Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The Kraken has been released
Comments
-
Poly Sci is actually a fairly common major for pre-law undergrads, at least it was at UO when I was there.MelloDawg said:
I love that you were a political science major.Goduckies said:
Yup my really good professor at Oregon hated vote by mail because of the fraud potential... he may have been a liberal, but he was a good liberal.... it also is ripe to coercion as well...Swaye said:
I don't want fraud on either side. Mail in voting allows the possibility of fraud on both sides. I've never claimed otherwise. That's why I like in person with ID voting. That system can be tricked as well, but it at least makes it a bit more difficult.TheKobeStopper said:
Your bravery in believing that voter fraud happens sometimes is noted.Swaye said:
I have always been consistent that while I do not know how much or how little fraud is occurring, SOME amount is occurring, and mail in voting only exacerbates that problem. To not see how sending millions of ballots out to addresses, and then expecting that all those ballots are only filled out by the prescribed person in accordance with the law is naive in the extreme. It invites fraud. The future with mail in voting does possess the potential for MASSIVE amounts of voter fraud. Will it happen? I don't know. But I am in the camp that says you shouldn't open the door to find out. Again, I have always been consistent in this opinion, and have absolutely no idea how those firmly held beliefs could be construed as cowardly.TheKobeStopper said:
As shocking as Race’s turn to full blown fascist has been, I gotta say, I’m most disappointed with you becoming an enlightened centrist. You did say that Swaye and then you said this:Swaye said:
I assume this isn't directed at me since I said right in my statement that "I have no idea how much fraud occurred or didn't occur with mail in voting and ballot harvesting, etc., but recounting ballots isn't ever going to change anything."TheKobeStopper said:
The cowardice to predict the crime you’re accusing people of can’t be proven.Swaye said:I said very early on that doing recounts would do nothing. This is a point of sale "crime." Catch it there or it won't be caught. I have no idea how much fraud occurred or didn't occur with mail in voting and ballot harvesting, etc., but recounting ballots isn't ever going to change anything. You fix election security BEFORE elections, not after. And with mail in voting here to stay, I'll give everyone 3 guesses as to what the future holds.
And with mail in voting here to stay, I'll give everyone 3 guesses as to what the future holds.
So what does the future hold? An undeterminable amount of voter fraud? More predicting crimes that you can’t prove? 100% this shit is cowardly.
To be frank, I'll put my bravery, in both beliefs and deeds, up against 99% of this country any day of the week. And certainly up against yours.
It is funny that it’s almost always Trumper’s getting caught committing voter fraud and you never say shit about that. But the “potential” is scary. What a hero.
Lastly, thank you for noting my heroism. I am pretty awesome. Glad you noticed. -
I love that on an anonymous message board you're too big a fucking coward to back up your mouth and hide behind your down votes.MelloDawg said:
I love that you were a political science major.Goduckies said:
Yup my really good professor at Oregon hated vote by mail because of the fraud potential... he may have been a liberal, but he was a good liberal.... it also is ripe to coercion as well...Swaye said:
I don't want fraud on either side. Mail in voting allows the possibility of fraud on both sides. I've never claimed otherwise. That's why I like in person with ID voting. That system can be tricked as well, but it at least makes it a bit more difficult.TheKobeStopper said:
Your bravery in believing that voter fraud happens sometimes is noted.Swaye said:
I have always been consistent that while I do not know how much or how little fraud is occurring, SOME amount is occurring, and mail in voting only exacerbates that problem. To not see how sending millions of ballots out to addresses, and then expecting that all those ballots are only filled out by the prescribed person in accordance with the law is naive in the extreme. It invites fraud. The future with mail in voting does possess the potential for MASSIVE amounts of voter fraud. Will it happen? I don't know. But I am in the camp that says you shouldn't open the door to find out. Again, I have always been consistent in this opinion, and have absolutely no idea how those firmly held beliefs could be construed as cowardly.TheKobeStopper said:
As shocking as Race’s turn to full blown fascist has been, I gotta say, I’m most disappointed with you becoming an enlightened centrist. You did say that Swaye and then you said this:Swaye said:
I assume this isn't directed at me since I said right in my statement that "I have no idea how much fraud occurred or didn't occur with mail in voting and ballot harvesting, etc., but recounting ballots isn't ever going to change anything."TheKobeStopper said:
The cowardice to predict the crime you’re accusing people of can’t be proven.Swaye said:I said very early on that doing recounts would do nothing. This is a point of sale "crime." Catch it there or it won't be caught. I have no idea how much fraud occurred or didn't occur with mail in voting and ballot harvesting, etc., but recounting ballots isn't ever going to change anything. You fix election security BEFORE elections, not after. And with mail in voting here to stay, I'll give everyone 3 guesses as to what the future holds.
