Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Say her name
Comments
-
Unfortunately, GRG's conservative views just aren't voting issues because of high character - Like Snow and Liz Cheney.SFGbob said:
But he isn't a "leftard" he is Conservative just like you and me. In fact he probably agrees with most all things you or I say, when he isn't busy performing his passive aggressive Kunt act where he down votes everything you or I say.WestlinnDuck said:
Never question a leftard's integrity or how much they want an honest discussion about anything.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press. -
Lol, who the fuck ever claimed I was a conservative?WestlinnDuck said:
Unfortunately, GRG's conservative views just aren't voting issues because of high character - Like Snow and Liz Cheney.SFGbob said:
But he isn't a "leftard" he is Conservative just like you and me. In fact he probably agrees with most all things you or I say, when he isn't busy performing his passive aggressive Kunt act where he down votes everything you or I say.WestlinnDuck said:
Never question a leftard's integrity or how much they want an honest discussion about anything.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press. -
Not me, you're a coward and a lightweight, not a Conservative.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Lol, who the fuck ever claimed I was a conservative?WestlinnDuck said:
Unfortunately, GRG's conservative views just aren't voting issues because of high character - Like Snow and Liz Cheney.SFGbob said:
But he isn't a "leftard" he is Conservative just like you and me. In fact he probably agrees with most all things you or I say, when he isn't busy performing his passive aggressive Kunt act where he down votes everything you or I say.WestlinnDuck said:
Never question a leftard's integrity or how much they want an honest discussion about anything.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press. -
14 minutes...SFGbob said:
Not me, you're a coward and a lightweight, not a Conservative.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Lol, who the fuck ever claimed I was a conservative?WestlinnDuck said:
Unfortunately, GRG's conservative views just aren't voting issues because of high character - Like Snow and Liz Cheney.SFGbob said:
But he isn't a "leftard" he is Conservative just like you and me. In fact he probably agrees with most all things you or I say, when he isn't busy performing his passive aggressive Kunt act where he down votes everything you or I say.WestlinnDuck said:
Never question a leftard's integrity or how much they want an honest discussion about anything.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.
-
So beside being a Kunt you also lack the ability to detect sarcasm.BennyBeaver said:
14 minutes...SFGbob said:
Not me, you're a coward and a lightweight, not a Conservative.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Lol, who the fuck ever claimed I was a conservative?WestlinnDuck said:
Unfortunately, GRG's conservative views just aren't voting issues because of high character - Like Snow and Liz Cheney.SFGbob said:
But he isn't a "leftard" he is Conservative just like you and me. In fact he probably agrees with most all things you or I say, when he isn't busy performing his passive aggressive Kunt act where he down votes everything you or I say.WestlinnDuck said:
Never question a leftard's integrity or how much they want an honest discussion about anything.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press. -
He should have fired into the air.GreenRiverGatorz said:
No I didn't. I said people in the crowd were armed, not her. But we can squabble semantics all you want, it wouldn't be a Bob argument without it.SFGbob said:
You didGreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.All I saw was a video of an armed crowd tryingto break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were.
Anyways, back to the point at hand, I have no problem recognizing that she herself was unarmed. Maybe police tactical superiority guy @Sledog can weigh in, but I'd guess that given the tight quarters and the sheer number of the horde trying to get through, it probably wouldn't have been very prudent for the cop to wait for the door to break down before identifying who was and wasn't armed. Generally speaking, if one person in the mob has a gun, the whole mob is fair game when it comes to self-defense.
But Westlinn is right, no harm in getting more facts. -
Or aimed for the legs. Or grabbed a taser.Alexis said:
He should have fired into the air.GreenRiverGatorz said:
No I didn't. I said people in the crowd were armed, not her. But we can squabble semantics all you want, it wouldn't be a Bob argument without it.SFGbob said:
You didGreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.All I saw was a video of an armed crowd tryingto break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were.
Anyways, back to the point at hand, I have no problem recognizing that she herself was unarmed. Maybe police tactical superiority guy @Sledog can weigh in, but I'd guess that given the tight quarters and the sheer number of the horde trying to get through, it probably wouldn't have been very prudent for the cop to wait for the door to break down before identifying who was and wasn't armed. Generally speaking, if one person in the mob has a gun, the whole mob is fair game when it comes to self-defense.
But Westlinn is right, no harm in getting more facts. -
The old “it was sarcasm” routine. Nice try gaybob.
