Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hey Yellow

SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,915
What's the state of the moral character of someone who indict and smear a 14 year old kid based upon zero evidence all because you didn't like his politics?




High character? Low character?

«134

Comments

  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,084 Founders Club
    God your obsessed.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,915

    God your obsessed.

    I have a memory that goes back further than 30 seconds. You dodged the question.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,084 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    God your obsessed.

    I have a memory that goes back further than 30 seconds. You dodged the question.
    And I already told you I formed the wrong conclusion.




    On a college football shit hole politics bored. Not as a public figure or on Twitter.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,915

    SFGbob said:

    God your obsessed.

    I have a memory that goes back further than 30 seconds. You dodged the question.
    And I already told you I formed the wrong conclusion.




    On a college football shit hole politics bored. Not as a public figure or on Twitter.
    But what compelled you to form that "wrong" conclusion? And it wasn't just a wrong conclusion, you had a particular animus directed at the young kid that was far greater than something that would arise just from having a "wrong conclusion."
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,394 Standard Supporter
    The kid cleaned the commies clock! Rich kid now.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,648 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    God your obsessed.

    I have a memory that goes back further than 30 seconds. You dodged the question.
    And I already told you I formed the wrong conclusion.




    On a college football shit hole politics bored. Not as a public figure or on Twitter.
    But what compelled you to form that "wrong" conclusion? And it wasn't just a wrong conclusion, you had a particular animus directed at the young kid that was far greater than something that would arise just from having a "wrong conclusion."
    He had a MAGA hat. That's all the feelz that Snow needs or needed. The Catholic angle probably didn't help either.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,915

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    God your obsessed.

    I have a memory that goes back further than 30 seconds. You dodged the question.
    And I already told you I formed the wrong conclusion.




    On a college football shit hole politics bored. Not as a public figure or on Twitter.
    But what compelled you to form that "wrong" conclusion? And it wasn't just a wrong conclusion, you had a particular animus directed at the young kid that was far greater than something that would arise just from having a "wrong conclusion."
    He had a MAGA hat. That's all the feelz that Snow needs or needed. The Catholic angle probably didn't help either.
    Exactly, our moral better hated that kid and swallowed the lies told about him for one reason only. The hat he was wearing. Yellow hated his politics so he hated the kid and was willing to swallow any line of bullshit he heard about him regardless of the facts and evidence. Don't all people of high character do this?
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,084 Founders Club
    edited March 2021
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    God your obsessed.

    I have a memory that goes back further than 30 seconds. You dodged the question.
    And I already told you I formed the wrong conclusion.




    On a college football shit hole politics bored. Not as a public figure or on Twitter.
    But what compelled you to form that "wrong" conclusion? And it wasn't just a wrong conclusion, you had a particular animus directed at the young kid that was far greater than something that would arise just from having a "wrong conclusion."
    He had a MAGA hat. That's all the feelz that Snow needs or needed. The Catholic angle probably didn't help either.
    Exactly, our moral better hated that kid and swallowed the lies told about him for one reason only. The hat he was wearing. Yellow hated his politics so he hated the kid and was willing to swallow any line of bullshit he heard about him regardless of the facts and evidence. Don't all people of high character do this?
    Yep. I really defamed the poor kid on HCH. Pretty serious stuff in the context of the nice things that have been said about youths on this site over the years.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,915
    No, you just revealed your willingness to trash a kid without any evidence all because you had been bum rushed by the Media and other liberal bedwetters. Your interest in fair play, evidence and facts was quickly surrendered all because he was a white kid in a MAGA hat.

    It revealed more about your character and judgment than you care to admit.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,084 Founders Club
    edited March 2021
    The owner of a site which you’ve posted on over 21,000 times liked my character enough and trusted me enough to make me a mod and give me a board to help generate content.

    You probably ought to consider leaving with shit heads like me helping out.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,915
    edited March 2021

    SFGbob said:

    No, you just revealed your willingness to trash a kid without any evidence all because you had been bum rushed by the Media and other liberal bedwetters. Your interest in fair play, evidence and facts was quickly surrendered all because he was a white kid in a MAGA hat.