And with mail in voting here to stay, I'll give everyone 3 guesses as to what the future holds.
So what does the future hold? An undeterminable amount of voter fraud? More predicting crimes that you can’t prove? 100% this shit is cowardly.
To be frank, I'll put my bravery, in both beliefs and deeds, up against 99% of this country any day of the week. And certainly up against yours.
It is funny that it’s almost always Trumper’s getting caught committing voter fraud and you never say shit about that. But the “potential” is scary. What a hero.
Lastly, thank you for noting my heroism. I am pretty awesome. Glad you noticed. -
Imagine caring about what degree someone graduated with 20-30 years ago.
-
I don’t care though, that’s the thing. Frankly, that’s the closest you’ll see me getting to a personal attack on the site.thechatch said:Imagine caring about what degree someone graduated with 20-30 years ago.
-
Yeah, you only highlighted it in order to show how much you don't care. Are you this big a fucking pussy in every aspect of your life?MelloDawg said:
I don’t care though, that’s the thing. Frankly, that’s the closest you’ll see me getting to a personal attack on the site.thechatch said:Imagine caring about what degree someone graduated with 20-30 years ago.
-
Thats very noble of you.Swaye said:
I don't want fraud on either side. Mail in voting allows the possibility of fraud on both sides. I've never claimed otherwise. That's why I like in person with ID voting. That system can be tricked as well, but it at least makes it a bit more difficult.TheKobeStopper said:
Your bravery in believing that voter fraud happens sometimes is noted.Swaye said:
I have always been consistent that while I do not know how much or how little fraud is occurring, SOME amount is occurring, and mail in voting only exacerbates that problem. To not see how sending millions of ballots out to addresses, and then expecting that all those ballots are only filled out by the prescribed person in accordance with the law is naive in the extreme. It invites fraud. The future with mail in voting does possess the potential for MASSIVE amounts of voter fraud. Will it happen? I don't know. But I am in the camp that says you shouldn't open the door to find out. Again, I have always been consistent in this opinion, and have absolutely no idea how those firmly held beliefs could be construed as cowardly.TheKobeStopper said:
As shocking as Race’s turn to full blown fascist has been, I gotta say, I’m most disappointed with you becoming an enlightened centrist. You did say that Swaye and then you said this:Swaye said:
I assume this isn't directed at me since I said right in my statement that "I have no idea how much fraud occurred or didn't occur with mail in voting and ballot harvesting, etc., but recounting ballots isn't ever going to change anything."TheKobeStopper said:
The cowardice to predict the crime you’re accusing people of can’t be proven.Swaye said:I said very early on that doing recounts would do nothing. This is a point of sale "crime." Catch it there or it won't be caught. I have no idea how much fraud occurred or didn't occur with mail in voting and ballot harvesting, etc., but recounting ballots isn't ever going to change anything. You fix election security BEFORE elections, not after. And with mail in voting here to stay, I'll give everyone 3 guesses as to what the future holds.
And with mail in voting here to stay, I'll give everyone 3 guesses as to what the future holds.
So what does the future hold? An undeterminable amount of voter fraud? More predicting crimes that you can’t prove? 100% this shit is cowardly.
To be frank, I'll put my bravery, in both beliefs and deeds, up against 99% of this country any day of the week. And certainly up against yours.
It is funny that it’s almost always Trumper’s getting caught committing voter fraud and you never say shit about that. But the “potential” is scary. What a hero.
Lastly, thank you for noting my heroism. I am pretty awesome. Glad you noticed.
I am all for cheating as long as its the side I agree with. The oppositions stupid woke bullshit must be crushed and they must continue to be miserable losers.
