Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

RIP Rush Limbaugh

13567

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,579

    HHusky said:

    Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. - HHutzky

    Other than the guy H claims to have voted for twice in the 80's

    As if Ronald Reagan ever did anything to shrink government at any level.

    He was an adept politician. He paid lip service to lots of things. Unfortunately, in a Western democracy, it is crucial to capture some reasonable share of the gullible vote.

    And you voted for him twice. Allegedly


    Gullible is your middle name. RUSSIA
    Yes. Twice.

    He wasn't remotely like what you gals now imagine, though you were there and should know better. Alas, not everyone can age well.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,458 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. - HHutzky

    Other than the guy H claims to have voted for twice in the 80's

    As if Ronald Reagan ever did anything to shrink government at any level.

    He was an adept politician. He paid lip service to lots of things. Unfortunately, in a Western democracy, it is crucial to capture some reasonable share of the gullible vote.

    And you voted for him twice. Allegedly


    Gullible is your middle name. RUSSIA
    Yes. Twice.

    He wasn't remotely like what you gals now imagine, though you were there and should know better. Alas, not everyone can age well.
    I do know better and I'm not a pathological liar like you

    I never voted for Reagan

    RR was all about shrinking government and doing what government is supposed to do. Defend the country

    What he wasn't was beloved or treated fairly by the slime ball media which is what I have been telling the GALS for over a year now as they got the vapors over Trump
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,579
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. - HHutzky

    Other than the guy H claims to have voted for twice in the 80's

    As if Ronald Reagan ever did anything to shrink government at any level.

    He was an adept politician. He paid lip service to lots of things. Unfortunately, in a Western democracy, it is crucial to capture some reasonable share of the gullible vote.

    Actually he did. And if you look at the budgets he proposed, he would have cut spending and the size of government even more if the Congress would have passed them. Weird how you cite your vote for Reagan as you single piece of evidence that you really are a Conservative and are ignorant of this Dazzler.
    It's easy to propose things that won't pass as a way to signal your purity.

    If you're not more sophisticated than this at your age, when will you ever be?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,579

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. - HHutzky

    Other than the guy H claims to have voted for twice in the 80's

    As if Ronald Reagan ever did anything to shrink government at any level.

    He was an adept politician. He paid lip service to lots of things. Unfortunately, in a Western democracy, it is crucial to capture some reasonable share of the gullible vote.

    And you voted for him twice. Allegedly


    Gullible is your middle name. RUSSIA
    Yes. Twice.

    He wasn't remotely like what you gals now imagine, though you were there and should know better. Alas, not everyone can age well.
    I do know better and I'm not a pathological liar like you

    I never voted for Reagan

    RR was all about shrinking government and doing what government is supposed to do. Defend the country

    What he wasn't was beloved or treated fairly by the slime ball media which is what I have been telling the GALS for over a year now as they got the vapors over Trump
    RR never shrank a government in his life. It wasn't remotely a touchstone of his governing philosophy.
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,908 Founders Club
    It's a mental disorder. The Dazzler has fantasies like this every day and did you know he's rich?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,579

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. - HHutzky

    Other than the guy H claims to have voted for twice in the 80's

    As if Ronald Reagan ever did anything to shrink government at any level.

    He was an adept politician. He paid lip service to lots of things. Unfortunately, in a Western democracy, it is crucial to capture some reasonable share of the gullible vote.

    And you voted for him twice. Allegedly


    Gullible is your middle name. RUSSIA
    Yes. Twice.

    He wasn't remotely like what you gals now imagine, though you were there and should know better. Alas, not everyone can age well.
    I do know better and I'm not a pathological liar like you

    I never voted for Reagan

    RR was all about shrinking government and doing what government is supposed to do. Defend the country

    What he wasn't was beloved or treated fairly by the slime ball media which is what I have been telling the GALS for over a year now as they got the vapors over Trump
    RR never shrank a government in his life. It wasn't remotely a touchstone of his governing philosophy.
    Sure

    You GALS are always worried about a GOP dictator then whine like GIRLS when they aren't and go along with Congress and stuff

    Reagan stood for less government. You didn't and you don't

    You're a fraud and a loser. And a sucker
    Reagan was a big government spender. In good times (California) and bad (when he took the Presidency).

    That's not a criticism on my part. It's a big part of the reason the early 80s economic recovery was so rapid.

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,914
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. - HHutzky

    Other than the guy H claims to have voted for twice in the 80's

    As if Ronald Reagan ever did anything to shrink government at any level.

    He was an adept politician. He paid lip service to lots of things. Unfortunately, in a Western democracy, it is crucial to capture some reasonable share of the gullible vote.

