Tucker: This is terrifying and unnerving
Comments
-
Hey carried a firearm across state lines Man!!!!! Except he didn't but liberals love to lie so they continue to claim that he did.46XiJCAB said:If Hondo were armed and someone grabbed the barrel of his gun. Hondo would let him have it so he could find out what his intentions were. Doesn’t matter the guy threatened to kill him earlier.
If someone took a skateboard to Hondo’s head and Hondo were armed, Hondo would take a few more just to make sure what skateboarders intentions were.
If Hondo were lying on the ground after taking a skateboard to the head and were approached by a man with his hands up, who then suddenly displayed a handgun and aimed it at him. Hondo would wait to see what his intentions were.
But KR shot “multiple” people and he was dumb for being there! FFS, this is the left in a nutshell.
-
He's a piece of shit for sure. And bi polar, etc. Even the judge says his criminal record can't be part of the trial. I'm just saying that Tucker is making that the central part of this case and that's fucktarded. And sheep eat it up.Swaye said:
If you molest 5 boys ages 9-11 you better hope for salvation from God because you will never get it from me. Only thing a piece of trash like that was owed was the death he went looking for and received. It takes a special kind of shit dick, like you, to try to find some way to mitigate the wrongdoings of walking garbage like this child molester piece of shit. Fuck off.2001400ex said:Shocking you guys didn't even read my post. You just scream that he's a pedophile and nothing else matters. Like the good Tucker sheep that you are.
-
Uh, no. The central part of Tucker's case and any normal American with a whit of intelligence is that Kyle defended himself against three garbage individuals who were trying to kill him. The fact that you keep missing the central part of the Rittenhouse case shows you are a lying abnormal anti-American POS.2001400ex said:
He's a piece of shit for sure. And bi polar, etc. Even the judge says his criminal record can't be part of the trial. I'm just saying that Tucker is making that the central part of this case and that's fucktarded. And sheep eat it up.Swaye said:
If you molest 5 boys ages 9-11 you better hope for salvation from God because you will never get it from me. Only thing a piece of trash like that was owed was the death he went looking for and received. It takes a special kind of shit dick, like you, to try to find some way to mitigate the wrongdoings of walking garbage like this child molester piece of shit. Fuck off.2001400ex said:Shocking you guys didn't even read my post. You just scream that he's a pedophile and nothing else matters. Like the good Tucker sheep that you are.
-
Bingo.WestlinnDuck said:
Uh, no. The central part of Tucker's case and any normal American with a whit of intelligence is that Kyle defended himself against three garbage individuals who were trying to kill him. The fact that you keep missing the central part of the Rittenhouse case shows you are a lying abnormal anti-American POS.2001400ex said:
He's a piece of shit for sure. And bi polar, etc. Even the judge says his criminal record can't be part of the trial. I'm just saying that Tucker is making that the central part of this case and that's fucktarded. And sheep eat it up.Swaye said:
If you molest 5 boys ages 9-11 you better hope for salvation from God because you will never get it from me. Only thing a piece of trash like that was owed was the death he went looking for and received. It takes a special kind of shit dick, like you, to try to find some way to mitigate the wrongdoings of walking garbage like this child molester piece of shit. Fuck off.2001400ex said:Shocking you guys didn't even read my post. You just scream that he's a pedophile and nothing else matters. Like the good Tucker sheep that you are.
But Tucker said! -
Create a strawman and then fuck it right in the ass. It's he Hondo way. He isn't making it a "central part of the case." But it is part of the case, and you don't like it when he mentions it. So you dismiss it because it was a long time ago.2001400ex said:
He's a piece of shit for sure. And bi polar, etc. Even the judge says his criminal record can't be part of the trial. I'm just saying that Tucker is making that the central part of this case and that's fucktarded. And sheep eat it up.Swaye said:
If you molest 5 boys ages 9-11 you better hope for salvation from God because you will never get it from me. Only thing a piece of trash like that was owed was the death he went looking for and received. It takes a special kind of shit dick, like you, to try to find some way to mitigate the wrongdoings of walking garbage like this child molester piece of shit. Fuck off.2001400ex said:Shocking you guys didn't even read my post. You just scream that he's a pedophile and nothing else matters. Like the good Tucker sheep that you are.
