Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump parts with impeachment lawyers a week before the trial

24567

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,527
    Goduckies said:

    I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing


    They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 8,102 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2021
    It does if they get their family attacked which has been happening. You don't see the GOP showing up at people's homes like the left does
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,228 Standard Supporter
    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    Did you just use the words lawyer and honest in the same sentence?
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,228 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2021
    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing


    They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
    Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?

    You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,527
    edited February 2021

    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing


    They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
    Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?

    You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
    There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.

    There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.

    Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.

    Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,527
    doogie said:

    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.

    I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    Goduckies said:

    It does if they get their family attacked which has been happening. You don't see the GOP showing up at people's homes like the left does

    That’s true, they go to the US capitol instead. Much less intrusive.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,772 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    doogie said:

    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.

    I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
    So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,527
    edited February 2021
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    doogie said:

    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.

    I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
    So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.
    Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?

    Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.

    Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued.