This is why the weatherman always says temperatures may be lower in outlying areas. Much of the supposed increase in average daily temperatures in the US are because of higher night time temperatures. The urban heat island effect is real and our government doesn't care about corrupt temperature data because it supports the global warming climate fraud. Sort of like the government commitment to honest elections and to the SCIENCE of a pandemic response.
I heard from the folks over at The Heartland Institute who informed me that they were about to release a major research report showing just how badly corrupted NOAA’s weather stations are. That report was published two days ago. Here is a link to the story at their website.
This is a link to the actual report: “Corrupted Climate Stations: The Official U.S. Temperature Record Remains Fatally Flawed
In Heartland’s own words, “Official NOAA temperature stations produce corrupted data due to purposeful placement in man-made hot spots.”
Just how flawed are NOAA’s weather stations?
This report finds approximately 96 percent of U.S. temperature stations fail to meet what the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) considers to be “acceptable,” uncorrupted placement. These findings strongly undermine the legitimacy and the magnitude of the official consensus on long-term climate warming trends. So just what measurements is Heartland using to discern that the stations don’t meet NOAA’s guidelines? They used NOAA’s own Site Information Handbook.
More from Heartland’s report:
The report was compiled via satellite and in-person survey visits to NOAA weather stations that contribute to the “official” land temperature data in the United States. The research shows that 96% of these stations are corrupted by localized effects of urbanization – producing heat-bias because of their close proximity to asphalt, machinery, and other heat-producing, heat-trapping, or heat-accentuating objects. Placing temperature stations in such locations violates NOAA’s own published standards and strongly undermines the legitimacy and the magnitude of the official consensus on long-term climate warming trends in the United States.
Yeah, it’s hard to put much faith in “climate science” when government-funded climate scientists willingly use corrupted data to produce the result they want. (Or to be more specific, to produce the result they are being paid to produce.)
“With a 96 percent warm-bias in U.S. temperature measurements, it is impossible to use any statistical methods to derive an accurate climate trend for the U.S.” said Heartland Institute Senior Fellow Anthony Watts, the director of the study. The report is actually a follow-up to a report done in 2009, which proved quite embarrassing to the climate community. As documented in this new report, some of the most egregious stations they reported on in 2009 were subsequently closed or moved by NOAA. But as shown in this picture from Cody, Wyoming, NOAA didn’t put much effort into improving the quality of the sites. This one was moved from atop a concrete dam to an asphalt parking lot.
Despite a few changes in locations, NOAA’s overall station placements have gotten much worse.
There are an abundance of photos showing weather stations that are obviously not reliable due to how they are situated, but the report also does the scientific work that NOAA apparently won’t do, grading these flawed stations using NOAA’s own guidelines. They fail consistently.
Here is just one example from Arco, Idaho. The temperature station is on a tiny strip of weeds between a parking lot and a sunlit wall. Below this photo is an infrared photo showing the captured heat of the building. Don’t forget that retained heat in the building doesn’t just affect high temps, it also inflates daily lows as the building releases its warmth overnight.
Take a look at this weather station, which sits at the top of a sunlit rock wall in Colfax, CA. Those rocks are holding a lot of heat. And get this, this weather station formerly sat in a grass field at this firehouse, but during a building renovation the weather station was moved to this corrupted site.
I drove to Chandler to visit snowbird family once. I had to leave at 5:30 am. The temp. dropped 10 degrees once I got outside of town and into farmland. There wasn't a major elevation change (probably 300-400 feet less). I really questioned where all the global warming data is coming from. Say that in mixed company and you're a right wing rube according to fags like Hhusky though.
Weather really should be taken among many stations. Relying on 1 station for municipalities is ridiculous and the number of weather stations that dot the landscape are many. Any meteorologist worth their salt will tell you placement of weather stations has an impact.
Professional Feminists taking it in the shorts from the trannies and the CRT crew. Amazing that supposedly strong independent women gave up the high ground without a fight.
An Organization Supposedly About Protecting Women From Domestic Violence Disintegrates In an Orgy of Woke Recriminations and, Of Course, anti-White Racism —Ace My favorite part is where this organization, supposedly devoted to protecting women from violent attackers, tells women not to call the cops because, you see, the cops will just come to the victims' house and beat them up more than their abusers did.
Mwah. That's delicious.
It was just two months after the death of George Floyd that one of the largest domestic violence nonprofits in the United States, Women Against Abuse, brought in several diversity consultants to conduct a racial-equity audit. The goal of the audit, Women Against Abuse told staffers, was to become "a fully inclusive, multicultural, and antiracist institution." By November 2020, the organization, which is ostensibly devoted to "serving all survivors," was offering to pay "BIPOC" employees more than their white counterparts and discouraging black abuse victims from calling the police. Its employees were also at war with each other, bickering over whether Jews are a persecuted minority group and whether there is such a thing as a non-racist white person.
...
