Daddy's lawyers are trying to thread a needle

HHusky

SFGbob said:

You'll notice that Dazzler provides no links and no context as to why the lawyers cited Trump's speech. That's not an oversight, it's intentional.

So they are defending him from the consequences of his speech on January 6. They cited to the full speech of January 6.

But you don't think it's fair to look at the speech of January 6.

You were right not to go to law school.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

You'll notice that Dazzler provides no links and no context as to why the lawyers cited Trump's speech. That's not an oversight, it's intentional.

So they are defending him from the consequences of his speech on January 6. They cited to the full speech of January 6.

But you don't think it's fair to look at the speech of January 6.

You were right not to go to law school.

You lied Dazzler. They are citing the speech to show that Trump never called for violence. They aren't citing it in order to argue the election was stolen. They aren't making that argument. You swallowed like a bitch that they were arguing that.

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

You'll notice that Dazzler provides no links and no context as to why the lawyers cited Trump's speech. That's not an oversight, it's intentional.

So they are defending him from the consequences of his speech on January 6. They cited to the full speech of January 6.

But you don't think it's fair to look at the speech of January 6.

You were right not to go to law school.

You lied Dazzler.

So nothing.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

You'll notice that Dazzler provides no links and no context as to why the lawyers cited Trump's speech. That's not an oversight, it's intentional.

So they are defending him from the consequences of his speech on January 6. They cited to the full speech of January 6.

But you don't think it's fair to look at the speech of January 6.

You were right not to go to law school.

You lied Dazzler.

So nothing.

Yes, other than your lies you have nothing. I guess you could always trot out the "Daddy gave Rush a medal" argument.

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

You'll notice that Dazzler provides no links and no context as to why the lawyers cited Trump's speech. That's not an oversight, it's intentional.

So they are defending him from the consequences of his speech on January 6. They cited to the full speech of January 6.

But you don't think it's fair to look at the speech of January 6.

You were right not to go to law school.

You lied Dazzler.

So nothing.

Yes, other than your lies you have nothing. I guess you could always trot out the "Daddy gave Rush a medal" argument.

okay

RaceBannon

All this because Biden is slaughtering people with Covid and still owes us 2 grand a piece

SAD

NorthwestFresh

RaceBannon said:

All this because Biden is slaughtering people with Covid and still owes us 2 grand a piece

SAD

The Left has all they want in DC and they still can’t get over Trump. It’s not him, it’s them.

HHusky

NorthwestFresh said:

RaceBannon said:

All this because Biden is slaughtering people with Covid and still owes us 2 grand a piece

SAD

The Left has all they want in DC and they still can’t get over Trump. It’s not him, it’s them.

In other words: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKGjOE_7bYI&feature=emb_title

alumni94

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPX-mW4l1rU

GrundleStiltzkin

Imagine giving a one-term looser this much rent free room in your head.