Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Rittenhouse verdict
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Gavin doesn't like his Fuhrer complex questioned or opposed.RaceBannon said:Gavin wants in on the stupid
-
Don't they have TV's down at the Tool Box?HHusky said:
For some reason it fascinated you ladies and lots of other people. Not me.WestlinnDuck said:
You clarified nothing with that word salad of yours. Glad you never followed the case. It was so damn complicated what with the video and the eyewitness on one side and all the lying on the other side.HHusky said:
Verdicts happen in cases that I didn't follow closely every day.WestlinnDuck said:The topic of this thread is: Notice how there isn’t a single leftist here supporting this verdict? So, thanks for your post which you felt necessary to make which doesn't change Bob's observations. You suck at this.
"The only comment I think I've ever made related to this case was to agree that the prosecutor was appropriately chastised by the judge."
I support verdicts being entered.
I particularly support jurors acquitting criminal defendants when they have reasonable doubts about their guilt.
So glad I could clarify this for you, Gasbag.
Bray on!
Lots of people follow NASCAR too.
Not really a question of whether it's complicated. -
-
What's the difference between Rittenhouse and Fowchi?
Kyle's shots were effective! -
FYI just saw that the judge for Kyles trail is a democrat. yes a democrat. Of course a democrat in Wisconsin isn't a necessarily Seattle democrat.
Just wanted the BidenBros to know one of their beloved democrats presided over Kyles acquittal.
