The Cost of Justice
Comments
-
To be clear, this is you conceding that you were using King’s words to cry about racism against white people.SFGbob said:
And this is you being so fucking pig ignorant and sheltered in your leftist bubble that you feel only white people can be racists and only black people can be the victims of racism. It's the racist left, made up of racial charlatans like Robin DeAngelo and black racist charlatans like Kendi who believe that the color of a person's skin is more important than the content of their character. It's not conservatives who have rejected King's dream of a color blind society, it's idiot leftists on you team who have rejected it.TheKobeStopper said:
This is you saying racists think a persons skin is everything and determines their character.SFGbob said:
50 years later and the racist now all reject King's arguments. Color a person's skin is everything, in fact it determines the content of your character.TheKobeStopper said:
50 years and the racists still haven’t come up with any new arguments.
This is a question asking if racists judge white people on their skin color and not the content of their character. You answered yes.TheKobeStopper said:
Do you think the racists in this country judge white people on the color of their skin and not the content of their character?SFGbob said:
I didn't say anything about white people my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend.TheKobeStopper said:
Of all the despicable shit you’ve said, using MLKs words to whine about how oppressed you are as a white person is the worst.SFGbob said:
50 years later and the racist now all reject King's arguments. Color a person's skin is everything, in fact it determines the content of your character.TheKobeStopper said:
50 years and the racists still haven’t come up with any new arguments.
This is you saying you weren’t talking about white people.SFGbob said:
I didn't say anything about white people my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend.TheKobeStopper said:
Of all the despicable shit you’ve said, using MLKs words to whine about how oppressed you are as a white person is the worst.SFGbob said:
50 years later and the racist now all reject King's arguments. Color a person's skin is everything, in fact it determines the content of your character.TheKobeStopper said:
50 years and the racists still haven’t come up with any new arguments.
Do you see how stupid you sound?
And King was a leftist, you fool. -
No habla gibberish.TheKobeStopper said:
To be clear, this is you conceding that you were using King’s words to cry about racism against white people.SFGbob said:
And this is you being so fucking pig ignorant and sheltered in your leftist bubble that you feel only white people can be racists and only black people can be the victims of racism. It's the racist left, made up of racial charlatans like Robin DeAngelo and black racist charlatans like Kendi who believe that the color of a person's skin is more important than the content of their character. It's not conservatives who have rejected King's dream of a color blind society, it's idiot leftists on you team who have rejected it.TheKobeStopper said:
This is you saying racists think a persons skin is everything and determines their character.SFGbob said:
50 years later and the racist now all reject King's arguments. Color a person's skin is everything, in fact it determines the content of your character.TheKobeStopper said:
50 years and the racists still haven’t come up with any new arguments.
This is a question asking if racists judge white people on their skin color and not the content of their character. You answered yes.TheKobeStopper said:
Do you think the racists in this country judge white people on the color of their skin and not the content of their character?SFGbob said:
I didn't say anything about white people my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend.TheKobeStopper said:
Of all the despicable shit you’ve said, using MLKs words to whine about how oppressed you are as a white person is the worst.SFGbob said:
50 years later and the racist now all reject King's arguments. Color a person's skin is everything, in fact it determines the content of your character.TheKobeStopper said:
50 years and the racists still haven’t come up with any new arguments.
This is you saying you weren’t talking about white people.SFGbob said:
I didn't say anything about white people my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend.TheKobeStopper said:
Of all the despicable shit you’ve said, using MLKs words to whine about how oppressed you are as a white person is the worst.SFGbob said:
50 years later and the racist now all reject King's arguments. Color a person's skin is everything, in fact it determines the content of your character.TheKobeStopper said:
50 years and the racists still haven’t come up with any new arguments.
Do you see how stupid you sound?
And King was a leftist, you fool. -
@TheKobeStopper you're full of shit. Same mentally and emotionally weak tactics you try on everyone. Making up a strawman and then saying that people are 'conceding'. That shit doesn't work. Keep digging.
-
Damn I had to open a bunch of Kobeknobslobberer threads to say fuck off!
-
Something about playing chess with a pigeon comes to mind.
-
One of my favorite analogies except there isn’t a Leftist who posts here that even comes close to pretending chess; it’s still checkers.Kaepsknee said:Something about playing chess with a pigeon comes to mind.
On other boards with more intelligent Leftists that’s their game. -
-
I feel pretty good about the people claiming I’m struggling being the same ones claiming conservatives are the ones fulfilling MLKs dream. Pretty good.
-
No matter that it's true, of course.TheKobeStopper said:I feel pretty good about the people claiming I’m struggling being the same ones claiming conservatives are the ones fulfilling MLKs dream. Pretty good.
-
Hitler thought his artwork was good.TheKobeStopper said:I feel pretty good about the people claiming I’m struggling being the same ones claiming conservatives are the ones fulfilling MLKs dream. Pretty good.
-
Noted color blind conservative Martin Luther King-TurdBomber said:
No matter that it's true, of course.TheKobeStopper said:I feel pretty good about the people claiming I’m struggling being the same ones claiming conservatives are the ones fulfilling MLKs dream. Pretty good.
“The majority of white Americans consider themselves sincerely committed to justice for the Negro. They believe that American society is essentially hospitable to fair play and to steady growth toward a middle-class Utopia embodying racial harmony. But unfortunately this is a fantasy of self-deception and comfortable vanity.”
“I contend that the cry of "Black Power" is, at bottom, a reaction to the reluctance of white power to make the kind of changes necessary to make justice a reality for the Negro. I think that we've got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard”
“Again we have deluded ourselves into believing the myth that Capitalism grew and prospered out of the Protestant ethic of hard work and sacrifice. The fact is that capitalism was built on the exploitation and suffering of black slaves and continues to thrive on the exploitation of the poor – both black and white, both here and abroad.”
You guys are so far out of your depth. -
SFGbob said:
50 years later and the racist now all reject King's arguments. The Color of a person's skin is everything, in fact it determines your score in the Oppression Olympics.TheKobeStopper said:
50 years and the racists still haven’t come up with any new arguments. -
Critical Race Theory Superiority guy.TheKobeStopper said:
Noted color blind conservative Martin Luther King-TurdBomber said:
No matter that it's true, of course.TheKobeStopper said:I feel pretty good about the people claiming I’m struggling being the same ones claiming conservatives are the ones fulfilling MLKs dream. Pretty good.
“The majority of white Americans consider themselves sincerely committed to justice for the Negro. They believe that American society is essentially hospitable to fair play and to steady growth toward a middle-class Utopia embodying racial harmony. But unfortunately this is a fantasy of self-deception and comfortable vanity.”
“I contend that the cry of "Black Power" is, at bottom, a reaction to the reluctance of white power to make the kind of changes necessary to make justice a reality for the Negro. I think that we've got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard”
“Again we have deluded ourselves into believing the myth that Capitalism grew and prospered out of the Protestant ethic of hard work and sacrifice. The fact is that capitalism was built on the exploitation and suffering of black slaves and continues to thrive on the exploitation of the poor – both black and white, both here and abroad.”
You guys are so far out of your depth.
-
Yes. Absolutely. Ignorant non-white racists do it all the time. It's what they are taught.TheKobeStopper said:
Do you think the racists in this country judge white people on the color of their skin and not the content of their character?SFGbob said:
I didn't say anything about white people my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend.TheKobeStopper said:
Of all the despicable shit you’ve said, using MLKs words to whine about how oppressed you are as a white person is the worst.SFGbob said:
50 years later and the racist now all reject King's arguments. Color a person's skin is everything, in fact it determines the content of your character.TheKobeStopper said:
50 years and the racists still haven’t come up with any new arguments. -
So we're still in 1965
Good job democrats -
50 years later, and MLK is still just as wrong now as he was back then. See the fanciful, widely discredited by historians everywhere, historical fiction NYT 1619 project.TheKobeStopper said:
Noted color blind conservative Martin Luther King-TurdBomber said:
No matter that it's true, of course.TheKobeStopper said:I feel pretty good about the people claiming I’m struggling being the same ones claiming conservatives are the ones fulfilling MLKs dream. Pretty good.
“The majority of white Americans consider themselves sincerely committed to justice for the Negro. They believe that American society is essentially hospitable to fair play and to steady growth toward a middle-class Utopia embodying racial harmony. But unfortunately this is a fantasy of self-deception and comfortable vanity.”
“I contend that the cry of "Black Power" is, at bottom, a reaction to the reluctance of white power to make the kind of changes necessary to make justice a reality for the Negro. I think that we've got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard”
“Again we have deluded ourselves into believing the myth that Capitalism grew and prospered out of the Protestant ethic of hard work and sacrifice. The fact is that capitalism was built on the exploitation and suffering of black slaves and continues to thrive on the exploitation of the poor – both black and white, both here and abroad.”
You guys are so far out of your depth. -
This does nothing to refute the fact that King's goal was a society that judged people on the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Not only does it not refute it, it doesn't even fucking address it but you're dumb as dog shit so I'm sure you think this is some kind of killer rebuttal.TheKobeStopper said:
Noted color blind conservative Martin Luther King-TurdBomber said:
No matter that it's true, of course.TheKobeStopper said:I feel pretty good about the people claiming I’m struggling being the same ones claiming conservatives are the ones fulfilling MLKs dream. Pretty good.
