I clearly remember where many people stand as “enemies of the progrum,” etc. but with Gas all I remember is that he was a boring guy with very safe takes.
Wrong. He took very strong takes that Willingham wasn't being given enough time and that this was so unfair. He co-hosted with Rondeau the Coach's Show that year, and I was massively disappointed in both him and Rondeau.
Didn’t Gas call anyone wanting Ty gone mouth breathers or something? Fuck that guy.
I will say this... When I was writing my Willingham book, Gastineau agreed to be interviewed, even though he was well aware of my criticism of the program and Willingham (and he was a vocal Willingham supporter).
Of course he was a Ty Willy supporter. He's a piece of shit with low standards and grovels for his access like the rest of them. FTG
91 was thirty years ago. It is pathetic that we are still hanging onto 91 because we have been mostly irrelevant since then.
While true, at least UW got there. For all the shit Oregon's NFL fans talk they have a semi final win against a burned out ACC team.
And SC has been completely irrelevant since their last championship, going on 15 years.
The burned out ACC team (Florida State) were National Champs the prior season.
To correct your memory, Oregon played in the National Championship game and lost to Auburn, 22-19, in 2011 (2010 season).
If there were a playoff in 2008, USC would have won the title. UW beat them in 2009, coming off 0-12. See how stupid your post is now?
You’ve never won a natty. “No natty!”
JFC.
“If there was a playoff in 2008, USC would have won the title.”
They could have proved it by beating Oregon State instead of losing, 27-21.
They didn’t.
How can you assume they would have won both playoff games?
UW beat them coming off an 0-12 season. True. With a new head coach (previously Offensive Coordinator at USC the season before) and new Defensive Coordinator (who coached at USC the season before).
USC had to replace both of them.
Next time, try comparing apples to apples.
Doog Logic: There’s nothing it can’t do.
You are correct about one thing: Oregon has never won a Natty.
Washington won a Co-Championship 30 years ago. It’s too bad they didn’t have a playoff at the time. It would have been a great game.
Washington has never won a Championship in the modern era.
91 was thirty years ago. It is pathetic that we are still hanging onto 91 because we have been mostly irrelevant since then.
While true, at least UW got there. For all the shit Oregon's NFL fans talk they have a semi final win against a burned out ACC team.
And SC has been completely irrelevant since their last championship, going on 15 years.
The burned out ACC team (Florida State) were National Champs the prior season.
To correct your memory, Oregon played in the National Championship game and lost to Auburn, 22-19, in 2011 (2010 season).
If there were a playoff in 2008, USC would have won the title. UW beat them in 2009, coming off 0-12. See how stupid your post is now?
You’ve never won a natty. “No natty!”
JFC.
“If there was a playoff in 2008, USC would have won the title.”
They could have proved it by beating Oregon State instead of losing, 27-21.
They didn’t.
How can you assume they would have won both playoff games?
UW beat them coming off an 0-12 season. True. With a new head coach (previously Offensive Coordinator at USC the season before) and new Defensive Coordinator (who coached at USC the season before).
USC had to replace both of them.
Next time, try comparing apples to apples.
Doog Logic: There’s nothing it can’t do.
You are correct about one thing: Oregon has never won a Natty.
Washington won a Co-Championship 30 years ago. It’s too bad they didn’t have a playoff at the time. It would have been a great game.
Washington has never won a Championship in the modern era.
91 was thirty years ago. It is pathetic that we are still hanging onto 91 because we have been mostly irrelevant since then.
While true, at least UW got there. For all the shit Oregon's NFL fans talk they have a semi final win against a burned out ACC team.
And SC has been completely irrelevant since their last championship, going on 15 years.
The burned out ACC team (Florida State) were National Champs the prior season.
To correct your memory, Oregon played in the National Championship game and lost to Auburn, 22-19, in 2011 (2010 season).
If there were a playoff in 2008, USC would have won the title. UW beat them in 2009, coming off 0-12. See how stupid your post is now?
You’ve never won a natty. “No natty!”
JFC.
“If there was a playoff in 2008, USC would have won the title.”
They could have proved it by beating Oregon State instead of losing, 27-21.
They didn’t.
How can you assume they would have won both playoff games?
UW beat them coming off an 0-12 season. True. With a new head coach (previously Offensive Coordinator at USC the season before) and new Defensive Coordinator (who coached at USC the season before).
USC had to replace both of them.
Next time, try comparing apples to apples.
Doog Logic: There’s nothing it can’t do.
You are correct about one thing: Oregon has never won a Natty.
Washington won a Co-Championship 30 years ago. It’s too bad they didn’t have a playoff at the time. It would have been a great game.
Washington has never won a Championship in the modern era.
91 was thirty years ago. It is pathetic that we are still hanging onto 91 because we have been mostly irrelevant since then.
While true, at least UW got there. For all the shit Oregon's NFL fans talk they have a semi final win against a burned out ACC team.
And SC has been completely irrelevant since their last championship, going on 15 years.
The burned out ACC team (Florida State) were National Champs the prior season.
To correct your memory, Oregon played in the National Championship game and lost to Auburn, 22-19, in 2011 (2010 season).
If there were a playoff in 2008, USC would have won the title. UW beat them in 2009, coming off 0-12. See how stupid your post is now?
You’ve never won a natty. “No natty!”
JFC.
“If there was a playoff in 2008, USC would have won the title.”
They could have proved it by beating Oregon State instead of losing, 27-21.
They didn’t.
How can you assume they would have won both playoff games?
UW beat them coming off an 0-12 season. True. With a new head coach (previously Offensive Coordinator at USC the season before) and new Defensive Coordinator (who coached at USC the season before).
USC had to replace both of them.
Next time, try comparing apples to apples.
Doog Logic: There’s nothing it can’t do.
You are correct about one thing: Oregon has never won a Natty.
Washington won a Co-Championship 30 years ago. It’s too bad they didn’t have a playoff at the time. It would have been a great game.
Washington has never won a Championship in the modern era.
Comments
And SC has been completely irrelevant since their last championship, going on 15 years.
To correct your memory, Oregon played in the National Championship game and lost to Auburn, 22-19, in 2011 (2010 season).
The previous year - 2014 (2013 season), Florida State won the National Championship, beating Auburn, 34-31.
You’ve never won a natty. “No natty!”
“If there was a playoff in 2008, USC would have won the title.”
They could have proved it by beating Oregon State instead of losing, 27-21.
They didn’t.
How can you assume they would have won both playoff games?
UW beat them coming off an 0-12 season. True. With a new head coach (previously Offensive Coordinator at USC the season before) and new Defensive Coordinator (who coached at USC the season before).
USC had to replace both of them.
Next time, try comparing apples to apples.
Doog Logic: There’s nothing it can’t do.
You are correct about one thing: Oregon has never won a Natty.
Washington won a Co-Championship 30 years ago. It’s too bad they didn’t have a playoff at the time. It would have been a great game.
Washington has never won a Championship in the modern era.
Fuck Off, nxtduck . . .
You? got destroyed when you? played Urban, just like everyone else besides Dabo.