The policies weren't just the product of employee activism, but of outside consultants--including Ragina Arrington, now the chief executive officer of the Clinton Foundation's Global Initiative University, who since July 2020 has been helping Women Against Abuse conduct its equity audit.
Anything that involves both George Floyd and a grifter from the Clinton Foundation is going to be focused on nothing but the public weal.
Arrington began this work as a senior officer at Philanthropy Unbound, one of two diversity consultancies retained by Women Against Abuse in the wake of George Floyd's death. The consultants soon injected race into every crevice of the organization, transforming it from the inside out. How much do you figure she makes?
... In addition to Arrington, Women Against Abuse hired Crossroads, a diversity consultancy that specializes in dismantling "white supremacy culture."
Mmm-mmm-mmm.
I can smell the money flowing from the government to grifters' pockets.
... After the consultants got involved, however, Women Against Abuse began hosting presentations on defunding the police, whom it discouraged non-white victims of domestic violence from calling.
"It is often unsafe for Black victims, victims of color and immigrant victims to reach out to police for help," the group posted on its website in the summer of 2020, given the "inherent racism" of law enforcement.
"The police have never been the solution to violence against women," asserted one PowerPoint presentation, which staffers were required to attend in May 2021. The presentation�"Defund the Police: Safety Planning"�counseled a "restorative justice" approach to domestic violence that used "community-based organizations."
Women Against Abuse did not respond to a request for comment about whom victims should call instead of police.
Professional Feminists taking it in the shorts from the trannies and the CRT crew. Amazing that supposedly strong independent women gave up the high ground without a fight.
An Organization Supposedly About Protecting Women From Domestic Violence Disintegrates In an Orgy of Woke Recriminations and, Of Course, anti-White Racism —Ace My favorite part is where this organization, supposedly devoted to protecting women from violent attackers, tells women not to call the cops because, you see, the cops will just come to the victims' house and beat them up more than their abusers did.
Mwah. That's delicious.
It was just two months after the death of George Floyd that one of the largest domestic violence nonprofits in the United States, Women Against Abuse, brought in several diversity consultants to conduct a racial-equity audit. The goal of the audit, Women Against Abuse told staffers, was to become "a fully inclusive, multicultural, and antiracist institution." By November 2020, the organization, which is ostensibly devoted to "serving all survivors," was offering to pay "BIPOC" employees more than their white counterparts and discouraging black abuse victims from calling the police. Its employees were also at war with each other, bickering over whether Jews are a persecuted minority group and whether there is such a thing as a non-racist white person.
...
The policies weren't just the product of employee activism, but of outside consultants--including Ragina Arrington, now the chief executive officer of the Clinton Foundation's Global Initiative University, who since July 2020 has been helping Women Against Abuse conduct its equity audit.
Anything that involves both George Floyd and a grifter from the Clinton Foundation is going to be focused on nothing but the public weal.
Arrington began this work as a senior officer at Philanthropy Unbound, one of two diversity consultancies retained by Women Against Abuse in the wake of George Floyd's death. The consultants soon injected race into every crevice of the organization, transforming it from the inside out. How much do you figure she makes?
... In addition to Arrington, Women Against Abuse hired Crossroads, a diversity consultancy that specializes in dismantling "white supremacy culture."
Mmm-mmm-mmm.
I can smell the money flowing from the government to grifters' pockets.
... After the consultants got involved, however, Women Against Abuse began hosting presentations on defunding the police, whom it discouraged non-white victims of domestic violence from calling.
"It is often unsafe for Black victims, victims of color and immigrant victims to reach out to police for help," the group posted on its website in the summer of 2020, given the "inherent racism" of law enforcement.
"The police have never been the solution to violence against women," asserted one PowerPoint presentation, which staffers were required to attend in May 2021. The presentation�"Defund the Police: Safety Planning"�counseled a "restorative justice" approach to domestic violence that used "community-based organizations."
Women Against Abuse did not respond to a request for comment about whom victims should call instead of police.
Your taxpayer dollars undoubtedly at work here. Everything the radical leftists touch turns to shit in the end.
Comments
https://ace.mu.nu/
I heard from the folks over at The Heartland Institute who informed me that they were about to release a major research report showing just how badly corrupted NOAA’s weather stations are. That report was published two days ago. Here is a link to the story at their website.
This is a link to the actual report: “Corrupted Climate Stations: The Official U.S. Temperature Record Remains Fatally Flawed
In Heartland’s own words, “Official NOAA temperature stations produce corrupted data due to purposeful placement in man-made hot spots.”
Just how flawed are NOAA’s weather stations?
This report finds approximately 96 percent of U.S. temperature stations fail to meet what the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) considers to be “acceptable,” uncorrupted placement. These findings strongly undermine the legitimacy and the magnitude of the official consensus on long-term climate warming trends.
So just what measurements is Heartland using to discern that the stations don’t meet NOAA’s guidelines? They used NOAA’s own Site Information Handbook.
