My prediction
Comments
-
Graham really does suck
-
Yeah the game today meant nothing. There was little or nothing to be learned.Gladstone said:We aren't losing to UCLA, and they're getting far too much credit for beating one of the most poorly coached teams in CFB. They might be an alright team, but I'm far more worried about Michigan, Oregon, and (obviously) at Stanford.
UCLA has some talent though and I've seen DTR be pretty hard to stop at times previously. I think they will be a tough W. -
A guy like him knows it’s a final paycheck. They mail it in. That’s a hard place to win unless a coach is totally committed.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Graham really does suck
-
I wouldn't say it's totally meaningless, UCLA completely physically dominated from the beginning which is something they haven't been doing much recently even against terrible teams.chuck said:
Yeah the game today meant nothing. There was little or nothing to be learned.Gladstone said:We aren't losing to UCLA, and they're getting far too much credit for beating one of the most poorly coached teams in CFB. They might be an alright team, but I'm far more worried about Michigan, Oregon, and (obviously) at Stanford.
UCLA has some talent though and I've seen DTR be pretty hard to stop at times previously. I think they will be a tough W.
Also, Charbonnet. He's a stud. Their run game looked a lot better than UW's, and judging by last year's run D, could easily pose problems.
DTR is just a mess though. -
Charbonet
-
UCLA has been pretty good running the ball for a few years. I agree that their defense looking this physical is a good sign. It was against a shit opponent, but they are better than I thought.Kingdome_Urinals said:
I wouldn't say it's totally meaningless, UCLA completely physically dominated from the beginning which is something they haven't been doing much recently even against terrible teams.chuck said:
Yeah the game today meant nothing. There was little or nothing to be learned.Gladstone said:We aren't losing to UCLA, and they're getting far too much credit for beating one of the most poorly coached teams in CFB. They might be an alright team, but I'm far more worried about Michigan, Oregon, and (obviously) at Stanford.
UCLA has some talent though and I've seen DTR be pretty hard to stop at times previously. I think they will be a tough W.
Also, Charbonnet. He's a stud. Their run game looked a lot better than UW's, and judging by last year's run D, could easily pose problems.
DTR is just a mess though. -
I'm putting a lot of weight on Hawaii being epically bad. I think they are. In all phases. Yes, UCLA ran over them like tackling dummies. I'm not sure what to make of that though.Kingdome_Urinals said:
I wouldn't say it's totally meaningless, UCLA completely physically dominated from the beginning which is something they haven't been doing much recently even against terrible teams.chuck said:
Yeah the game today meant nothing. There was little or nothing to be learned.Gladstone said:We aren't losing to UCLA, and they're getting far too much credit for beating one of the most poorly coached teams in CFB. They might be an alright team, but I'm far more worried about Michigan, Oregon, and (obviously) at Stanford.
UCLA has some talent though and I've seen DTR be pretty hard to stop at times previously. I think they will be a tough W.
Also, Charbonnet. He's a stud. Their run game looked a lot better than UW's, and judging by last year's run D, could easily pose problems.
DTR is just a mess though. -
Hawaii is horrible. UCLA sucks.
-
Gladstone said:
We aren't losing to UCLA, and they're getting far too much credit for beating one of the most poorly coached teams in CFB. They might be an alright team, but I'm far more worried about Michigan, Oregon, and (obviously) at Stanford.

-
Gladstone and J return! In the same thread! Praise Allah the season is here!







