Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

AOC’s ‘Tax the Rich’ dress designer is a tax deadbeat

12357

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,904
    SFGbob said:

    AOC's entire act is a grift. From going by Sandy Cortez nearly her entire life to then running as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in order to give herself a more ethnic flavor is a grift. Lying about growing up poor when she really live in a wealthy suburb and attended a private college is a grift. Staging photo Ops where she pretends to be crying uncontrollably over the treatment of illegals while she is really staring out at a parking lot is a grift. She is grifting you and every dumb shit like you and Kobe all the time.

    Yet she has none of my money.

    Quite the swindle!
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Socialism is when people in the suburbs aren’t working class.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    edited September 2021

    hardhat said:

    I’ve asked multiple times for anyone to explain how exactly her actions were hypocritical. No answer.

    AOC wants to tax the rich when she’s in the Bronx. She wants to tax the rich when she’s in DC. She wants to tax the rich when she’s delivering water to Texans. She wants to tax the rich when she’s in congress. And she wants to tax the rich when she’s at the Met Gala.

    She hasn’t moved.

    You really believe that, that's funny. Wake me up when she passes any legislation that actually does that. Meanwhile, keep wasting your money that you send to her.
    Just pass legislation, bro. Biden can’t even get his signature infrastructure bill through but just pass legislation.

    The single most important thing AOC can do right now is make sure people are always talking about it. 6 pages. Job done.
    It's not clear who is less informed about tax and economic policy between you, hh, and AOC, but all three of you are clueless.
    Let's start with her degree in economics from a private university. No job offers from KMPG, Deloitte, PWC, maybe a smaller boutique firm? Strange.
    What happened with her chance to tax Amazon and along with it, 25,000 jerbs for her constituents? Great work there.
    Talking about something !=doing it. Jimmy Lake talks about UW winning championships, I guess that's good enough. Democrats are 'talking' about helping the blacks and the poor. That's good enough. Like I said, wake me up when this talk turns into something.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC's entire act is a grift. From going by Sandy Cortez nearly her entire life to then running as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in order to give herself a more ethnic flavor is a grift. Lying about growing up poor when she really live in a wealthy suburb and attended a private college is a grift. Staging photo Ops where she pretends to be crying uncontrollably over the treatment of illegals while she is really staring out at a parking lot is a grift. She is grifting you and every dumb shit like you and Kobe all the time.

    Yet she has none of my money.

    Quite the swindle!
    Trump has none of my money.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,904
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC's entire act is a grift. From going by Sandy Cortez nearly her entire life to then running as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in order to give herself a more ethnic flavor is a grift. Lying about growing up poor when she really live in a wealthy suburb and attended a private college is a grift. Staging photo Ops where she pretends to be crying uncontrollably over the treatment of illegals while she is really staring out at a parking lot is a grift. She is grifting you and every dumb shit like you and Kobe all the time.

    Yet she has none of my money.

    Quite the swindle!
    Trump has none of my money.
    The flaw in your attempt here is that I didn't suggest Trump had swindled you. blob says AOC has grifted me.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,789 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2021


    Did she design this one?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,937 Founders Club
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    hardhat said:

    hardhat said:

    I’ve asked multiple times for anyone to explain how exactly her actions were hypocritical. No answer.

    AOC wants to tax the rich when she’s in the Bronx. She wants to tax the rich when she’s in DC. She wants to tax the rich when she’s delivering water to Texans. She wants to tax the rich when she’s in congress. And she wants to tax the rich when she’s at the Met Gala.

    She hasn’t moved.

    You really believe that, that's funny. Wake me up when she passes any legislation that actually does that. Meanwhile, keep wasting your money that you send to her.
    Just pass legislation, bro. Biden can’t even get his signature infrastructure bill through but just pass legislation.

    The single most important thing AOC can do right now is make sure people are always talking about it. 6 pages. Job done.
    It's not clear who is less informed about tax and economic policy between you, hh, and AOC, but all three of you are clueless.
    Let's start with her degree in economics from a private university. No job offers from KMPG, Deloitte, PWC, maybe a smaller boutique firm? Strange.
    What happened with her chance to tax Amazon and along with it, 25,000 jerbs for her constituents? Great work there.
    Talking about something !=doing it. Jimmy Lake talks about UW winning championships, I guess that's good enough. Democrats are 'talking' about helping the blacks and the poor. That's good enough. Like I said, wake me up when this talk turns into something.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/11/amazon-will-move-into-nyc-after-all-did-it-really-need-public-investments/?outputType=amp
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC's entire act is a grift. From going by Sandy Cortez nearly her entire life to then running as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in order to give herself a more ethnic flavor is a grift. Lying about growing up poor when she really live in a wealthy suburb and attended a private college is a grift. Staging photo Ops where she pretends to be crying uncontrollably over the treatment of illegals while she is really staring out at a parking lot is a grift. She is grifting you and every dumb shit like you and Kobe all the time.