More from Heartland’s report:
The report was compiled via satellite and in-person survey visits to NOAA weather stations that contribute to the “official” land temperature data in the United States. The research shows that 96% of these stations are corrupted by localized effects of urbanization – producing heat-bias because of their close proximity to asphalt, machinery, and other heat-producing, heat-trapping, or heat-accentuating objects. Placing temperature stations in such locations violates NOAA’s own published standards and strongly undermines the legitimacy and the magnitude of the official consensus on long-term climate warming trends in the United States.
Yeah, it’s hard to put much faith in “climate science” when government-funded climate scientists willingly use corrupted data to produce the result they want. (Or to be more specific, to produce the result they are being paid to produce.)
“With a 96 percent warm-bias in U.S. temperature measurements, it is impossible to use any statistical methods to derive an accurate climate trend for the U.S.” said Heartland Institute Senior Fellow Anthony Watts, the director of the study.
The report is actually a follow-up to a report done in 2009, which proved quite embarrassing to the climate community. As documented in this new report, some of the most egregious stations they reported on in 2009 were subsequently closed or moved by NOAA. But as shown in this picture from Cody, Wyoming, NOAA didn’t put much effort into improving the quality of the sites. This one was moved from atop a concrete dam to an asphalt parking lot.
Despite a few changes in locations, NOAA’s overall station placements have gotten much worse.
There are an abundance of photos showing weather stations that are obviously not reliable due to how they are situated, but the report also does the scientific work that NOAA apparently won’t do, grading these flawed stations using NOAA’s own guidelines. They fail consistently.
Here is just one example from Arco, Idaho. The temperature station is on a tiny strip of weeds between a parking lot and a sunlit wall. Below this photo is an infrared photo showing the captured heat of the building. Don’t forget that retained heat in the building doesn’t just affect high temps, it also inflates daily lows as the building releases its warmth overnight.
Take a look at this weather station, which sits at the top of a sunlit rock wall in Colfax, CA. Those rocks are holding a lot of heat. And get this, this weather station formerly sat in a grass field at this firehouse, but during a building renovation the weather station was moved to this corrupted site.
Now not so much
I'll keep saying it until everyone gets it
One more lab made virus release and we are either in fascism or civil war.
If you think they don't have round 2 tee'd up...
Earth Day started in 69. Climate alarm in the 70s. Generations indoctrinated by it
And now it makes your piss bad
Out energy policy is doing REAL damage unlike climate change
https://ace.mu.nu/
An Organization Supposedly About Protecting Women From Domestic Violence Disintegrates In an Orgy of Woke Recriminations and, Of Course, anti-White Racism
—Ace
My favorite part is where this organization, supposedly devoted to protecting women from violent attackers, tells women not to call the cops because, you see, the cops will just come to the victims' house and beat them up more than their abusers did.
Mwah. That's delicious.
It was just two months after the death of George Floyd that one of the largest domestic violence nonprofits in the United States, Women Against Abuse, brought in several diversity consultants to conduct a racial-equity audit. The goal of the audit, Women Against Abuse told staffers, was to become "a fully inclusive, multicultural, and antiracist institution."
By November 2020, the organization, which is ostensibly devoted to "serving all survivors," was offering to pay "BIPOC" employees more than their white counterparts and discouraging black abuse victims from calling the police. Its employees were also at war with each other, bickering over whether Jews are a persecuted minority group and whether there is such a thing as a non-racist white person.
...
The policies weren't just the product of employee activism, but of outside consultants--including Ragina Arrington, now the chief executive officer of the Clinton Foundation's Global Initiative University, who since July 2020 has been helping Women Against Abuse conduct its equity audit.
Anything that involves both George Floyd and a grifter from the Clinton Foundation is going to be focused on nothing but the public weal.
Arrington began this work as a senior officer at Philanthropy Unbound, one of two diversity consultancies retained by Women Against Abuse in the wake of George Floyd's death. The consultants soon injected race into every crevice of the organization, transforming it from the inside out.
How much do you figure she makes?
...
In addition to Arrington, Women Against Abuse hired Crossroads, a diversity consultancy that specializes in dismantling "white supremacy culture."
Mmm-mmm-mmm.
I can smell the money flowing from the government to grifters' pockets.
...
After the consultants got involved, however, Women Against Abuse began hosting presentations on defunding the police, whom it discouraged non-white victims of domestic violence from calling.
"It is often unsafe for Black victims, victims of color and immigrant victims to reach out to police for help," the group posted on its website in the summer of 2020, given the "inherent racism" of law enforcement.
"The police have never been the solution to violence against women," asserted one PowerPoint presentation, which staffers were required to attend in May 2021. The presentation�"Defund the Police: Safety Planning"�counseled a "restorative justice" approach to domestic violence that used "community-based organizations."
Women Against Abuse did not respond to a request for comment about whom victims should call instead of police.