Political conservatism was actually moored to conservatism writ broadly, and was intellectually and philosophically coherent in 1980.
Rush helped to change that.
Missed by the right wing's rabble. No one else.
Dazzler's "coherent" Conservatism is a Conservatism that supports Socialized Medicine, increasing taxes, and voting for Obama. That's Dazzler's "coherent" Conservatism. The Dazzler believes that since he doesn't support trannies competing against girls in sports, even though he votes for people who do, that qualifies him as a "coherent" conservative.
"Americans who have gotten fed up with having elections stolen from them by the Democrats, including the White House."--Rush Limbaugh
Quite the "conservative".
"The Gentle Giant was shot in the back while running away" and "Obama is the most fiscally responsible alternative therefore I'll vote for him." Quite the "Conservative."
"Americans who have gotten fed up with having elections stolen from them by the Democrats, including the White House."--Rush Limbaugh
Quite the "conservative".
Your sophomoric hypocrisy is duly noted. You voted for a rat who was 2nd in command of an administration that wire tapped a Presidential campaign HQ and a party that made up lies about Russians stealing the election for Trump. Your rat buddies even had the balls to try to impeach by special prosecuting Trump on those pack of lies. The history of rat leaders complaining about stolen elections goes back to the 80's and has been a central theme each and every time your rat buddies have lost an election.
You are a gigantic dishonest hypocrite HH. Your dishonesty and hypocrisy have risen to a ridiculous level.
Political conservatism was actually moored to conservatism writ broadly, and was intellectually and philosophically coherent in in 1980.
Rush helped to change that.
Missed by the right wing's rabble. No one else.
Do you consider social media writ? How was Rush's spoken opinions on subjects like small government different than intellectual prose on the same subject in 1980?
Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. It's not an intellectually honest pursuit and neither political party has ever pursued it, regardless of what they said during a campaign. It's a fantasy. And all most of you ever mean by it is you want the government to do stuff you like, but not stuff you don't like.
Small government is at best a rhetorical flourish required to pander to the stupidest voter a Republican can hope to convince to pull the lever for him come election time.
Yeah. Because without a US Department of Education we would have a complete failure of public education. Geezus, you suck at this.
Political conservatism was actually moored to conservatism writ broadly, and was intellectually and philosophically coherent in in 1980.
Rush helped to change that.
Missed by the right wing's rabble. No one else.
Do you consider social media writ? How was Rush's spoken opinions on subjects like small government different than intellectual prose on the same subject in 1980?
Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. It's not an intellectually honest pursuit and neither political party has ever pursued it, regardless of what they said during a campaign. It's a fantasy. And all most of you ever mean by it is you want the government to do stuff you like, but not stuff you don't like.
Small government is at best a rhetorical flourish required to pander to the stupidest voter a Republican can hope to convince to pull the lever for him come election time.
Yeah. Because without a US Department of Education we would have a complete failure of public education. Geezus, you suck at this.
Because Dazzler is a "real" conservative, he believes in a massive and bloated Federal Government and anyone who opposes it is just "stupid" and not a "real" conservative like him. That's why Dazzler votes for Obama and Hillary, just like all "real" Conservatives.
Political conservatism was actually moored to conservatism writ broadly, and was intellectually and philosophically coherent in in 1980.
Rush helped to change that.
Missed by the right wing's rabble. No one else.
Do you consider social media writ? How was Rush's spoken opinions on subjects like small government different than intellectual prose on the same subject in 1980?
Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. It's not an intellectually honest pursuit and neither political party has ever pursued it, regardless of what they said during a campaign. It's a fantasy. And all most of you ever mean by it is you want the government to do stuff you like, but not stuff you don't like.
Small government is at best a rhetorical flourish required to pander to the stupidest voter a Republican can hope to convince to pull the lever for him come election time.
Interesting intellectual take from a mentally tortured individual. I'm sorry your intellect cannot comprehend the infinite applications of such a simple word as small.
I was driving to the Rose Bowl with my mom in late 1990 through the vast wasteland of Oregon when we came across him on the radio. My mom was immediately uncomfortable so I left it on of course.
I started to listen off and on when we got back and I was driving to jobsites. I still voted for Clinton twice and then Gore so it took like 14 years and John Kerry for me to be brainwashed
Rush drew listeners who agreed and disagreed. Who loved him and hated him. But they tuned in. He was funny which is something the sour pussed left has never figured out.