    Yet she has none of my money.

    Quite the swindle!
    Trump has none of my money.
    The flaw in your attempt here is that I didn't suggest Trump had swindled you. blob says AOC has grifted me.
    You’re here defending her.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344

    hardhat said:

    hardhat said:

    I’ve asked multiple times for anyone to explain how exactly her actions were hypocritical. No answer.

    AOC wants to tax the rich when she’s in the Bronx. She wants to tax the rich when she’s in DC. She wants to tax the rich when she’s delivering water to Texans. She wants to tax the rich when she’s in congress. And she wants to tax the rich when she’s at the Met Gala.

    She hasn’t moved.

    You really believe that, that's funny. Wake me up when she passes any legislation that actually does that. Meanwhile, keep wasting your money that you send to her.
    Just pass legislation, bro. Biden can’t even get his signature infrastructure bill through but just pass legislation.

    The single most important thing AOC can do right now is make sure people are always talking about it. 6 pages. Job done.
    It's not clear who is less informed about tax and economic policy between you, hh, and AOC, but all three of you are clueless.
    Let's start with her degree in economics from a private university. No job offers from KMPG, Deloitte, PWC, maybe a smaller boutique firm? Strange.
    What happened with her chance to tax Amazon and along with it, 25,000 jerbs for her constituents? Great work there.
    Talking about something !=doing it. Jimmy Lake talks about UW winning championships, I guess that's good enough. Democrats are 'talking' about helping the blacks and the poor. That's good enough. Like I said, wake me up when this talk turns into something.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/11/amazon-will-move-into-nyc-after-all-did-it-really-need-public-investments/?outputType=amp
    Amazon announced that it would nevertheless expand operations in New York, adding 1,500 jobs and 335,000 square feet of office space. Hmm, that seems like less than 25,00. Is it?

    In Manhattan. Outside of AOC's district. Maybe read your link first.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    hardhat said:

    hardhat said:

    hardhat said:

    I’ve asked multiple times for anyone to explain how exactly her actions were hypocritical. No answer.

    AOC wants to tax the rich when she’s in the Bronx. She wants to tax the rich when she’s in DC. She wants to tax the rich when she’s delivering water to Texans. She wants to tax the rich when she’s in congress. And she wants to tax the rich when she’s at the Met Gala.

    She hasn’t moved.

    You really believe that, that's funny. Wake me up when she passes any legislation that actually does that. Meanwhile, keep wasting your money that you send to her.
    Just pass legislation, bro. Biden can’t even get his signature infrastructure bill through but just pass legislation.

    The single most important thing AOC can do right now is make sure people are always talking about it. 6 pages. Job done.
    It's not clear who is less informed about tax and economic policy between you, hh, and AOC, but all three of you are clueless.
    Let's start with her degree in economics from a private university. No job offers from KMPG, Deloitte, PWC, maybe a smaller boutique firm? Strange.
    What happened with her chance to tax Amazon and along with it, 25,000 jerbs for her constituents? Great work there.
    Talking about something !=doing it. Jimmy Lake talks about UW winning championships, I guess that's good enough. Democrats are 'talking' about helping the blacks and the poor. That's good enough. Like I said, wake me up when this talk turns into something.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/11/amazon-will-move-into-nyc-after-all-did-it-really-need-public-investments/?outputType=amp
    Amazon announced that it would nevertheless expand operations in New York, adding 1,500 jobs and 335,000 square feet of office space. Hmm, that seems like less than 25,00. Is it?

    In Manhattan. Outside of AOC's district. Maybe read your link first.
    Amazon is still opening new locations in New York, including the Bronx.

    Also, since you continue quoting the 25,000 number. That number was not contractual, it was a “pledge”. Nothing legally. So the deal was that they got the tax incentives and then could do whatever the fuck they wanted.

    Someone pointed out how stupid this was and then Amazon decided to make a big stink about how they weren’t going to come to New York anymore. And then they spent the last 3 years opening Amazon locations across New York. Oops.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Bob_C said:

    Explain to me how a tax incentive that delivers incremental revenue to a municipality vs delivering nothing is a bad thing.

    The brain power of Trumpers on display.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    edited September 2021

    hardhat said:

    hardhat said:

    hardhat said:

    I’ve asked multiple times for anyone to explain how exactly her actions were hypocritical. No answer.

    AOC wants to tax the rich when she’s in the Bronx. She wants to tax the rich when she’s in DC. She wants to tax the rich when she’s delivering water to Texans. She wants to tax the rich when she’s in congress. And she wants to tax the rich when she’s at the Met Gala.

    She hasn’t moved.

    You really believe that, that's funny. Wake me up when she passes any legislation that actually does that. Meanwhile, keep wasting your money that you send to her.
    Just pass legislation, bro. Biden can’t even get his signature infrastructure bill through but just pass legislation.

    The single most important thing AOC can do right now is make sure people are always talking about it. 6 pages. Job done.
    It's not clear who is less informed about tax and economic policy between you, hh, and AOC, but all three of you are clueless.
    Let's start with her degree in economics from a private university. No job offers from KMPG, Deloitte, PWC, maybe a smaller boutique firm? Strange.
    What happened with her chance to tax Amazon and along with it, 25,000 jerbs for her constituents? Great work there.
    Talking about something !=doing it. Jimmy Lake talks about UW winning championships, I guess that's good enough. Democrats are 'talking' about helping the blacks and the poor. That's good enough. Like I said, wake me up when this talk turns into something.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/11/amazon-will-move-into-nyc-after-all-did-it-really-need-public-investments/?outputType=amp
    Amazon announced that it would nevertheless expand operations in New York, adding 1,500 jobs and 335,000 square feet of office space. Hmm, that seems like less than 25,00. Is it?

    In Manhattan. Outside of AOC's district. Maybe read your link first.
    Amazon is still opening new locations in New York, including the Bronx.

    Also, since you continue quoting the 25,000 number. That number was not contractual, it was a “pledge”. Nothing legally. So the deal was that they got the tax incentives and then could do whatever the fuck they wanted.

    Someone pointed out how stupid this was and then Amazon decided to make a big stink about how they weren’t going to come to New York anymore. And then they spent the last 3 years opening Amazon locations across New York. Oops.
    Someone could point out to you how AOC had nothing to do with any of the Amazon jobs that are referred to in this stupid article that you linked while embarrassing yourself. I'm sure you can find out how much input she had on the negotiations. She definitely got people talking about what a fucking idiot she is. Oops.

  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    Bob_C said:

    Explain to me how a tax incentive that delivers incremental revenue to a municipality vs delivering nothing is a bad thing.

    The brain power of Trumpers on display.
    Don't play in the deep end of finance, @TheKobeStopper. You're about to get slaughtered.

    By capitalists that can’t solve how to retain employees? Seems unlikely.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344

    Bob_C said:

    Explain to me how a tax incentive that delivers incremental revenue to a municipality vs delivering nothing is a bad thing.

    The brain power of Trumpers on display.
    Don't play in the deep end of finance, @TheKobeStopper. You're about to get slaughtered.

    It's almost as if he's got no formal business training at all...
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344

    Bob_C said:

    Explain to me how a tax incentive that delivers incremental revenue to a municipality vs delivering nothing is a bad thing.

    The brain power of Trumpers on display.
    Don't play in the deep end of finance, @TheKobeStopper. You're about to get slaughtered.

    By capitalists that can’t solve how to retain employees? Seems unlikely.
    Maybe you can explain how businesses retain employees, since you have no knowledge of working or running a business. Seems unlikely.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,682 Founders Club

    Bob_C said:

    Explain to me how a tax incentive that delivers incremental revenue to a municipality vs delivering nothing is a bad thing.

    The brain power of Trumpers on display.
    Don't play in the deep end of finance, @TheKobeStopper. You're about to get slaughtered.

    By capitalists that can’t solve how to retain employees? Seems unlikely.
    The 1041 filer has nothing. Shocking.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662

    Socialism is when people in the suburbs aren’t working class.

    Socialism is when everyone is poor and legit people are as equally poor as dumb losers.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Bob_C said:

    Bob_C said:

    Explain to me how a tax incentive that delivers incremental revenue to a municipality vs delivering nothing is a bad thing.

