Whoever said he was a good MWC QB is absolutely correct. He is not a Carr brother or Kaepernick, he has limitations. My guess is he will have plenty of opportunity to put up some impressive Doog numbers on the bottom 3/4 of his conference but will look average/good against the upper part of his conference (Boise, Nevada, San Diego st., Wyoming) and average/poor against P5 competition (Oregon, UCLA). Apparently the media says Oregon has the best defense on the west coast so we will see on Saturday.
Against Pac-12 teams, Haener's career numbers are: 2/6 for -3 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT, and 1 sack for -9 yards.
He was given the ball 7 times for -12 yards and a pick six.
Even Lindquist was never that bad.
quite the sample set you've got there
The small sample size is because Haener wasn't good enough to earn more time. Slobbering over him shredding a former basketball school is odd.
Again, it is not based on one game. Is everyone on here illiterate?
Apparently you are. I'm implying that him being unable to beat out Eason and Morris is evidence of his entire body of work being poor, in addition to his shitty Cal cameo.
I was at this game, it was painful. Not a huge Browning fan, but that was the worst call to remove him. He wasn't doing a lot to win that game, but he wasn't losing it either.
Comments
Sounds like a MWC qb to me
Petersen QB recruits are so shitty.
Not a huge Browning fan, but that was the worst call to remove him.
He wasn't doing a lot to win that game, but he wasn't losing it either.
I was so pissed.