-
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of THOSE idiots was shot.GreenRiverGatorz said:
No I didn't. I said people in the crowd were armed, not her. But we can squabble semantics all you want, it wouldn't be a Bob argument without it.SFGbob said:
You didGreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.All I saw was a video of an armed crowd tryingto break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were.
Anyways, back to the point at hand, I have no problem recognizing that she herself was unarmed. Maybe police tactical superiority guy @Sledog can weigh in, but I'd guess that given the tight quarters and the sheer number of the horde trying to get through, it probably wouldn't have been very prudent for the cop to wait for the door to break down before identifying who was and wasn't armed. Generally speaking, if one person in the mob has a gun, the whole mob is fair game when it comes to self-defense.
But Westlinn is right, no harm in getting more facts.
Query: One of what idiots? Why the idiots in the armed crowd, of course!
Thanks for playing, @GreenRiverGatorz. I didn't know English was your second language. -
I've been sarcastically mocking him use that exact same response for a few weeks now. But if you prefer to keep your head up your ass, cheers.BennyBeaver said:The old “it was sarcasm” routine. Nice try gaybob.
-
SFGbob said:
I've been sarcastically mocking him use that exact same response for a few weeks now. But if you prefer to keep your head up your ass, cheers.BennyBeaver said:The old “it was sarcasm” routine. Nice try gaybob.
-
Maybe shot the knife out of her left hand and the gun out of her right hand.....GreenRiverGatorz said:
Or aimed for the legs. Or grabbed a taser.Alexis said:
He should have fired into the air.GreenRiverGatorz said:
No I didn't. I said people in the crowd were armed, not her. But we can squabble semantics all you want, it wouldn't be a Bob argument without it.SFGbob said:
You didGreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.All I saw was a video of an armed crowd tryingto break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were.
Anyways, back to the point at hand, I have no problem recognizing that she herself was unarmed. Maybe police tactical superiority guy @Sledog can weigh in, but I'd guess that given the tight quarters and the sheer number of the horde trying to get through, it probably wouldn't have been very prudent for the cop to wait for the door to break down before identifying who was and wasn't armed. Generally speaking, if one person in the mob has a gun, the whole mob is fair game when it comes to self-defense.
But Westlinn is right, no harm in getting more facts.
Oh....she wasn't armed?!? Nevermind.
Now, let's get back to LeBron's demand for accountability on the knife wielding black chick.
-
I'm having no difficulty understanding how stupid LeBron's comments were, while simultaneously recognizing that you, Gasbag and blob, to name but three, are fucking idiots.PurpleThrobber said:
Maybe shot the knife out of her left hand and the gun out of her right hand.....GreenRiverGatorz said:
Or aimed for the legs. Or grabbed a taser.Alexis said:
He should have fired into the air.GreenRiverGatorz said:
No I didn't. I said people in the crowd were armed, not her. But we can squabble semantics all you want, it wouldn't be a Bob argument without it.SFGbob said:
You didGreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.All I saw was a video of an armed crowd tryingto break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were.
Anyways, back to the point at hand, I have no problem recognizing that she herself was unarmed. Maybe police tactical superiority guy @Sledog can weigh in, but I'd guess that given the tight quarters and the sheer number of the horde trying to get through, it probably wouldn't have been very prudent for the cop to wait for the door to break down before identifying who was and wasn't armed. Generally speaking, if one person in the mob has a gun, the whole mob is fair game when it comes to self-defense.
But Westlinn is right, no harm in getting more facts.
Oh....she wasn't armed?!? Nevermind.
Now, let's get back to LeBron's demand for accountability on the knife wielding black chick. -
Thanks for weighing in, “Mr. Hands Up, Don’t Shoot.”
You calling anyone else an “idiot” . . . Now, that’s rich. -
Yeah, I guess was just "pretending" for over two weeks now.GreenRiverGatorz said:SFGbob said:
I've been sarcastically mocking him use that exact same response for a few weeks now. But if you prefer to keep your head up your ass, cheers.BennyBeaver said:The old “it was sarcasm” routine. Nice try gaybob.