    The brain power of Trumpers on display.
    Explain it then. You can’t.
    Let’s pretend for a moment that Amazon didn’t come to New York anyways. Do I really need to explain how getting nothing from Amazon would be better than having their headquarters in your city on a Washington Husky football board?

    It’s funny, in one thread you guys will rail against evil marxist corporations. In the next you’ll argue city’s should suck Amazon’s dick to get their headquarters. In the next you’ll bitch about how shitty Seattle has become. Shit is wild.

  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    Socialism is when people in the suburbs aren’t working class.

    Socialism is when everyone is poor and legit people are as equally poor as dumb losers.
    What is a “legit” person?
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,085

    Bob_C said:

    Explain to me how a tax incentive that delivers incremental revenue to a municipality vs delivering nothing is a bad thing.

    The brain power of Trumpers on display.
    Don't play in the deep end of finance, @TheKobeStopper. You're about to get slaughtered.

    By capitalists that can’t solve how to retain employees? Seems unlikely.
    If you can't retain, you replace. With automation and technology. I just did it today, in fact. Fuck off - I'm not filling that seat with overpriced help. Hello new software and technology for the cost of a new hire. Outsource anything that the machines can't handle.

    wellbye.gif, millennial drama. Welcome to the real world.





  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    PAGE 8 OF WINNING
    When does @TheKobeStopper start posting pictures of slave ships?
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344

    Bob_C said:

    Bob_C said:

    Explain to me how a tax incentive that delivers incremental revenue to a municipality vs delivering nothing is a bad thing.

    The brain power of Trumpers on display.
    Explain it then. You can’t.
    Let’s pretend for a moment that Amazon didn’t come to New York anyways. Do I really need to explain how getting nothing from Amazon would be better than having their headquarters in your city on a Washington Husky football board?

    It’s funny, in one thread you guys will rail against evil marxist corporations. In the next you’ll argue city’s should suck Amazon’s dick to get their headquarters. In the next you’ll bitch about how shitty Seattle has become. Shit is wild.

    Tell me about an evil marxist corporation.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    Bob_C said:

    Explain to me how a tax incentive that delivers incremental revenue to a municipality vs delivering nothing is a bad thing.

    The brain power of Trumpers on display.
    Don't play in the deep end of finance, @TheKobeStopper. You're about to get slaughtered.

    By capitalists that can’t solve how to retain employees? Seems unlikely.
    If you can't retain, you replace. With automation and technology. I just did it today, in fact. Fuck off - I'm not filling that seat with overpriced help. Hello new software and technology for the cost of a new hire. Outsource anything that the machines can't handle.

    wellbye.gif, millennial drama. Welcome to the real world.





    Getting you guys to go full mask off with even the slightest poke at capitalism is my favorite pastime.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    hardhat said:

    Bob_C said:

    Bob_C said:

    Explain to me how a tax incentive that delivers incremental revenue to a municipality vs delivering nothing is a bad thing.

    The brain power of Trumpers on display.
    Explain it then. You can’t.
    Let’s pretend for a moment that Amazon didn’t come to New York anyways. Do I really need to explain how getting nothing from Amazon would be better than having their headquarters in your city on a Washington Husky football board?

    It’s funny, in one thread you guys will rail against evil marxist corporations. In the next you’ll argue city’s should suck Amazon’s dick to get their headquarters. In the next you’ll bitch about how shitty Seattle has become. Shit is wild.

    Tell me about an evil marxist corporation.
    That’s what I’m saying.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,682 Founders Club

    Bob_C said:

    Bob_C said:

    Explain to me how a tax incentive that delivers incremental revenue to a municipality vs delivering nothing is a bad thing.

    The brain power of Trumpers on display.
    Explain it then. You can’t.
    Let’s pretend for a moment that Amazon didn’t come to New York anyways. Do I really need to explain how getting nothing from Amazon would be better than having their headquarters in your city on a Washington Husky football board?

    It’s funny, in one thread you guys will rail against evil marxist corporations. In the next you’ll argue city’s should suck Amazon’s dick to get their headquarters. In the next you’ll bitch about how shitty Seattle has become. Shit is wild.

    You’re the one that suggested that was a good thing that AOC did. Not me. Still nothing as to why that was a good thing. You must have your reasons. I’ll drop it, you’ve embarrassed yourself enough for today.