    It revealed more about your character and judgment than you care to admit.

    I know quite a few people here in real life including regular posters in the Tug. I’ve got plenty of folks here to vouch for my character. If it’s not good enough for you I could not give two shits. HTH.
    I'm sure you're a good guy, you seem like a good guy. You and I would probably get along in real life. But if I were impaneling a jury, and my client was a Trump supporter, I wouldn't want you on the jury. You're far to easily swayed by your emotions and quick to come to conclusions, often irrational conclusions, based upon your emotions. Don't know if this is in all areas of your life but it definitely impacts the way you vote and think about politics and how you viewed Nic Sandmann.

    Voting for Biden because you feel he has superior character to Trump is totally irrational and not based upon any facts. It's purely an emotional reaction, as was your kneejerk response to the Covington Kids. I don't trust the judgement of people who so easily suspend their regard for evidence and facts. Doesn't mean you're not a great guy to have a beer and watch a football game with, just wouldn't want you on my jury.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,648 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, you just revealed your willingness to trash a kid without any evidence all because you had been bum rushed by the Media and other liberal bedwetters. Your interest in fair play, evidence and facts was quickly surrendered all because he was a white kid in a MAGA hat.

    It revealed more about your character and judgment than you care to admit.

    I know quite a few people here in real life including regular posters in the Tug. I’ve got plenty of folks here to vouch for my character. If it’s not good enough for you I could not give two shits. HTH.
    I'm sure you're a good guy, you seem like a good guy. You and I would probably get along in real life. But if I were impaneling a jury, and my client was a Trump supporter, I wouldn't want you on the jury. You're far to easily swayed by your emotions and quick to come to conclusions, often irrational conclusions, based upon your emotions. Don't know if this is in all areas of your life but it definitely impacts the way you vote and think about politics and how you viewed Nic Sandmann.

    Voting for Biden because you feel he has superior character to Trump is totally irrational and not based upon any facts. It's purely an emotional reaction, as was your kneejerk response to the Covington Kids. I don't trust the judgement of people who so easily suspend their regard for evidence and facts. Doesn't mean you're not a great guy to have a beer and watch a football game with, just wouldn't want you on my jury.
    Or educating my kids. Moving from Seattle to Bend and then voting for the policies that destroyed Seattle is the definition of irrational.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,084 Founders Club

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, you just revealed your willingness to trash a kid without any evidence all because you had been bum rushed by the Media and other liberal bedwetters. Your interest in fair play, evidence and facts was quickly surrendered all because he was a white kid in a MAGA hat.

    It revealed more about your character and judgment than you care to admit.

    I know quite a few people here in real life including regular posters in the Tug. I’ve got plenty of folks here to vouch for my character. If it’s not good enough for you I could not give two shits. HTH.
    I'm sure you're a good guy, you seem like a good guy. You and I would probably get along in real life. But if I were impaneling a jury, and my client was a Trump supporter, I wouldn't want you on the jury. You're far to easily swayed by your emotions and quick to come to conclusions, often irrational conclusions, based upon your emotions. Don't know if this is in all areas of your life but it definitely impacts the way you vote and think about politics and how you viewed Nic Sandmann.

    Voting for Biden because you feel he has superior character to Trump is totally irrational and not based upon any facts. It's purely an emotional reaction, as was your kneejerk response to the Covington Kids. I don't trust the judgement of people who so easily suspend their regard for evidence and facts. Doesn't mean you're not a great guy to have a beer and watch a football game with, just wouldn't want you on my jury.
    Or educating my kids. Moving from Seattle to Bend and then voting for the policies that destroyed Seattle is the definition of irrational.
    Guys, I think we over emphasize presidential politics at the expense of state and local. Trump can’t fix Seattle, Portland or SFO. Nor can Biden. Only the voters in those cities can. and that isn’t changing. So what difference does it make?
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,084 Founders Club
    edited March 2021
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, you just revealed your willingness to trash a kid without any evidence all because you had been bum rushed by the Media and other liberal bedwetters. Your interest in fair play, evidence and facts was quickly surrendered all because he was a white kid in a MAGA hat.

    It revealed more about your character and judgment than you care to admit.

    I know quite a few people here in real life including regular posters in the Tug. I’ve got plenty of folks here to vouch for my character. If it’s not good enough for you I could not give two shits. HTH.
    I'm sure you're a good guy, you seem like a good guy. You and I would probably get along in real life. But if I were impaneling a jury, and my client was a Trump supporter, I wouldn't want you on the jury. You're far to easily swayed by your emotions and quick to come to conclusions, often irrational conclusions, based upon your emotions. Don't know if this is in all areas of your life but it definitely impacts the way you vote and think about politics and how you viewed Nic Sandmann.

    Voting for Biden because you feel he has superior character to Trump is totally irrational and not based upon any facts. It's purely an emotional reaction, as was your kneejerk response to the Covington Kids. I don't trust the judgement of people who so easily suspend their regard for evidence and facts. Doesn't mean you're not a great guy to have a beer and watch a football game with, just wouldn't want you on my jury.
    That’s rich. I guess 80 million of your fellow Americans aren’t qualified to be jurors.

    I’ve sat on a jury and ended up being picked by my peers to be the presiding juror. My emotional and irrational personality probably had a lot to do with this.

    I would have had to award damages to a piece of shit heroin junkie if evidence supported the plaintiff. It did not.


  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,915

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, you just revealed your willingness to trash a kid without any evidence all because you had been bum rushed by the Media and other liberal bedwetters. Your interest in fair play, evidence and facts was quickly surrendered all because he was a white kid in a MAGA hat.

    It revealed more about your character and judgment than you care to admit.

    I know quite a few people here in real life including regular posters in the Tug. I’ve got plenty of folks here to vouch for my character. If it’s not good enough for you I could not give two shits. HTH.
    I'm sure you're a good guy, you seem like a good guy. You and I would probably get along in real life. But if I were impaneling a jury, and my client was a Trump supporter, I wouldn't want you on the jury. You're far to easily swayed by your emotions and quick to come to conclusions, often irrational conclusions, based upon your emotions. Don't know if this is in all areas of your life but it definitely impacts the way you vote and think about politics and how you viewed Nic Sandmann.

    Voting for Biden because you feel he has superior character to Trump is totally irrational and not based upon any facts. It's purely an emotional reaction, as was your kneejerk response to the Covington Kids. I don't trust the judgement of people who so easily suspend their regard for evidence and facts. Doesn't mean you're not a great guy to have a beer and watch a football game with, just wouldn't want you on my jury.
    That’s rich. I guess 80 million of your fellow Americans aren’t qualified to be jurors.

    I’ve sat on a jury and ended up being picked by my peers to be the presiding juror. My emotional and irrational personality probably had a lot to do with this.

    Did all 80 million trash Nick Sandmann and think Biden has superior moral character?
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,084 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, you just revealed your willingness to trash a kid without any evidence all because you had been bum rushed by the Media and other liberal bedwetters. Your interest in fair play, evidence and facts was quickly surrendered all because he was a white kid in a MAGA hat.

    It revealed more about your character and judgment than you care to admit.

    I know quite a few people here in real life including regular posters in the Tug. I’ve got plenty of folks here to vouch for my character. If it’s not good enough for you I could not give two shits. HTH.
    I'm sure you're a good guy, you seem like a good guy. You and I would probably get along in real life. But if I were impaneling a jury, and my client was a Trump supporter, I wouldn't want you on the jury. You're far to easily swayed by your emotions and quick to come to conclusions, often irrational conclusions, based upon your emotions. Don't know if this is in all areas of your life but it definitely impacts the way you vote and think about politics and how you viewed Nic Sandmann.

    Voting for Biden because you feel he has superior character to Trump is totally irrational and not based upon any facts. It's purely an emotional reaction, as was your kneejerk response to the Covington Kids. I don't trust the judgement of people who so easily suspend their regard for evidence and facts. Doesn't mean you're not a great guy to have a beer and watch a football game with, just wouldn't want you on my jury.
    That’s rich. I guess 80 million of your fellow Americans aren’t qualified to be jurors.

