Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

2»

Comments

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,276
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Some traditions are more equal than others.

    You girls started this march toward doing whatever you have the raw power to do.

    I said you'd get an opposite and equal reaction.

    #I_told_you_so

    Fuck off. The GOP never did anything even remotely like this. Telling that Dazzler doesn't criticize the Rats but blames the GOP for what the Rats are now doing.
    Some of us would have been happy to do things in the traditional manner. The GOP broke that convention. Some Democrats want revenge.

    Regrettable, but exactly what I told you would happen.
    You're a lying sack of shit. If the Rats held the Senate and they did exactly what the GOP did you wouldn't have said a fucking thing about it other than to praise it. You're a fraud and liar Dazzler.
    Yes, yes. "You would have done it too!" Always the projection of the fanatic.
    Rats are seriously talking about packing the Supreme Court, Dazzler blames the GOP. But trust him, he would have been totally opposed to the Rats blocking a vote on a Judicial nominee if they had the power to do so.


    Doesn't everyone recall the Dazzler OUTRAGE when the Rats did exactly that with Miguel Estrada. Fucking liar and a hack Dazzler.
    The guy from CHiPs?
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    edited April 2021

    SFGbob said:

    Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court


    How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?
    None, and they were under no obligation to do so. They didn't violate any rules or policies nor did they have to change any rules or procedures that were available to them. They exercised the already existing power they had.
  • Options
    BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 5,394
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Some traditions are more equal than others.

    You girls started this march toward doing whatever you have the raw power to do.

    I said you'd get an opposite and equal reaction.

    #I_told_you_so

    Fuck off. The GOP never did anything even remotely like this. Telling that Dazzler doesn't criticize the Rats but blames the GOP for what the Rats are now doing.
    Some of us would have been happy to do things in the traditional manner. The GOP broke that convention. Some Democrats want revenge.

    Regrettable, but exactly what I told you would happen.
    You're a lying sack of shit. If the Rats held the Senate and they did exactly what the GOP did you wouldn't have said a fucking thing about it other than to praise it. You're a fraud and liar Dazzler.
    Yes, yes. "You would have done it too!" Always the projection of the fanatic.
    Rats are seriously talking about packing the Supreme Court, Dazzler blames the GOP. But trust him, he would have been totally opposed to the Rats blocking a vote on a Judicial nominee if they had the power to do so.


    Doesn't everyone recall the Dazzler OUTRAGE when the Rats did exactly that with Miguel Estrada. Fucking liar and a hack Dazzler.
    The lying shit show they performed in front of the entire world during the Kavanaugh hearings was as low as one side can get. The procedural non-vote on Garland was nothing.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,276
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court


    How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?
    None, and they were under no obligation to do so.
    Called it!

    That's the standard.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court


    How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?
    None, and they were under no obligation to do so.
    Called it!

    That's the standard.
    Called what? That you're a shameless liar and a hack? That's fact was established long ago Dazzler.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Some traditions are more equal than others.

    You girls started this march toward doing whatever you have the raw power to do.

    I said you'd get an opposite and equal reaction.

    #I_told_you_so

    Fuck off. The GOP never did anything even remotely like this. Telling that Dazzler doesn't criticize the Rats but blames the GOP for what the Rats are now doing.
    Some of us would have been happy to do things in the traditional manner. The GOP broke that convention. Some Democrats want revenge.

    Regrettable, but exactly what I told you would happen.
    You're a lying sack of shit. If the Rats held the Senate and they did exactly what the GOP did you wouldn't have said a fucking thing about it other than to praise it. You're a fraud and liar Dazzler.
    Yes, yes. "You would have done it too!" Always the projection of the fanatic.
    Rats are seriously talking about packing the Supreme Court, Dazzler blames the GOP. But trust him, he would have been totally opposed to the Rats blocking a vote on a Judicial nominee if they had the power to do so.


    Doesn't everyone recall the Dazzler OUTRAGE when the Rats did exactly that with Miguel Estrada. Fucking liar and a hack Dazzler.
    The lying shit show they performed in front of the entire world during the Kavanaugh hearings was as low as one side can get. The procedural non-vote on Garland was nothing.
    The baseless Kavanaugh smear was another move that Dazzler applauded and another great example of the Dazzler's shifting standard for proof and evidence.
  • Options
    HustlinOwlHustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Goduckies said:

    SFGbob said:

    Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court


    How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?
    Why waste time when they knew he wasn't going to get confirmed?
    Then vote him down and go to the next person. Intentionally leaving a seat open for over a year isn't necessarily the definition of stealing, but it's pretty fucking close.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    Goduckies said:

    SFGbob said:

    Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court


    How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?
    Why waste time when they knew he wasn't going to get confirmed?
    Then vote him down and go to the next person. Intentionally leaving a seat open for over a year isn't necessarily the definition of stealing, but it's pretty fucking close.
    How is it close? Were the Rats "stealing" Judicial seats when they refused to vote on Bush's nominees? Of course you never once referred to that as "stealing."
  • Options
    HustlinOwlHustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    SFGbob said:

    Goduckies said:

    SFGbob said:

    Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court


    How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?
    Why waste time when they knew he wasn't going to get confirmed?
    Then vote him down and go to the next person. Intentionally leaving a seat open for over a year isn't necessarily the definition of stealing, but it's pretty fucking close.
    How is it close? Were the Rats "stealing" Judicial seats when they refused to vote on Bush's nominees? Of course you never once referred to that as "stealing."
    It would be almost the same thing if not completely different.

    In October 2005, George W. Bush nominated Harriet Miers, a corporate attorney from Texas who had served as Bush's private attorney and as White House Counsel, as an Associate Justice to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Miers was widely perceived as unqualified for the position, and it later emerged that she had allowed her law license to lapse for a time. The nomination was immediately attacked by politicians and commentators from across the political spectrum. At Miers's request, Bush withdrew the nomination on October 27, ostensibly to avoid violating executive privilege by disclosing details of her work at the White House.[47] Four days later, Bush nominated Samuel Alito to the seat. Alito was confirmed by a vote of 58–42 on January 31, 2006.[6]
  • Options
    theknowledgetheknowledge Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,583
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment
    Swaye's Wigwam
    hardhat said:

    Lots to unpack there from an openly anti-semitic idiot who wants to get rid of police, but we can start with the false narrative that the majority is stolen. If Hillary had been president and the lefties had their guys in there, what would the narrative be?

    RBG had 8 years of Obama to retire and allow a progressive judicial candidate be nominated yet she held on. Did she love the power and cache or did she think BO was a shitty man/president owned by the wrong people? So many on the left lamented at the alter of her dead corpse that she should have held on for a few more months when the reality was that she was old as dirt from 2008-2016 and yet decided keep "serving". The whole situation never sat well with me, never made sense.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    Goduckies said:

    SFGbob said:

    Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court


    How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?
    Why waste time when they knew he wasn't going to get confirmed?
    Then vote him down and go to the next person. Intentionally leaving a seat open for over a year isn't necessarily the definition of stealing, but it's pretty fucking close.
    How is it close? Were the Rats "stealing" Judicial seats when they refused to vote on Bush's nominees? Of course you never once referred to that as "stealing."
    It would be almost the same thing if not completely different.

    In October 2005, George W. Bush nominated Harriet Miers, a corporate attorney from Texas who had served as Bush's private attorney and as White House Counsel, as an Associate Justice to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Miers was widely perceived as unqualified for the position, and it later emerged that she had allowed her law license to lapse for a time. The nomination was immediately attacked by politicians and commentators from across the political spectrum. At Miers's request, Bush withdrew the nomination on October 27, ostensibly to avoid violating executive privilege by disclosing details of her work at the White House.[47] Four days later, Bush nominated Samuel Alito to the seat. Alito was confirmed by a vote of 58–42 on January 31, 2006.[6]
    I wasn't talking about Harriet Miers but nice try dumbfuck.
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,753
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Some traditions are more equal than others.

    You girls started this march toward doing whatever you have the raw power to do.

    I said you'd get an opposite and equal reaction.

    #I_told_you_so

    Fuck off. The GOP never did anything even remotely like this. Telling that Dazzler doesn't criticize the Rats but blames the GOP for what the Rats are now doing.
    Some of us would have been happy to do things in the traditional manner. The GOP broke that convention. Some Democrats want revenge.

    Regrettable, but exactly what I told you would happen.
    You're a lying sack of shit. If the Rats held the Senate and they did exactly what the GOP did you wouldn't have said a fucking thing about it other than to praise it. You're a fraud and liar Dazzler.
    Yes, yes. "You would have done it too!" Always the projection of the fanatic.
    Rats are seriously talking about packing the Supreme Court, Dazzler blames the GOP. But trust him, he would have been totally opposed to the Rats blocking a vote on a Judicial nominee if they had the power to do so.


    Doesn't everyone recall the Dazzler OUTRAGE when the Rats did exactly that with Miguel Estrada. Fucking liar and a hack Dazzler.
    The lying shit show they performed in front of the entire world during the Kavanaugh hearings was as low as one side can get. The procedural non-vote on Garland was nothing.
    Thank God Garland wasn't approved. That mealy-mouthed weasel is spineless as fuck.
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 14,009
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Some traditions are more equal than others.

    You girls started this march toward doing whatever you have the raw power to do.

    I said you'd get an opposite and equal reaction.

    #I_told_you_so

    Fuck off. The GOP never did anything even remotely like this. Telling that Dazzler doesn't criticize the Rats but blames the GOP for what the Rats are now doing.
    Some of us would have been happy to do things in the traditional manner. The GOP broke that convention. Some Democrats want revenge.

    Regrettable, but exactly what I told you would happen.
    You're a lying sack of shit. If the Rats held the Senate and they did exactly what the GOP did you wouldn't have said a fucking thing about it other than to praise it. You're a fraud and liar Dazzler.
    Yes, yes. "You would have done it too!" Always the projection of the fanatic.
    Rats are seriously talking about packing the Supreme Court, Dazzler blames the GOP. But trust him, he would have been totally opposed to the Rats blocking a vote on a Judicial nominee if they had the power to do so.


    Doesn't everyone recall the Dazzler OUTRAGE when the Rats did exactly that with Miguel Estrada. Fucking liar and a hack Dazzler.
    The lying shit show they performed in front of the entire world during the Kavanaugh hearings was as low as one side can get. The procedural non-vote on Garland was nothing.
    Thank God Garland wasn't approved. That mealy-mouthed weasel is spineless as fuck.
    That and he couldn't be more of a leftard. He is as centrist as mello.
  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    edited April 2021
    SFGbob said:
    You have to be complete stooge to believe you live in a democracy.

    You are less dumb if you believe you live in a republic, because that
    was what was intended, but it's still not the reality.

    You live in a Nazi State, a Fascist society where government power
    is fused with corporate power.

    It is only a matter of time before these Satanic Nazis show their
    truest colors and start wearing Gestapo/SS Uniforms with the
    Swastika. They really are that sick. Perhaps that will wake you up.

    That's where this is headed with your continued compliance with
    their tyranny.

  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,753
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited April 2021

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Some traditions are more equal than others.

    You girls started this march toward doing whatever you have the raw power to do.

    I said you'd get an opposite and equal reaction.

    #I_told_you_so

    Fuck off. The GOP never did anything even remotely like this. Telling that Dazzler doesn't criticize the Rats but blames the GOP for what the Rats are now doing.
    Some of us would have been happy to do things in the traditional manner. The GOP broke that convention. Some Democrats want revenge.

    Regrettable, but exactly what I told you would happen.
    You're a lying sack of shit. If the Rats held the Senate and they did exactly what the GOP did you wouldn't have said a fucking thing about it other than to praise it. You're a fraud and liar Dazzler.
    Yes, yes. "You would have done it too!" Always the projection of the fanatic.
    Rats are seriously talking about packing the Supreme Court, Dazzler blames the GOP. But trust him, he would have been totally opposed to the Rats blocking a vote on a Judicial nominee if they had the power to do so.


    Doesn't everyone recall the Dazzler OUTRAGE when the Rats did exactly that with Miguel Estrada. Fucking liar and a hack Dazzler.
    The lying shit show they performed in front of the entire world during the Kavanaugh hearings was as low as one side can get. The procedural non-vote on Garland was nothing.
    Thank God Garland wasn't approved. That mealy-mouthed weasel is spineless as fuck.
    That and he couldn't be more of a leftard. He is as centrist as mello.

    More interloper or charity case than centrist.
  • Options
    HustlinOwlHustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Goduckies said:

    SFGbob said:

    Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court


    How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?
    Why waste time when they knew he wasn't going to get confirmed?
    Then vote him down and go to the next person. Intentionally leaving a seat open for over a year isn't necessarily the definition of stealing, but it's pretty fucking close.
    How is it close? Were the Rats "stealing" Judicial seats when they refused to vote on Bush's nominees? Of course you never once referred to that as "stealing."
    It would be almost the same thing if not completely different.

    In October 2005, George W. Bush nominated Harriet Miers, a corporate attorney from Texas who had served as Bush's private attorney and as White House Counsel, as an Associate Justice to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Miers was widely perceived as unqualified for the position, and it later emerged that she had allowed her law license to lapse for a time. The nomination was immediately attacked by politicians and commentators from across the political spectrum. At Miers's request, Bush withdrew the nomination on October 27, ostensibly to avoid violating executive privilege by disclosing details of her work at the White House.[47] Four days later, Bush nominated Samuel Alito to the seat. Alito was confirmed by a vote of 58–42 on January 31, 2006.[6]
    I wasn't talking about Harriet Miers but nice try dumbfuck.
    Can I get a list of the others?
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,753
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    Sedition and insurgency used to be cool before it wasn't. Note the left still clinging to Russia Russia Russia. They will be 20 years from now as well.

    Still a Meathead, after all these years. Without his father, nobody would know his name.
    AND, to top it off, we can thank Reiner for that fucking awful show "The West Wing," spawned by Reiner's sappy POS movie "The American President." The film was a cliche-filled bucket of shit.

    The TV show was a bucket of Aaron Sorkin's verbose diarrhea for ex-Clinton baby-boomer voters to lap up while waiting for their ED pills to kick in.

    Fucking Awful TV. Worse than Mad About You.
Sign In or Register to comment.