Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Dear Abby: Help! I'm dazed; he's confused
Comments
-
Let's see who disputes it besides the dipshit.TheKobeStopper said:
This claim is disputed.Sledog said:
The facts say you're a dipshit.TheKobeStopper said:Shit tweet. Shit tweeter.
She’s right, by definition. Republicans hate facts.
-
Remember how barry funneled a trillion into shovel ready jobs and fixed all the roads. Me neither, most of it funneled into state payments for government employees. Infrastucture.RaceBannon said:I wonder why our roads are shit
No I don't -
The masses support Biden’s infrastructure plan. I’m sorry you feel that the definitions of words are a “marketing game” but feel free to run against it since so many people will be upset. I suspect you’ll stick to attacking 0.4% of the population, just like op.Bob_C said:
The masses equate infrastructure with physical existence of something. Right or wrong that’s what they believe. If you are playing marketing games against the accepted meaning you are being deliberately dishonest.TheKobeStopper said:Shit tweet. Shit tweeter.
She’s right, by definition. Republicans hate facts. -
Je suis infrastructure
-
Someone once wrote, "When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways." You should take this to heart. Bob C is correct, the MSM is not telling the "masses" what the stimulus package contains. They use the term "infrastructure" because you can see the sh*tty roads and bridges. The assumption is that they will be fixed. The truth is very little is going to roads and bridges because you leftards hate cars and the individuals freedom travel on their own terms.TheKobeStopper said:
The masses support Biden’s infrastructure plan. I’m sorry you feel that the definitions of words are a “marketing game” but feel free to run against it since so many people will be upset. I suspect you’ll stick to attacking 0.4% of the population, just like op.Bob_C said:
The masses equate infrastructure with physical existence of something. Right or wrong that’s what they believe. If you are playing marketing games against the accepted meaning you are being deliberately dishonest.TheKobeStopper said:Shit tweet. Shit tweeter.
She’s right, by definition. Republicans hate facts. -
See that my post came untethered and drifted into the Tug. What up boyz?
-
Si se podemos!PurpleThrobber said:Je suis infrastructure
-
Like you missed Trump's infrastructure plans during the whole Russia! Russia! Russia! bullshit you fell for. Or during the 2 phony impeachment trials.TheKobeStopper said:
The masses support Biden’s infrastructure plan. I’m sorry you feel that the definitions of words are a “marketing game” but feel free to run against it since so many people will be upset. I suspect you’ll stick to attacking 0.4% of the population, just like op.Bob_C said:
The masses equate infrastructure with physical existence of something. Right or wrong that’s what they believe. If you are playing marketing games against the accepted meaning you are being deliberately dishonest.TheKobeStopper said:Shit tweet. Shit tweeter.
She’s right, by definition. Republicans hate facts.
Fuck off with the "Biden's Plan" bullshit, shill.
One word: Podesta.
10% off the top for the big guy.
-
And before Kobe and his ilk re-define it, take all the screenshots you need:
Infrastructure is the set of fundamental facilities and systems that support the sustainable functionality of households and firms. Serving a country, city, or other area,[1] including the services and facilities necessary for its economy to function.[2] Infrastructure is composed of public and private physical structures such as roads, railways, bridges, tunnels, water supply, sewers, electrical grids, and telecommunications (including Internet connectivity and broadband access). In general, infrastructure has been defined as "the physical components of interrelated systems providing commodities and services essential to enable, sustain, or enhance societal living conditions" and maintain the surrounding environment.[3] -
Circular logic. The masses support it because they hear infrastructure and think they know what that means. If they knew what infrastructure meant in the bill they might feel differently.TheKobeStopper said:
The masses support Biden’s infrastructure plan. I’m sorry you feel that the definitions of words are a “marketing game” but feel free to run against it since so many people will be upset. I suspect you’ll stick to attacking 0.4% of the population, just like op.Bob_C said:
The masses equate infrastructure with physical existence of something. Right or wrong that’s what they believe. If you are playing marketing games against the accepted meaning you are being deliberately dishonest.TheKobeStopper said:Shit tweet. Shit tweeter.
She’s right, by definition. Republicans hate facts.
Why not be totally transparent? If the bill was so good on its own there should be no problem with presenting the nuance. We were promised transparency, we are getting marketing.