    I’ve sat on a jury and ended up being picked by my peers to be the presiding juror. My emotional and irrational personality probably had a lot to do with this.

    Did all 80 million trash Nick Sandmann and think Biden has superior moral character?
    Get over yourself Bob.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,915

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, you just revealed your willingness to trash a kid without any evidence all because you had been bum rushed by the Media and other liberal bedwetters. Your interest in fair play, evidence and facts was quickly surrendered all because he was a white kid in a MAGA hat.

    It revealed more about your character and judgment than you care to admit.

    I know quite a few people here in real life including regular posters in the Tug. I’ve got plenty of folks here to vouch for my character. If it’s not good enough for you I could not give two shits. HTH.
    I'm sure you're a good guy, you seem like a good guy. You and I would probably get along in real life. But if I were impaneling a jury, and my client was a Trump supporter, I wouldn't want you on the jury. You're far to easily swayed by your emotions and quick to come to conclusions, often irrational conclusions, based upon your emotions. Don't know if this is in all areas of your life but it definitely impacts the way you vote and think about politics and how you viewed Nic Sandmann.

    Voting for Biden because you feel he has superior character to Trump is totally irrational and not based upon any facts. It's purely an emotional reaction, as was your kneejerk response to the Covington Kids. I don't trust the judgement of people who so easily suspend their regard for evidence and facts. Doesn't mean you're not a great guy to have a beer and watch a football game with, just wouldn't want you on my jury.
    That’s rich. I guess 80 million of your fellow Americans aren’t qualified to be jurors.

    I’ve sat on a jury and ended up being picked by my peers to be the presiding juror. My emotional and irrational personality probably had a lot to do with this.

    Did all 80 million trash Nick Sandmann and think Biden has superior moral character?
    Get over yourself Bob.
    See, irrational, emotional thinking.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,648 Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    No, you just revealed your willingness to trash a kid without any evidence all because you had been bum rushed by the Media and other liberal bedwetters. Your interest in fair play, evidence and facts was quickly surrendered all because he was a white kid in a MAGA hat.

    It revealed more about your character and judgment than you care to admit.

    I know quite a few people here in real life including regular posters in the Tug. I’ve got plenty of folks here to vouch for my character. If it’s not good enough for you I could not give two shits. HTH.
    I'm sure you're a good guy, you seem like a good guy. You and I would probably get along in real life. But if I were impaneling a jury, and my client was a Trump supporter, I wouldn't want you on the jury. You're far to easily swayed by your emotions and quick to come to conclusions, often irrational conclusions, based upon your emotions. Don't know if this is in all areas of your life but it definitely impacts the way you vote and think about politics and how you viewed Nic Sandmann.

    Voting for Biden because you feel he has superior character to Trump is totally irrational and not based upon any facts. It's purely an emotional reaction, as was your kneejerk response to the Covington Kids. I don't trust the judgement of people who so easily suspend their regard for evidence and facts. Doesn't mean you're not a great guy to have a beer and watch a football game with, just wouldn't want you on my jury.
    Or educating my kids. Moving from Seattle to Bend and then voting for the policies that destroyed Seattle is the definition of irrational.
    Guys, I think we over emphasize presidential politics at the expense of state and local. Trump can’t fix Seattle, Portland or SFO. Nor can Biden. Only the voters in those cities can. and that isn’t changing. So what difference does it make?
    But federal policies and mandates can wreck rural America. Take away the jobs would be a good start like they did with the timber industry or with the chicom crud shut down of rural tourism - hotels, restaurants, parks. They can take away your right to complain at a city council or school board meeting because your disagreement is "disinformation" or hate speech. They can make gasoline so expensive that rural Americans have to cut back on trips both for business and pleasure. I'm not sure if you are oblivious as you appear to think the left's endgame entails leaving rural republicans alone.
Sign In or Register to comment.