HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
Maybe.
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
Somewhere, out there, a very shitty lawyer's been googling.
HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
Maybe.
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.
HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
Maybe.
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.
HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
Maybe.
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.
HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
Maybe.
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.
You aren’t a lawyer are you?
Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Hardly your most glaring error.
Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?
HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
Maybe.
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.
You aren’t a lawyer are you?
Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Hardly your most glaring error.
Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?
If I was a lawyer, I'd note that you're now off on a tangent.
HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
Maybe.
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.
You aren’t a lawyer are you?
Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Hardly your most glaring error.
Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?
If I was a lawyer, I'd note that you're now off on a tangent.
HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
Maybe.
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.
You aren’t a lawyer are you?
Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.
Good luck the rest of the way.
Hardly your most glaring error.
Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?
If I was a lawyer, I'd note that you're now off on a tangent.
I absolutely believe you'd do that. T'would be the heart of your case.
Comments
Good luck the rest of the way.
Color me shocked.