My prediction

DerekJohnson

Pac-12 Championship Game

Washington vs. UCLA

dirtysouwfdawg

DerekJohnson said:

Pac-12 Championship Game

Washington vs. UCLA

Someone else did that. You plagiarizing their shit, fucko?

Joey

I was worried about UCLA before the season. That’s why I wanted SC and Utah.

Doogles

I was first, remains to be seen if I'm right.

HuskyJW

DTR can’t throw

RoadDawg55

dirtysouwfdawg said:

DerekJohnson said:

Pac-12 Championship Game

Washington vs. UCLA

Someone else did that. You plagiarizing their shit, fucko?

Must have been Pup. Nobody else here has the balls to make predictions.

chuck

HuskyJW said:

DTR can’t throw

He can and will against UW. It's the script.

Kingdome_Urinals

chuck said:

HuskyJW said:

DTR can’t throw

He can and will against UW. It's the script.

Pretty atrocious passing game, and pass protection, but I agree UCLA always plays better against UW. Plus, UW run defense remains a question mark.

Joey

UCLA has a running game. We? are suspect against the run until we aren’t right now. DTR sucks as a passer but as @chuck pointed out, will have the gayme of his lifetim against the Dawgs

LebamDawg

in the last 10 years we have only played UCLA 5 times - we? are 3-2 against them and have won the last 2.

Chip 'I am not gay' Kelly seems to have taken a step back from his innovative approach to coaching - this is too obvious of a game to pick as a loss. We loose to teams that have no chance of winning before we lose to UCLA twice in one year.

I think we play them this year

Gladstone

We aren't losing to UCLA, and they're getting far too much credit for beating one of the most poorly coached teams in CFB. They might be an alright team, but I'm far more worried about Michigan, Oregon, and (obviously) at Stanford.

PostGameOrangeSlices

Graham really does suck

chuck

Gladstone said:

We aren't losing to UCLA, and they're getting far too much credit for beating one of the most poorly coached teams in CFB. They might be an alright team, but I'm far more worried about Michigan, Oregon, and (obviously) at Stanford.

Yeah the game today meant nothing. There was little or nothing to be learned.

UCLA has some talent though and I've seen DTR be pretty hard to stop at times previously. I think they will be a tough W.

RoadDawg55

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Graham really does suck

A guy like him knows it’s a final paycheck. They mail it in. That’s a hard place to win unless a coach is totally committed.

Kingdome_Urinals

chuck said:

Gladstone said:

We aren't losing to UCLA, and they're getting far too much credit for beating one of the most poorly coached teams in CFB. They might be an alright team, but I'm far more worried about Michigan, Oregon, and (obviously) at Stanford.

Yeah the game today meant nothing. There was little or nothing to be learned.

UCLA has some talent though and I've seen DTR be pretty hard to stop at times previously. I think they will be a tough W.

I wouldn't say it's totally meaningless, UCLA completely physically dominated from the beginning which is something they haven't been doing much recently even against terrible teams.

Also, Charbonnet. He's a stud. Their run game looked a lot better than UW's, and judging by last year's run D, could easily pose problems.

DTR is just a mess though.

dirtysouwfdawg

Charbonet

RoadDawg55

Kingdome_Urinals said:

chuck said:

Gladstone said:

We aren't losing to UCLA, and they're getting far too much credit for beating one of the most poorly coached teams in CFB. They might be an alright team, but I'm far more worried about Michigan, Oregon, and (obviously) at Stanford.

Yeah the game today meant nothing. There was little or nothing to be learned.

UCLA has some talent though and I've seen DTR be pretty hard to stop at times previously. I think they will be a tough W.

I wouldn't say it's totally meaningless, UCLA completely physically dominated from the beginning which is something they haven't been doing much recently even against terrible teams.

Also, Charbonnet. He's a stud. Their run game looked a lot better than UW's, and judging by last year's run D, could easily pose problems.

DTR is just a mess though.

UCLA has been pretty good running the ball for a few years. I agree that their defense looking this physical is a good sign. It was against a shit opponent, but they are better than I thought.

chuck

Kingdome_Urinals said:

chuck said:

Gladstone said:

We aren't losing to UCLA, and they're getting far too much credit for beating one of the most poorly coached teams in CFB. They might be an alright team, but I'm far more worried about Michigan, Oregon, and (obviously) at Stanford.

Yeah the game today meant nothing. There was little or nothing to be learned.

UCLA has some talent though and I've seen DTR be pretty hard to stop at times previously. I think they will be a tough W.

I wouldn't say it's totally meaningless, UCLA completely physically dominated from the beginning which is something they haven't been doing much recently even against terrible teams.

Also, Charbonnet. He's a stud. Their run game looked a lot better than UW's, and judging by last year's run D, could easily pose problems.

DTR is just a mess though.

I'm putting a lot of weight on Hawaii being epically bad. I think they are. In all phases. Yes, UCLA ran over them like tackling dummies. I'm not sure what to make of that though.

Kaepsknee

Hawaii is horrible. UCLA sucks.

coronabruin

Gladstone said:

We aren't losing to UCLA, and they're getting far too much credit for beating one of the most poorly coached teams in CFB. They might be an alright team, but I'm far more worried about Michigan, Oregon, and (obviously) at Stanford.

dnc

Gladstone and J return! In the same thread! Praise Allah the season is here!