“The majority of white Americans consider themselves sincerely committed to justice for the Negro. They believe that American society is essentially hospitable to fair play and to steady growth toward a middle-class Utopia embodying racial harmony. But unfortunately this is a fantasy of self-deception and comfortable vanity.”
“I contend that the cry of "Black Power" is, at bottom, a reaction to the reluctance of white power to make the kind of changes necessary to make justice a reality for the Negro. I think that we've got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard”
“Again we have deluded ourselves into believing the myth that Capitalism grew and prospered out of the Protestant ethic of hard work and sacrifice. The fact is that capitalism was built on the exploitation and suffering of black slaves and continues to thrive on the exploitation of the poor – both black and white, both here and abroad.”
You guys are so far out of your depth.
King didn't believe that America in 1965 was color blind but his goal was to one day live in country where his kids weren't judged by the color of their skin.
It's the left that has rejected King's dream. To racists like Kendi and DiAngelo skin color is everything when determining a person guilt and or innocence. It's not Conservatives who think we should use the state to reward and punish people based upon their skin color, it's racist fucking leftist like you who believe that. -
“Again we have deluded ourselves into believing the myth that Capitalism grew and prospered out of the Protestant ethic of hard work and sacrifice. The fact is that capitalism was built on the exploitation and suffering of black slaves and continues to thrive on the exploitation of the poor – both black and white, both here and abroad.”
How are blacks exploited in the US? Shouldn't be hard since they are so exploited. Black in the US basically have the same per capita income as citizens in Italy. The cost of living in the US is much lower than in Italy which taxes the sh*t out of everything, so basically blacks have a higher standard of living. Like defining black for AA purposes, Tug leftards won't touch this one. -
Yawn.
King openly rejected communism:
“During the Christmas holidays of 1949 I decided to spend my spare time reading Karl Marx to try to understand the appeal of communism for many people. For the first time I carefully scrutinized Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto,” he wrote. “I also read some interpretative works on the thinking of Marx and Lenin. In reading such Communist writings I drew certain conclusions that have remained with me as convictions to this day.”
Then King listed the three reasons he could never accept Marxism.
“First, I rejected their materialistic interpretation of history. Communism, avowedly secularistic and materialistic, has no place for God,” he wrote.
Marx’s theory of “dialectical materialism” (and the conjoined theory of “historical materialism”) instead envisioned the human race as a one-dimensional economic creature.
“Second, I strongly disagreed with communism’s ethical relativism. Since for the Communist there is no divine government, no absolute moral order, there are no fixed, immutable principles; consequently almost anything – force, violence murder, lying – is a justifiable means to the ‘millennial’ end,” he wrote.
“Man becomes hardly more, in communism, than a depersonalized cog in the turning wheel of the state,” King concluded. -
MLK Superiority Guy > Critical Race Theory Superiority Guy.hardhat said:Yawn.
King openly rejected communism:
“During the Christmas holidays of 1949 I decided to spend my spare time reading Karl Marx to try to understand the appeal of communism for many people. For the first time I carefully scrutinized Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto,” he wrote. “I also read some interpretative works on the thinking of Marx and Lenin. In reading such Communist writings I drew certain conclusions that have remained with me as convictions to this day.”
Then King listed the three reasons he could never accept Marxism.
“First, I rejected their materialistic interpretation of history. Communism, avowedly secularistic and materialistic, has no place for God,” he wrote.
Marx’s theory of “dialectical materialism” (and the conjoined theory of “historical materialism”) instead envisioned the human race as a one-dimensional economic creature.
“Second, I strongly disagreed with communism’s ethical relativism. Since for the Communist there is no divine government, no absolute moral order, there are no fixed, immutable principles; consequently almost anything – force, violence murder, lying – is a justifiable means to the ‘millennial’ end,” he wrote.
“Man becomes hardly more, in communism, than a depersonalized cog in the turning wheel of the state,” King concluded.
(Hi @TheKobeStopper !)
-
Given his strong Christianity and what communism looked like at the time, he should have rejected it. But he repeatedly called himself more socialistic than capitalistic. He’s a Bernie, not a Karl.hardhat said:Yawn.
King openly rejected communism:
“During the Christmas holidays of 1949 I decided to spend my spare time reading Karl Marx to try to understand the appeal of communism for many people. For the first time I carefully scrutinized Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto,” he wrote. “I also read some interpretative works on the thinking of Marx and Lenin. In reading such Communist writings I drew certain conclusions that have remained with me as convictions to this day.”
Then King listed the three reasons he could never accept Marxism.
“First, I rejected their materialistic interpretation of history. Communism, avowedly secularistic and materialistic, has no place for God,” he wrote.
Marx’s theory of “dialectical materialism” (and the conjoined theory of “historical materialism”) instead envisioned the human race as a one-dimensional economic creature.
“Second, I strongly disagreed with communism’s ethical relativism. Since for the Communist there is no divine government, no absolute moral order, there are no fixed, immutable principles; consequently almost anything – force, violence murder, lying – is a justifiable means to the ‘millennial’ end,” he wrote.
“Man becomes hardly more, in communism, than a depersonalized cog in the turning wheel of the state,” King concluded.
And I agree with King that turning people into a cog in the wheel of the state is wrong. Which is why I don’t want a state at all. -
Martin Luther King Jr is an absolute loser who failed more spectacularly than he could ever dream of
-
Dude pulled a lot of tail.Pitchfork51 said:Martin Luther King Jr is an absolute loser who failed more spectacularly than he could ever dream of
Respect the player.
-
I actually have gained some respect for you in this thread, Bob. We obviously disagree but I figured I could get you to go full “MLK actually sucked” like these other idiots but you didn’t go that path and I’m impressed.SFGbob said:
This does nothing to refute the fact that King's goal was a society that judged people on the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Not only does it not refute it, it doesn't even fucking address it but you're dumb as dog shit so I'm sure you think this is some kind of killer rebuttal.TheKobeStopper said:
Noted color blind conservative Martin Luther King-TurdBomber said:
No matter that it's true, of course.TheKobeStopper said:I feel pretty good about the people claiming I’m struggling being the same ones claiming conservatives are the ones fulfilling MLKs dream. Pretty good.
“The majority of white Americans consider themselves sincerely committed to justice for the Negro. They believe that American society is essentially hospitable to fair play and to steady growth toward a middle-class Utopia embodying racial harmony. But unfortunately this is a fantasy of self-deception and comfortable vanity.”
“I contend that the cry of "Black Power" is, at bottom, a reaction to the reluctance of white power to make the kind of changes necessary to make justice a reality for the Negro. I think that we've got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard”
“Again we have deluded ourselves into believing the myth that Capitalism grew and prospered out of the Protestant ethic of hard work and sacrifice. The fact is that capitalism was built on the exploitation and suffering of black slaves and continues to thrive on the exploitation of the poor – both black and white, both here and abroad.”
You guys are so far out of your depth.
King didn't believe that America in 1965 was color blind but his goal was to one day live in country where his kids weren't judged by the color of their skin.
It's the left that has rejected King's dream. To racists like Kendi and DiAngelo skin color is everything when determining a person guilt and or innocence. It's not Conservatives who think we should use the state to reward and punish people based upon their skin color, it's racist fucking leftist like you who believe that. -
He also liked being pissed on.hardhat said:
Hitler thought his artwork was good.TheKobeStopper said:I feel pretty good about the people claiming I’m struggling being the same ones claiming conservatives are the ones fulfilling MLKs dream. Pretty good.
-
MLK had a good message. So did Malcolm X. The current iteration is insane and the exact opposite of those two.TheKobeStopper said:
I actually have gained some respect for you in this thread, Bob. We obviously disagree but I figured I could get you to go full “MLK actually sucked” like these other idiots but you didn’t go that path and I’m impressed.SFGbob said:
This does nothing to refute the fact that King's goal was a society that judged people on the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Not only does it not refute it, it doesn't even fucking address it but you're dumb as dog shit so I'm sure you think this is some kind of killer rebuttal.TheKobeStopper said:
Noted color blind conservative Martin Luther King-TurdBomber said:
No matter that it's true, of course.TheKobeStopper said:I feel pretty good about the people claiming I’m struggling being the same ones claiming conservatives are the ones fulfilling MLKs dream. Pretty good.
“The majority of white Americans consider themselves sincerely committed to justice for the Negro. They believe that American society is essentially hospitable to fair play and to steady growth toward a middle-class Utopia embodying racial harmony. But unfortunately this is a fantasy of self-deception and comfortable vanity.”
“I contend that the cry of "Black Power" is, at bottom, a reaction to the reluctance of white power to make the kind of changes necessary to make justice a reality for the Negro. I think that we've got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard”
“Again we have deluded ourselves into believing the myth that Capitalism grew and prospered out of the Protestant ethic of hard work and sacrifice. The fact is that capitalism was built on the exploitation and suffering of black slaves and continues to thrive on the exploitation of the poor – both black and white, both here and abroad.”
