledog

TheKobeStopper said:

Sledog said:

TheKobeStopper said:

https://twitter.com/cons_owned/status/1463216624509636618

.

How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.

TheKobeStopper said:

greenblood said:

Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right

A progressive tax is uniform.

Answered!

No it's not. Uniform is far from progressive. And that's state to state. Show me where the constitution says higher percentage for higher income. I'll wait.

TheKobeStopper

PurpleThrobber said:

TheKobeStopper said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Sledog said:

TheKobeStopper said:

https://twitter.com/cons_owned/status/1463216624509636618

.

How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.

The term general welfare in 1789 didn't mean providing free sh*t to state residents. That was the state's choice. General welfare related to welfare of the US as a country, like roads, mail etc. The Constitution provides explicit examples of what the limited powers of the federal government consist of. But leftards have no interest in a written document limiting the power of the state.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

Well armed militia, anyone?

Kobe fighting it out with the Dazzler for ignorant motherfucker of the day honors.

Clash of the titans.

TheKobeStopper

Sledog said:

TheKobeStopper said:

Sledog said:

TheKobeStopper said:

https://twitter.com/cons_owned/status/1463216624509636618

.

How that tax equality working out? Then the rich should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else. No one can find the "tax the wealthy" shit in the constitution as it doesn't exist.
We didn't have personal income taxes the government was supposed to run on tariffs etc.

TheKobeStopper said:

greenblood said:

Sweet…does that mean we get a flat tax rate? Oh, that’s right

A progressive tax is uniform.

Answered!

No it's not. Uniform is far from progressive. And that's state to state. Show me where the constitution says higher percentage for higher income. I'll wait.

With a progressive tax everyone is subject to the exact same tax rates. I would pay the same percentage for income over a million that Elon Musk would pay. And he would pay the same percentage on the first $50,000 that I would pay. It is the same, in all cases, the definition of uniform.

The real problem with your argument is the logic of it suggests that a flat tax would also be unconstitutional. Because if the tax rate is 10% and I make $10 and you make $100 then you’re paying more. You’d make more and you’d pay more which you are currently defining as not uniform.

So if a flat tax is unconstitutional and a progressive tax in unconstitutional, kinda makes you wonder why they bothered to make taxes constitutional. If I didn’t know any better, I’d say you’re just wrong.

UW_Doog_Bot

Sounds like you have everything you need to pass further taxation. Go for it.

hardhat

If we've moved on to taxes and economis prowess

https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1410709115333234691?s=20