Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
It's not a bug; it's a feature.
Comments
-
Like a child the Dazzler actually believes data and numbers reported by this White House.
-
I said I'm for a wealth tax more robust than Elizabeth Warren's. I'm not clear what team we're talking about.hardhat said:
So you agree, but still afraid to take off the team jersey?HHusky said:
I agree with you that wealth should be taxed more heavily. And not starting at $50 million. I'd say $5 million. I think starting at $1 million (as Piketty proposed) is too aggressive.hardhat said:Bernie's been talking about 'taxing the rich' long before I was born, but he's done jack shit about it. When he did finally release his plans, the ugly truth is that the only way to truly pay for all these things is to raise payroll taxes on the middle class, by at least 9%. That was from non-partisan analysis. I don't hear anything coming out of Davos or the World Economic Forum about those fucktards paying more in taxes. Start there.
-
Unrealized capital gains are like icebergs. Imagine taking them into account.SFGbob said:Like a child the Dazzler actually believes data and numbers reported by this White House.
-
That's really dumb, you know. The entire west coast is dominated by democrats, and they can do whatever they want. And as we've already pointed out, raising taxes just to do it isn't the answer. What is it that you want to raise the taxes for? Let's see some solid policy analysis. How much money is being spent on homelessness in Seattle? Should we spend more on that?HHusky said:
It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.hardhat said:
Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.HHusky said:
My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.Sledog said:
How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?HHusky said:
A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:
I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.HHusky said:Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?
The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis. -
Imagine believing anything that's put out by this White House. It would be like actually believing anything you say Dazzler. George Will said that Republicans physically fear for their safety from their own voters.HHusky said:
Unrealized capital gains are like icebergs. Imagine taking them into account.SFGbob said:Like a child the Dazzler actually believes data and numbers reported by this White House.
-
No one thinks anything is going to change as things stand. But lying about whether Joe Biden would sign a bill to eliminate the Trump tax cuts insults even Sled's intelligence.RaceBannon said:
And yet the House has a larger majority than the SenateHHusky said:
It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.hardhat said:
Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.HHusky said:
My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.Sledog said:
How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?HHusky said:
A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:
I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.HHusky said:Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?
The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.
This is the second time this century the democrats control the government
Obama did NOT get rid of the Bush tax cuts and Biden will NOT get rid of the Trump tax cuts
Not sure why you think anyone still falls for this bullshit
Other than you
You vote like you want things to get worse. I vote and contribute to candidates who I think would advance the ball. -
If you want to change the subject to local governance, start a new thread. This is about taxes at the federal level.hardhat said:
That's really dumb, you know. The entire west coast is dominated by democrats, and they can do whatever they want. And as we've already pointed out, raising taxes just to do it isn't the answer. What is it that you want to raise the taxes for? Let's see some solid policy analysis. How much money is being spent on homelessness in Seattle? Should we spend more on that?HHusky said:
It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.hardhat said:
Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.HHusky said:
My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.Sledog said:
How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?HHusky said:
A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:
I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.HHusky said:Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?
The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis. -
Where is the bill for Biden to sign you lying hack?HHusky said:
No one thinks anything is going to change as things stand. But lying about whether Joe Biden would sign a bill to eliminate the Trump tax cuts insults even Sled's intelligence.RaceBannon said:
And yet the House has a larger majority than the SenateHHusky said:
It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.hardhat said:
Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.HHusky said:
My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.Sledog said:
How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?HHusky said:
A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:
I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.HHusky said:Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?
The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.
This is the second time this century the democrats control the government
Obama did NOT get rid of the Bush tax cuts and Biden will NOT get rid of the Trump tax cuts
Not sure why you think anyone still falls for this bullshit
Other than you
You vote like you want things to get worse. I vote and contribute to candidates who I think would advance the ball.
Where is Joe calling for it
Move the goalposts
I vote like 7 trillion a year is enough revenue
I voted for Trump who raised taxes on the rich and lowered mine
I'm not a dumbfuck Biden voter like you -
painfully ignorantRaceBannon said:HHusky said:
No one thinks anything is going to change as things stand. But lying about whether Joe Biden would sign a bill to eliminate the Trump tax cuts insults even Sled's intelligence.RaceBannon said:
And yet the House has a larger majority than the SenateHHusky said:
It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.hardhat said:
Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.HHusky said:
My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.Sledog said:
How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?HHusky said:
A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:
I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.HHusky said:Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?
The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.
This is the second time this century the democrats control the government
Obama did NOT get rid of the Bush tax cuts and Biden will NOT get rid of the Trump tax cuts
Not sure why you think anyone still falls for this bullshit
Other than you
You vote like you want things to get worse. I vote and contribute to candidates who I think would advance the ball.
I voted for Trump who raised taxes on the rich and lowered mine -
You blamed magatards for not having higher taxes. I pointed out that states can enact taxes, including estate taxes. Feel free to look that up anytime. And you know that innovation by a state can in fact lead to changes at the federal level.HHusky said:
If you want to change the subject to local governance, start a new thread. This is about taxes at the federal level.hardhat said:
That's really dumb, you know. The entire west coast is dominated by democrats, and they can do whatever they want. And as we've already pointed out, raising taxes just to do it isn't the answer. What is it that you want to raise the taxes for? Let's see some solid policy analysis. How much money is being spent on homelessness in Seattle? Should we spend more on that?HHusky said:
It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.hardhat said:
Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.HHusky said:
My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.Sledog said:
How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?HHusky said:
A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:
I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.HHusky said:Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?
The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.
