Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Trump parts with impeachment lawyers a week before the trial
DerekJohnson
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,376 
in Tug Tavern
Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo Comments
-
easy - be a Dem that got elected to congress
-
Or a Republican who doesn’t want to get re elected.LebamDawg said:easy - be a Dem that got elected to congress
-
Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.DerekJohnson said:Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo -
Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.animate said:
Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.DerekJohnson said:Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo
Except Facebook wine wife anyway. -
He wanted them to argue his stolen election bullshit. No lawyer worth a damn is going to make that argument before the Senate or a court.
-
Noted Estate lawyer weighs in with the inside trackHHusky said:He wanted them to argue his stolen election bullshit. No lawyer worth a damn is going to make that argument before the Senate or a court.
-
Estate lawyer?Kaepsknee said:
Noted Estate lawyer weighs in with the inside trackHHusky said:He wanted them to argue his stolen election bullshit. No lawyer worth a damn is going to make that argument before the Senate or a court.
How do you gals explain Daddy’s lawyers fleeing on the eve of trial? -
Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.Kaepsknee said:
Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.animate said:
Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.DerekJohnson said:Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo
Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.
Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."
-
Abogado Estadio then?HHusky said:
Estate lawyer?Kaepsknee said:
Noted Estate lawyer weighs in with the inside trackHHusky said:He wanted them to argue his stolen election bullshit. No lawyer worth a damn is going to make that argument before the Senate or a court.
How do you gals explain Daddy’s lawyers fleeing on the eve of trial? -
I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing
-
Goduckies said:
I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing
They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim. -
It does if they get their family attacked which has been happening. You don't see the GOP showing up at people's homes like the left does
-
You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retaineranimate said:
Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.Kaepsknee said:
Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.animate said:
Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.DerekJohnson said:Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo
Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.
Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..." -
Did you just use the words lawyer and honest in the same sentence?animate said:
Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.Kaepsknee said:
Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.animate said:
Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.DerekJohnson said:Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo
Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.
Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..." -
Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?HHusky said:Goduckies said:I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing
They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap. -
There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.Bendintheriver said:
Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?HHusky said:Goduckies said:I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing
They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.
Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.
Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far. -
I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.doogie said:
You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retaineranimate said:
Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.Kaepsknee said:
Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.animate said:
Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.DerekJohnson said:Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo
Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.
Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."
I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations. -
That’s true, they go to the US capitol instead. Much less intrusive.Goduckies said:It does if they get their family attacked which has been happening. You don't see the GOP showing up at people's homes like the left does
-
So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.HHusky said:
I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.doogie said:
You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retaineranimate said:
Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.Kaepsknee said:
Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.animate said:
Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.DerekJohnson said:Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo
Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.
Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."
I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations. -
Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?Sledog said:
So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.HHusky said:
I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.doogie said:
You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retaineranimate said:
Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.Kaepsknee said:
Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.animate said:
Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.DerekJohnson said:Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo
Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.
Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."
I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.
Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued. -
What
A political Show Trial presided over by a Democrat Senator is a kangaroo court and should be treated as a farce.HHusky said:
Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?Sledog said:
So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.HHusky said:
I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.doogie said:
You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retaineranimate said:
Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.Kaepsknee said:
Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.animate said:
Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.DerekJohnson said:Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo
Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.
Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."
I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.
Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued. -
So the defense at their disciplinary hearing is that a trial before the Senate in their role as lawyers didn't require them to behave ethically.NorthwestFresh said:What
A political Show Trial presided over by a Democrat Senator is a kangaroo court and should be treated as a farce.HHusky said:
Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?Sledog said:
So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.HHusky said:
I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.doogie said:
You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retaineranimate said:
Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.Kaepsknee said:
Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.animate said:
Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.DerekJohnson said:Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo
Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.
Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."
I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.
Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued.
Good luck with that. -
There was zero evidence that there was ever any collusion. I read the bulk (not all) of the Mueller report. What I failed to see in the mueller report was any investigation into the DNC and The Bitch colluding with Russians, which they obviously did so the conclusion on that sham of an "investigation" was that it was 100% a political hit job. It was a hit job and that is precisely why there was no conviction or anything even close. You conveniently avoided the fact that your side did the unthinkable and wire tapped a competing Presidential campaign and then let one of the direct players off the hook with a $100 fine. 3rd world corrupt politics by your party.HHusky said:
There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.Bendintheriver said:
Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?HHusky said:Goduckies said:I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing
They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.
Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.
Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
As for no evidence of fraud, maybe you can tell me why we never got an answer or any detail on the fraud that took place in Atlanta? They didn't even bother to tell us what happened, just swept it under the rug. A toilet overflows in the morning and that night they kick everyone out except democrats and start counting again with a video of one of the rats recording herself in a message to her daughter that she is there to do what she has to do? Kicking Rep observers out in multiple locations across the country? Statistically impossible one sided swells of votes only for biden?
The fix was in. -
The authorities are again hiding the evidence of the things that never happened that you were told happened. Lying or nuts? I don't think you're lying.Bendintheriver said:
There was zero evidence that there was ever any collusion. I read the bulk (not all) of the Mueller report. What I failed to see in the mueller report was any investigation into the DNC and The Bitch colluding with Russians, which they obviously did so the conclusion on that sham of an "investigation" was that it was 100% a political hit job. It was a hit job and that is precisely why there was no conviction or anything even close. You conveniently avoided the fact that your side did the unthinkable and wire tapped a competing Presidential campaign and then let one of the direct players off the hook with a $100 fine. 3rd world corrupt politics by your party.HHusky said:
There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.Bendintheriver said:
Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?HHusky said:Goduckies said:I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing
They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.
Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.
Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
As for no evidence of fraud, maybe you can tell me why we never got an answer or any detail on the fraud that took place in Atlanta? They didn't even bother to tell us what happened, just swept it under the rug. A toilet overflows in the morning and that night they kick everyone out except democrats and start counting again with a video of one of the rats recording herself in a message to her daughter that she is there to do what she has to do? Kicking Rep observers out in multiple locations across the country? Statistically impossible one sided swells of votes only for biden?
The fix was in. -
That I was told happened? I saw it with my own two eyes. The only side caught lying repeatedly is the left. Keep dodging and making excuses but no one trusts rats when it comes to just about anything. My honest rat friends even admit as much. THey admit, their leadership lies and cheats. It doesn't bother them because at the end of the day it gives them power.HHusky said:
The authorities are again hiding the evidence of the things that never happened that you were told happened. Lying or nuts? I don't think you're lying.Bendintheriver said:
There was zero evidence that there was ever any collusion. I read the bulk (not all) of the Mueller report. What I failed to see in the mueller report was any investigation into the DNC and The Bitch colluding with Russians, which they obviously did so the conclusion on that sham of an "investigation" was that it was 100% a political hit job. It was a hit job and that is precisely why there was no conviction or anything even close. You conveniently avoided the fact that your side did the unthinkable and wire tapped a competing Presidential campaign and then let one of the direct players off the hook with a $100 fine. 3rd world corrupt politics by your party.HHusky said:
There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.Bendintheriver said:
Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?HHusky said:Goduckies said:I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing
They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.
Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.
Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
As for no evidence of fraud, maybe you can tell me why we never got an answer or any detail on the fraud that took place in Atlanta? They didn't even bother to tell us what happened, just swept it under the rug. A toilet overflows in the morning and that night they kick everyone out except democrats and start counting again with a video of one of the rats recording herself in a message to her daughter that she is there to do what she has to do? Kicking Rep observers out in multiple locations across the country? Statistically impossible one sided swells of votes only for biden?
The fix was in. -
"Confession" by "honest" people who aren't involved in the process in any way. Awesome!Bendintheriver said:
That I was told happened? I saw it with my own two eyes. The only side caught lying repeatedly is the left. Keep dodging and making excuses but no one trusts rats when it comes to just about anything. My honest rat friends even admit as much. THey admit, their leadership lies and cheats. It doesn't bother them because at the end of the day it gives them power.HHusky said:
The authorities are again hiding the evidence of the things that never happened that you were told happened. Lying or nuts? I don't think you're lying.Bendintheriver said:
There was zero evidence that there was ever any collusion. I read the bulk (not all) of the Mueller report. What I failed to see in the mueller report was any investigation into the DNC and The Bitch colluding with Russians, which they obviously did so the conclusion on that sham of an "investigation" was that it was 100% a political hit job. It was a hit job and that is precisely why there was no conviction or anything even close. You conveniently avoided the fact that your side did the unthinkable and wire tapped a competing Presidential campaign and then let one of the direct players off the hook with a $100 fine. 3rd world corrupt politics by your party.HHusky said:
There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.Bendintheriver said:
Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?HHusky said:Goduckies said:I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing
They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.
Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.
Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
As for no evidence of fraud, maybe you can tell me why we never got an answer or any detail on the fraud that took place in Atlanta? They didn't even bother to tell us what happened, just swept it under the rug. A toilet overflows in the morning and that night they kick everyone out except democrats and start counting again with a video of one of the rats recording herself in a message to her daughter that she is there to do what she has to do? Kicking Rep observers out in multiple locations across the country? Statistically impossible one sided swells of votes only for biden?
The fix was in. -
Watching lawyers lie in court and spin crazy yarns is nothing new. Seen it a ton of times. Have you actually been in court?HHusky said:
"Confession" by "honest" people who aren't involved in the process in any way. Awesome!Bendintheriver said:
That I was told happened? I saw it with my own two eyes. The only side caught lying repeatedly is the left. Keep dodging and making excuses but no one trusts rats when it comes to just about anything. My honest rat friends even admit as much. THey admit, their leadership lies and cheats. It doesn't bother them because at the end of the day it gives them power.HHusky said:
The authorities are again hiding the evidence of the things that never happened that you were told happened. Lying or nuts? I don't think you're lying.Bendintheriver said:
There was zero evidence that there was ever any collusion. I read the bulk (not all) of the Mueller report. What I failed to see in the mueller report was any investigation into the DNC and The Bitch colluding with Russians, which they obviously did so the conclusion on that sham of an "investigation" was that it was 100% a political hit job. It was a hit job and that is precisely why there was no conviction or anything even close. You conveniently avoided the fact that your side did the unthinkable and wire tapped a competing Presidential campaign and then let one of the direct players off the hook with a $100 fine. 3rd world corrupt politics by your party.HHusky said:
There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.Bendintheriver said:
Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?HHusky said:Goduckies said:I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing
They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.
Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.
Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
As for no evidence of fraud, maybe you can tell me why we never got an answer or any detail on the fraud that took place in Atlanta? They didn't even bother to tell us what happened, just swept it under the rug. A toilet overflows in the morning and that night they kick everyone out except democrats and start counting again with a video of one of the rats recording herself in a message to her daughter that she is there to do what she has to do? Kicking Rep observers out in multiple locations across the country? Statistically impossible one sided swells of votes only for biden?
The fix was in. -
Even John Roberts knows this is a complete farce. I’m sure Leaky Leahy will run an honest Kangaroo Court.HHusky said:
So the defense at their disciplinary hearing is that a trial before the Senate in their role as lawyers didn't require them to behave ethically.NorthwestFresh said:What
A political Show Trial presided over by a Democrat Senator is a kangaroo court and should be treated as a farce.HHusky said:
Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?Sledog said:
So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.HHusky said:
I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.doogie said:
You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retaineranimate said:
Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.Kaepsknee said:
Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.animate said:
Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.DerekJohnson said:Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo
Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.
Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."
I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.
Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued.
Good luck with that. -
Another apochryphal tale from the alleged "cop".Sledog said:
Watching lawyers lie in court and spin crazy yarns is nothing new. Seen it a ton of times. Have you actually been in court?HHusky said:
"Confession" by "honest" people who aren't involved in the process in any way. Awesome!Bendintheriver said:
That I was told happened? I saw it with my own two eyes. The only side caught lying repeatedly is the left. Keep dodging and making excuses but no one trusts rats when it comes to just about anything. My honest rat friends even admit as much. THey admit, their leadership lies and cheats. It doesn't bother them because at the end of the day it gives them power.HHusky said:
The authorities are again hiding the evidence of the things that never happened that you were told happened. Lying or nuts? I don't think you're lying.Bendintheriver said:
There was zero evidence that there was ever any collusion. I read the bulk (not all) of the Mueller report. What I failed to see in the mueller report was any investigation into the DNC and The Bitch colluding with Russians, which they obviously did so the conclusion on that sham of an "investigation" was that it was 100% a political hit job. It was a hit job and that is precisely why there was no conviction or anything even close. You conveniently avoided the fact that your side did the unthinkable and wire tapped a competing Presidential campaign and then let one of the direct players off the hook with a $100 fine. 3rd world corrupt politics by your party.HHusky said:
There is and was lots of evidence of contact between Daddy's campaign and Russia. You should actually read the Mueller Report sometime. Bill Barr's "summary" is only the Classic Comics version at best.Bendintheriver said:
Yeah we have seen the frivolous claim/accusation from you rats before. Like Russian collusion and the left denying that Trump's campaign HQ was wire tapped. Or how about Trump claiming during the election that that idiot biden would shut down fracking and the rats claiming it was a lie?HHusky said:Goduckies said:I think they were worried about death threats and career threats the democrats are doing
They practice in fucking South Carolina. Representing Daddy didn’t present a career threat. They just weren’t willing to go to the floor and argue a frivolous claim.
You can stop with the "frivolous" bullshit. You people lie way too much to listen to that crap.
There is absolutely no evidence that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen. None. Nada. Zip.
Anyone who says otherwise is lying or nuts.
Edit: I see nuts has weighed in. Twice, so far.
As for no evidence of fraud, maybe you can tell me why we never got an answer or any detail on the fraud that took place in Atlanta? They didn't even bother to tell us what happened, just swept it under the rug. A toilet overflows in the morning and that night they kick everyone out except democrats and start counting again with a video of one of the rats recording herself in a message to her daughter that she is there to do what she has to do? Kicking Rep observers out in multiple locations across the country? Statistically impossible one sided swells of votes only for biden?
The fix was in.
Seen it a ton of times. -
I missed his statement to that effect. Link?NorthwestFresh said:
Even John Roberts knows this is a complete farce.HHusky said:
So the defense at their disciplinary hearing is that a trial before the Senate in their role as lawyers didn't require them to behave ethically.NorthwestFresh said:What
A political Show Trial presided over by a Democrat Senator is a kangaroo court and should be treated as a farce.HHusky said:
Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?Sledog said:
So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.HHusky said:
I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.doogie said:
You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retaineranimate said:
Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.Kaepsknee said:
Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.animate said:
Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.DerekJohnson said:Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?
How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo
Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.
Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."
I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.
Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued.
Good luck with that.
