RIP Rush Limbaugh
Comments
-
Dazzler's "coherent" Conservatism is a Conservatism that supports Socialized Medicine, increasing taxes, and voting for Obama. That's Dazzler's "coherent" Conservatism. The Dazzler believes that since he doesn't support trannies competing against girls in sports, even though he votes for people who do, that qualifies him as a "coherent" conservative.HHusky said:Political conservatism was actually moored to conservatism writ broadly, and was intellectually and philosophically coherent in 1980.
Rush helped to change that.
Missed by the right wing's rabble. No one else. -
"The Gentle Giant was shot in the back while running away" and "Obama is the most fiscally responsible alternative therefore I'll vote for him." Quite the "Conservative."HHusky said:"Americans who have gotten fed up with having elections stolen from them by the Democrats, including the White House."--Rush Limbaugh
Quite the "conservative". -
Your sophomoric hypocrisy is duly noted. You voted for a rat who was 2nd in command of an administration that wire tapped a Presidential campaign HQ and a party that made up lies about Russians stealing the election for Trump. Your rat buddies even had the balls to try to impeach by special prosecuting Trump on those pack of lies. The history of rat leaders complaining about stolen elections goes back to the 80's and has been a central theme each and every time your rat buddies have lost an election.HHusky said:"Americans who have gotten fed up with having elections stolen from them by the Democrats, including the White House."--Rush Limbaugh
Quite the "conservative".
You are a gigantic dishonest hypocrite HH. Your dishonesty and hypocrisy have risen to a ridiculous level. -
Yeah. Because without a US Department of Education we would have a complete failure of public education. Geezus, you suck at this.HHusky said:
Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. It's not an intellectually honest pursuit and neither political party has ever pursued it, regardless of what they said during a campaign. It's a fantasy. And all most of you ever mean by it is you want the government to do stuff you like, but not stuff you don't like.RoadTrip said:
Do you consider social media writ? How was Rush's spoken opinions on subjects like small government different than intellectual prose on the same subject in 1980?HHusky said:Political conservatism was actually moored to conservatism writ broadly, and was intellectually and philosophically coherent in in 1980.
Rush helped to change that.
Missed by the right wing's rabble. No one else.
Small government is at best a rhetorical flourish required to pander to the stupidest voter a Republican can hope to convince to pull the lever for him come election time. -
And right on time, the human scum come crawling out from under their rock.TheKobeStopper said:One less fascist.
-
Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. - HHutzky
Other than the guy H claims to have voted for twice in the 80's -
Like the dazzler's mythical MBA.RaceBannon said:Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. - HHutzky
Other than the guy H claims to have voted for twice in the 80's -
Because Dazzler is a "real" conservative, he believes in a massive and bloated Federal Government and anyone who opposes it is just "stupid" and not a "real" conservative like him. That's why Dazzler votes for Obama and Hillary, just like all "real" Conservatives.WestlinnDuck said:
Yeah. Because without a US Department of Education we would have a complete failure of public education. Geezus, you suck at this.HHusky said:
Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. It's not an intellectually honest pursuit and neither political party has ever pursued it, regardless of what they said during a campaign. It's a fantasy. And all most of you ever mean by it is you want the government to do stuff you like, but not stuff you don't like.RoadTrip said:
Do you consider social media writ? How was Rush's spoken opinions on subjects like small government different than intellectual prose on the same subject in 1980?HHusky said:Political conservatism was actually moored to conservatism writ broadly, and was intellectually and philosophically coherent in in 1980.
Rush helped to change that.
Missed by the right wing's rabble. No one else.
Small government is at best a rhetorical flourish required to pander to the stupidest voter a Republican can hope to convince to pull the lever for him come election time.
Dazzler is a Lincoln Project Pedo Conservative. -
Interesting intellectual take from a mentally tortured individual. I'm sorry your intellect cannot comprehend the infinite applications of such a simple word as small.HHusky said:
Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. It's not an intellectually honest pursuit and neither political party has ever pursued it, regardless of what they said during a campaign. It's a fantasy. And all most of you ever mean by it is you want the government to do stuff you like, but not stuff you don't like.RoadTrip said:
Do you consider social media writ? How was Rush's spoken opinions on subjects like small government different than intellectual prose on the same subject in 1980?HHusky said:Political conservatism was actually moored to conservatism writ broadly, and was intellectually and philosophically coherent in in 1980.
Rush helped to change that.
Missed by the right wing's rabble. No one else.
Small government is at best a rhetorical flourish required to pander to the stupidest voter a Republican can hope to convince to pull the lever for him come election time. -
If Rush was a rat, he would have been crowned king of our country decades ago. The rats and their willing partners in the media would have had him on every talk show known to man and would have given him his own television platform to work. The man was brilliant and no rat could compete intellectually. They knew this and they froze him out of the mainstream. It wasn't until FOX came along that I ever saw him on the telly. Imagine, the largest listening audience since radio was the only medium and rats were so afraid of him they locked him out.RaceBannon said:I was driving to the Rose Bowl with my mom in late 1990 through the vast wasteland of Oregon when we came across him on the radio. My mom was immediately uncomfortable so I left it on of course.
I started to listen off and on when we got back and I was driving to jobsites. I still voted for Clinton twice and then Gore so it took like 14 years and John Kerry for me to be brainwashed
Rush drew listeners who agreed and disagreed. Who loved him and hated him. But they tuned in. He was funny which is something the sour pussed left has never figured out.
Rush also had 10 to 20 times as many listeners as cable news. He used to say he felt bad playing clips from MSNBC because he gave them more listeners than they could ever get on their own
A broadcast legend who will always partly be known for the lack of quality of his opposition.
The guy was a legend and it is confirmed over and over again when low life rats celebrate his death simply because they couldn't compete intellectually and he had a different political opinion.