Since the left is super lazy, the easiest way is to add another layer for voting since they are likely to just give up.
The fewer leftist people that vote, the better.
Now of course people on the left agree with this on their side, they just pretend they dont and that they are the moral standard. -
Leftists are ugly, stupid AND lazy. Change my mind.Pitchfork51 said:
Thats very noble of you.Swaye said:
I don't want fraud on either side. Mail in voting allows the possibility of fraud on both sides. I've never claimed otherwise. That's why I like in person with ID voting. That system can be tricked as well, but it at least makes it a bit more difficult.TheKobeStopper said:
Your bravery in believing that voter fraud happens sometimes is noted.Swaye said:
I have always been consistent that while I do not know how much or how little fraud is occurring, SOME amount is occurring, and mail in voting only exacerbates that problem. To not see how sending millions of ballots out to addresses, and then expecting that all those ballots are only filled out by the prescribed person in accordance with the law is naive in the extreme. It invites fraud. The future with mail in voting does possess the potential for MASSIVE amounts of voter fraud. Will it happen? I don't know. But I am in the camp that says you shouldn't open the door to find out. Again, I have always been consistent in this opinion, and have absolutely no idea how those firmly held beliefs could be construed as cowardly.TheKobeStopper said:
As shocking as Race’s turn to full blown fascist has been, I gotta say, I’m most disappointed with you becoming an enlightened centrist. You did say that Swaye and then you said this:Swaye said:
I assume this isn't directed at me since I said right in my statement that "I have no idea how much fraud occurred or didn't occur with mail in voting and ballot harvesting, etc., but recounting ballots isn't ever going to change anything."TheKobeStopper said:
The cowardice to predict the crime you’re accusing people of can’t be proven.Swaye said:I said very early on that doing recounts would do nothing. This is a point of sale "crime." Catch it there or it won't be caught. I have no idea how much fraud occurred or didn't occur with mail in voting and ballot harvesting, etc., but recounting ballots isn't ever going to change anything. You fix election security BEFORE elections, not after. And with mail in voting here to stay, I'll give everyone 3 guesses as to what the future holds.
And with mail in voting here to stay, I'll give everyone 3 guesses as to what the future holds.
So what does the future hold? An undeterminable amount of voter fraud? More predicting crimes that you can’t prove? 100% this shit is cowardly.
To be frank, I'll put my bravery, in both beliefs and deeds, up against 99% of this country any day of the week. And certainly up against yours.
It is funny that it’s almost always Trumper’s getting caught committing voter fraud and you never say shit about that. But the “potential” is scary. What a hero.
Lastly, thank you for noting my heroism. I am pretty awesome. Glad you noticed.
I am all for cheating as long as its the side I agree with. The oppositions stupid woke bullshit must be crushed and they must continue to be miserable losers.
Since the left is super lazy, the easiest way is to add another layer for voting since they are likely to just give up.
The fewer leftist people that vote, the better.
Now of course people on the left agree with this on their side, they just pretend they dont and that they are the moral standard. -
-
Noted band nerd heard from.MelloDawg said:
I love that you were a political science major.Goduckies said:
Yup my really good professor at Oregon hated vote by mail because of the fraud potential... he may have been a liberal, but he was a good liberal.... it also is ripe to coercion as well...Swaye said:
I don't want fraud on either side. Mail in voting allows the possibility of fraud on both sides. I've never claimed otherwise. That's why I like in person with ID voting. That system can be tricked as well, but it at least makes it a bit more difficult.TheKobeStopper said:
Your bravery in believing that voter fraud happens sometimes is noted.Swaye said:
I have always been consistent that while I do not know how much or how little fraud is occurring, SOME amount is occurring, and mail in voting only exacerbates that problem. To not see how sending millions of ballots out to addresses, and then expecting that all those ballots are only filled out by the prescribed person in accordance with the law is naive in the extreme. It invites fraud. The future with mail in voting does possess the potential for MASSIVE amounts of voter fraud. Will it happen? I don't know. But I am in the camp that says you shouldn't open the door to find out. Again, I have always been consistent in this opinion, and have absolutely no idea how those firmly held beliefs could be construed as cowardly.TheKobeStopper said:
As shocking as Race’s turn to full blown fascist has been, I gotta say, I’m most disappointed with you becoming an enlightened centrist. You did say that Swaye and then you said this:Swaye said:
I assume this isn't directed at me since I said right in my statement that "I have no idea how much fraud occurred or didn't occur with mail in voting and ballot harvesting, etc., but recounting ballots isn't ever going to change anything."TheKobeStopper said:
The cowardice to predict the crime you’re accusing people of can’t be proven.Swaye said:I said very early on that doing recounts would do nothing. This is a point of sale "crime." Catch it there or it won't be caught. I have no idea how much fraud occurred or didn't occur with mail in voting and ballot harvesting, etc., but recounting ballots isn't ever going to change anything. You fix election security BEFORE elections, not after. And with mail in voting here to stay, I'll give everyone 3 guesses as to what the future holds.