-
Hondo had two choices
Discuss the merits of the case and make a case based on law for Kyle to be convicted
Scream TUCKER and cry about a pedo being called a pedo and being put down like the shit he was
Hondo chose poorly
I think we are at 8 now -
Hondo discuss the merits of the case? Please!!!!RaceBannon said:Hondo had two choices
Discuss the merits of the case and make a case based on law for Kyle to be convicted
Scream TUCKER and cry about a pedo being called a pedo and being put down like the shit he was
Hondo chose poorly
I think we are at 8 now -
-
I thought this was going to be about the lead prosecutor's 20 year old hair style. What a fucking fag trying to look hip with his fauxhawk doo from the early 2000's. There's a special place in hell for this faggot.
-
The left in a nutshell where KR is concerned.
If you’re someplace they believe you shouldn’t be and you’re armed, you’re an idiot.
If a group of thugs chase you because they don’t like you there and they want to do you harm. That’s apparently okay
You’re a murderer when you rightfully defend yourself with the weapon you have from said thugs.
Their logic is stunning and deeply flawed because they’re conditioned by a narrative that is fed to them daily. -
The evidence of how Rittenhouse acted in the moments leading up to and after the shooting supersede any comments he may have made and any photos he may have taken with whatever groups of people. The evidence clearly shows that during those moments he was not acting with the state of mind of wanting to shoot people unjustifiably. Otherwise he would not have restrained himself from using his gun until people were attacking him and he had nowhere else to run.2001400ex said:Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
Besides, he shot WHITE people who weren't even part of the protest. People who were hurting the protest. The actual peaceful legit protesters were unhappy with the actions of these white men, with some making comments that they're hurting the cause. So even *if* Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, why would that apply to a case where he shot white people that were hurting BLM's cause?
People need to stop seeing the situation as Rittenhouse versus BLM. It's an incorrect perspective that ignores all the nuances.
-
Could someone please tell me what KR meeting with Proud Boys 4 months after the shooting has to do with his state of mind was on the night of the shooting? Hondo, because he is a fucking moron thinks this is some sort of important point.
-
Hondo Bros Prosecution. You're obviously a biased right-winger for making those rioters look bad.
-
The prosecutor gives Hondo a run for his money on being a moron
-
He was a loser child rapist. He would be an alive loser child rapist still if he didn't try to chase Rittenhouse down. Not surprised you are trying to water it down by bringing up it was 18 years ago.2001400ex said:This is what I love about Tucker. He starts off that Roasenbaum is a sex offender who was just released from prison and he ended his life as he lived it, trying to touch kids. No mention that the sex charges were from 18 years prior and he was in a mental hospital for trying to commit suicide (which would actually help his case). He goes straight to the pedophile angle.
And before you guys start screaming "why are you defending Roasenbaum?" Like the idiots you are. I'm not defending him. I'm blasting Tucker for the idiot he is. I think everyone there was in the wrong. Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people? -
Does Hondo always support child rapists or does he only support child rapists who are killed by people he doesn't like?CuntWaffle said:
He was a loser child rapist. He would be an alive loser child rapist still if he didn't try to chase Rittenhouse down. Not surprised you are trying to water it down by bringing up it was 18 years ago.2001400ex said:This is what I love about Tucker. He starts off that Roasenbaum is a sex offender who was just released from prison and he ended his life as he lived it, trying to touch kids. No mention that the sex charges were from 18 years prior and he was in a mental hospital for trying to commit suicide (which would actually help his case). He goes straight to the pedophile angle.
And before you guys start screaming "why are you defending Roasenbaum?" Like the idiots you are. I'm not defending him. I'm blasting Tucker for the idiot he is. I think everyone there was in the wrong. Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people? -
It doesnt. Just like george floyd deserved to be put underground, so did this guy.2001400ex said:Shocking you guys didn't even read my post. You just scream that he's a pedophile and nothing else matters. Like the good Tucker sheep that you are.
-
I agree with most of this (other than the discussion about the color of their skin). No this wasn't proud boys vs blm. It was idiots against idiots. And both sides of the media are sensationalizing the shit they want to get clicks and views.Fenderbender123 said:
The evidence of how Rittenhouse acted in the moments leading up to and after the shooting supersede any comments he may have made and any photos he may have taken with whatever groups of people. The evidence clearly shows that during those moments he was not acting with the state of mind of wanting to shoot people unjustifiably. Otherwise he would not have restrained himself from using his gun until people were attacking him and he had nowhere else to run.2001400ex said:Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
Besides, he shot WHITE people who weren't even part of the protest. People who were hurting the protest. The actual peaceful legit protesters were unhappy with the actions of these white men, with some making comments that they're hurting the cause. So even *if* Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, why would that apply to a case where he shot white people that were hurting BLM's cause?
People need to stop seeing the situation as Rittenhouse versus BLM. It's an incorrect perspective that ignores all the nuances.
I asked those questions for a reason ass you were the first to engage them. Rather than just scream about a pedophile like Tucker sheep do.
Thank you Bob for making my point. Yes him meeting with the proud boys has no bearing on this case. Just like a dude being convicted of an awful crime 18 years ago has no bearing on this case. A point the judge, that you stroke for his ringtone, agrees with.SFGbob said:Could someone please tell me what KR meeting with Proud Boys 4 months after the shooting has to do with his state of mind was on the night of the shooting? Hondo, because he is a fucking moron thinks this is some sort of important point.
He's dead because he threw a plastic bag at a dude with a gun. But you get all riled up cause he's a pedophile like the sheep that you are. -
Well they have a narrative to sell... and it is disgustingSwaye said:It's crazy to see all the levers of power align against a kid who was being attacked by three criminal adults and defended himself from a violent mob. This is America in 2021. Live in cities at your own peril. None of this bullshit would go down in rural VA. I'll never live in a city again and rarely visit them.
-
Yup, just like the stl couple charged... pure bsSledog said:They don't want people to see Americans defend themselves and their communities against communist aggression. People might get ideas. If they just look at gun and ammo sales they might figure out we already know what they are up to. But they are HHHondo dumb.
-
Child rapist = picture with Proud Boys to Hondo. Just never accuse a leftard of making weak lame ass moral equivalency arguments.2001400ex said:
I agree with most of this (other than the discussion about the color of their skin). No this wasn't proud boys vs blm. It was idiots against idiots. And both sides of the media are sensationalizing the shit they want to get clicks and views.Fenderbender123 said:
The evidence of how Rittenhouse acted in the moments leading up to and after the shooting supersede any comments he may have made and any photos he may have taken with whatever groups of people. The evidence clearly shows that during those moments he was not acting with the state of mind of wanting to shoot people unjustifiably. Otherwise he would not have restrained himself from using his gun until people were attacking him and he had nowhere else to run.2001400ex said:Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
Besides, he shot WHITE people who weren't even part of the protest. People who were hurting the protest. The actual peaceful legit protesters were unhappy with the actions of these white men, with some making comments that they're hurting the cause. So even *if* Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, why would that apply to a case where he shot white people that were hurting BLM's cause?
People need to stop seeing the situation as Rittenhouse versus BLM. It's an incorrect perspective that ignores all the nuances.
I asked those questions for a reason ass you were the first to engage them. Rather than just scream about a pedophile like Tucker sheep do.
Thank you Bob for making my point. Yes him meeting with the proud boys has no bearing on this case. Just like a dude being convicted of an awful crime 18 years ago has no bearing on this case. A point the judge, that you stroke for his ringtone, agrees with.SFGbob said:Could someone please tell me what KR meeting with Proud Boys 4 months after the shooting has to do with his state of mind was on the night of the shooting? Hondo, because he is a fucking moron thinks this is some sort of important point.
He's dead because he threw a plastic bag at a dude with a gun. But you get all riled up cause he's a pedophile like the sheep that you are.
Who is stroking the judge for his ringtone and what does that have to do with the fact that your upset that three white criminals got shot for trying to kill a 17 year old? Never accuse a leftard of ass phucking strawmen. -
Here is the irony. If some Christian family had a 17 year old gay kid and then wanted to send him to a conversion camp to turn him into a heterosexual, Hondo would go nuts and tell us you can't change the built in sexual preference of a gay dude. But, having a built in sexual preference to phuck little kids can be cured with a jail sentence and some therapy. Anyone here want a Rosenbaum to baby sit your 10 year old because he hasn't been caught anally raping a little kid in 18 years?CuntWaffle said:
He was a loser child rapist. He would be an alive loser child rapist still if he didn't try to chase Rittenhouse down. Not surprised you are trying to water it down by bringing up it was 18 years ago.2001400ex said:This is what I love about Tucker. He starts off that Roasenbaum is a sex offender who was just released from prison and he ended his life as he lived it, trying to touch kids. No mention that the sex charges were from 18 years prior and he was in a mental hospital for trying to commit suicide (which would actually help his case). He goes straight to the pedophile angle.
