Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
It's not a bug; it's a feature.
Comments
-
My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I don't think I should volunteer to subsidize them more than I already do.WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.Sledog said:
How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?HHusky said:
A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:
I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.HHusky said:Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?
The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis. -
I wasn't asking them to pay me. Logic much?Sledog said:
How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?HHusky said:
A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:
I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.HHusky said:Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?
The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis. -
Why not? You need to pay your fair share manHHusky said:
My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.Sledog said:
How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?HHusky said:
A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:
I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.HHusky said:Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?
The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis. -
Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.HHusky said:
My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.Sledog said:
How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?HHusky said:
A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:
I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.HHusky said:Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?
The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis. -
I agree with you that wealth should be taxed more heavily. And not starting at $50 million. I'd say $5 million. I think starting at $1 million (as Piketty proposed) is too aggressive.hardhat said:Bernie's been talking about 'taxing the rich' long before I was born, but he's done jack shit about it. When he did finally release his plans, the ugly truth is that the only way to truly pay for all these things is to raise payroll taxes on the middle class, by at least 9%. That was from non-partisan analysis. I don't hear anything coming out of Davos or the World Economic Forum about those fucktards paying more in taxes. Start there.
-
Dazzler jumped in with both feet on everyone of those stories. Weird how he never talks about that.hardhat said: -
Less taxes and less spending. We don't have a revenue problem we have a spending problem - Ronald Reagan who H allegedly voted for
-
So you agree, but still afraid to take off the team jersey?HHusky said:
I agree with you that wealth should be taxed more heavily. And not starting at $50 million. I'd say $5 million. I think starting at $1 million (as Piketty proposed) is too aggressive.hardhat said:Bernie's been talking about 'taxing the rich' long before I was born, but he's done jack shit about it. When he did finally release his plans, the ugly truth is that the only way to truly pay for all these things is to raise payroll taxes on the middle class, by at least 9%. That was from non-partisan analysis. I don't hear anything coming out of Davos or the World Economic Forum about those fucktards paying more in taxes. Start there.
-
It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.hardhat said:
Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.HHusky said:
My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.Sledog said:
How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?HHusky said:
A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:
I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.HHusky said:Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?
The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis. -
And yet the House has a larger majority than the SenateHHusky said:
It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.hardhat said:
Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.HHusky said:
My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.Sledog said:
How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?HHusky said:
A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:
I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.HHusky said:Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?
The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.
This is the second time this century the democrats control the government
Obama did NOT get rid of the Bush tax cuts and Biden will NOT get rid of the Trump tax cuts
Not sure why you think anyone still falls for this bullshit
Other than you
