Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Official invite from Softy Mahler via twitter

1…68101112

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    I'm not willing to step across that line ...

    There were very clear reasons to be critical of Keith as a QB good enough to get you to a mediocre level (say 5-4) in the conference but not to a championship.

    Being critical of Russell Wilson because of his "height" isn't that huge of a reach. The miss with him was that his intangibles are off the chart and that there's a part of him that is revolutionizing the QB position. It was very obvious very quickly that Wilson was going to be a championship winning QB once on the NFL field ... even Huge agreed with that quickly.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    edited March 2014
    Tequilla said:

    If you look at the Honks, you see where each have their shtick ...

    Hugh is the former player that is the stat geek and has the tendency to fly off the handle at mediocrity.. he's not willing to settle

    Dick is the protector of coaches but knows that a good program is built off of sound recruiting and player development ... his biggest fault is that he thinks that all coaches are capable of that

    Softy is the cheerleader that runs the emotions of whatever is going on at the time. When things are good, he's jumping up and down. When not so good, he's as pissed as anybody. In the grand scheme of things, the bottom line is that Softy is unable to separate his emotions from his opinions.


    Under Ty he would but under Sark he never once did. He would always state that Sark is doing things the right way and is better than Ty. He was enabling mediocrity if anything.

    Fuck Hugh! Seriously fuck him! He's the worst of the three IMO because he should know better. Like you said Baird is the Doog coach homer, Softy is fucking retarded. Hugh never once questioned Sark's job. He was always quick to blame it on Price.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Tequilla said:

    I'm not willing to step across that line ...

    There were very clear reasons to be critical of Keith Sark as a QB HC good enough to get you to a mediocre level (say 5-4) in the conference but not to a championship.

    Fixed and yea he never once questioned Sark. Not once.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,116 Standard Supporter
    Sarkingham said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    dnc said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    After battling on twitter all night where he said stuff like Sark went from 0-12 to 9-4. He challenged me and anyone in here to meet him in person to chat to HIS FACE!!!!

    Dave Softy Mahler ‏@Softykjr 11m
    @NegaDawg I'll tell u what. Open invite to you and every other "HHB" who would like to sit down in person. Until then I'll assume you'd...

    Dave Softy Mahler ‏@Softykjr 11m
    @NegaDawg ..rather just hide behind your Twitter account.

    Dave Softy Mahler ‏@Softykjr 9m
    @NegaDawg and if u want to play it that way, you've just given all HHB's a bad name. Met Rip Ty in Vegas. Only one.

    Dave Softy Mahler ‏@Softykjr 7m
    @NegaDawg nope. Just met him in Vegas. Good dude. No problem with him. None

    Sounds like Cheers has actually met him. Could be interesting. Speaking for myself I don't plan on meeting up with him for drinks as I don't care to. For those who do though here is the invite. For Road,Chest and Little Jimmy here is a chance to possibly set up an interview with him.

    I'm there as long as Softy's buying. I hear he's loaded.

    Of course, he's a Jew.
    ($75k)?!?!? Or does that fall under the
    15-yard unsportsmanlike category?

    Ich glaube, es ist Fülle.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    Granted I probably don't listen to Hugh as much as others do, but I could have sworn that I've heard him say on a few instances that the program should have been in a better position and that by the end of last year that while he wasn't directly coming out and saying that Sark should be fired, he wasn't offering up a lot of support for him. The best support he was giving was "he's better than Tyrone" ... which is far from a ringing endorsement.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Tequilla said:

    Granted I probably don't listen to Hugh as much as others do, but I could have sworn that I've heard him say on a few instances that the program should have been in a better position and that by the end of last year that while he wasn't directly coming out and saying that Sark should be fired, he wasn't offering up a lot of support for him. The best support he was giving was "he's better than Tyrone" ... which is far from a ringing endorsement.

    After UCLA loss he was still talking about how Sark is "doing things the right way" and he's just not ready to say he needs to be replaced. Then started trashing on Ty to show how "far" we've came under Sark.

    I have no doubts Hugh believed in Sark.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    allpurpleallgold said:

    I like the combination of "Sark left the program in better shape" and "OMG things were so fucking terrible we went 0-12 and had the worst roster ever" arguments. Who wasn't going to leave the program in better shape under those conditions?

    THIS

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    allpurpleallgold said:

    I like the combination of "Sark left the program in better shape" and "OMG things were so fucking terrible we went 0-12 and had the worst roster ever" arguments. Who wasn't going to leave the program in better shape under those conditions?

    By that shit tier argument of leaving the program in better shape than he inherited you could say Ty did his job since there was more talent in 2009 roster than 2005.

    That argument is fucktarded and pulling an AuburnDoog. If someone told you at that initial KICK ASS presser Sark would go 34-29, 31-29 vs FBS, 19-17 vs conference and have his best season be 5-4 in conference play you would have said that was a failure.

    Yet Doogs now move the Goal Posts and say shit like "well the program is better off than when he got here. We were 0-12 what did you expect? "
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter