Why don't we go back to the fine idea of a flat tax and simplify (i.e. eliminate) much of the tax process? I would vote for this before a system that goes after successful people, what type of culture does that breed?
A commie one is what is breeds.
Nothing says chattel slavery like a progressive tax on multimillionaires.
Nothnig says envious shitbag like wanting to live off the sweat of your neighbors brow,
You must live in a ritzier neighborhood than I do. The proposed tax starts at fifty million dollars.
Why don't we go back to the fine idea of a flat tax and simplify (i.e. eliminate) much of the tax process? I would vote for this before a system that goes after successful people, what type of culture does that breed?
A commie one is what is breeds.
Nothing says chattel slavery like a progressive tax on multimillionaires.
Nothnig says envious shitbag like wanting to live off the sweat of your neighbors brow,
Dazzler feels he has an entitlement to the labor of others. Rat party members really haven't changed all that much from their antebellum brethren.
Why don't we go back to the fine idea of a flat tax and simplify (i.e. eliminate) much of the tax process? I would vote for this before a system that goes after successful people, what type of culture does that breed?
A commie one is what is breeds.
Nothing says chattel slavery like a progressive tax on multimillionaires.
Nothnig says envious shitbag like wanting to live off the sweat of your neighbors brow,
Dazzler feels he has an entitlement to the labor of others. Rat party members really haven't changed all that much from their antebellum brethren.
A 2% tax on vast fortunes is just like chattel slavery. I already conceded that.
Why don't we go back to the fine idea of a flat tax and simplify (i.e. eliminate) much of the tax process? I would vote for this before a system that goes after successful people, what type of culture does that breed?
A commie one is what is breeds.
Nothing says chattel slavery like a progressive tax on multimillionaires.
Nothnig says envious shitbag like wanting to live off the sweat of your neighbors brow,
Dazzler feels he has an entitlement to the labor of others. Rat party members really haven't changed all that much from their antebellum brethren.
A 2% tax on vast fortunes is just like chattel slavery. I already conceded that.
A feeling of entitlement to the labor of others doesn't require a certain percentage Dazzler.
How does the constitution allow disparate treatment because you make more money? Asking for a friend.
Your $50,000,001 gets taxed at the same rate as my $50,000,001. Equal treatment.
Out of principle, I think it's bullshit to tax money that has already been taxed. But that's another discussion.
Either way, you know the ultra wealthy will just transfer their hard assets, right? Money can be sent to overseas accounts, and physical property can be transferred within family, or to trusts. They already have a plan.
Then once the government realizes they are running short on the funds they want, they'll progressively move the needle down until they can get the revenue they are wanting. Rich stay rich for a reason. They are either smarter or hire smarter people than we? are.
How does the constitution allow disparate treatment because you make more money? Asking for a friend.
Your $50,000,001 gets taxed at the same rate as my $50,000,001. Equal treatment.
Out of principle, I think it's bullshit to tax money that has already been taxed. But that's another discussion.
Either way, you know the ultra wealthy will just transfer their hard assets, right? Money can be sent to overseas accounts, and physical property can be transferred within family, or to trusts. They already have a plan.
Then once the government realizes they are running short on the funds they want, they'll progressively move the needle down until they can get the revenue they are wanting. Rich stay rich for a reason. They are either smarter or hire smarter people than we? are.
plagiarize my shit, fucko - albeit in more elaborate language
How does the constitution allow disparate treatment because you make more money? Asking for a friend.
Your $50,000,001 gets taxed at the same rate as my $50,000,001. Equal treatment.
Out of principle, I think it's bullshit to tax money that has already been taxed. But that's another discussion.
Either way, you know the ultra wealthy will just transfer their hard assets, right? Money can be sent to overseas accounts, and physical property can be transferred within family, or to trusts. They already have a plan.
Then once the government realizes they are running short on the funds they want, they'll progressively move the needle down until they can get the revenue they are wanting. Rich stay rich for a reason. They are either smarter or hire smarter people than we? are.
The appreciation on long held assets hasn't been taxed. Large fortunes primarily consist of appreciated assets. And tracking the flows in order to discover tax evasion wouldn't be insurmountable at all. Plus the prize would be large. (Why not add multimillion dollar penalties and interest to the 2% assessment, right?)
All that said, this won't get enacted anytime soon. It could be useful, however, as a vehicle for looking at the tax code and how it favors the establishment of a permanent upper class and an oligarchy.
Why don't we go back to the fine idea of a flat tax and simplify (i.e. eliminate) much of the tax process? I would vote for this before a system that goes after successful people, what type of culture does that breed?
A commie one is what is breeds.
Nothing says chattel slavery like a progressive tax on multimillionaires.
"Progressive tax"? There is no such thing. All taxes create a negative reaction. The "little people" will pay the bill at the end of the day.
Why don't we go back to the fine idea of a flat tax and simplify (i.e. eliminate) much of the tax process? I would vote for this before a system that goes after successful people, what type of culture does that breed?
A commie one is what is breeds.
Nothing says chattel slavery like a progressive tax on multimillionaires.
"Progressive tax"? There is no such thing. All taxes create a negative reaction. The "little people" will pay the bill at the end of the day.
Your comment is typical rat bullshit.
Of course. We all remember the postwar hellscape of the mid 20th Century.
Why don't we go back to the fine idea of a flat tax and simplify (i.e. eliminate) much of the tax process? I would vote for this before a system that goes after successful people, what type of culture does that breed?
A commie one is what is breeds.
Nothing says chattel slavery like a progressive tax on multimillionaires.
"Progressive tax"? There is no such thing. All taxes create a negative reaction. The "little people" will pay the bill at the end of the day.
Your comment is typical rat bullshit.
Of course. We all remember the postwar hellscape of the mid 20th Century.
You mean when we had a 90% income tax rate that few if any people paid?
Comments
Either way, you know the ultra wealthy will just transfer their hard assets, right? Money can be sent to overseas accounts, and physical property can be transferred within family, or to trusts. They already have a plan.
https://www.fa-mag.com/news/how-to-protect-client-assets-from-a-wealth-tax-53392.html#:~:text=Meanwhile, a charitable remainder trust,wealth tax, according to Aucamp.
Then once the government realizes they are running short on the funds they want, they'll progressively move the needle down until they can get the revenue they are wanting. Rich stay rich for a reason. They are either smarter or hire smarter people than we? are.
All that said, this won't get enacted anytime soon. It could be useful, however, as a vehicle for looking at the tax code and how it favors the establishment of a permanent upper class and an oligarchy.
And nobody will ever pay it. And the Dems could care less. They just want the votes.
Your comment is typical rat bullshit.
No loopholes.
No Corp deductions.
Deal?