Hey, you got the two fucking morons Benny and Flea to tongue your ass, life must be good.SFGbob said:
Oh GRG is no leftard, he just hates people who pick sides and who don't blame Conservatives from the problems in Rat run cities.WestlinnDuck said:
GRG and leftards don't seem to understand the election process in blue cities or states. They do love the institutional white racism they vote for.TurdBomber said:
Christ. You're delusional if you think you're the least bit objective or impartial. Nice attempt, but at least Mello is transparent about his fence-shitting.GreenRiverGatorz said:
What kind of gotcha is this? I've been pretty clear that neither "side" is going to do jack shit. And anyone aligning themselves with either "side" is a dipshit. Take yourself, exhibit/dipshit A.SFGbob said:
Didn't you just point the finger at Conservatives for not fixing the policing problems in Blue cities?GreenRiverGatorz said:
"Sides" are for dipshits. I'm for whoever is going to get shit done. Finger pointing seems to be more your jam.TurdBomber said:
What's this check-down, behind the line of scrimmage passing, weak-ass bullshit? It's up to the other side to fix everything themselves so you can be happy?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Exactly, the leftist playbook for police reform is pants on head stupid. If conservatives helped push for actual pragmatic reform, starting with untangling police union influence, we could actually get somewhere. But crying about msnbc is a lot easier. Can't fault you too much for taking the low hanging fruit.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes it's the Conservatives who are engaging in a culture war. I have an idea on what we can do about incompetent policing. Lets defund them, and lets attack them and lets drive out the good cops so that we have to select more incompetent female cops and diversity quotas.GreenRiverGatorz said:
A police officer incompetently shooting someone to death when she intended to use a taser is the kind of police mistake that is all too common in this country. "Conservatives and constitutionalists" are too absorbed by their culture war with woketards to do something about it.TurdBomber said:
Routine traffic stops are not the kind of "big government intrusions" conservatives and constitutionalists are worried about.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Sounds like something a selective statist would say. Your centrist credentials are as legit as Mello's.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
If you resist arrest, bad things can happen. It doesn't mean anyone deserved to die. But don't put the game in the ref's hands after committing a technicalHHusky said:Always funny to read the messages of the "I have to be armed to the teeth to protect me from government overreach" crowd when they're explaining that you deserve what you get if you resist arrest.
You might google a bit about the 4th Amendment to up your game and reach the adult leagues someday.
Get your hands dirty or don't play, GRG.
Why, yes you did.
Exactly, the leftist playbook for police reform is pants on head stupid. If conservatives helped push for actual pragmatic reform, starting with untangling police union influence, we could actually get somewhere. -
Yeah, the guy who lets Al Sharpton and Ben Crump lead him around by the nose is smartz!!!trublue said:Thanks for weighing in, “Mr. Hands Up, Don’t Shoot.”
You calling anyone else an “idiot” . . . Now, that’s rich. -
Like I care what you think. You've provided nothing but shit for years both here and other forums.HHusky said:
I'm having no difficulty understanding how stupid LeBron's comments were, while simultaneously recognizing that you, Gasbag and blob, to name but three, are fucking idiots.PurpleThrobber said:
Maybe shot the knife out of her left hand and the gun out of her right hand.....GreenRiverGatorz said:
Or aimed for the legs. Or grabbed a taser.Alexis said:
He should have fired into the air.GreenRiverGatorz said:
No I didn't. I said people in the crowd were armed, not her. But we can squabble semantics all you want, it wouldn't be a Bob argument without it.SFGbob said:
You didGreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.All I saw was a video of an armed crowd tryingto break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were.
Anyways, back to the point at hand, I have no problem recognizing that she herself was unarmed. Maybe police tactical superiority guy @Sledog can weigh in, but I'd guess that given the tight quarters and the sheer number of the horde trying to get through, it probably wouldn't have been very prudent for the cop to wait for the door to break down before identifying who was and wasn't armed. Generally speaking, if one person in the mob has a gun, the whole mob is fair game when it comes to self-defense.
But Westlinn is right, no harm in getting more facts.
Oh....she wasn't armed?!? Nevermind.
Now, let's get back to LeBron's demand for accountability on the knife wielding black chick.
Fuck off.
-
*This claim is disputedMelloDawg said:
Not true. Also, not a leftist.Sledog said:
His reasons is shooting conservatives is OK. The left is off the reservation and need to be reigned in, the hard way.Bob_C said:@Mellowdawg quick on the downvote draw today. I’m sure he has his reasons.
-
When you need to know, fo-sho, use Swaye-Check. The Best Indigenous Fact Checker on the InterwebsSwaye said:
*This claim is disputedMelloDawg said:
Not true. Also, not a leftist.Sledog said:
His reasons is shooting conservatives is OK. The left is off the reservation and need to be reigned in, the hard way.Bob_C said:@Mellowdawg quick on the downvote draw today. I’m sure he has his reasons.
-
IIRC the only guy arrested for being armed was the ANTIFABLM guy that was baiting Trump people to come in after the ABTIFABLM people broke in. He bragged about it on his video. He was carrying. Have any articles on all the armed Trumpers arrested.GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.