And with mail in voting here to stay, I'll give everyone 3 guesses as to what the future holds.
So what does the future hold? An undeterminable amount of voter fraud? More predicting crimes that you can’t prove? 100% this shit is cowardly.
To be frank, I'll put my bravery, in both beliefs and deeds, up against 99% of this country any day of the week. And certainly up against yours.
It is funny that it’s almost always Trumper’s getting caught committing voter fraud and you never say shit about that. But the “potential” is scary. What a hero.
Lastly, thank you for noting my heroism. I am pretty awesome. Glad you noticed. -
Was in banking for 15 years and have a series 7... sure done poor.MelloDawg said:
I love that you were a political science major.Goduckies said:
Yup my really good professor at Oregon hated vote by mail because of the fraud potential... he may have been a liberal, but he was a good liberal.... it also is ripe to coercion as well...Swaye said:
I don't want fraud on either side. Mail in voting allows the possibility of fraud on both sides. I've never claimed otherwise. That's why I like in person with ID voting. That system can be tricked as well, but it at least makes it a bit more difficult.TheKobeStopper said:
Your bravery in believing that voter fraud happens sometimes is noted.Swaye said:
I have always been consistent that while I do not know how much or how little fraud is occurring, SOME amount is occurring, and mail in voting only exacerbates that problem. To not see how sending millions of ballots out to addresses, and then expecting that all those ballots are only filled out by the prescribed person in accordance with the law is naive in the extreme. It invites fraud. The future with mail in voting does possess the potential for MASSIVE amounts of voter fraud. Will it happen? I don't know. But I am in the camp that says you shouldn't open the door to find out. Again, I have always been consistent in this opinion, and have absolutely no idea how those firmly held beliefs could be construed as cowardly.TheKobeStopper said:
As shocking as Race’s turn to full blown fascist has been, I gotta say, I’m most disappointed with you becoming an enlightened centrist. You did say that Swaye and then you said this:Swaye said:
I assume this isn't directed at me since I said right in my statement that "I have no idea how much fraud occurred or didn't occur with mail in voting and ballot harvesting, etc., but recounting ballots isn't ever going to change anything."TheKobeStopper said:
The cowardice to predict the crime you’re accusing people of can’t be proven.Swaye said:I said very early on that doing recounts would do nothing. This is a point of sale "crime." Catch it there or it won't be caught. I have no idea how much fraud occurred or didn't occur with mail in voting and ballot harvesting, etc., but recounting ballots isn't ever going to change anything. You fix election security BEFORE elections, not after. And with mail in voting here to stay, I'll give everyone 3 guesses as to what the future holds.
And with mail in voting here to stay, I'll give everyone 3 guesses as to what the future holds.
So what does the future hold? An undeterminable amount of voter fraud? More predicting crimes that you can’t prove? 100% this shit is cowardly.
To be frank, I'll put my bravery, in both beliefs and deeds, up against 99% of this country any day of the week. And certainly up against yours.
It is funny that it’s almost always Trumper’s getting caught committing voter fraud and you never say shit about that. But the “potential” is scary. What a hero.
Lastly, thank you for noting my heroism. I am pretty awesome. Glad you noticed. -
This guy was busted long ago but just keeps pushing his BS out there to the idiots that think he's just a dad poasting his brilliant takes.RaceBannon said:
