Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
The evidence of how Rittenhouse acted in the moments leading up to and after the shooting supersede any comments he may have made and any photos he may have taken with whatever groups of people. The evidence clearly shows that during those moments he was not acting with the state of mind of wanting to shoot people unjustifiably. Otherwise he would not have restrained himself from using his gun until people were attacking him and he had nowhere else to run.
Besides, he shot WHITE people who weren't even part of the protest. People who were hurting the protest. The actual peaceful legit protesters were unhappy with the actions of these white men, with some making comments that they're hurting the cause. So even *if* Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, why would that apply to a case where he shot white people that were hurting BLM's cause?
People need to stop seeing the situation as Rittenhouse versus BLM. It's an incorrect perspective that ignores all the nuances.
Could someone please tell me what KR meeting with Proud Boys 4 months after the shooting has to do with his state of mind was on the night of the shooting? Hondo, because he is a fucking moron thinks this is some sort of important point.
This is what I love about Tucker. He starts off that Roasenbaum is a sex offender who was just released from prison and he ended his life as he lived it, trying to touch kids. No mention that the sex charges were from 18 years prior and he was in a mental hospital for trying to commit suicide (which would actually help his case). He goes straight to the pedophile angle.
And before you guys start screaming "why are you defending Roasenbaum?" Like the idiots you are. I'm not defending him. I'm blasting Tucker for the idiot he is. I think everyone there was in the wrong. Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
He was a loser child rapist. He would be an alive loser child rapist still if he didn't try to chase Rittenhouse down. Not surprised you are trying to water it down by bringing up it was 18 years ago.
This is what I love about Tucker. He starts off that Roasenbaum is a sex offender who was just released from prison and he ended his life as he lived it, trying to touch kids. No mention that the sex charges were from 18 years prior and he was in a mental hospital for trying to commit suicide (which would actually help his case). He goes straight to the pedophile angle.
And before you guys start screaming "why are you defending Roasenbaum?" Like the idiots you are. I'm not defending him. I'm blasting Tucker for the idiot he is. I think everyone there was in the wrong. Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
He was a loser child rapist. He would be an alive loser child rapist still if he didn't try to chase Rittenhouse down. Not surprised you are trying to water it down by bringing up it was 18 years ago.
Does Hondo always support child rapists or does he only support child rapists who are killed by people he doesn't like?
Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
The evidence of how Rittenhouse acted in the moments leading up to and after the shooting supersede any comments he may have made and any photos he may have taken with whatever groups of people. The evidence clearly shows that during those moments he was not acting with the state of mind of wanting to shoot people unjustifiably. Otherwise he would not have restrained himself from using his gun until people were attacking him and he had nowhere else to run.
Besides, he shot WHITE people who weren't even part of the protest. People who were hurting the protest. The actual peaceful legit protesters were unhappy with the actions of these white men, with some making comments that they're hurting the cause. So even *if* Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, why would that apply to a case where he shot white people that were hurting BLM's cause?
People need to stop seeing the situation as Rittenhouse versus BLM. It's an incorrect perspective that ignores all the nuances.
I agree with most of this (other than the discussion about the color of their skin). No this wasn't proud boys vs blm. It was idiots against idiots. And both sides of the media are sensationalizing the shit they want to get clicks and views.
I asked those questions for a reason ass you were the first to engage them. Rather than just scream about a pedophile like Tucker sheep do.
Could someone please tell me what KR meeting with Proud Boys 4 months after the shooting has to do with his state of mind was on the night of the shooting? Hondo, because he is a fucking moron thinks this is some sort of important point.
Thank you Bob for making my point. Yes him meeting with the proud boys has no bearing on this case. Just like a dude being convicted of an awful crime 18 years ago has no bearing on this case. A point the judge, that you stroke for his ringtone, agrees with.
He's dead because he threw a plastic bag at a dude with a gun. But you get all riled up cause he's a pedophile like the sheep that you are.
It's crazy to see all the levers of power align against a kid who was being attacked by three criminal adults and defended himself from a violent mob. This is America in 2021. Live in cities at your own peril. None of this bullshit would go down in rural VA. I'll never live in a city again and rarely visit them.