You guys are so far out of your depth.
King didn't believe that America in 1965 was color blind but his goal was to one day live in country where his kids weren't judged by the color of their skin.
It's the left that has rejected King's dream. To racists like Kendi and DiAngelo skin color is everything when determining a person guilt and or innocence. It's not Conservatives who think we should use the state to reward and punish people based upon their skin color, it's racist fucking leftist like you who believe that.
Just curious, care to go on record on your opinion of Kendi? -
How does communism look any different today cunt?TheKobeStopper said:
Given his strong Christianity and what communism looked like at the time, he should have rejected it. But he repeatedly called himself more socialistic than capitalistic. He’s a Bernie, not a Karl.hardhat said:Yawn.
King openly rejected communism:
“During the Christmas holidays of 1949 I decided to spend my spare time reading Karl Marx to try to understand the appeal of communism for many people. For the first time I carefully scrutinized Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto,” he wrote. “I also read some interpretative works on the thinking of Marx and Lenin. In reading such Communist writings I drew certain conclusions that have remained with me as convictions to this day.”
Then King listed the three reasons he could never accept Marxism.
“First, I rejected their materialistic interpretation of history. Communism, avowedly secularistic and materialistic, has no place for God,” he wrote.
Marx’s theory of “dialectical materialism” (and the conjoined theory of “historical materialism”) instead envisioned the human race as a one-dimensional economic creature.
“Second, I strongly disagreed with communism’s ethical relativism. Since for the Communist there is no divine government, no absolute moral order, there are no fixed, immutable principles; consequently almost anything – force, violence murder, lying – is a justifiable means to the ‘millennial’ end,” he wrote.
“Man becomes hardly more, in communism, than a depersonalized cog in the turning wheel of the state,” King concluded.
And I agree with King that turning people into a cog in the wheel of the state is wrong. Which is why I don’t want a state at all. -
TheKobeStopper said:
"Given his strong Christianity and what communism looked like at the time, he should have rejected it. But he repeatedly called himself more socialistic than capitalistic. He’s a Bernie, not a Karl."
Dude phucking took his honeymoon in the USSR and championed the commies in Nicaragua. He sucked Castro's and Hugo Chavez's dick. Pretending that Bernie is some sort of socialism lite is the sign of a weak mind. Leftards lie and love to be lied to. Also ignorant as phuck. -
I live for your approval. The people who are rejecting King's message today are all on your team Kobe, not mine. Pretty amazing that a racist country like ours only has one national holiday for a single individual, who just happened to be black. King was an impressive by very flawed person as we all are. He did plagiarize his Doctorial thesis and he did constantly cheat on his wife and most likely rape a few women but unlike other flawed individuals in history who are white, like Thomas Jefferson, we don't talk about King's warts.TheKobeStopper said:
I actually have gained some respect for you in this thread, Bob. We obviously disagree but I figured I could get you to go full “MLK actually sucked” like these other idiots but you didn’t go that path and I’m impressed.SFGbob said:
This does nothing to refute the fact that King's goal was a society that judged people on the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Not only does it not refute it, it doesn't even fucking address it but you're dumb as dog shit so I'm sure you think this is some kind of killer rebuttal.TheKobeStopper said:
Noted color blind conservative Martin Luther King-TurdBomber said:
No matter that it's true, of course.TheKobeStopper said:I feel pretty good about the people claiming I’m struggling being the same ones claiming conservatives are the ones fulfilling MLKs dream. Pretty good.
“The majority of white Americans consider themselves sincerely committed to justice for the Negro. They believe that American society is essentially hospitable to fair play and to steady growth toward a middle-class Utopia embodying racial harmony. But unfortunately this is a fantasy of self-deception and comfortable vanity.”
“I contend that the cry of "Black Power" is, at bottom, a reaction to the reluctance of white power to make the kind of changes necessary to make justice a reality for the Negro. I think that we've got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard”
“Again we have deluded ourselves into believing the myth that Capitalism grew and prospered out of the Protestant ethic of hard work and sacrifice. The fact is that capitalism was built on the exploitation and suffering of black slaves and continues to thrive on the exploitation of the poor – both black and white, both here and abroad.”
You guys are so far out of your depth.
King didn't believe that America in 1965 was color blind but his goal was to one day live in country where his kids weren't judged by the color of their skin.
It's the left that has rejected King's dream. To racists like Kendi and DiAngelo skin color is everything when determining a person guilt and or innocence. It's not Conservatives who think we should use the state to reward and punish people based upon their skin color, it's racist fucking leftist like you who believe that.