And before you guys start screaming "why are you defending Roasenbaum?" Like the idiots you are. I'm not defending him. I'm blasting Tucker for the idiot he is. I think everyone there was in the wrong. Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people? -
And thats all folks2001400ex said:
I agree with most of this (other than the discussion about the color of their skin). No this wasn't proud boys vs blm. It was idiots against idiots. And both sides of the media are sensationalizing the shit they want to get clicks and views.Fenderbender123 said:
The evidence of how Rittenhouse acted in the moments leading up to and after the shooting supersede any comments he may have made and any photos he may have taken with whatever groups of people. The evidence clearly shows that during those moments he was not acting with the state of mind of wanting to shoot people unjustifiably. Otherwise he would not have restrained himself from using his gun until people were attacking him and he had nowhere else to run.2001400ex said:Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
Besides, he shot WHITE people who weren't even part of the protest. People who were hurting the protest. The actual peaceful legit protesters were unhappy with the actions of these white men, with some making comments that they're hurting the cause. So even *if* Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, why would that apply to a case where he shot white people that were hurting BLM's cause?
People need to stop seeing the situation as Rittenhouse versus BLM. It's an incorrect perspective that ignores all the nuances.
I asked those questions for a reason ass you were the first to engage them. Rather than just scream about a pedophile like Tucker sheep do.
Thank you Bob for making my point. Yes him meeting with the proud boys has no bearing on this case. Just like a dude being convicted of an awful crime 18 years ago has no bearing on this case. A point the judge, that you stroke for his ringtone, agrees with.SFGbob said:Could someone please tell me what KR meeting with Proud Boys 4 months after the shooting has to do with his state of mind was on the night of the shooting? Hondo, because he is a fucking moron thinks this is some sort of important point.
He's dead because he threw a plastic bag at a dude with a gun. But you get all riled up cause he's a pedophile like the sheep that you are. -
It seems like this 20014ex creep wants to tell us they fuck sheep.
-
Hey strawman ass fucking Kunt, quote where I ever said that the guy you're defending being a pedo had any bearing on the case. I never did. And your claim that you don't believe that the Proud Boys have any bearing on the case is obviously a lie. You never would have asked these questions if you thought that.2001400ex said:
I agree with most of this (other than the discussion about the color of their skin). No this wasn't proud boys vs blm. It was idiots against idiots. And both sides of the media are sensationalizing the shit they want to get clicks and views.Fenderbender123 said:
The evidence of how Rittenhouse acted in the moments leading up to and after the shooting supersede any comments he may have made and any photos he may have taken with whatever groups of people. The evidence clearly shows that during those moments he was not acting with the state of mind of wanting to shoot people unjustifiably. Otherwise he would not have restrained himself from using his gun until people were attacking him and he had nowhere else to run.2001400ex said:Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there looking to shoot someone and the others shouldn't have agitated a dude with a gun.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
Besides, he shot WHITE people who weren't even part of the protest. People who were hurting the protest. The actual peaceful legit protesters were unhappy with the actions of these white men, with some making comments that they're hurting the cause. So even *if* Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, why would that apply to a case where he shot white people that were hurting BLM's cause?
People need to stop seeing the situation as Rittenhouse versus BLM. It's an incorrect perspective that ignores all the nuances.
I asked those questions for a reason ass you were the first to engage them. Rather than just scream about a pedophile like Tucker sheep do.
Thank you Bob for making my point. Yes him meeting with the proud boys has no bearing on this case. Just like a dude being convicted of an awful crime 18 years ago has no bearing on this case. A point the judge, that you stroke for his ringtone, agrees with.SFGbob said:Could someone please tell me what KR meeting with Proud Boys 4 months after the shooting has to do with his state of mind was on the night of the shooting? Hondo, because he is a fucking moron thinks this is some sort of important point.
He's dead because he threw a plastic bag at a dude with a gun. But you get all riled up cause he's a pedophile like the sheep that you are.
That being said, why can't prosecutors call the deceased "victims"? Why can't they show pictures of him with proud boys? And why can't protectors show the video before the trial of him saying he wanted to shoot people?
You clearly think those issues are important to this case and aren't being let in for some nefarious reason.
Got to love how Hondo tries to claim I was making his "point" when I expose his stupidity.
-
Dazzler is still in the lead by quite a bit.RaceBannon said:The prosecutor gives Hondo a run for his money on being a moron
-
Yup.i would if those proud boys would try to kill him... so yes the meme is accurate, but not in how they thinkRaceBannon said:This is team hondo in action
-
Leftards assume we think like they do. So, we must support their meme that Rittenhouse was a white supremacist that went hunting patriotic leftists who were randomly gunned down. But since we only care about white supremacy we are supporting Rittenhouse. Now if Rittenhouse was black, then we would of course support the innocent white victims and put Kyle away for life.Goduckies said:
Yup.i would if those proud boys would try to kill him... so yes the meme is accurate, but not in how they thinkRaceBannon said:This is team hondo in action
-
Did somebody call for the Proud Boys? Antifa fag need his ass kicked?