Well they have a narrative to sell... and it is disgusting
They don't want people to see Americans defend themselves and their communities against communist aggression. People might get ideas. If they just look at gun and ammo sales they might figure out we already know what they are up to. But they are HHHondo dumb.
Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
The evidence of how Rittenhouse acted in the moments leading up to and after the shooting supersede any comments he may have made and any photos he may have taken with whatever groups of people. The evidence clearly shows that during those moments he was not acting with the state of mind of wanting to shoot people unjustifiably. Otherwise he would not have restrained himself from using his gun until people were attacking him and he had nowhere else to run.
Besides, he shot WHITE people who weren't even part of the protest. People who were hurting the protest. The actual peaceful legit protesters were unhappy with the actions of these white men, with some making comments that they're hurting the cause. So even *if* Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, why would that apply to a case where he shot white people that were hurting BLM's cause?
People need to stop seeing the situation as Rittenhouse versus BLM. It's an incorrect perspective that ignores all the nuances.
I agree with most of this (other than the discussion about the color of their skin). No this wasn't proud boys vs blm. It was idiots against idiots. And both sides of the media are sensationalizing the shit they want to get clicks and views.
I asked those questions for a reason ass you were the first to engage them. Rather than just scream about a pedophile like Tucker sheep do.
Could someone please tell me what KR meeting with Proud Boys 4 months after the shooting has to do with his state of mind was on the night of the shooting? Hondo, because he is a fucking moron thinks this is some sort of important point.
Thank you Bob for making my point. Yes him meeting with the proud boys has no bearing on this case. Just like a dude being convicted of an awful crime 18 years ago has no bearing on this case. A point the judge, that you stroke for his ringtone, agrees with.
He's dead because he threw a plastic bag at a dude with a gun. But you get all riled up cause he's a pedophile like the sheep that you are.
Child rapist = picture with Proud Boys to Hondo. Just never accuse a leftard of making weak lame ass moral equivalency arguments.
Who is stroking the judge for his ringtone and what does that have to do with the fact that your upset that three white criminals got shot for trying to kill a 17 year old? Never accuse a leftard of ass phucking strawmen.
This is what I love about Tucker. He starts off that Roasenbaum is a sex offender who was just released from prison and he ended his life as he lived it, trying to touch kids. No mention that the sex charges were from 18 years prior and he was in a mental hospital for trying to commit suicide (which would actually help his case). He goes straight to the pedophile angle.
And before you guys start screaming "why are you defending Roasenbaum?" Like the idiots you are. I'm not defending him. I'm blasting Tucker for the idiot he is. I think everyone there was in the wrong. Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
He was a loser child rapist. He would be an alive loser child rapist still if he didn't try to chase Rittenhouse down. Not surprised you are trying to water it down by bringing up it was 18 years ago.
Here is the irony. If some Christian family had a 17 year old gay kid and then wanted to send him to a conversion camp to turn him into a heterosexual, Hondo would go nuts and tell us you can't change the built in sexual preference of a gay dude. But, having a built in sexual preference to phuck little kids can be cured with a jail sentence and some therapy. Anyone here want a Rosenbaum to baby sit your 10 year old because he hasn't been caught anally raping a little kid in 18 years?
Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
The evidence of how Rittenhouse acted in the moments leading up to and after the shooting supersede any comments he may have made and any photos he may have taken with whatever groups of people. The evidence clearly shows that during those moments he was not acting with the state of mind of wanting to shoot people unjustifiably. Otherwise he would not have restrained himself from using his gun until people were attacking him and he had nowhere else to run.
Besides, he shot WHITE people who weren't even part of the protest. People who were hurting the protest. The actual peaceful legit protesters were unhappy with the actions of these white men, with some making comments that they're hurting the cause. So even *if* Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, why would that apply to a case where he shot white people that were hurting BLM's cause?
People need to stop seeing the situation as Rittenhouse versus BLM. It's an incorrect perspective that ignores all the nuances.
I agree with most of this (other than the discussion about the color of their skin). No this wasn't proud boys vs blm. It was idiots against idiots. And both sides of the media are sensationalizing the shit they want to get clicks and views.
I asked those questions for a reason ass you were the first to engage them. Rather than just scream about a pedophile like Tucker sheep do.
Could someone please tell me what KR meeting with Proud Boys 4 months after the shooting has to do with his state of mind was on the night of the shooting? Hondo, because he is a fucking moron thinks this is some sort of important point.
Thank you Bob for making my point. Yes him meeting with the proud boys has no bearing on this case. Just like a dude being convicted of an awful crime 18 years ago has no bearing on this case. A point the judge, that you stroke for his ringtone, agrees with.
He's dead because he threw a plastic bag at a dude with a gun. But you get all riled up cause he's a pedophile like the sheep that you are.
Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
The evidence of how Rittenhouse acted in the moments leading up to and after the shooting supersede any comments he may have made and any photos he may have taken with whatever groups of people. The evidence clearly shows that during those moments he was not acting with the state of mind of wanting to shoot people unjustifiably. Otherwise he would not have restrained himself from using his gun until people were attacking him and he had nowhere else to run.
Besides, he shot WHITE people who weren't even part of the protest. People who were hurting the protest. The actual peaceful legit protesters were unhappy with the actions of these white men, with some making comments that they're hurting the cause. So even *if* Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, why would that apply to a case where he shot white people that were hurting BLM's cause?
People need to stop seeing the situation as Rittenhouse versus BLM. It's an incorrect perspective that ignores all the nuances.
I agree with most of this (other than the discussion about the color of their skin). No this wasn't proud boys vs blm. It was idiots against idiots. And both sides of the media are sensationalizing the shit they want to get clicks and views.
I asked those questions for a reason ass you were the first to engage them. Rather than just scream about a pedophile like Tucker sheep do.
Could someone please tell me what KR meeting with Proud Boys 4 months after the shooting has to do with his state of mind was on the night of the shooting? Hondo, because he is a fucking moron thinks this is some sort of important point.
Thank you Bob for making my point. Yes him meeting with the proud boys has no bearing on this case. Just like a dude being convicted of an awful crime 18 years ago has no bearing on this case. A point the judge, that you stroke for his ringtone, agrees with.
He's dead because he threw a plastic bag at a dude with a gun. But you get all riled up cause he's a pedophile like the sheep that you are.
Hey strawman ass fucking Kunt, quote where I ever said that the guy you're defending being a pedo had any bearing on the case. I never did. And your claim that you don't believe that the Proud Boys have any bearing on the case is obviously a lie. You never would have asked these questions if you thought that.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
You clearly think those issues are important to this case and aren't being let in for some nefarious reason.
Got to love how Hondo tries to claim I was making his "point" when I expose his stupidity.
Yup.i would if those proud boys would try to kill him... so yes the meme is accurate, but not in how they think
Leftards assume we think like they do. So, we must support their meme that Rittenhouse was a white supremacist that went hunting patriotic leftists who were randomly gunned down. But since we only care about white supremacy we are supporting Rittenhouse. Now if Rittenhouse was black, then we would of course support the innocent white victims and put Kyle away for life.
Comments
Besides, he shot WHITE people who weren't even part of the protest. People who were hurting the protest. The actual peaceful legit protesters were unhappy with the actions of these white men, with some making comments that they're hurting the cause. So even *if* Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, why would that apply to a case where he shot white people that were hurting BLM's cause?
People need to stop seeing the situation as Rittenhouse versus BLM. It's an incorrect perspective that ignores all the nuances.
I asked those questions for a reason ass you were the first to engage them. Rather than just scream about a pedophile like Tucker sheep do. Thank you Bob for making my point. Yes him meeting with the proud boys has no bearing on this case. Just like a dude being convicted of an awful crime 18 years ago has no bearing on this case. A point the judge, that you stroke for his ringtone, agrees with.
He's dead because he threw a plastic bag at a dude with a gun. But you get all riled up cause he's a pedophile like the sheep that you are.
Who is stroking the judge for his ringtone and what does that have to do with the fact that your upset that three white criminals got shot for trying to kill a 17 year old? Never accuse a leftard of ass phucking strawmen.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
You clearly think those issues are important to this case and aren't being let in for some nefarious reason.
Got to love how Hondo tries to claim I was making his "point" when I expose his stupidity.