Recruiting presser tidbit

chuck

Whoosh?


Irishdoog?

Global

MisterEm said:

Global is just another Doogman troll trying to make HH look bad.

Nice one, but so ignorant that it is not close. I have not been on Doogman in more than 10 years, ns stopped paying those fools in 2002. If you have paid any attention at all -- which obviously you have not -- you will often see me complaining about how much people here are obsessed by Doogman. I got over them long ago.

But again, Sark-whatever is avoiding the issue - He is asserting that the UW should out recruit USC and that Petersen has failed because Sark at USC pulled in a higher starred class.

Now he has to prove to us when that has EVER happened. Otherwise, as we already know, he is just blowing smoke out of his ass.

[Deleted User]

This thread doesn't deliver and needs to DIAF!

Global

Sark-whatever - Still waiting for you to man up, and prove when the UW has out recruited USC.

Or admit you were blowing smoke out of your butt.

sarktastic

You made a fucktarded claim that you cannot back up and now somehow it's my fault?

Kim. Go home.

Global

Sarkasskisser, Dude, you made the claim. The claim was that since your bro Sark brought in more stars than Petersen, the debate was over and your sweet Sark is better.

I demonstrated that USC ALWAYS recruits better than the UW, regardless of coach, so your claim is meaningless, ignorant, and full of shit.

You can prove you have a point only by demonstrating that the UW has out recruited USC. Of course, you would need to show that the UW has a strong history of beating USC in recruiting to have your sark/Pete claim make any sense. But let's first see if you can find one year where the UW has beaten USC in the recruiting rankings. If Sark is so good, surely he beat Kiffen or Carroll? Or maybe you think Neuheisel beat the USC coaches he faced? Or maybe you think it was DJ?

So which Washington coach or coaches has out recruited their USC counterpart? That is the only support for your fucking stupid assertion that Sark won some competition. Of course, USC always wins, which is what I stated, but like the dumb fuck you are, you are pretending to avoid the question, when actually you have been caught with Sark's dick in your mouth.

sarktastic

Global said:

Sarkasskisser, Dude, you made the claim. The claim was that since your bro Sark brought in more stars than Petersen, the debate was over and your sweet Sark is better.

I demonstrated that USC ALWAYS recruits better than the UW, regardless of coach, so your claim is meaningless, ignorant, and full of shit.

You can prove you have a point only by demonstrating that the UW has out recruited USC. Of course, you would need to show that the UW has a strong history of beating USC in recruiting to have your sark/Pete claim make any sense. But let's first see if you can find one year where the UW has beaten USC in the recruiting rankings. If Sark is so good, surely he beat Kiffen or Carroll? Or maybe you think Neuheisel beat the USC coaches he faced? Or maybe you think it was DJ?

So which Washington coach or coaches has out recruited their USC counterpart? That is the only support for your fucking stupid assertion that Sark won some competition. Of course, USC always wins, which is what I stated, but like the dumb fuck you are, you are pretending to avoid the question, when actually you have been caught with Sark's dick in your mouth.

Now why am I surprised to see that once again you're too stupid to read what you wrote?

You made a claim you cannot back up, Kim. Your 'demonstration' is mearly your own opinion.

Now go home.

Global

Sarkasskisser, it is common knowledge that USC always recruits higher ranked HS players than the UW. It always has.

I gave you twelve years where USC outrecruited the UW, just to back up what everyone except you already knows.

So the ball is in your court. Find us one year, any time in the last fifty years, where a UW coach outrecruited USC and got a recruiting class with higher ranked athletes than USC. Just one year.

One tip: Try google.

Another tip: You will need to take Sark's cock out of your mouth for five minutes to do it.

sarktastic

Kim, you seriously don't have a fucking clue, do you.

Global

Sarkasskisser, you could not have chosen a more irrelevant response. Really? Kim? What a stupid cliche answer.

Come on, Dude broh. Just five minutes on google! and give us a link with one year where a UW coach out recruited a USC coach based on rankings.

Put up, or shut the fuck up.

BennyBeaver

I have query that is germain to the Sark v. Peterman debate.

Has Peterman ever beat Sark in a game?

Tailgater

Don't know about Peterman, whomever he is, but Petersen and Sarkisian are 1-1 against each other. Petersen's Broncos beat Sark in the final game of 2012 which was a low level bowl, and Sark's Huskies beat Petersen in the first game of 2013 which inaugurated the Husky Stadium renovation. But of course you knew all this, right Jerry?

BennyBeaver

Who's Jerry?

Does he post here?

Tailgater

The creator of Peterman apparently does post here.

Swaye

TheGlove said:

I have query that is germain to the Sark v. Peterman debate.

Has Peterman ever beat Sark in a game?

What the fuck does germain even mean? Isn't that one of the Jackson 5?

DawgDaze71

That's Tito

dnc

TheGlove said:

I have query that is germain to the Sark v. Peterman debate.

Has Peterman ever beat Sark in a game?

Axe Budda Baker

CuntWaffle

LIFPO. Peterman might end up being shit, he could also turn UW into a powerhouse. Either way it will be interesting.

[Deleted User]

TheGlove said:

I have query that is germain to the Sark v. Peterman debate.

Has Peterman ever beat Sark in a game?

FO,G

Tailgater

Swaye said:

What the fuck does germain even mean? Isn't that one of the Jackson 5?

Wasn't it the germains who bombed Pearl Harbor?

Global

TheGlove said:

I have query that is germain to the Sark v. Peterman debate.

Has Peterman ever beat Sark in a game?

Petersen has ""it"".

petersen beat.Sark on a neutral field. Sark beat Pete at Husky Stadium.