Libertarian Public Health

HHusky

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.

Maff

175 > 97

m'kay, dazzler?

And 176 > 109 too.

But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.

5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.

5 days hence will be fun.

PurpleThrobber

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.

Maff

175 > 97

m'kay, dazzler?

And 176 > 109 too.

But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.

5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.

5 days hence will be fun.

Please don't ever try to run a business. 5 days does not a trend make.

Go back to Dazzling legal analysis. Leave the numbers to professionals.

HHusky

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.

Maff

175 > 97

m'kay, dazzler?

And 176 > 109 too.

But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.

5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.

5 days hence will be fun.

Please don't ever try to run a business. 5 days does not a trend make.

Go back to Dazzling legal analysis. Leave the numbers to professionals.

Funny. I can remember way back to July, when North Dakota wasn’t rapidly closing in on New York’s death rate. Sucks having South Dakota as a neighbor, of course.

#MasksDontWork!

EsophagealFeces

GrundleStiltzkin said:

https://twitter.com/RussellOkung/status/1328798512977489928

One where they next want us to start ratting out our family and friends.

hardhat

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.

Maff

175 > 97

m'kay, dazzler?

And 176 > 109 too.

But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.

5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.

5 days hence will be fun.

Keep us posted, shitstain. In 5 days everyone in South and North Dakota will be dead?

HHusky

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.

Maff

175 > 97

m'kay, dazzler?

And 176 > 109 too.

But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.

5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.

5 days hence will be fun.

Keep us posted, shitstain. In 5 days everyone in South and North Dakota will be dead?

You’re thinking of Iowa. Understandable error.

HHusky

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.

Maff

175 > 97

m'kay, dazzler?

And 176 > 109 too.

But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.

177 > 120

But still . . .

HHusky

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.

Maff

175 > 97

m'kay, dazzler?

And 176 > 109 too.

But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.

177 > 120

But still . . .

179 > 130

And yet . . .

GrundleStiltzkin

EsophagealFeces said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

https://twitter.com/RussellOkung/status/1328798512977489928

One where they next want us to start ratting out our family and friends.

Start? Been going on since the jump in Warshington.

HHusky

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.

Maff

175 > 97

m'kay, dazzler?

And 176 > 109 too.

But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.

177 > 120

But still . . .

179 > 130

And yet . . .

181 > 140

PT assures me there is no trend.

PurpleThrobber

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.

Maff

175 > 97

m'kay, dazzler?

And 176 > 109 too.

But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.

177 > 120

But still . . .

179 > 130

And yet . . .

181 > 140

PT assures me there is no trend.

Old people die. Old people die at a slightly greater rate because GG and boomers are getting old.

What's your point other than the one on your head?

HHusky

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.

Maff

175 > 97

m'kay, dazzler?

And 176 > 109 too.

But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.

177 > 120

But still . . .

179 > 130

And yet . . .

181 > 140

PT assures me there is no trend.

Old people die. Old people die at a slightly greater rate because GG and boomers are getting old.

What's your point other than the one on your head?

Apparently they die faster in the vast, maskless prairies these days.

PurpleThrobber

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.

Maff

175 > 97

m'kay, dazzler?

And 176 > 109 too.

But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.

177 > 120

But still . . .

179 > 130

And yet . . .

181 > 140

PT assures me there is no trend.

Old people die. Old people die at a slightly greater rate because GG and boomers are getting old.

What's your point other than the one on your head?

Apparently they die faster in the vast, maskless prairies these days.

Because Cuomo murdered the GG/Boomers earlier this year.

Maff.

HHusky

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.

Maff

175 > 97

m'kay, dazzler?

And 176 > 109 too.

But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.

177 > 120

But still . . .

179 > 130

And yet . . .

181 > 140

PT assures me there is no trend.

186 > 161

Hmmmm . . .

PurpleThrobber

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.

Maff

175 > 97

m'kay, dazzler?

And 176 > 109 too.

But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.

177 > 120

But still . . .

179 > 130

And yet . . .

181 > 140

PT assures me there is no trend.

186 > 161

Hmmmm . . .

When is the running count of death from the seasonal flu going to start?

hardhat

HHusky said:

#RIP_Damone

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.twincities.com/2020/11/15/how-did-north-dakotas-covid-19-outbreak-become-the-worst-in-the-country/amp/

How did this turn out? Did everyone in North Dakota die?

46XiJCAB

All deaths Joey’s fault since Jan. 2021. Those are the rules. Any other numbers you’d care to discuss Dazzler?

MikeDamone

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

#RIP_Damone

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.twincities.com/2020/11/15/how-did-north-dakotas-covid-19-outbreak-become-the-worst-in-the-country/amp/

How did this turn out? Did everyone in North Dakota die?

Haha. This thread aged perfectly. Herr Dazzler dumb fuckery on full display and me being right. From day fucking 1.

RaceBannon

RaceBannon said:

http://twitter.com/KristiNoem/status/1327001678499942403?s=20

RaceBannon

RaceBannon said:

http://twitter.com/CNN/status/1328759831772221442?s=20

Imagine being that pathetic of a person like H is