Rush also had 10 to 20 times as many listeners as cable news. He used to say he felt bad playing clips from MSNBC because he gave them more listeners than they could ever get on their own
A broadcast legend who will always partly be known for the lack of quality of his opposition.
If Rush was a rat, he would have been crowned king of our country decades ago. The rats and their willing partners in the media would have had him on every talk show known to man and would have given him his own television platform to work. The man was brilliant and no rat could compete intellectually. They knew this and they froze him out of the mainstream. It wasn't until FOX came along that I ever saw him on the telly. Imagine, the largest listening audience since radio was the only medium and rats were so afraid of him they locked him out.
The guy was a legend and it is confirmed over and over again when low life rats celebrate his death simply because they couldn't compete intellectually and he had a different political opinion.
Rush briefly had a TV show but dropped it when the knives came out. On radio he didn't have to give a shit. He spawned the now decades long obsession with the Fairness Doctrine and Air America and other liberal failures to compete with him
Then a drumbeat of smears over the years and of course Obama being obsessed with him because he was one of the few who didn't bend the knee.
Political conservatism was actually moored to conservatism writ broadly, and was intellectually and philosophically coherent in in 1980.
Rush helped to change that.
Missed by the right wing's rabble. No one else.
Do you consider social media writ? How was Rush's spoken opinions on subjects like small government different than intellectual prose on the same subject in 1980?
Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. It's not an intellectually honest pursuit and neither political party has ever pursued it, regardless of what they said during a campaign. It's a fantasy. And all most of you ever mean by it is you want the government to do stuff you like, but not stuff you don't like.
Small government is at best a rhetorical flourish required to pander to the stupidest voter a Republican can hope to convince to pull the lever for him come election time.
I think "small government" should be replaced with "limited government". Government will never be small, but it should be limited when it can be. Look at what the government red tape did in regards to the PNW forest fires. These fires grew in large part to the restricted timber laws that Oregon and Washington passed. Had logging companies been able to thin over grown forest areas, it would have slowed the spread and saved millions of forest acres.
Rush briefly had a TV show but dropped it when the knives came out. On radio he didn't have to give a shit. He spawned the now decades long obsession with the Fairness Doctrine and Air America and other liberal failures to compete with him
Then a drumbeat of smears over the years and of course Obama being obsessed with him because he was one of the few who didn't bend the knee.
Remember when the dazzler used to post about the great success of Air America? Good times.
Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. - HHutzky
Other than the guy H claims to have voted for twice in the 80's
As if Ronald Reagan ever did anything to shrink government at any level.
He was an adept politician. He paid lip service to lots of things. Unfortunately, in a Western democracy, it is crucial to capture some reasonable share of the gullible vote.
I had a summer jerb in college that had me driving around a lot for a couple years. I listened to Rush, and a whole raft of other talk shows, then, but never really since. Not my bag.
Rush briefly had a TV show but dropped it when the knives came out. On radio he didn't have to give a shit. He spawned the now decades long obsession with the Fairness Doctrine and Air America and other liberal failures to compete with him
Then a drumbeat of smears over the years and of course Obama being obsessed with him because he was one of the few who didn't bend the knee.
Remember when the dazzler used to post about the great success of Air America? Good times.
If any of you "remember" that, do get in to see your doctor.
Nobody with an ounce of intelligence has ever believed that "small government" is a realistic or a worthy objective. - HHutzky
Other than the guy H claims to have voted for twice in the 80's
As if Ronald Reagan ever did anything to shrink government at any level.
He was an adept politician. He paid lip service to lots of things. Unfortunately, in a Western democracy, it is crucial to capture some reasonable share of the gullible vote.
Comments
You are a gigantic dishonest hypocrite HH. Your dishonesty and hypocrisy have risen to a ridiculous level.
Other than the guy H claims to have voted for twice in the 80's
Dazzler is a Lincoln Project Pedo Conservative.
The guy was a legend and it is confirmed over and over again when low life rats celebrate his death simply because they couldn't compete intellectually and he had a different political opinion.
Then a drumbeat of smears over the years and of course Obama being obsessed with him because he was one of the few who didn't bend the knee.
He was an adept politician. He paid lip service to lots of things. Unfortunately, in a Western democracy, it is crucial to capture some reasonable share of the gullible vote.
Gullible is your middle name. RUSSIA