    Actually he did. And if you look at the budgets he proposed, he would have cut spending and the size of government even more if the Congress would have passed them. Weird how you cite your vote for Reagan as you single piece of evidence that you really are a Conservative and are ignorant of this Dazzler.
    It's easy to propose things that won't pass as a way to signal your purity.

    If you're not more sophisticated than this at your age, when will you ever be?
    He didn't just propose them liar. Because you're a lying piece of shit Dazzler you feel that everyone else is like you. Reagan did cut spending and did reduce the size of the Federal government. If you would have made him king he would cut the size of government even more. Unfortunately he had a Congress filled with Dazzlers who had no interest in cutting spending.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,914
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. - HHutzky

    Other than the guy H claims to have voted for twice in the 80's

    As if Ronald Reagan ever did anything to shrink government at any level.

    He was an adept politician. He paid lip service to lots of things. Unfortunately, in a Western democracy, it is crucial to capture some reasonable share of the gullible vote.

    And you voted for him twice. Allegedly


    Gullible is your middle name. RUSSIA
    Yes. Twice.

    He wasn't remotely like what you gals now imagine, though you were there and should know better. Alas, not everyone can age well.
    I do know better and I'm not a pathological liar like you

    I never voted for Reagan

    RR was all about shrinking government and doing what government is supposed to do. Defend the country

    What he wasn't was beloved or treated fairly by the slime ball media which is what I have been telling the GALS for over a year now as they got the vapors over Trump
    RR never shrank a government in his life. It wasn't remotely a touchstone of his governing philosophy.
    Sure

    You GALS are always worried about a GOP dictator then whine like GIRLS when they aren't and go along with Congress and stuff

    Reagan stood for less government. You didn't and you don't

    You're a fraud and a loser. And a sucker
    Reagan was a big government spender. In good times (California) and bad (when he took the Presidency).

    That's not a criticism on my part. It's a big part of the reason the early 80s economic recovery was so rapid.

    If spending alone could bring about an economic Recovery you man crush Obama would have had a booming economy. As a percentage of GDP spending actually shrank under Reagan.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,638 Standard Supporter
    alumni94 said:

    My Rush story.

    I was walking to class down greek row, 17th and a car stopped and asked, "Hey can I give you a ride so I can get carpool rate in the parking garage?" I got in. The guys asks me, "Do you like Rush?". Me thinking music first, said, "Sure!" (Thinking he was going to rock out on Tom Sayer or something). I then realize that he was talking about Limbaugh. I'm glad that I didn't make a Neil Peart comment.

    I know, cool story bro.

    First Neil goes and now Rush in just over a year. I blame the chicom crud. Saw Rush and Kiss at the old Paramount venue in Portland in 1975.



    No, his mind is not for rent
    To any god or government.
    Always hopeful, yet discontent
    He knows changes aren’t permanent –

    PS One of my finest memories was touring the UW Greek Row in 1980 with my best friend and two Oregon cheerleaders, still decked out, (super hot) after a September game with the dawgs. We were treated like kings. Amazing what hot women can accomplish.







  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,985 Standard Supporter

    Conservative and accurate. Unlike you and the Russian Collusion hoax which you deep throated.

    Amen. #NeverForget
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,985 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    HHusky said:

    Political conservatism was actually moored to conservatism writ broadly, and was intellectually and philosophically coherent in in 1980.

    Rush helped to change that.

    Missed by the right wing's rabble. No one else.

    Do you consider social media writ? How was Rush's spoken opinions on subjects like small government different than intellectual prose on the same subject in 1980?
    Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. It's not an intellectually honest pursuit and neither political party has ever pursued it, regardless of what they said during a campaign. It's a fantasy. And all most of you ever mean by it is you want the government to do stuff you like, but not stuff you don't like.

    Small government is at best a rhetorical flourish required to pander to the stupidest voter a Republican can hope to convince to pull the lever for him come election time.
    You've written some real whoppers in your time, Dazzler. But this one might be the dumbest and most factually challenged to date.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,985 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. - HHutzky

    Other than the guy H claims to have voted for twice in the 80's

    As if Ronald Reagan ever did anything to shrink government at any level.

    He was an adept politician. He paid lip service to lots of things. Unfortunately, in a Western democracy, it is crucial to capture some reasonable share of the gullible vote.

    Actually he did. And if you look at the budgets he proposed, he would have cut spending and the size of government even more if the Congress would have passed them. Weird how you cite your vote for Reagan as you single piece of evidence that you really are a Conservative and are ignorant of this Dazzler.
    It's easy to propose things that won't pass as a way to signal your purity.

    If you're not more sophisticated than this at your age, when will you ever be?
    Like the public option? Glad to finally see Obama go under the "conservative" bus.
Sign In or Register to comment.