Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

SCOTUS throws out Texas BS case

13»

Comments

  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,236

    dflea said:

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    Where it also has no standing.

    But it is another opportunity to lose and get his nuthuggers to send in more money.
    True. I’m just posting that yet again, @insinceredawg jumps in immediately and only gives half the story. It’s a pattern for dumb, emotion-driven people like you and ID.
    Go send in your money, bitch. Of course it's true. I said it.
  • AOGAOG Member Posts: 1,864

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    Northwest-tard doesn't grasp that if the same suit were filed at a lower court, the lower court would also be a federal court, and unable to render a judgment lacking jurisdiction. The alternative would be to try individual state's courts, but they've spent the last month laughing this bullshit out of court. Nice one Northwest-tard! bravo.
  • HairyBallsDawgHairyBallsDawg Member Posts: 1,052
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!
    The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.

    But continue to act like a dumbfuck.

    Unless it isn't an act?
    Soy boy. Standing is about who can and can't bring the case. Nothing else.
    Lol. I'd kick your ass 7 days a week. Pussy.
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited December 2020
    AOG said:

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    Northwest-tard doesn't grasp that if the same suit were filed at a lower court, the lower court would also be a federal court, and unable to render a judgment lacking jurisdiction. The alternative would be to try individual state's courts, but they've spent the last month laughing this bullshit out of court. Nice one Northwest-tard! bravo.
    Thanks for confirming that the case was dismissed on standing and can be filed at a lower court. Not sure what the rest of your rant is about.
  • AOGAOG Member Posts: 1,864

    AOG said:

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    Northwest-tard doesn't grasp that if the same suit were filed at a lower court, the lower court would also be a federal court, and unable to render a judgment lacking jurisdiction. The alternative would be to try individual state's courts, but they've spent the last month laughing this bullshit out of court. Nice one Northwest-tard! bravo.
    Thanks for confirming that the case was dismissed on standing. Not sure what the rest of your rant is about.
    It means you're fucked if you were expecting it to be re-litigated
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    AOG said:

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    Northwest-tard doesn't grasp that if the same suit were filed at a lower court, the lower court would also be a federal court, and unable to render a judgment lacking jurisdiction. The alternative would be to try individual state's courts, but they've spent the last month laughing this bullshit out of court. Nice one Northwest-tard! bravo.
    Thanks for confirming that the case was dismissed on standing. Not sure what the rest of your rant is about.

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!
    The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.

    But continue to act like a dumbfuck.

    Unless it isn't an act?
    Soy boy. Standing is about who can and can't bring the case. Nothing else.
    Lol. I'd kick your ass 7 days a week. Pussy.
    RAWR

    So sexy when you go all Butch.
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Dugdawg said:

    This seems appropriate tonight...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpcWMBlzZts

    Herpes Patient Zero sounds like full-blown syphilis has attacked his brain.


  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,266 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!
    The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.

    But continue to act like a dumbfuck.

    Unless it isn't an act?
    Soy boy. Standing is about who can and can't bring the case. Nothing else.
    Lol. I'd kick your ass 7 days a week. Pussy.
    Ok slicksack! Internet tough!
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,314 Founders Club
    Bob_C said:

    Enjoy the mandate.


  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,266 Standard Supporter

    Bob_C said:

    Enjoy the mandate.


    China has!
  • DoogieMcDoogersonDoogieMcDoogerson Member Posts: 2,495
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!
    The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.

    But continue to act like a dumbfuck.

    Unless it isn't an act?
    Soy boy. Standing is about who can and can't bring the case. Nothing else.
    Thanks for straightening this dumb fuck out.
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,803
    this thread is delivering
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.
    SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?
    SCOTUS didn’t hear the case, they dismissed on standing. They didn’t rule on the case at all, you idiot.

    How many times are you going to continue to do this? Even when you get a win, you fuck up the thread celebrating it with your ignorance and stupidity.
  • DugdawgDugdawg Member Posts: 308
    Sledog said:


    Ya know...after some consideration....I agree with this one.
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.
    SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?
    SCOTUS didn’t hear the case, they dismissed on standing. They didn’t rule on the case at all, you idiot.

    How many times are you going to continue to do this? Even when you get a win, you fuck up the thread celebrating it with your ignorance and stupidity.
    You seem upset.

    When is SCOTUS going to hear Mike Kelly's case? I heard it's still pending.
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    edited December 2020

    Biden will never be inaugurated. In fact, he is attempting to negotiate surrender behind the scenes, and will likely end up conceding to avoid going to Guantanamo, where he will likely end up anyway, along with Kamala Harris.

    Seems legit. Source?
  • AOGAOG Member Posts: 1,864

    Biden will never be inaugurated. In fact, he is attempting to negotiate surrender behind the scenes, and will likely end up conceding to avoid going to Guantanamo, where he will likely end up anyway, along with Kamala Harris.

    This has legs
Sign In or Register to comment.