Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Dominion is going to unleash legal armageddon on Trump election truthers

124»

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,039

    The NWO through one of its partners, Dominion, is suing people for billions. They seem really confident that they own the USA's Judicial System and that they are going to win in the courts.

    They are correct to be confident about this.

    We need to see the military flex soon or I'm gonna lose the rhythm.

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,725 Standard Supporter
    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,725 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    edited March 2021
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    edited March 2021
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,036
    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Don’t quit your day job.

    You got most of that wrong.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    Somewhere, out there, a very shitty lawyer's been googling.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    POTD.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    edited March 2021
    .

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    Somewhere, out there, a very shitty lawyer's been googling.
    inscrutable
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,725 Standard Supporter
    so are the going to ask if jurors are commie or conservative?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    Sledog said:

    so are the going to ask if jurors are commie or conservative?

    What was your second choice?
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,036
    Kaepsknee said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
    ;)
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    Kaepsknee said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
    Hardly your most glaring error.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
    Hardly your most glaring error.
    Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
    Hardly your most glaring error.
    Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?
    If I was a lawyer, I'd note that you're now off on a tangent.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
    Hardly your most glaring error.
    Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?
    If I was a lawyer, I'd note that you're now off on a tangent.
    So ya got nuttin’


    Color me shocked.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
    Hardly your most glaring error.
    Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?
    If I was a lawyer, I'd note that you're now off on a tangent.
    I absolutely believe you'd do that. T'would be the heart of your case.