Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Dominion is going to unleash legal armageddon on Trump election truthers

124»

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,117 Standard Supporter
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    The NWO through one of its partners, Dominion, is suing people for billions. They seem really confident that they own the USA's Judicial System and that they are going to win in the courts.

    They are correct to be confident about this.

    We need to see the military flex soon or I'm gonna lose the rhythm.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,849 Standard Supporter
    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,965
    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,849 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,965
    edited March 2021
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    edited March 2021
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067
    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,965
    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Don’t quit your day job.

    You got most of that wrong.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    Somewhere, out there, a very shitty lawyer's been googling.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    POTD.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,965
    edited March 2021
    .
    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    Somewhere, out there, a very shitty lawyer's been googling.
    inscrutable
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,849 Standard Supporter
    so are the going to ask if jurors are commie or conservative?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,965
    Sledog said:

    so are the going to ask if jurors are commie or conservative?

    What was your second choice?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    creepycoug said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067
    Kaepsknee said:

    creepycoug said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
    ;)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,965
    Kaepsknee said:

    creepycoug said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
    Hardly your most glaring error.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    creepycoug said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
    Hardly your most glaring error.
    Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,965
    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    creepycoug said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
    Hardly your most glaring error.
    Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?
    If I was a lawyer, I'd note that you're now off on a tangent.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    creepycoug said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
    Hardly your most glaring error.
    Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?
    If I was a lawyer, I'd note that you're now off on a tangent.
    So ya got nuttin’


    Color me shocked.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    creepycoug said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HH will Lindell and Rudy call Obunghole and Xiden as witnesses? They said the machines could be hacked........................

    Maybe.

    But Mr. Pillowman and Rudy said the machines were hacked in 2020, so the testimony won’t provide much of a defense.
    I'd think the word of two illegal presidents would have some impact. They have access to Intel.
    Mike and Rudy need to prove more than that the machines could be hacked. They need to prove they had some plausible reason to say the machines had been hacked. In fact, they claimed to have proof . . . that they haven’t shared.
    If this sees trial, You do realize that this needs to be presented to a jury. And this jury needs at least 12 out of 12 to vote without a shadow of doubt that Dominions machines are secure and not hackable.

    You aren’t a lawyer are you?
    Well, we know you're not, so there's that.
    You’re right. I meant to type 10 out of 12.

    Good luck the rest of the way.
    Hardly your most glaring error.
    Do tell how either 5 out of 6 or 10 out of 12 jurors are going to rule for slander when there is already precedent of fraud in other countries that used Dominion systems?
    If I was a lawyer, I'd note that you're now off on a tangent.
    I absolutely believe you'd do that. T'would be the heart of your case.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter