Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
White House compiling list of Facebook names to censor
Comments
-
SFGbob said:
You're now equating people who talked about Covid coming from a Chinese lab to domestic terrorists? This issue has nothing to do with law enforcement or domestic terrorism unless we're now calling people who question the government's claims regarding COVID and the vaccines domestic terrorists.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Beyond the obvious overreach of state power that could set the precedent for further government abuse against any sort of group in the future - this new "strategy" is just a solution looking for a problem. I haven't seen anything that suggests law enforcement isn't already properly equipped to deal with domestic terrorism.GrundleStiltzkin said:
ding ding 🛎. Winner winner chicken dinner!
-
For such a big opponent of strawman rapes you sure do like to go to town on shit I didn't say.SFGbob said:
You're now equating people who talked about Covid coming from a Chinese lab to domestic terrorists? This issue has nothing to do with law enforcement or domestic terrorism unless we're now calling people who question the government's claims regarding COVID and the vaccines domestic terrorists.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Beyond the obvious overreach of state power that could set the precedent for further government abuse against any sort of group in the future - this new "strategy" is just a solution looking for a problem. I haven't seen anything that suggests law enforcement isn't already properly equipped to deal with domestic terrorism.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I'm not defining domestic terrorism, not sure what you read to make you think that, but I guess you are kind of dumb. To the extent that "domestic terrorism" involves crime, we already have the apparatus to deal with it. Trying to expand the scope of "domestic terrorism" to include activity that isn't criminal is exactly the kind of police state bullshit that REAL liberals used to rail against back in the early Patriot Act days. -
You should have posted this the first time.
-
Yeah, where would anyone get the idea that you were conflating people the White House claims are spreading "misinformation" with domestic terrorists.GreenRiverGatorz said:
For such a big opponent of strawman rapes you sure do like to go to town on shit I didn't say.SFGbob said:
You're now equating people who talked about Covid coming from a Chinese lab to domestic terrorists? This issue has nothing to do with law enforcement or domestic terrorism unless we're now calling people who question the government's claims regarding COVID and the vaccines domestic terrorists.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Beyond the obvious overreach of state power that could set the precedent for further government abuse against any sort of group in the future - this new "strategy" is just a solution looking for a problem. I haven't seen anything that suggests law enforcement isn't already properly equipped to deal with domestic terrorism.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I'm not defining domestic terrorism, not sure what you read to make you think that, but I guess you are kind of dumb. To the extent that "domestic terrorism" involves crime, we already have the apparatus to deal with it. Trying to expand the scope of "domestic terrorism" to include activity that isn't criminal is exactly the kind of police state bullshit that REAL liberals used to rail against back in the early Patriot Act days.
I haven't seen anything that suggests law enforcement isn't already properly equipped to deal with domestic terrorism.
Speaking of stupid people, do you even know what the topic was that you were commenting on?
What you were trying to say is pretty fucking unclear, that's why I asked you a question and didn't claim you had said it, so you can stick your strawman charge up your ass. -
And he should make it a voting issue. But, for GRG it appears that free sh*t is the only issue that counts. Is there a leftard on this board that can rationally explain their core issues other than free sh*t and power?doogie said:You should have posted this the first time.
-
Free shit, not mean and orange.WestlinnDuck said:
And he should make it a voting issue. But, for GRG it appears that free sh*t is the only issue that counts. Is there a leftard on this board that can rationally explain their core issues other than free sh*t and power?doogie said:You should have posted this the first time.
Pretty much covers the leftists.
-
In the BO and biden WH we already witnessed them censoring Conservative organizations through the weaponizing of the IRS and the DOJ. We witnessed them wire tapping members of congress, the media and of course they wire tapped Trumps HQ. This is just more of the same shit.
-
GreenRiverGatorz said:
Beyond the obvious overreach of state power that could set the precedent for further government abuse against any sort of group in the future - this new "strategy" is just a solution looking for a problem. I haven't seen anything that suggests law enforcement isn't already properly equipped to deal with domestic terrorism.GrundleStiltzkin said:
-
FYFMFE, I better understand "gas lighting" now. You're inclined to think there's gotta be a defensible reason for this shit, but nope. Just doing it right out in open.
-
I liked it more when the government was discrete about coordinating with tech oligarchies to unilaterally silence people. That they're doing it out in the open now means they've determined they no longer pay a political cost for doing so.GrundleStiltzkin said:FYFMFE, I better understand "gas lighting" now. You're inclined to think there's gotta be a defensible reason for this shit, but nope. Just doing it right out in open.
