Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Libertarian Public Health

1234579

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,360

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

    NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.
    Maff

    175 > 97

    m'kay, dazzler?

    And 176 > 109 too.

    But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
    5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.

    5 days hence will be fun.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,583 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

    NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.
    Maff

    175 > 97

    m'kay, dazzler?

    And 176 > 109 too.

    But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
    5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.

    5 days hence will be fun.
    Please don't ever try to run a business. 5 days does not a trend make.

    Go back to Dazzling legal analysis. Leave the numbers to professionals.


  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,360
    edited November 2020

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

    NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.
    Maff

    175 > 97

    m'kay, dazzler?

    And 176 > 109 too.

    But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
    5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.

    5 days hence will be fun.
    Please don't ever try to run a business. 5 days does not a trend make.

    Go back to Dazzling legal analysis. Leave the numbers to professionals.


    Funny. I can remember way back to July, when North Dakota wasn’t rapidly closing in on New York’s death rate. Sucks having South Dakota as a neighbor, of course.

    #MasksDontWork!
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,329
    One where they next want us to start ratting out our family and friends.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

    NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.
    Maff

    175 > 97

    m'kay, dazzler?

    And 176 > 109 too.

    But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
    5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.

    5 days hence will be fun.
    Keep us posted, shitstain. In 5 days everyone in South and North Dakota will be dead?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,360
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

    NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.
    Maff

    175 > 97

    m'kay, dazzler?

    And 176 > 109 too.

    But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
    5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.

    5 days hence will be fun.
    Keep us posted, shitstain. In 5 days everyone in South and North Dakota will be dead?
    You’re thinking of Iowa. Understandable error.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,360
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

    NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.
    Maff

    175 > 97

    m'kay, dazzler?

    And 176 > 109 too.

    But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
    177 > 120

    But still . . .
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,360
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

    NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.
    Maff

    175 > 97

    m'kay, dazzler?

    And 176 > 109 too.

    But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
    177 > 120

    But still . . .
    179 > 130

    And yet . . .
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    One where they next want us to start ratting out our family and friends.
    Start? Been going on since the jump in Warshington.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,360
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.

    NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.
    Maff

    175 > 97

    m'kay, dazzler?

    And 176 > 109 too.

    But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
    177 > 120

    But still . . .
    179 > 130

    And yet . . .
    181 > 140

    PT assures me there is no trend.