Tucker: This is terrifying and unnerving
Comments
-
The evidence of how Rittenhouse acted in the moments leading up to and after the shooting supersede any comments he may have made and any photos he may have taken with whatever groups of people. The evidence clearly shows that during those moments he was not acting with the state of mind of wanting to shoot people unjustifiably. Otherwise he would not have restrained himself from using his gun until people were attacking him and he had nowhere else to run.2001400ex said:Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
Besides, he shot WHITE people who weren't even part of the protest. People who were hurting the protest. The actual peaceful legit protesters were unhappy with the actions of these white men, with some making comments that they're hurting the cause. So even *if* Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, why would that apply to a case where he shot white people that were hurting BLM's cause?
People need to stop seeing the situation as Rittenhouse versus BLM. It's an incorrect perspective that ignores all the nuances.
-
Could someone please tell me what KR meeting with Proud Boys 4 months after the shooting has to do with his state of mind was on the night of the shooting? Hondo, because he is a fucking moron thinks this is some sort of important point.
-
Hondo Bros Prosecution. You're obviously a biased right-winger for making those rioters look bad.
-
The prosecutor gives Hondo a run for his money on being a moron
-
He was a loser child rapist. He would be an alive loser child rapist still if he didn't try to chase Rittenhouse down. Not surprised you are trying to water it down by bringing up it was 18 years ago.2001400ex said:This is what I love about Tucker. He starts off that Roasenbaum is a sex offender who was just released from prison and he ended his life as he lived it, trying to touch kids. No mention that the sex charges were from 18 years prior and he was in a mental hospital for trying to commit suicide (which would actually help his case). He goes straight to the pedophile angle.
And before you guys start screaming "why are you defending Roasenbaum?" Like the idiots you are. I'm not defending him. I'm blasting Tucker for the idiot he is. I think everyone there was in the wrong. Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people? -
Does Hondo always support child rapists or does he only support child rapists who are killed by people he doesn't like?CuntWaffle said:
He was a loser child rapist. He would be an alive loser child rapist still if he didn't try to chase Rittenhouse down. Not surprised you are trying to water it down by bringing up it was 18 years ago.2001400ex said:This is what I love about Tucker. He starts off that Roasenbaum is a sex offender who was just released from prison and he ended his life as he lived it, trying to touch kids. No mention that the sex charges were from 18 years prior and he was in a mental hospital for trying to commit suicide (which would actually help his case). He goes straight to the pedophile angle.
And before you guys start screaming "why are you defending Roasenbaum?" Like the idiots you are. I'm not defending him. I'm blasting Tucker for the idiot he is. I think everyone there was in the wrong. Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people? -
It doesnt. Just like george floyd deserved to be put underground, so did this guy.2001400ex said:Shocking you guys didn't even read my post. You just scream that he's a pedophile and nothing else matters. Like the good Tucker sheep that you are.
-
I agree with most of this (other than the discussion about the color of their skin). No this wasn't proud boys vs blm. It was idiots against idiots. And both sides of the media are sensationalizing the shit they want to get clicks and views.Fenderbender123 said:
The evidence of how Rittenhouse acted in the moments leading up to and after the shooting supersede any comments he may have made and any photos he may have taken with whatever groups of people. The evidence clearly shows that during those moments he was not acting with the state of mind of wanting to shoot people unjustifiably. Otherwise he would not have restrained himself from using his gun until people were attacking him and he had nowhere else to run.2001400ex said:Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
Besides, he shot WHITE people who weren't even part of the protest. People who were hurting the protest. The actual peaceful legit protesters were unhappy with the actions of these white men, with some making comments that they're hurting the cause. So even *if* Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, why would that apply to a case where he shot white people that were hurting BLM's cause?
People need to stop seeing the situation as Rittenhouse versus BLM. It's an incorrect perspective that ignores all the nuances.
I asked those questions for a reason ass you were the first to engage them. Rather than just scream about a pedophile like Tucker sheep do.
Thank you Bob for making my point. Yes him meeting with the proud boys has no bearing on this case. Just like a dude being convicted of an awful crime 18 years ago has no bearing on this case. A point the judge, that you stroke for his ringtone, agrees with.SFGbob said:Could someone please tell me what KR meeting with Proud Boys 4 months after the shooting has to do with his state of mind was on the night of the shooting? Hondo, because he is a fucking moron thinks this is some sort of important point.
He's dead because he threw a plastic bag at a dude with a gun. But you get all riled up cause he's a pedophile like the sheep that you are. -
Well they have a narrative to sell... and it is disgustingSwaye said:It's crazy to see all the levers of power align against a kid who was being attacked by three criminal adults and defended himself from a violent mob. This is America in 2021. Live in cities at your own peril. None of this bullshit would go down in rural VA. I'll never live in a city again and rarely visit them.
-
Yup, just like the stl couple charged... pure bsSledog said:They don't want people to see Americans defend themselves and their communities against communist aggression. People might get ideas. If they just look at gun and ammo sales they might figure out we already know what they are up to. But they are HHHondo dumb.
