Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Say her name
Comments
-
disagree.PurpleThrobber said:
In a hypothetical sense, #metoo.doogie said:@MelloDawg fuck off.
I hope you are shot and killed by a Federal agent and we learn about it so you can be laughed at while your family is mocked on Twitter.
Even dumbfucks like @MelloShillDawg don't deserve death wished on them.
DIAFF, sure. But he can light his own damned match for that one. -
Shill.MelloDawg said:
Mental gymnastics over this incident on that day? Doesn't sound like there are any, I assume folks here have watched the videos of her entering the building and have made their conclusions before commenting. It does sound like you disagree with the DOJ's finding that the officer acted in self-defense in this instance.PurpleThrobber said:
What mental gymnastics are there? An unarmed woman was shot down in cold blood with no warning, no nothing. Bang bang dead.MelloDawg said:The Olympic level mental gymnastics being performed regarding this day are interesting.
Don’t forget, you’ll still need to face Finland. People forget that.
And, who shot her by the way? Has that ever been disclosed? Why not him over Lebron's "Who's Next" guy?
Hypocrite.
Say her fucking name, shill.
Say the shooter's name.
-
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press. -
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press. -
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press. -
Fuck
-
Never question a leftard's integrity or how much they want an honest discussion about anything.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press. -
You didGreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. -
But he isn't a "leftard" he is Conservative just like you and me. In fact he probably agrees with most all things you or I say, when he isn't busy performing his passive aggressive Kunt act where he down votes everything you or I say.WestlinnDuck said:
Never question a leftard's integrity or how much they want an honest discussion about anything.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press. -
No I didn't. I said people in the crowd were armed, not her. But we can squabble semantics all you want, it wouldn't be a Bob argument without it.SFGbob said:
You didGreenRiverGatorz said:
Who said she was armed?SFGbob said:
What was she armed with?GreenRiverGatorz said:
All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.WestlinnDuck said:
Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?Bob_C said:Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.
She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.All I saw was a video of an armed crowd tryingto break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were.
Anyways, back to the point at hand, I have no problem recognizing that she herself was unarmed. Maybe police tactical superiority guy @Sledog can weigh in, but I'd guess that given the tight quarters and the sheer number of the horde trying to get through, it probably wouldn't have been very prudent for the cop to wait for the door to break down before identifying who was and wasn't armed. Generally speaking, if one person in the mob has a gun, the whole mob is fair game when it comes to self-defense.
But Westlinn is right, no harm in getting more facts.
