Dominion is going to unleash legal armageddon on Trump election truthers
Comments
-
We need to see the military flex soon or I'm gonna lose the rhythm.oregonblitzkrieg said:The NWO through one of its partners, Dominion, is suing people for billions. They seem really confident that they own the USA's Judicial System and that they are going to win in the courts.
They are correct to be confident about this.
-
HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
-
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
-
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense. -
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense. -
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.HHusky said:
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
You aren’t a lawyer are you? -
Well, we know you're not, so there's that.Kaepsknee said:
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.HHusky said:
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
You aren’t a lawyer are you? -
Don’t quit your day job.Kaepsknee said:
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.HHusky said:
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
You aren’t a lawyer are you?
You got most of that wrong. -
Somewhere, out there, a very shitty lawyer's been googling.HHusky said:
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense. -
POTD.Kaepsknee said:
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.HHusky said:
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
You aren’t a lawyer are you? -
.
inscrutableTurdBomber said:
Somewhere, out there, a very shitty lawyer's been googling.HHusky said:
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense. -
so are the going to ask if jurors are commie or conservative?
-
What was your second choice?Sledog said:so are the going to ask if jurors are commie or conservative?
-
You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.creepycoug said:
Well, we know you're not, so there's that.Kaepsknee said:
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.HHusky said:
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
You aren’t a lawyer are you?
Good luck the rest of the way. -
Kaepsknee said:
You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.creepycoug said:
Well, we know you're not, so there's that.Kaepsknee said:
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.HHusky said:
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
You aren’t a lawyer are you?
Good luck the rest of the way. -
Hardly your most glaring error.Kaepsknee said:
You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.creepycoug said:
Well, we know you're not, so there's that.Kaepsknee said:
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.HHusky said:
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
You aren’t a lawyer are you?
Good luck the rest of the way. -
Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?HHusky said:
Hardly your most glaring error.Kaepsknee said:
You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.creepycoug said:
Well, we know you're not, so there's that.Kaepsknee said:
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.HHusky said:
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
You aren’t a lawyer are you?
Good luck the rest of the way. -
If I was a lawyer, I'd note that you're now off on a tangent.Kaepsknee said:
Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?HHusky said:
Hardly your most glaring error.Kaepsknee said:
You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.creepycoug said:
Well, we know you're not, so there's that.Kaepsknee said:
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.HHusky said:
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
You aren’t a lawyer are you?
Good luck the rest of the way. -
So ya got nuttin’HHusky said:
If I was a lawyer, I'd note that you're now off on a tangent.Kaepsknee said:
Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?HHusky said:
Hardly your most glaring error.Kaepsknee said:
You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.creepycoug said:
Well, we know you're not, so there's that.Kaepsknee said:
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.HHusky said:
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
You aren’t a lawyer are you?
Good luck the rest of the way.
Color me shocked. -
I absolutely believe you'd do that. T'would be the heart of your case.HHusky said:
If I was a lawyer, I'd note that you're now off on a tangent.Kaepsknee said:
Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?HHusky said:
Hardly your most glaring error.Kaepsknee said:
You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.creepycoug said:
Well, we know you're not, so there's that.Kaepsknee said:
If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.HHusky said:
Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.Sledog said:
I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.HHusky said:
Maybe.Sledog said:HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
You aren’t a lawyer are you?
Good luck the rest of the way.