Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump parts with impeachment lawyers a week before the trial

DerekJohnson
DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,558 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,793 Swaye's Wigwam
    easy - be a Dem that got elected to congress
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,136 Standard Supporter
    LebamDawg said:

    easy - be a Dem that got elected to congress

    Or a Republican who doesn’t want to get re elected.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • animate
    animate Member Posts: 4,245
    DerekJohnson said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    animate said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    He wanted them to argue his stolen election bullshit. No lawyer worth a damn is going to make that argument before the Senate or a court.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    HHusky said:

    He wanted them to argue his stolen election bullshit. No lawyer worth a damn is going to make that argument before the Senate or a court.

    Noted Estate lawyer weighs in with the inside track
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    edited February 2021
    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    He wanted them to argue his stolen election bullshit. No lawyer worth a damn is going to make that argument before the Senate or a court.

    Noted Estate lawyer weighs in with the inside track
    Estate lawyer?

    How do you gals explain Daddy’s lawyers fleeing on the eve of trial?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • animate
    animate Member Posts: 4,245
    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    HHusky said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    HHusky said:

    He wanted them to argue his stolen election bullshit. No lawyer worth a damn is going to make that argument before the Senate or a court.

    Noted Estate lawyer weighs in with the inside track
    Estate lawyer?

    How do you gals explain Daddy’s lawyers fleeing on the eve of trial?
    Abogado Estadio then?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 8,003 Standard Supporter
    I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    Goduckies said:

    I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing


    They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 8,003 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2021
    It does if they get their family attacked which has been happening. You don't see the GOP showing up at people's homes like the left does
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,057 Standard Supporter
    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    Did you just use the words lawyer and honest in the same sentence?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,057 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2021
    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing


    They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
    Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?

    You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    edited February 2021
    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing


    They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
    Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?

    You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
    There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.

    There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.

    Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.

    Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    doogie said:

    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.

    I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,853
    Goduckies said:

    It does if they get their family attacked which has been happening. You don't see the GOP showing up at people's homes like the left does

    That’s true, they go to the US capitol instead. Much less intrusive.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,888 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    doogie said:

    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.

    I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
    So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    edited February 2021
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    doogie said:

    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.

    I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
    So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.
    Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?

    Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.

    Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    What
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    doogie said:

    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.

    I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
    So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.
    Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?

    Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.

    Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued.
    A political Show Trial presided over by a Democrat Senator is a kangaroo court and should be treated as a farce.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    NorthwestFresh said:

    What

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    doogie said:

    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.

    I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
    So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.
    Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?

    Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.

    Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued.
    A political Show Trial presided over by a Democrat Senator is a kangaroo court and should be treated as a farce.
    So the defense at their disciplinary hearing is that a trial before the Senate in their role as lawyers didn't require them to behave ethically.

    Good luck with that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,057 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing


    They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
    Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?

    You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
    There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.

    There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.

    Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.

    Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
    There was zero evidence that there was ever any collusion. I read the bulk (not all) of the Mueller report. What I failed to see in the mueller report was any investigation into the DNC and The Bitch colluding with Russians, which they obviously did so the conclusion on that sham of an "investigation" was that it was 100% a political hit job. It was a hit job and that is precisely why there was no conviction or anything even close. You conveniently avoided the fact that your side did the unthinkable and wire tapped a competing Presidential campaign and then let one of the direct players off the hook with a $100 fine. 3rd world corrupt politics by your party.

    As for no evidence of fraud, maybe you can tell me why we never got an answer or any detail on the fraud that took place in Atlanta? They didn't even bother to tell us what happened, just swept it under the rug. A toilet overflows in the morning and that night they kick everyone out except democrats and start counting again with a video of one of the rats recording herself in a message to her daughter that she is there to do what she has to do? Kicking Rep observers out in multiple locations across the country? Statistically impossible one sided swells of votes only for biden?

    The fix was in.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing


    They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
    Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?

    You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
    There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.

    There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.

    Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.

    Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
    There was zero evidence that there was ever any collusion. I read the bulk (not all) of the Mueller report. What I failed to see in the mueller report was any investigation into the DNC and The Bitch colluding with Russians, which they obviously did so the conclusion on that sham of an "investigation" was that it was 100% a political hit job. It was a hit job and that is precisely why there was no conviction or anything even close. You conveniently avoided the fact that your side did the unthinkable and wire tapped a competing Presidential campaign and then let one of the direct players off the hook with a $100 fine. 3rd world corrupt politics by your party.

    As for no evidence of fraud, maybe you can tell me why we never got an answer or any detail on the fraud that took place in Atlanta? They didn't even bother to tell us what happened, just swept it under the rug. A toilet overflows in the morning and that night they kick everyone out except democrats and start counting again with a video of one of the rats recording herself in a message to her daughter that she is there to do what she has to do? Kicking Rep observers out in multiple locations across the country? Statistically impossible one sided swells of votes only for biden?

    The fix was in.
    The authorities are again hiding the evidence of the things that never happened that you were told happened. Lying or nuts? I don't think you're lying.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,057 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing


    They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
    Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?

    You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
    There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.

    There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.

    Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.

    Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
    There was zero evidence that there was ever any collusion. I read the bulk (not all) of the Mueller report. What I failed to see in the mueller report was any investigation into the DNC and The Bitch colluding with Russians, which they obviously did so the conclusion on that sham of an "investigation" was that it was 100% a political hit job. It was a hit job and that is precisely why there was no conviction or anything even close. You conveniently avoided the fact that your side did the unthinkable and wire tapped a competing Presidential campaign and then let one of the direct players off the hook with a $100 fine. 3rd world corrupt politics by your party.

    As for no evidence of fraud, maybe you can tell me why we never got an answer or any detail on the fraud that took place in Atlanta? They didn't even bother to tell us what happened, just swept it under the rug. A toilet overflows in the morning and that night they kick everyone out except democrats and start counting again with a video of one of the rats recording herself in a message to her daughter that she is there to do what she has to do? Kicking Rep observers out in multiple locations across the country? Statistically impossible one sided swells of votes only for biden?

    The fix was in.
    The authorities are again hiding the evidence of the things that never happened that you were told happened. Lying or nuts? I don't think you're lying.
    That I was told happened? I saw it with my own two eyes. The only side caught lying repeatedly is the left. Keep dodging and making excuses but no one trusts rats when it comes to just about anything. My honest rat friends even admit as much. THey admit, their leadership lies and cheats. It doesn't bother them because at the end of the day it gives them power.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    edited February 2021
    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing


    They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
    Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?

    You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
    There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.

    There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.

    Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.

    Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
    There was zero evidence that there was ever any collusion. I read the bulk (not all) of the Mueller report. What I failed to see in the mueller report was any investigation into the DNC and The Bitch colluding with Russians, which they obviously did so the conclusion on that sham of an "investigation" was that it was 100% a political hit job. It was a hit job and that is precisely why there was no conviction or anything even close. You conveniently avoided the fact that your side did the unthinkable and wire tapped a competing Presidential campaign and then let one of the direct players off the hook with a $100 fine. 3rd world corrupt politics by your party.

    As for no evidence of fraud, maybe you can tell me why we never got an answer or any detail on the fraud that took place in Atlanta? They didn't even bother to tell us what happened, just swept it under the rug. A toilet overflows in the morning and that night they kick everyone out except democrats and start counting again with a video of one of the rats recording herself in a message to her daughter that she is there to do what she has to do? Kicking Rep observers out in multiple locations across the country? Statistically impossible one sided swells of votes only for biden?

    The fix was in.
    The authorities are again hiding the evidence of the things that never happened that you were told happened. Lying or nuts? I don't think you're lying.
    That I was told happened? I saw it with my own two eyes. The only side caught lying repeatedly is the left. Keep dodging and making excuses but no one trusts rats when it comes to just about anything. My honest rat friends even admit as much. THey admit, their leadership lies and cheats. It doesn't bother them because at the end of the day it gives them power.
    "Confession" by "honest" people who aren't involved in the process in any way. Awesome!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,888 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing


    They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
    Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?

    You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
    There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.

    There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.

    Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.

    Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
    There was zero evidence that there was ever any collusion. I read the bulk (not all) of the Mueller report. What I failed to see in the mueller report was any investigation into the DNC and The Bitch colluding with Russians, which they obviously did so the conclusion on that sham of an "investigation" was that it was 100% a political hit job. It was a hit job and that is precisely why there was no conviction or anything even close. You conveniently avoided the fact that your side did the unthinkable and wire tapped a competing Presidential campaign and then let one of the direct players off the hook with a $100 fine. 3rd world corrupt politics by your party.

    As for no evidence of fraud, maybe you can tell me why we never got an answer or any detail on the fraud that took place in Atlanta? They didn't even bother to tell us what happened, just swept it under the rug. A toilet overflows in the morning and that night they kick everyone out except democrats and start counting again with a video of one of the rats recording herself in a message to her daughter that she is there to do what she has to do? Kicking Rep observers out in multiple locations across the country? Statistically impossible one sided swells of votes only for biden?

    The fix was in.
    The authorities are again hiding the evidence of the things that never happened that you were told happened. Lying or nuts? I don't think you're lying.
    That I was told happened? I saw it with my own two eyes. The only side caught lying repeatedly is the left. Keep dodging and making excuses but no one trusts rats when it comes to just about anything. My honest rat friends even admit as much. THey admit, their leadership lies and cheats. It doesn't bother them because at the end of the day it gives them power.
    "Confession" by "honest" people who aren't involved in the process in any way. Awesome!
    Watching lawyers lie in court and spin crazy yarns is nothing new. Seen it a ton of times. Have you actually been in court?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited February 2021
    HHusky said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    What

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    doogie said:

    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.

    I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
    So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.
    Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?

    Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.

    Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued.
    A political Show Trial presided over by a Democrat Senator is a kangaroo court and should be treated as a farce.
    So the defense at their disciplinary hearing is that a trial before the Senate in their role as lawyers didn't require them to behave ethically.

    Good luck with that.
    Even John Roberts knows this is a complete farce. I’m sure Leaky Leahy will run an honest Kangaroo Court.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing


    They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
    Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?

    You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
    There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.

    There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.

    Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.

    Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
    There was zero evidence that there was ever any collusion. I read the bulk (not all) of the Mueller report. What I failed to see in the mueller report was any investigation into the DNC and The Bitch colluding with Russians, which they obviously did so the conclusion on that sham of an "investigation" was that it was 100% a political hit job. It was a hit job and that is precisely why there was no conviction or anything even close. You conveniently avoided the fact that your side did the unthinkable and wire tapped a competing Presidential campaign and then let one of the direct players off the hook with a $100 fine. 3rd world corrupt politics by your party.

    As for no evidence of fraud, maybe you can tell me why we never got an answer or any detail on the fraud that took place in Atlanta? They didn't even bother to tell us what happened, just swept it under the rug. A toilet overflows in the morning and that night they kick everyone out except democrats and start counting again with a video of one of the rats recording herself in a message to her daughter that she is there to do what she has to do? Kicking Rep observers out in multiple locations across the country? Statistically impossible one sided swells of votes only for biden?

    The fix was in.
    The authorities are again hiding the evidence of the things that never happened that you were told happened. Lying or nuts? I don't think you're lying.
    That I was told happened? I saw it with my own two eyes. The only side caught lying repeatedly is the left. Keep dodging and making excuses but no one trusts rats when it comes to just about anything. My honest rat friends even admit as much. THey admit, their leadership lies and cheats. It doesn't bother them because at the end of the day it gives them power.
    "Confession" by "honest" people who aren't involved in the process in any way. Awesome!
    Watching lawyers lie in court and spin crazy yarns is nothing new. Seen it a ton of times. Have you actually been in court?
    Another apochryphal tale from the alleged "cop".

    Seen it a ton of times.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    NorthwestFresh said:

    HHusky said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    What

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    doogie said:

    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.

    I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
    So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.
    Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?

    Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.

    Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued.
    A political Show Trial presided over by a Democrat Senator is a kangaroo court and should be treated as a farce.
    So the defense at their disciplinary hearing is that a trial before the Senate in their role as lawyers didn't require them to behave ethically.

    Good luck with that.
    Even John Roberts knows this is a complete farce.
    I missed his statement to that effect. Link?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter